[HN Gopher] Mark Zuckerberg creating new Applied AI engineering ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mark Zuckerberg creating new Applied AI engineering company,
       reorganises teams
        
       Author : matthieu_bl
       Score  : 90 points
       Date   : 2026-03-09 21:19 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (timesofindia.indiatimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (timesofindia.indiatimes.com)
        
       | briga wrote:
       | What are the odds that Zuckerberg would still be CEO if he didn't
       | have a majority stake in the company? From the outside it seems
       | like he has made one terrible financial decision after the next.
       | Can anyone be surprised that things aren't going smoothly given
       | his track record?
        
         | milesskorpen wrote:
         | Facebook stock is up 6x in ~3 years, so the market does not
         | agree with your assessment of his track record.
        
           | dmix wrote:
           | Some people in tech want companies to innovate and take risks
           | by spending on R&D instead of just funneling it back to
           | investors or safer existing markets, others will complain
           | that they took those risks and failed despite still running
           | profitable businesses.
        
             | semiquaver wrote:
             | meta is spending an absolute boat load on R&D and taking
             | massive risks. It seems like your actual position is
             | "company bad"
        
               | dmix wrote:
               | I'm in the former group where I personally support Meta
               | taking risks on big ideas while still being profitable.
               | Just like SpaceX and others. I don't blame Mark for
               | getting excited about AR which is very likely a big
               | market in the future, the gamble on the tech being
               | affordable enough was just far too early for the scale of
               | investment. Their investments there might still pay off
               | as it gets cheaper.
        
           | briga wrote:
           | Astonishingly. I just find it funny that one person can be
           | responsible for wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and
           | still keep their job.
        
             | ergocoder wrote:
             | Because he made many more billions... Not sure why this is
             | difficult to understand though. It's a simple subtraction.
        
             | mosura wrote:
             | Easy: be responsible at the same time for tens of billions
             | in upside.
             | 
             | Post VR it is not like investors don't know what this is.
             | Meta bets and bets big.
        
           | ProfessorLayton wrote:
           | And in the last 4.5y it's up 70% while the S&P500 is up 51%
           | in the same time period, not quite as exciting eh?
        
             | function_seven wrote:
             | Beating the index by 40% after 2 decades as a company?
             | Yeah, still good.
        
               | ProfessorLayton wrote:
               | Well we just went from "6x" to "40%" and "good" so,
               | yeah... not quite as exciting.
        
         | carefree-bob wrote:
         | Unfortunately looking at CEOs that don't have a majority stake
         | but make one terrible decision after another ( _waves to Satya_
         | ) I think odds are pretty good he'd still be around.
        
         | ergocoder wrote:
         | Given that he has been running the company for many years and
         | the valuation/profit/or whatever has gone up 100x times, I'd
         | say the board is probably gonna be patient with the guy.
         | 
         | Imagine the guy made you $1.4 trillion dollars but lost $14
         | billions. Would you fire him?
        
           | carabiner wrote:
           | I would.
        
           | jjee wrote:
           | After enough chances, yeah. Zuck probably has a few more big
           | mistakes to go before the stock price is crushed and flat
           | lines for awhile... in that environment a change of CEO would
           | be needed.
        
         | em500 wrote:
         | You mean his terrible financial decisions of founding a company
         | in 2004 that IPO at 104B within eight years, and now 14 years
         | on is valued at 1.6T? Are we looking different track records?
        
       | mips_avatar wrote:
       | The striking thing I heard from Meta staff is that Alexandr Wang
       | would walk around campus with very obvious bodyguards surrounding
       | him. Like sure maybe security is needed, but the decision to be
       | surrounded with bouncerish guys says something about him.
        
         | DonThomasitos wrote:
         | But even on campus? Weird.
        
           | mips_avatar wrote:
           | Yeah on campus apparently
        
         | UltraSane wrote:
         | That is just being obnoxiously self important.
        
         | 0xy wrote:
         | It could be required by the company. Many companies require top
         | executives to have personal security. I'd be surprised if Zuck
         | didn't have bodyguards even within the office. He has 24/7
         | security outside, so why wouldn't he inside?
        
           | mips_avatar wrote:
           | I think the notes about Alexander I've heard is just how
           | obvious his were
        
       | measurablefunc wrote:
       | It doesn't matter how many "wunderkinds" Zuckerberg pays off to
       | work at Meta. Meta is not an AI company so they will never
       | produce anything of relevance in that domain.
        
         | jjee wrote:
         | I don't see meta around in 10 years frankly. They are very
         | vulnerable to technological shifts they aren't leading.
        
           | brcmthrowaway wrote:
           | Same with apple
        
           | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
           | Meta, Reddit, Twitter, they're staying around. Too much of
           | the population has been captured in those places and is too
           | passive and docile to seek out better options. The disruption
           | we've seen in the last with social networks won't happen
           | anymore. These places are so bad already that there's no
           | reason to think the remaining people will leave for any
           | reason.
        
           | fmajid wrote:
           | Meta is the smallest but also the most profitable of the
           | FAANGs in terms of percentage profit margin at 30%, vs 25%
           | for Apple and Google and much less for Amazon and Netflix.
           | Their position in social networks is a license to print money
           | and unless humanity goes fully autistic all of a sudden, this
           | is unlikely to change, technological shifts notwhitstanding.
           | 
           | The one thing that can kill them is the fact each successive
           | generation avoids their fuddy-duddy parents' social network,
           | so Boomers and Gen X are on Facebook, Millennials on
           | Instagram and Gen Z on TikTok. If TikTok had been killed as
           | was originally the plan, they would have benefited massively,
           | but Trump does not trust Zuck and made sure it went to his
           | son Barron and the Ellisons.
        
       | nekitamo wrote:
       | I've participated in some corporate shit-shows in my day, but man
       | I don't think I've ever seen one burn cash this fast.
       | 
       | Another thought: they say the software you ship reflects your org
       | chart ("you ship your org chart"). Given how far Meta has slipped
       | in the last year in the AI race, their org-wide dysfunction is
       | starting to seriously harm them, from Financials to execution to
       | talent. They need to get their act together, starting from the
       | top.
       | 
       | I'm not a fan of Meta, but I'm a big fan of Llama. It was the
       | first notable open weights model, and paved the way for all the
       | others. Just for that I want to say: I'm rooting for you guys.
       | Hope an amazing Llama 5 release comes after all this pain and
       | churn.
        
         | rvz wrote:
         | These sort of people do not care about any of us.
         | 
         | Meta is building a more powerful version of Llama that is
         | likely not going to be open-weight anymore and will move to
         | being closed up. [0].
         | 
         | You're more likely going to be using Deepseek v4 or Deepseek R2
         | as an open weight model than Llama 5 at this point.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20251211PD206/meta-llama-
         | dev...
        
       | skeptrune wrote:
       | shoutout Zuck for making the call. seems right given they haven't
       | had any good model releases since bringing him on
        
       | matt_daemon wrote:
       | Hard to not delight in the schadenfreude
        
         | bagxrvxpepzn wrote:
         | Keep coping. Dude got billions of dollars out of it and you
         | spend your free time commenting on Hacker News.
        
       | railgunmerlin wrote:
       | can't even really blame Alex for taking the deal, why would
       | Zuckerberg not do more due diligence? Wang has created (a
       | relatively) successful subcontracting operation but that doesn't
       | mean anything about research or new models
        
       | isahers wrote:
       | The decision to buy scale and put Wang in charge was a bad one,
       | but I think people are too focused on the $14B (which doesn't
       | matter to Meta in the slightest) instead of the actual logic
       | behind the purchase. Meta didn't need more labeled data, and a
       | data labeling expert is not the person to lead your AI
       | initiatives. I think spending $14B to try and get ahead in the AI
       | race is a great idea, and Meta should be spending more money
       | (there is some level of existential risk if they don't play in
       | this market), but spending it on companies like Scale makes no
       | sense.
        
         | HDThoreaun wrote:
         | This seems like the right take to me. Meta made $60 bil net
         | profit on their last earnings report. With Mark unaccountable
         | to investors effectively all of that can be funneled into their
         | AI initiative. With their massive distribution network I think
         | it makes sense for them to take big risks because if they fall
         | behind they dont suffer a penalty from declining user base. It
         | just never made sense for this to be the risk they took
        
       | alexbike wrote:
       | I have a feeling we will start seeing a lot of this...
        
       | grim_io wrote:
       | I wish I could fuck up this much this often and still get richer
       | every day.
        
         | bgun wrote:
         | Say what you will about Zuck, he's made investors a trillion
         | dollars. If they cared about his occasionally being wrong and
         | losing a few billion here or there, it's not showing up in the
         | stock price.
        
       | spenvo wrote:
       | I guess this comment got merged into a different thread (the
       | times of india one). This comment was originally posted to this
       | article's thread
       | https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/61918/zuckerberg-has-fini...
       | 
       | This looks like a slop article. It seems to be referring (without
       | a link) to https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-
       | news/mar... which itself appears to be referring to this (without
       | a link) https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-to-create-new-applied-
       | ai-en... Neither of these articles include the word "finished" in
       | them.
       | 
       | Update: and fwiw here is Andy Stone saying it's false
       | https://x.com/andymstone/status/2031129981267620314
        
         | bitpush wrote:
         | This is the only sensible take. This article is based on an
         | Indian publication. It is true we'll never get the full story
         | but this is pretty weak.
         | 
         | I mean, I'll be happy when this happens but today aint it.
        
       | pants2 wrote:
       | The HN post[1] eight months ago about the Scale acquisition is
       | full of comments questioning Zuck's choice to have Wang lead
       | their AI division. I guess HN was right this time.
       | 
       | 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44268197
        
       | adamnemecek wrote:
       | Who could have predicted that a guy who has no experience
       | developing superintelligence will fail at developing
       | superintelligence.
        
       | dzonga wrote:
       | zuck panicked.
       | 
       | the metaverse didn't pan out.
       | 
       | other companies were making inroads on A.I and zuck felt flat-
       | footed.
       | 
       | the crazy shit is in an era where most content on social media is
       | A.I generated - zuck should've pivoted to banning A.I content but
       | eh what do I know
        
         | gdulli wrote:
         | I don't know how he could ban it. AI can't be used to reliably
         | detect AI for the same reasons it's unreliable at other tasks.
         | He didn't really have a choice but to sell the same grift
         | everyone else is selling. He's stuck in a prisoners' dilemma
         | that everyone is losing except a few people at the top.
        
       | adverbly wrote:
       | Fail fast
        
       | mikert89 wrote:
       | People seriously underestimate how many founders were just right
       | place at the right time/had their startups pumped full of VC
       | cash. Meet some of these unicorn founders in person behind closed
       | doors and it will throw you into an existential crisis
        
         | siva7 wrote:
         | the fun part - it doesn't matter if his professional reputation
         | is that of a clown. He is still a billionaire clown and you, my
         | friend, may be a genius but dependent on the hand that feeds
         | you.
        
       | neko_ranger wrote:
       | Unfortunate isn't the right word, but it's unfortunate they are
       | going to spend all this money and have nothing to show for it.
       | Maybe wasteful is the right word.
        
       | tomhow wrote:
       | Can anyone find any more authoritative sources for this story
       | than I can?
       | 
       | The original source submitted was
       | https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/61918/zuckerberg-has-fini...,
       | with the headline _Zuckerberg has "finished" with Alexandr Wang,
       | worth US$14 billion_.
       | 
       | The second paragraph says "According to a report by Times of
       | India...". I found that article -
       | https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/mar... -
       | and changed the URL and title on this submission (though I find
       | it hard to read the article without freezing/crashing Chrome on
       | my quite-new Apple laptop).
       | 
       | I can't find a source for the claim that _Zuckerberg has
       | "finished" with Alexandr Wang_ in either article. Nobody is
       | quoted using the word "finished" or making any other assertions
       | about Wang 's status at Meta. It all just seems to be IDN
       | Financials handwavingly connecting dots to create a
       | sensationalist story and headline.
       | 
       | Also, the Times of India article says "According to The Wall
       | Street Journal...", which must mean this article: _Meta to Create
       | New Applied AI Engineering Organization_ -
       | https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-to-create-new-applied-ai-en....
       | 
       | That article also makes no assertions about Wang's status at
       | Meta.
       | 
       | As that article is the original source for this whole story, it
       | should be the URL and title for this submission. But I can't get
       | an archive link for it.
       | 
       | For now I'm downweighting this submission and I want the last 30
       | minutes of my life back!
        
         | siva7 wrote:
         | ai slop meets clickbait. what a future
        
       | stevenicr wrote:
       | A new applied AI? A new team with access to fbook?
       | 
       | Challenge: take all the real estate / house for rent / sale
       | scammers and make them only be seen by each other and not waste
       | so many other people's time.
       | 
       | I'm sure an agent could of taken the fb message and then engaged
       | in the sms phone texts and deciphered the affiliate scam I dealt
       | with today faster than I did.
       | 
       | Save users time, money and make fbook better. I think this is
       | possible.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-09 23:02 UTC)