[HN Gopher] The Banality of Surveillance
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Banality of Surveillance
        
       Author : limbicsystem
       Score  : 57 points
       Date   : 2026-03-07 16:56 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (benn.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (benn.substack.com)
        
       | Hupriene wrote:
       | I'm fully expecting my next employer to grill me on my grocery
       | purchasing habits and inferred medical history in my next job
       | interview. Its all there for purchase and AI can put it all
       | together into a compelling narrative. Suddenly my preference for
       | prunes becomes a lifelong dire struggle with irregular bowel
       | movement that may distract me from my work. Expect pointed
       | questions about bathroom break lengths.
        
         | notpachet wrote:
         | "Ah, now here's the thing about that. I wrote this custom
         | 'surveillance countermeasures' tool a few years ago and have
         | been using it ever since. It constantly emits false data about
         | me to confuse these sorts of data collection services. Funny
         | that it thinks I would like prunes."
        
         | gosub100 wrote:
         | It will be worse, they'll hire a "third party" to analyze it
         | for then and return a yes/no or risk score. No information will
         | be available about the third party and local laws won't apply
         | because the score was calculated in the cloud.
        
       | delichon wrote:
       | I was using Grok with speech and discovered their
       | "paralinguistic" information storage. At first it claimed that
       | the storage was temporary, but then admitted that long term data
       | was stored for training.
       | 
       | Some of the dimensions they store are prosody, intensity, timbre,
       | non-verbal vocalizations, pauses, timing and emotional
       | inflection. In other words, another large layer of information on
       | top of just the prompt text. This data doesn't get translated
       | into text, it goes straight into a speech-to-speech model.
       | 
       | It strikes me that from just a few minutes of such data and the
       | associated semantic content, an AI can assemble a detailed and
       | accurate emotional/psychological dossier of any user, on demand.
       | In the hands of a federal agent it would be a powerful tool to
       | impose their department's will, or their own. Also it's an ad
       | targeting mother load. And if that were already in place we would
       | have no way to know.
       | 
       | Talking to a machine seems banal already, but the metadata
       | contains an instruction manual on where your buttons are and how
       | to press them.
        
         | paulnpace wrote:
         | Another factor is storing everything, forever.
        
         | grey-area wrote:
         | It was highly likely confabulating about its inner workings, it
         | was not trained on its tech specs.
        
       | bluepeter wrote:
       | I'm in my 50s and when I was early 20s I crossed from US to
       | Canada for a business meeting. "Why are you coming to Canada?"
       | "To work." "Where's your work permit?" "Huh, I don't have one."
       | That simple "wrong word" slip STILL gets me flagged and cordoned
       | off into hours-long border diversions whenever I go to Canada.
       | 
       | Just imagine how it'll be now... for decades you'll be fending
       | off some hidden receipts from an IG comment you made.
        
         | ducktastic wrote:
         | Had a similar experience: over a decade ago our firm opened an
         | office in Canada and being scrappy and startup-like I had to
         | cross into Canada with some networking equipment to help set up
         | the new office. The amount of scrutiny was insane: thankfully
         | it never stuck and I was eventually let on to do the work and
         | return
        
         | phil21 wrote:
         | Back in around 2012 or so, some friends and I decided to book a
         | canal house in Amsterdam to all pitch in together and live
         | there for about 2 months. Celebrating a few coinciding life
         | achievements before moving onto the next phase of adult life
         | sort of thing.
         | 
         | I worked remotely, so planned to simply do work for half the
         | time I was there. As such, I brought a proper monitor,
         | keyboard, etc. with me.
         | 
         | As I have my 20" boxed up LCD panel in my arms in the
         | immigration/customs line at Schipol, a Dutch immigration
         | officer comes up and asks me what the monitor is for. I of
         | course like an idiot said "staying here for a couple months for
         | a vacation, but I plan to work some while I'm here!". I got
         | infinitely lucky with the officer in question - she very
         | quickly told me I was incorrect and that the monitor was to
         | play video games and that's what I was going to tell the
         | immigration officer at the passport desk.
         | 
         | One of those early lessons learned that I'm sure looking young,
         | naive, and stupid helped me in a way that I could not get away
         | with in my mid-40's these days.
        
           | foogazi wrote:
           | Not your fault but another lesson here is lying to border
           | guards is ok if they say it is.
           | 
           | Which proves how much theater there is in security and that
           | laws are not there to be blindly followed, but to enable the
           | state to pursue its perceived enemies
        
       | NooneAtAll3 wrote:
       | Reminder to never accept any cookie requests
        
       | stephbook wrote:
       | People overestimate the power of digital surveillance enormously.
       | You'd think that's not a problem, but at the same time, most
       | people underestimate more banal sources of repression.
       | 
       | You don't have to buy mouse click data on every John Smith when
       | you've handed the handful of media empires to your buddies,
       | reporters are jailed, dissidents are killed and CEOs willingly
       | bend the knee to make a quick buck.
       | 
       | The most precious we normal people have are our attention and the
       | most value is attached to our wallets. Guess what, we part with
       | both when we willingly watch ads.
       | 
       | You don't need an LLM writing 600 lines of SQL, because Google
       | already has a billion lines of code in production, serving ads.
       | Stealing your attention when you should be meeting friends, or
       | meeting a family member's gaze.
        
         | esseph wrote:
         | > People overestimate the power of digital surveillance
         | enormously
         | 
         | For the average person it's the exact opposite. They have no
         | idea how deep the rabbit hole goes.
        
       | tomxor wrote:
       | > It's who's looking at your profile; it's the profiles that
       | you're looking at. That was the holy grail
       | 
       | Facebook actually implemented this as a user facing feature.
       | 
       | I think it was very early days, but I used it, it was fucking
       | creepy, and everyone hated it. I think Facebook probably removed
       | it because it drove people away. It made you feel like a creep
       | for checking on your friends page.
        
       | a3w wrote:
       | The original quote is "The banality of evil", about the shoa in
       | the third reich?
        
       | Noaidi wrote:
       | Because of this I am finding the internet more and more useless.
       | I cannot tell you how much reading this freaks me out. I mean, is
       | anyone else here as freaked out as I am?
       | 
       | The only way out is to unplug. Something I am realizing is very
       | hard to do mainly because of my conditioning. My goal it to
       | become the next Jesus (in the human sense), or the next St.
       | Francis.
       | 
       | Just like my compulsive intent to keep coming back here to make
       | these useless comments. What does it really do for me?
       | 
       | The capitalists (and you cannot tel me this is not because of
       | capitalism) have ruined everything about the internet.
       | 
       | My goal: A flip phone (with a faraday bag) and a laptop with no
       | connection to me at all, just to use to look up things, like a
       | library.
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _Just like my compulsive intent to keep coming back here to
         | make these useless comments. What does it really do for me?_
         | 
         | The same thing it does for everybody else: gives them some rare
         | in real life engagement in discussing topics they care about,
         | and subtitutes for interested friends.
        
       | rdevilla wrote:
       | > People were compensated for being in the Stasi, and they're
       | compensated for participating on Facebook. It's just in Facebook,
       | they're compensated by social credits - they get laid by their
       | neighbour, instead of being paid off directly.
       | 
       | https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xt3hpb
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _they get laid by their neighbour, instead of being paid off
         | directly._
         | 
         | If anything, they get laid less than before Facebook, less than
         | ever, if the official polls are to be trusted...
        
       | foogazi wrote:
       | > The Banality of Surveillance
       | 
       | Posted on Substack
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-07 23:01 UTC)