[HN Gopher] Are the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Beginning to ...
___________________________________________________________________
Are the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Beginning to Dissolve?
Author : wjb3
Score : 24 points
Date : 2026-03-01 21:33 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
| jadbox wrote:
| How does "quantum darwinism" effectively select a state? Like how
| does that work in principle- what is the selection criteria.
| thyristan wrote:
| Energy.
| Nevermark wrote:
| > None of the leading interpretations of quantum theory are very
| convincing. They ask us to believe, for example, that the world
| we experience is fundamentally divided from the subatomic realm
| it's built from. Or that there is a wild proliferation of
| parallel universes, or that a mysterious process causes
| quantumness to spontaneously collapse.
|
| Actually, the "many worlds" "interpretation", simply treats the
| equations as meaning what they say.
|
| And it is misnamed. The field equations describe a highly
| interconnected "web universe" of "tangles" (what I call spans of
| entangled states) and "spangles", disjoint versions of particles.
| Basically, union and intersection over versions where laws of
| conservation are maintained.
|
| Buy including all consistent versions, no external information is
| required by the theory. It is informationally complete. An actual
| explanation.
|
| There is no additional information needed to explain quantum
| "collapse" because it is explained by the fast bifurcation of
| disjoint tangles when lots of particle interact. So anyone
| attempting to invent a mechanism for that is like someone trying
| to explain why despite the world being spherical it is really
| somehow still flat as well.
|
| And the only reason to not take the field equations as a plain
| reading, is the result is "too big" for someone's imagination.
|
| Bluntly: The total field equations preserve information - that is
| the plain implication for having both unions (tangles) and
| intersections (spangles) of alternate versions.
|
| Anything else requires magical information to choose collapses,
| in order to explain something already explained. In other words,
| it requires dressed up voodoo. And by "re-complicating", uh, "re-
| explaining" the already explained, introduces a ridiculous new
| puzzle. Where does that information come from? Saying it "just
| happens" is like saying someone's version of a creator "just is".
| It is a code for "Don't Ask Questions".
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-03-01 23:00 UTC)