[HN Gopher] Qt45: A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesiz...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Qt45: A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself
        
       Author : ppnpm
       Score  : 111 points
       Date   : 2026-02-27 23:42 UTC (23 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.science.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.science.org)
        
       | java-man wrote:
       | 2009 paper: Self-sustained replication of an RNA enzyme [0].
       | 
       | [0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19131595/
        
         | rcyeh wrote:
         | Amazing! The 2009 Lincoln & Joyce paper you cited catalyzes one
         | bond per hour on average. (Doubling time = 1 hour, but only one
         | bond between oligonucleotides needed to double.)
         | 
         | OP's Gianni et al 2026 paper connects 45 nucleotides, taking 72
         | days (1700 hours) to yield 0.2%.
         | 
         | The latter effort is like drawing the whole owl.
         | 
         | That is incredible patience. Without access to the full
         | article, I read only the abstract. I wonder if they used
         | simulations to narrow the candidates?
        
           | java-man wrote:
           | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7618777/pdf/EMS2125.
           | ..
        
           | Noumenon72 wrote:
           | I don't know if ChatGPT translated your rate for the 2026
           | paper right, but it says you mean:
           | 
           | * 99.8% of the starting molecules fail to form the desired
           | product
           | 
           | * The ones that do, form 0.026 bonds per hour
        
       | cyberax wrote:
       | It's interesting, that we're getting down to the sizes of self-
       | replicating RNA that realistically can form by a complete
       | accident.
       | 
       | Getting this sequence by random chance out of a pile of
       | nucleotides is a 1 in 2^90 chance. That's around 1.2*10^27 or
       | just around 20000 moles! Not at all an impossible number.
        
         | jjk166 wrote:
         | Note that the Bennu asteroid sample had approximately 5
         | nanomoles of nucleotides per gram, meaning 20,000 moles of
         | nucleotides could be delivered by a single 4 million ton
         | asteroid, which if it were a spherical carbonaceous chondrite
         | would be about 183 meters in diameter. An asteroid about that
         | size impacts earth roughly every 36,000 years, and that mass of
         | meteor material falls to earth each century.
         | 
         | If primordial earth's oceans had nucleotide concentrations
         | comparable to Bennu, then there would be about 10^39
         | nucleotides in the ocean.
        
           | nkrisc wrote:
           | If raw materials isn't the bottle neck for life every where,
           | then what might it further down the line between oceans full
           | of nucleotides and life? The oceans themselves?
        
             | cousinbryce wrote:
             | Temperature range and magnetic field are my first thoughts.
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | I don't see any reason for the source molecules to come from
           | space. We already know that nucleotides will spontaneously
           | form and polymerize in conditions consistent with the early
           | earth, and a meteorite origin just moves the source of those
           | nucleotides elsewhere but doesn't answer how they formed.
        
             | rolph wrote:
             | space has been around for a lot longer than earth, its
             | possible that inter planetary generation of nucleic acids
             | may be primarily a matter of chemistry.
             | 
             | Nucleobase synthesis in interstellar ices[2019]
             | 
             | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12404-1?error=se
             | r...
             | 
             | Chemistry of Abiotic Nucleotide Synthesis[2020]
             | 
             | https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00546
        
             | heavyset_go wrote:
             | It's possible (proto-)life evolved in the pre-Earth
             | protoplanetary disk.
             | 
             | If so, life might not require a special snowflake planet
             | like Earth to develop. Development could be solar system-
             | wide, and common in other early solar systems.
        
             | jjk166 wrote:
             | Delivery by meteorites isn't necessarily the only or even
             | primary source, but the fact is that it is a source we can
             | directly observe, and it is a sufficient source. Earth's
             | primordial chemistry likely did create more, but the
             | existence of those conditions is theoretical, and such
             | additional production need not be invoked to explain the
             | needed level of abundance. Even a world with very different
             | conditions from primordial Earth would likewise receive
             | vast quantities of nucleotide during its formation and
             | continuous replenishment afterwards.
        
           | littlestymaar wrote:
           | I wonder how much nucleotides present in asteroids in space
           | survive the massive heating in the atmosphere and the crash
           | though.
        
         | Paedor wrote:
         | 20000 moles of length 45 nucleotides is 306 metric tons? Spread
         | out over millions of years, that does seem completely feasible.
        
         | adgjlsfhk1 wrote:
         | it's much more than 1 in 2^90. this specific 45 base sequence
         | was found by random search which strongly implies that the odds
         | of finding such a protein are much much higher (i.e. >2^-30)
         | since the experiment probably only searched a couple million
         | proteins
        
           | cyberax wrote:
           | (these are not proteins, these are RNA sequences)
           | 
           | And it's likely that there are even smaller replicators but
           | probably not much smaller. And there are likely more
           | configurations among these 45 base-combinations that can
           | self-replicate. It's also more likely that the first
           | replicators were arrangements of multiple smaller molecules
           | that can amplify themselves, and not just one large molecule.
           | 
           | But even this longer sequence is well within the realm of
           | synthesis by pure chance. RNA molecules can grow base-by-
           | base, so a random walk model should eventually produce it.
        
           | Kotlopou wrote:
           | Actually, the search here is chemical -- you make a bunch of
           | random small RNA sequences, then chemically replicate those
           | that do what you want, and after a few cycles of this you
           | find just a few sequences dominating the population. The
           | pools can easily reach 10^14 examples and more, because you
           | don't need a separate container/experiment for each one, but
           | do it all together in one batch. The keyword is SELEX, a
           | pretty cool idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_ev
           | olution_of_ligand...
        
       | dekhn wrote:
       | See also: Spiegleman's Monster
        
       | panarchy wrote:
       | Quinozyme
        
       | guax wrote:
       | We haven't finished migrating from Qt5 and there is a v45
       | already? Jeez.
        
       | pcrh wrote:
       | The pay wall doesn't permit much access to the details of this. A
       | better summary is available at the UK's MRC website, link below.
       | 
       | https://mrclmb.ac.uk/news-events/articles/bridging-the-gap-f...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-28 23:01 UTC)