[HN Gopher] Dan Simmons, author of Hyperion, has died
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dan Simmons, author of Hyperion, has died
        
       Author : throw0101a
       Score  : 402 points
       Date   : 2026-02-27 18:13 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.dignitymemorial.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.dignitymemorial.com)
        
       | throw0101a wrote:
       | Obituary:
       | 
       | * https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/longmont-co/danie...
        
         | liquidise wrote:
         | Thanks for posting this. It should be the link in the OP
         | frankly.
        
           | tomhow wrote:
           | Done.
        
       | rwmj wrote:
       | Although it's quite a flawed novel compared to brilliant space
       | opera like Hyperion, I have a bit of a soft spot for Carrion
       | Comfort. I think it'd make a great movie!
        
         | boznz wrote:
         | I would also rate this above hyperion, like hyperion book 1 it
         | crossed into the horror genre quite well, the rest of the
         | hyperion books were a little bit too preachy but a good series
         | never the less. RIP Dan.
        
         | perardi wrote:
         | I have a real soft spot for Summer of Night.
         | 
         | It obviously owes a lot to Stephen King's IT. But it stands on
         | its own merits...and I give it extra credit because it was set
         | in my home town.
         | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_of_Night)
        
         | nurbl wrote:
         | Carrion Comfort was my introduction to Dan Simmons, I loved it.
         | Not as good as some of his later stuff but it's really
         | inventive, and never boring.
        
       | jabroni_salad wrote:
       | See you later, alligator...
        
       | LaurensBER wrote:
       | I'm sorry to read this, I was just thinking about rereading the
       | entire saga the other day. His words and ideas will forever life
       | in my mind.
        
       | jnellis wrote:
       | The library wait list for Hyperion was months. I'm in the middle
       | of Fall of Hyperion right now. Great writing.
        
       | Freak_NL wrote:
       | The _Hyperion Cantos_ is a masterpiece which every scifi fan
       | ought to have read, but I would like to recommend a lesser known
       | title of Simmons for readers who have read at least some works of
       | Charles Dickens (self-explanatory) and Wilkie Collins (such as
       | _The Woman in White_ or _The Moonstone_ ).
       | 
       | Simmons wrote _Drood_ (2009), which takes these two classical
       | authors and places them in a mystery novel. What struck me as
       | particularly masterful is that Simmons managed to write his prose
       | in such a way that as a reader you soon forget that this book was
       | not written in the 1800s -- his tone and style match that of
       | Dickens and Collins so convincingly.
        
         | matthewsinclair wrote:
         | 100%. One of the genuine great writers.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | > The _Hyperion Cantos_ is a masterpiece which every scifi fan
         | ought to have read
         | 
         | You have to have some affinity to religious/Christianity/church
         | topics, otherwise it's quite a turn-off.
        
           | mbeex wrote:
           | Atheist here: Not true, there is much more in Hyperion (and
           | even Endymion)
        
             | layer8 wrote:
             | I'm not saying that you have to be religious. But if you
             | find those topics and related symbolisms rather
             | uninteresting in your sci-fi, then the books may not be for
             | you.
        
               | Freak_NL wrote:
               | I mean, it's not my fandom, but Catholics do have a
               | wicked sense of symbolism and decoration. _Hyperion_
               | wouldn 't be as colourful if Simmons used a bunch of
               | Evangelicals instead.
        
               | indubioprorubik wrote:
               | Well, i detest jihadism, but still could enjoy dune
        
               | Brian_K_White wrote:
               | People are interesting, and religion is a thing people
               | do.
               | 
               | In this case there is quasi-religious imagery but you as
               | the reader aren't actually supposed to be mystical about
               | the god/devil in the story the way the characters
               | themselves are. It's not C. S. Lewis
               | 
               | Do you also find LeGuin uninteresting?
        
           | ceejayoz wrote:
           | I have zero affinity for those and found it a fascinating
           | read.
        
           | Supermancho wrote:
           | It's interesting how different stories have different
           | underlying religious underpinnings in different parts of the
           | world. It's important to consider that these themes are
           | precisely because the stories are born from the surrounding
           | culture.
           | 
           | Christian references in the Cantos were probably incidental,
           | given the expected familiarity of the intended audience
           | (american white male young men). eg The Matrix trilogy
           | started with the obvious messianic hero's journey, then
           | attempted to expand it in the following films (karma, cycles
           | of death and rebirth, etc).
           | 
           | For some, these religious messages can be a turn off, I
           | agree. I happened to be raised in a culture that allowed me
           | to ignore it more or less and I can recognize that.
        
             | sgillen wrote:
             | Not sure if I agree with the christian references being
             | incidental ... the first book is literally a retelling of
             | the The Canterbury Tales, all the characters are on a
             | pilgrimage. there are a bunch of religious groups with at
             | least one being central to the story, there are cross
             | shaped parasites that grant eternal life.
             | 
             | I still think you can enjoy it without caring much about
             | religion.
        
               | AlanYx wrote:
               | >there are cross shaped parasites that grant eternal life
               | 
               | Without giving away any spoilers to the books, the
               | parasites are only that on the surface. If anything, the
               | books present a wary picture of religion, especially the
               | last two Endymion books, but also a wary picture of
               | technology.
        
               | Supermancho wrote:
               | > the first book is literally a retelling of the The
               | Canterbury Tales, all the characters are on a pilgrimage.
               | 
               | As we have both read the books, it's notable that you
               | associate pilgrimage with Christianity. This illustrates
               | the point.
        
             | Barrin92 wrote:
             | >Christian references in the Cantos were probably
             | incidental,
             | 
             | They're not at all incidental. The themes and the literal
             | Catholic Church don't just make it into the books by
             | osmosis, they're central to it and deliberate.
             | 
             | Like Gene Wolfe he's part of a pretty small group of US
             | authors who wrote Catholic speculative fiction. Like Wolfe
             | his writing is also fairly un-American. If Heinlein or
             | Asimov are examples of archetypal US science fiction,
             | Simmons is about as far as the other end as you can be,
             | with the post-modern structure, the Canterbury Tales as a
             | template for the story and so on.
        
           | castral wrote:
           | To be fair, the first novel Hyperion is quite literally a
           | survey of major world religions, not just Christianity. It
           | does settle onto Christian symbolism in the second book
           | onward, but the first two novels alone are still worth
           | reading for their ideas. No affinity required, it's just the
           | default Western canon at work.
        
             | layer8 wrote:
             | > just the default Western canon
             | 
             | It's particular topics of that canon, and you have to fancy
             | their treatment in a science-fiction setting. Some people
             | like science-fiction because/when it proposes fresh
             | perspectives that aren't rooted in, by lack of a better
             | description, non-enlightenment parts of that canon.
        
               | indubioprorubik wrote:
               | The clean slate of banks - where we discarded culture to
               | embrace the "culture" and look where this "winging" it
               | got us. Turns out the operating system of a society is
               | important- and the atheist distilled synthetic one is not
               | really working - same goes for alot of others.
               | 
               | The utopist urge for cultural tabula rasa is a
               | retardation, a attempt of the brain to shirk embracing
               | and discovering complexity. One has to look at the
               | "backwards" parts to start to understand what works in a
               | society and with the actual human beeings lifing in a
               | actual society, not the wingless Star Trek Angels in PJs.
               | 
               | Embrace complexity, embrace analysis, build something
               | without defining the endstate first. Make small things
               | that work, combine them into bigger things that work. Way
               | less calling for cullings of the "sabotaging traitors" as
               | they are usual with utopists on the march.
        
               | davedx wrote:
               | Who is "we"? In Banks' culture universe, humanity (us)
               | were explicitly rejected and never became part of the
               | Culture.
               | 
               | (The State of the Art)
        
           | Trasmatta wrote:
           | I disagree strongly. I'm not religious at all, and have a
           | strong aversion to Christianity, and I loved those books.
        
           | kakacik wrote:
           | Atheist/agnostic here, completely untrue statement
        
           | iamtheworstdev wrote:
           | :shrug: I'm an Atheist, I loved the series.
        
           | bayindirh wrote:
           | The religious themes are a thin veil in Hyperion, looking
           | behind them opens another dimension to ponder about.
           | 
           | I'm not a Christian, BTW.
        
           | samus wrote:
           | It's up to anybody to not have a particular taste for
           | religious topics, however, spirituality (or the lack thereof)
           | is an important part of human culture and psychology.
           | Therefore a science fiction novel in a sufficiently different
           | setting from Earth's early 21st century really ought to cover
           | these topics as well, lest the worldbuilding would be very
           | shallow and the resulting work would likely lack depth.
        
           | loloquwowndueo wrote:
           | Entirely untrue.
        
           | Brian_K_White wrote:
           | Atheist. Loved it.
        
           | stickfigure wrote:
           | I don't want to dogpile on the other comments (atheist, loved
           | the book) but I think there's something interesting here.
           | 
           | Most science fiction tends to assume that religiosity will
           | fade as humanity matures, and in a few thousand years we'll
           | all have a good laugh at those silly ancient humans. This
           | feels generally right to me. But it's not the only possible
           | future, and Hyperion explores a far future in which
           | religiosity becomes _more_ ingrained.
           | 
           | I thought it was one of the more interesting aspects of the
           | book, and contributed to the feeling of "not just another
           | space opera". You don't have to appreciate religion to like
           | the story.
        
         | UltraSane wrote:
         | Carrion Comfort is a ridiculously entertaining novel.
        
           | tsumnia wrote:
           | I favor Carrion over Hyperion and find myself repeating
           | Sheriff Bobby Joe Gentry's line "I like junk" quite often.
        
             | UltraSane wrote:
             | Hyperion is the better novel but Carrion Comfort is just
             | really exciting and creepy. And the way the mind
             | controllers treated regular humans like toys hits far too
             | close to home now.
        
               | rwmj wrote:
               | Yeah, one of the bad guys even had a private island where
               | he invited all his rich psychopathic friends.
        
               | tsumnia wrote:
               | Oh absolutely, I don't want to spoil anything but (to
               | sound like a nutcase for a second) if there is an
               | Illuminati then I think they were avid readers of
               | Carrion.
               | 
               | Apropos given your username XD
        
               | defen wrote:
               | > if there is an Illuminati then I think they were avid
               | readers of Carrion
               | 
               | lol, I never really thought about that but given recent
               | revelations it does almost seem like they were using it
               | as a template.
        
               | washadjeffmad wrote:
               | I still think about it relatively often. It took me
               | almost a year to finish it between breaks to recover.
        
         | nz wrote:
         | Great writer. For people who want to get a taste of Simmons
         | without committing to an entire book, I would recommend this
         | (very) short story: The River Styx Runs Upstream[1].
         | 
         | [1]: https://talesofmytery.blogspot.com/2013/02/dan-simmons-
         | river...
        
         | rdedev wrote:
         | I tried reading it but I couldn't get into it. Maybe it the
         | heavy religious themes or just the science fiction being so far
         | into the future? I really should give it a shot again
        
           | pilooch wrote:
           | Try Flashback, it's darker but genius as well, maybe more
           | approachable.
        
           | samus wrote:
           | It starts very slowly and the worldbuilding is exquisite and
           | you will likely uncover many facets only upon rereading it.
           | However, it is well worth persisting.
           | 
           | Works with considerably more action are Olympus and Ilium.
        
           | sleepybrett wrote:
           | It's Canterbury Tales structure put me off and the reveals
           | didn't do anything for me. I think I stopped after the second
           | book.
        
         | rurp wrote:
         | Despite being a huge fan of Simmons I had originally passed on
         | this one because I didn't care for the Dickens novels I had
         | read in school. At a family gathering I was surprised to learn
         | that my Grandma was a big Simmons fan. She convinced me to give
         | Drood a shot and sure enough I really enjoyed it! So I'd say
         | it's worth checking out even if you're not a big Dickens
         | reader.
        
       | lordleft wrote:
       | Hyperion was a wonderful sci-novel. Thank you Dan, for your
       | amazing writing; may you rest in peace.
        
       | melecas wrote:
       | The TechnoCore using human minds as unwitting processing nodes --
       | to solve a problem humans couldn't even be told about -- reads
       | differently every few years. 2026 is a particularly strange time
       | to reread it.
        
         | perardi wrote:
         | Also, that should have been the backstory of the Matrix, and
         | not the whole "living power source" nonsense.
        
           | ortusdux wrote:
           | I'm convinced that the studio forced the change to 'human
           | batteries' out of concern over a conflict with Hyperion.
        
             | bee_rider wrote:
             | Probably the idea is broad enough to get away with
             | borrowing it or putting their own spin on the general idea
             | (I mean, it is expected that stores will influence each
             | other and ideas will spread). I'd rather guess that a
             | studio executive thought the battery idea would be more
             | understandable to people (if that is the case though, I
             | think they were dramatically wrong, the computing idea
             | makes much more sense and I think all of us in the audience
             | would have been fine with it).
        
               | Henchman21 wrote:
               | Remember that all critiques of Hollywood require you to
               | think like you've just consumed a massive line of
               | cocaine. Because that is how they think and live. So,
               | empathy reduced to zero, all your ideas are great,
               | everything else is dumb, etc. Making decisions under the
               | influence of strong narcotics is a recipe for idiocy.
               | 
               | Source: me, I had a huge cocaine problem and worked many
               | years in the tech side of music and movies
        
           | MikeTheGreat wrote:
           | I saw a YouTube video where they said this was more-or-less
           | the original backstory but then they changed it. I think it
           | said that the People In Charge thought the 'living power
           | source' would be easier for the audience to understand?
           | 
           | I don't have the link handy, and don't trust everything I
           | read on the Internet, etc, etc.
           | 
           | But yeah - this makes so much more sense than breeding,
           | raising, and feeding humans just to harvest their body heat.
        
             | perardi wrote:
             | According to Reddit...so, grain of salt...that is an urban
             | legend, related to a Neil Gaiman short story that appeared
             | on the Matrix promo website.
             | 
             | https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1amree7/theres_a_w
             | i...
        
               | bee_rider wrote:
               | I think we the urban legend really sticks around because
               | the compute explanation just makes much more sense and we
               | all want this beloved movies not to have a sill (albeit
               | inconsequential) plot hole.
        
               | perardi wrote:
               | Oh, totally, it's my head canon as well.
        
               | bee_rider wrote:
               | Mine is either that, or, the idea I mentioned in this
               | post:
               | 
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185076
               | 
               | Machines trying to be benevolent, but overly controlling.
        
               | jbaber wrote:
               | That's very good.
        
             | tempestn wrote:
             | I like to think the machines actually were using them for
             | processing power, and the humans themselves just
             | misunderstood (or oversimplified for Neo) what was actually
             | going on.
        
               | bee_rider wrote:
               | Processing power is my second favorite explanation.
               | 
               | My first favorite would have been: they don't use the
               | humans for anything, the pods are just the most efficient
               | way to store humans. The machines think they are being
               | benevolent, just want peace and quiet and for humans to
               | stop doing dramatic things like scorching the sky. But I
               | don't know where the plot would go from there.
        
               | jemmyw wrote:
               | There is backstory that the films could have gone into,
               | though I don't know if it was written before or after the
               | first film. The humans in the matrix were allied with the
               | machines and they put them in the matrix to protect them
               | from the war. They were being benevolent.
        
               | unsupp0rted wrote:
               | They benevolently feed the dead to the living
        
               | unsupp0rted wrote:
               | What the humans thought they knew came from the Zion
               | archives mostly. And guess where the Zion archives came
               | from...
        
           | xg15 wrote:
           | I like how the other story that has this premise is
           | Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
        
             | ping00 wrote:
             | don't forget Sirens of Titan!
        
             | zoogeny wrote:
             | Hitchhiker's Guide had a slightly deeper philosophical
             | implication though, in that the premise is that powerful
             | computers already existed to solve complex problems. Earth
             | was created to pose powerful questions.
        
           | gostsamo wrote:
           | I'm sure that one Star trek episode had the same premise,
           | together with something from Lem. The connection
           | human/machine brain is rather old and human brains being used
           | for computation is so reused, it is practically public
           | domain.
        
       | teeray wrote:
       | Enjoyed the first Hyperion, but Fall of Hyperion was a bit of a
       | slog for me. If Fall of Hyperion were compressed into the
       | conclusion of Hyperion and other stories left as novellas (in the
       | way James S.A. Corey has done), I think I would have enjoyed the
       | story more.
        
         | Trasmatta wrote:
         | In contrast, getting through Hyperion was hard for me (some of
         | the character stories I LOVED and some felt like a slog), but I
         | really loved Fall of Hyperion.
        
         | globular-toast wrote:
         | I did find the transition from _Hyperion_ to _Fall_ a little
         | jarring. It has a completely different narrative structure for
         | a start, but more importantly the scope goes from a single
         | group of people doing a pilgrimage to a huge interstellar
         | conspiracy. I think it works best if you read each book
         | slightly separately rather than as one huge work.
        
         | k__ wrote:
         | Yeah, Hyperion had an interesting structure, but the second
         | book was quite basic compared to that.
         | 
         | If The Fall of Hyperion were 1/3 of the length and part of the
         | first book it would be perfect.
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | I had a copy of Hyperion but didn't read it for years because the
       | scary knife robot on the cover seemed intimidating. I finally
       | read it, and all the sequels, and they were great books, and hell
       | YEAH that was an intimidating knife robot! Sometimes you CAN tell
       | a book by its cover.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | The scary knife robot is way, way more intimidating in person.
        
           | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote:
           | I still remember the first time I met a scary knife robot.
           | Working fast food night shift was crazy times.
        
         | samus wrote:
         | I find it awesome that the true nature and mission of the
         | Shrike remains a secret.
        
       | matthewsinclair wrote:
       | Vale Dan Simmons. You brought the world a _lot_ of joy.
        
       | okasaki wrote:
       | RIP. I really liked the Hyperion books and Ilium/Olympos. He
       | seemed to become a bit of a chud after 9/11 but the books are
       | still well worth reading.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | Things most people don't know about Illinois is that while the
         | Mason Dixon line officially goes around the bottom of the
         | state, philosophically it cuts through the middle. Peoria is
         | maybe thirty miles north of the rednecks.
         | 
         | Add that he was a boomer and I was disappointed but not
         | surprised when people started complaining about him.
        
           | perardi wrote:
           | Ha, I'd argue it starts right at Pekin.
        
             | hinkley wrote:
             | That puts several university towns below the line. But
             | little towns outside big towns in the Midwest have their
             | own vibe.
        
         | JackFr wrote:
         | Loved Ilium, and Olympos a little less so. Inspired me to read
         | the Iliad.
        
         | AdmiralAsshat wrote:
         | Yeah, the Islamophobia in Ilium/Olympos made me really tempted
         | to put the books down several times. It's such a strange about-
         | face from when he wrote the character Kassad in the Hyperion
         | Cantos.
         | 
         | Like Frank Miller, it seems like 9/11 just broke him.
        
         | poisonarena wrote:
         | > He seemed to become a bit of a chud
         | 
         | I will now read Ilium/Olympos
        
       | textm0de wrote:
       | Here lies one whose name was writ in Eternity.
        
       | Izikiel43 wrote:
       | I picked up Hyperion on a whim on Kindle because it was on sale
       | for 2$.
       | 
       | Amazing book, I bought and loved the other 3, I still hope they
       | do a good miniseries with the books.
        
         | pelagicAustral wrote:
         | I sincerely hope they don't make any adaptation... after the
         | slaughterhouse they've made with 3 Body Problem, Foundation,
         | Altered Carbon, et al Not to mention all the damage done to
         | other more traditional works of fiction.
        
           | nilamo wrote:
           | Sometimes it's done right, like with The Expanse. Although
           | the writers also wrote some of the episode scripts, so that
           | probably helped...
        
             | lotsoweiners wrote:
             | To each their own I guess. I never found the Expanse
             | television series to be very good when compared to the
             | books.
        
           | wowtip wrote:
           | Hm altered carbon season 1 was pretty good?
           | 
           | the books are still on my to read list.
        
           | therealdrag0 wrote:
           | You don't have to watch them.
        
       | Trasmatta wrote:
       | I recommend everyone read Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion. The
       | messages about AI and human stagnation are highly relevant to our
       | current world.
        
       | idontwantthis wrote:
       | Hyperion is the first sci-fi series I have ever described as
       | beautiful. I just heard about and read all four in the past year.
        
       | anp wrote:
       | I read the Hyperion books during a particularly intense period of
       | my life and found them quite powerful. I didn't know anything
       | about Simmons at the time, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised
       | that like Tolkein these stories started with an oral format for
       | children.
        
         | EvanAnderson wrote:
         | My "intense time of life" story re: Hyperion. I was finishing
         | "The Rise of Endymion" and was stricken with a kidney stone. It
         | was absolutely eerie, and has cemented my memory of that book
         | in a strange way.
        
       | ctvo wrote:
       | Carrion Comfort is still one of the most creepy horror books I've
       | ever read and is seldom mentioned when we talk about Dan Simmons.
        
         | Arainach wrote:
         | Very much agreed. I haven't read all of Dan's work to comment
         | how it ranks among his output, but Carrion Comfort is a book
         | that I still think back on years after I read it.
        
         | colkassad wrote:
         | The first person perspective of the old lady at the beginning
         | of the book was so creepy.
        
       | howard941 wrote:
       | Hyperion cries out for a good film adaptation.
        
         | virgil_disgr4ce wrote:
         | ...does it though? I mean we don't have to argue about personal
         | desires and opinions. But Hyperion simply doesn't seem
         | adaptable. You would lose everything that makes it great.
        
           | sandmn wrote:
           | Not sure about a film, but maybe TV series? I thought Game of
           | Thrones was not adaptable but then HBO did it.
        
             | colkassad wrote:
             | It would make a perfect mini-series. Each episode or two
             | could cover each pilgrim's story, with a finale two-parter
             | to wrap up Fall of Hyperion. A lot from Fall could be
             | trimmed down.
        
         | samus wrote:
         | I rather hope it doesn't. It's not so much about action; it's
         | subtle worldbuilding and a certain vibe that is easily
         | distorted on screen. Also, it would destroy everybody's
         | personal vision of the Shrike...
        
       | zabzonk wrote:
       | I liked all of the Hyperion/Shrike novels, except when Raul
       | Endymion persistently refers to the heroine/love-interest as "my
       | young friend", or similar phrasing - slightly creepy/boring.
       | 
       | I didn't know that Summer of Night was a series - really liked
       | the original book - will have to investigate.
       | 
       | And, of course, I'm sad he's died.
        
       | Aromasin wrote:
       | Wow. I picked up a copy of Hyperion this morning while taking a
       | random stroll through town - something I rarely do during a work
       | day anymore. I popped into a book shop on a complete whim, and
       | picked it up as it had been on my list for a while. The
       | coincidence feels deeply uncanny.
        
         | Kaibeezy wrote:
         | I started reading it for the first time this week. It's just a
         | statistical anomaly... but humans are wired to notice and feel
         | coincidence; it connects us to space and time in a way that
         | must have helped make religion more believable.
        
           | bookofjoe wrote:
           | "Coincidence is a glimpse of the scaffolding of reality."
           | 
           | I read that many years ago, forgot the source.
        
             | mwigdahl wrote:
             | It would be interesting if it were Dan Simmons...
        
         | occz wrote:
         | And I just finished The Rise of Endymion a few days ago.
         | Uncanny indeed.
        
         | Loughla wrote:
         | Do yourself a favor and get the audiobook after you read the
         | physical book. It is, hands down, the best audiobook ever made.
         | By far and away.
        
       | Sebguer wrote:
       | The type of person the concept 'death of the author' was invented
       | for, because whoo were some of his other books ideological
       | garbage.
        
         | ceejayoz wrote:
         | 9/11 kinda broke his brain, as I recall. (The book Flashback
         | is... ooof. Hyperion includes a major Muslim character and it's
         | just a wild shift between the two.)
        
           | avazhi wrote:
           | Almost like he updated his view of the world, which isn't a
           | bad thing.
        
             | Sebguer wrote:
             | his updated view of the world involved global warming being
             | a hoax and that obama (literally obama, not even a fake
             | obama parallel) caused the end of the west.
        
       | ChipopLeMoral wrote:
       | Hyperion Cantos might be my favorite sci-fi series ever. What a
       | great writer.
        
       | aerhardt wrote:
       | I read Hyperion last year. It's an ode to the English letters and
       | a phenomenal exercise in world-building. RIP.
        
       | plasma_beam wrote:
       | I see everyone talking about Hyperion, so I will play up The
       | Terror as one of my favorites. The TV series did NOT do it
       | justice.
        
         | MonkeyIsNull wrote:
         | Yeah, I never got pulled into Hyperion but The Terror was..
         | something else. Just a masterpiece, and the TV series came
         | nowhere near.
        
         | virgil_disgr4ce wrote:
         | THANK YOU!!! The Terror--the book--absolutely blew me away. I
         | still am in awe of that book. Just everything about it.
         | 
         | And yeah the adaptation was so, so weak. But it faced the same
         | problem many horror movies do, which is that if you're forced
         | to show the Thing(tm) it loses all its power.
        
         | nurbl wrote:
         | Well there was no way the show would be quite as good as the
         | book. But I was still pleasantly surprised, it was definitely
         | better than the average TV adaptation. The actors were very
         | good.
        
         | 93benz wrote:
         | Currently finishing up The Terror. I've never read a horror
         | story until I got this. There are times I struggle to put it
         | down, incredible book. Simmons painted quite a colorful picture
         | of what it's like to die from scurvy so now I bring an
         | emergency orange wherever I go.
        
       | toomuchtodo wrote:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Simmons
        
       | lysace wrote:
       | 'Hyperion' is a brilliant name of a book in 1989.
        
       | cess11 wrote:
       | If one enjoys the Hyperion books, then it is highly likely one
       | would also enjoy the Ilium books.
       | 
       | It's nice that he ruminated on these old stories these books riff
       | on without being smug about it.
       | 
       | It's sad that he didn't manage to resist the fear based, fiercely
       | reactionary politics of the last quarter of a century or so.
        
       | hardlianotion wrote:
       | RIP Dan
        
       | Loughla wrote:
       | Fuck
        
       | globular-toast wrote:
       | A girl I was infatuated with told me to read _Hyperion_ when I
       | was in my early 20s. Never read a book to try to win someone 's
       | affections. It won't work, but what's worse is you won't even
       | enjoy the book.
       | 
       | I read a lot of SF and just last year I thought it was about time
       | I gave it another go. I couldn't put it down. Almost couldn't
       | believe what I was reading, it was so good. Continued to read the
       | other three and it was just a good all the way through. Was quite
       | sad when I finished and it was all over.
       | 
       | It now has a permanent place in my library. I expect I'll enjoy
       | it even more on my next reading. I can only dream of giving
       | people as much joy as an author like Simmons.
        
       | shaunxcode wrote:
       | you mean, author of Song of Kali.
        
         | poisonarena wrote:
         | I remember I was in a hotel in detroit years ago and read the
         | whole book, in pdf form on my laptop, it was that fun!
        
       | clarkmoody wrote:
       | Simmons opened new frontiers of thought for me with his _Hyperion
       | Cantos_. A house with each room on a different planet. A
       | heartbreaking tale of a daughter aging in reverse. A romance
       | playing out over space and time. A grand piano on the pop-out
       | balcony of a starship. The cruciform parasite. The Shrike.
       | 
       | Branches of humanity torn between decadent stagnation and radical
       | evolution. The artificial intelligence civilization with its own
       | agenda. The All Thing (Internet) as the third branch of
       | government.
       | 
       | So much good stuff, published in 1989 no less.
       | 
       | Rest in Peace to a true legend.
        
         | samus wrote:
         | He predicted social media as well. So many themes in this work
         | only mentioned in passing, too many to develop in full...
        
         | libraryofbabel wrote:
         | Oh, boy. The Shrike. That thing still haunts me in a way that
         | no other monster or alien across all of Sci-fi or fantasy
         | really does. It's something about the _inscrutability_ of it,
         | especially in the first novel (still my favorite) where its
         | purpose and backstory haven 't been revealed. Sure, it's scary,
         | but I think the mystery of its motives - and its ability to
         | unpredictably act apparently benevolently sometimes - is where
         | the real terror lies.
        
       | dtj1123 wrote:
       | I have to admit that I found the Hyperion Cantos to be a bit of a
       | disappointment. There were some decent bits and pieces scattered
       | throughout, but overall the story never seemed to resolve into
       | something I could find engaging.
       | 
       | Can someone who liked it share why?
        
         | k__ wrote:
         | Pro: Interesting world building, Canterbury Tales in space,
         | Huckleberry Finn in space, strong female characters.
         | 
         | Con: Pro Judaism and Christianity (albeit with much criticism
         | to both) and anti Islam, awkward sex scenes, awkward Lolita-
         | esque vibes in the latter books.
        
       | takko_the_boss wrote:
       | Rest In Peace Dan Simmons.
       | 
       | R.I.P.
        
       | brcmthrowaway wrote:
       | Does this book date well, or is it cheest/unreadable like
       | Neuromancer?
        
         | k__ wrote:
         | The first too books aged well.
        
       | BigTTYGothGF wrote:
       | I enjoyed the Hyperion books but this got him put on my "never
       | read anything from ever again" list:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20060424105133/http://www.dansim...
        
         | fatbird wrote:
         | Same here. It's a fading memory, but the decade following 9/11
         | really did feature a lot of big brains turning THE COMING
         | CALIPHATE into an existential threat to humanity. Which seems
         | quaint, now.
        
         | ZpJuUuNaQ5 wrote:
         | >never read anything from ever again
         | 
         | I think it's a poisonous and reductive mindset to have. You can
         | separate art from the character of the artist. If you cared
         | about everything everyone has ever said or done in various
         | stages of their lives, you wouldn't have much left to enjoy or
         | appreciate.
        
           | isr wrote:
           | He's referring ... to his "art". Thats what the piece he
           | linked to was a part of.
           | 
           | Its not poisonous nor reductive to decide not to follow an
           | "artist" because his "art" is repulsive.
        
             | ZpJuUuNaQ5 wrote:
             | "I will never read anything by [AUTHOR] because some things
             | [AUTHOR] wrote are now in my no no list."
             | 
             | Sorry, that just doesn't make sense to me.
        
             | lxgr wrote:
             | Sure, but at the same time it's debatable whether even an
             | artist themselves gets to retroactively reinterpret their
             | own art that way.
        
           | ses1984 wrote:
           | On the other hand, there is so so much art out there, I could
           | never hope to consume it all. It's simple for me to use the
           | character of the artist as a filter. I can break that rule
           | whenever I want, but by default, other things being equal, I
           | would prefer to consume art for pleasure from artists I
           | respect as people.
           | 
           | I do consume art from outside this bubble but more to satisfy
           | academic curiosity than pleasure.
        
         | petsfed wrote:
         | So he had a pretty good (not perfect) run up until the final
         | 1/3, then had a staggering turn that only the author thought
         | was profound or earned?
         | 
         | That's a man who lived his craft right there.
        
         | ses1984 wrote:
         | Can you perhaps explain what is objectionable so I don't have
         | to read the objectionable thing?
        
         | pragmatic wrote:
         | Interesting.
         | 
         | I don't think he was particularly kind to any proselytizing
         | religion.
         | 
         | Did you read the Cantos?
        
       | ortusdux wrote:
       | I wonder if the adaptation is still in the works?
       | 
       | https://deadline.com/2021/11/bradley-cooper-set-hyperion-at-...
        
         | genjipress wrote:
         | As a general rule, if an announcement about a movie project is
         | over a year old and nothing else has been mentioned since, you
         | can safely assume it's no longer a thing.
        
       | fr3772 wrote:
       | Read Hyperion some years ago. I was totally trhrilled to read it
       | because of the good reviews... But I was very fast disappointed
       | about the overwhelming focus on boring religion. The interessting
       | stuff like TechnoCore was so sparse that I never came into a flow
       | reading the book. After 2/3 I just wanted to finish it fast.
        
       | saltysalt wrote:
       | Oh no! I just finished reading Hyperion this week and it has
       | become one of my favorite books of all time. I will treasure my
       | signed copy more so now, RIP.
        
       | anvuong wrote:
       | RIP
       | 
       | Hyperion Cantos is the most influential scifi story I've ever
       | read personally. The first book is a masterpiece, while the rest
       | remains one of the greats.
       | 
       | :(
        
       | ChicagoDave wrote:
       | Hyperion was the first science fiction book that made me cry.
       | 
       | I love all four books in the series.
       | 
       | I never really engaged in any of his other writing. I have a
       | signed copy of Ilium but never read it.
        
       | skipkey wrote:
       | Back in the 90s and the early aughts Simmons was on my
       | "automatically buy everything he writes" list. But it seemed like
       | he had stopped writing. But then I happened to browse Barnes and
       | Noble beyond the SF&F and horror aisles and discovered he had
       | been writing crime novels. And they were good.
       | 
       | I think if he had ever decided to write romance novels I would
       | have probably enjoyed those as well.
        
       | mark_l_watson wrote:
       | I enjoyed his sci-fi so much. Rest in peace brother.
        
       | hyperion2010 wrote:
       | To me, the Hyperion Cantos present a vision of the future that is
       | incredibly hopeful. The path along the way may at times be bleak,
       | and I find the handling of the TechnoCore to reveal echos of the
       | great chain in a work that otherwise seems to totally reject it.
       | Despite those and a few other shortcomings the Cantos are
       | essential guides for charting our way toward a distant future
       | that is filled with warmth, love, and compassion rather than the
       | cold empty void of hate. To receive such a vision is a rare gift.
       | Thank you Dan. Choose again.
        
       | StillBored wrote:
       | RIP, truly one of the greats.
       | 
       | His early stuff contains some real masterworks. Hyperion is still
       | to this day, going to show up at the top of my scifi recommended
       | reading list, most of his horror novels were also great in their
       | own ways.
       | 
       | PS: I thought Fall of Hyperion should have been the end, it was
       | just too final. There was plenty of space for some prequels but
       | while the sequels contained some interesting ideas, they just
       | never got to the level I felt justified reversing the finality of
       | Fall. And Olympus/etc was pretty forgettable, but I don't regret
       | the time I spent reading pretty much everything he wrote,
       | sometimes more than once. So again, RIP.
        
       | funemployed wrote:
       | The books were incredibly influential on me as a teenager, twenty
       | years later on re-reading the cantos I found some of the specific
       | language around intergenerational romance to be troubling and the
       | focus on it to be a major distraction from the rest of the
       | excellent story.
       | 
       | Praying for his friends and family. RIP
        
         | Agingcoder wrote:
         | I read the book years ago so might have forgotten - what
         | intergenerational romance ?
        
       | Gazoche wrote:
       | I have never read an ending that was as sad, happy, clever and
       | beautiful as the ending to _Rise of Endymion_. To this day it 's
       | one of the very few books that made me shed a tear.
       | 
       | Now, over decade later, I am in the middle of re-reading every
       | book in the _Cantos_ series back to back (this time in their
       | original language), and still loving them.
       | 
       | Rest in peace Mr Simmons. You had the words of a poet and the
       | mind of a dreamer.
        
       | eatonphil wrote:
       | I really liked Children of the Night.
        
       | elorm wrote:
       | Simmons wrote one of my favourite short stories of all time
       | _Vanni Fucci is Alive and Well and living in Hell_.
       | 
       | While I'm definitely not willing to put myself through any of his
       | books after 9/11, I haven't stopped recommending Vanni Fucci as
       | an introduction to Dan Simmons.
       | 
       | Rest in peace.
        
       | crorella wrote:
       | I am sad to know about this, Dan Simmons had a mind blowing
       | amount of imagination and the ability to turn that into
       | interesting and imaginative books that expanded my imagination
       | when I read them.
       | 
       | I loved Hyperion cantos, Illium and then non sci-fi books like A
       | Winter Haunting and Summer of night (which I read in the wrong
       | order lol).
       | 
       | I am also happy to read that he was a great person overall and a
       | great teacher. May he rest in peace.
        
       | loloquwowndueo wrote:
       | It's all about the Hyperion Cantos which is fair but - the one
       | Dan Simmons book we still talk about, years later, is his first
       | novel: Song of Kali. Short and raw, one of the most horrifying
       | books I've ever read.
        
       | colkassad wrote:
       | I've had this internet handle since the last century. Most people
       | in here are talking about Hyperion but Simmons was a fantastic
       | cross-genre author. My favorites were his historical fiction that
       | contained a fantastical bent:
       | 
       | Drood: Has Wilkie Collins as an unreliable narrator, depicting
       | the last five or so years of Charles Dickens' life.
       | 
       | Crook Factory: An FBI agent is sent to Cuba to keep an eye on
       | Ernest Hemingway, hijinks ensue.
       | 
       | The Fifth Heart: Henry James and Sherlock Holmes team up to solve
       | a mystery.
       | 
       | The Terror: Tells the story of what happened to the HMS Terror
       | that attempted to make the northwest passage. The Arctic is a
       | character in itself in this amazing story. I thought the TV mini-
       | series was fine.
       | 
       | Abominable and Black Hills: I haven't read these yet but look
       | forward to doing so.
       | 
       | Honestly, I think Dan Simmons is my favorite author. I know his
       | politics became unpalatable but I could never find it in myself
       | to care. My heart sank when I saw this post.
        
       | tetrisgm wrote:
       | Thank you for the wonderful stories. Hyperion was such a trip. It
       | managed to move me, an aging hardcore sci-fi fan, with its silly,
       | chaotic, poetic universe.
        
       | FpUser wrote:
       | RIP. Absolutely loved his writings
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-27 23:00 UTC)