[HN Gopher] Old School Visual Effects: The Cloud Tank (2010)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Old School Visual Effects: The Cloud Tank (2010)
        
       Author : exvi
       Score  : 91 points
       Date   : 2026-02-19 06:43 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (singlemindedmovieblog.blogspot.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (singlemindedmovieblog.blogspot.com)
        
       | xfeeefeee wrote:
       | Really cool to see this here. I always loved these in movies.
       | There are a bunch of really interesting artists making use of ink
       | ink liquid, oils, chemical reactions etc that create beautiful
       | abstract pieces. Fitting for HN, Roman De Giuli even creates his
       | own machines. Check out Emitter https://youtu.be/VMd608zCEWc
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | I have a couple of friends really into paint pouring, and I've
         | tried to make interesting videos of it in the past. It never
         | comes out well because they are still trying to make a finished
         | art piece instead of making a video art piece. I feel like
         | Roman here decided the video was the art. The spillage at the
         | end of one of these shoots must be pretty interesting as well.
         | The pooled paint will retain the patterns in a compressed form,
         | but the paint will be pretty thick that when dried becomes an
         | interesting sculpture in itself. I'd love to see some of those.
        
       | mgot wrote:
       | Great article, big fan of stuff like this. (Recommending
       | Corridors VFX series, for ppl who want something similar).
       | 
       | However, checking the authors "Top/Worst films of the year",
       | being called the "Single Minded Movie Blog" seems fitting, and
       | not in the way they think. Some of the worst movie takes I've
       | seen hahahahh
        
         | whycome wrote:
         | What makes a take bad?
        
           | DoctorOW wrote:
           | Apparently thinking _One Battle After Another (2025)_ is
           | "without a doubt THE most insufferable movie of the year" (<h
           | ttps://singlemindedmovieblog.blogspot.com/2026/01/bottom-10..
           | .>)
        
             | thinkingQueen wrote:
             | It looks like he's confusing Paul Thomas Anderson with Paul
             | W. S. Anderson. The latter directed Resident Evil, which
             | the author refers to.
        
       | BoredPositron wrote:
       | If you are interested in old school vfx work there is a great
       | documentary about the early days of vfx called "Light and Magic."
        
         | dblohm7 wrote:
         | I really love VFX in the period between Star Wars and Jurassic
         | Park. To me it will always be the "golden age" of VFX.
        
           | steve1977 wrote:
           | The 80s have been the golden age of many things I think.
        
       | JKCalhoun wrote:
       | _Close Encounters of the Third Kind_ was indeed when I first
       | noticed this effect. It was dramatic and cool and all that, but
       | pretty obviously an effect. Coupling it with _Raiders of the Lost
       | Ark_ and the effect almost pigeon-holes a film to be of that era.
       | 
       | I'm unsurprised Douglas Trumbull was behind the _Close
       | Encounters_ effect since his work on _2001: A Space Odyssey_
       | captured his earliest experiments filming tanks of liquids with
       | fluids added. They were fairly effective in Kubrick 's film when
       | they appeared to resemble fantastic nebulae, globular clusters...
       | 
       | (And never mind the mind-bending cleverness of how the slit-scan
       | shots were created for _2001_.)
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Growing up my mom pointed out that she could tell it was a
         | Spielberg movie by the cloud effect. It wasn't until I was
         | older and rewatched them to see she wasn't wrong. I'm pretty
         | sure it was the first time I learned about little signatures
         | like this, or how a director will use the same camera move in
         | every movie. But the Spielberg clouds was one of the things
         | that really got me interested in the magic of movie making.
        
           | JKCalhoun wrote:
           | Agree.
           | 
           | In fact, ha ha, when I was a teen, I set up a window pane as
           | level as I could with a Super-8 camera beneath pointing up. I
           | added water to about an inch in depth (about all I could
           | manage for the window frame) and then poured milk in to
           | create the cloud effect.
           | 
           | I don't have a recollection of seeing the resulting footage,
           | making me wonder if I bothered filming it. Perhaps from the
           | camera point of view all I got was reflections--or perhaps
           | the whole thing was underexposed. Regardless, it was fun to
           | be young and experimenting like that.
           | 
           | My best low-budget effect (not counting the stop-motion
           | animation I experimented with--of course) was when I set my
           | Super-8 camera upside down on a tripod outside at night. I
           | had a piece of glass (the same glass window frame?) and had
           | painted the silhouette of a house in black paint. The windows
           | of the house were left clear but with white paper backing.
           | 
           | The camera was set up to film the glass-painted house outside
           | at night with the sky/trees/stars that were outside as a
           | natural backdrop through the glass. With the camera rolling I
           | had a small light on behind the glass that made the windows
           | of the house appear to be on. I turned it off after the
           | camera rolled for a few seconds. Then I briefly kicked on a
           | very powerful light that caused a quite a flash behind the
           | silhouetted house.
           | 
           | The last thing to film was a thread I had hanging behind the
           | glass that I set on fire with a lighter. It quickly burned up
           | the thread as the camera rolled.
           | 
           | When the film came back I flipped it around end for end,
           | splicing it back into the final roll of film. The inverted
           | camera footage was now right-side up but with the film
           | playing in reverse.
           | 
           | And so the thread had become instead a flame like a meteor
           | crashing to the ground--resulting in a bright flash. Seconds
           | later the lights in the house come on.
        
             | steve1977 wrote:
             | I love that story. It illustrates perfectly what fascinated
             | me so much about visual effects as a kid, and maybe also
             | why I lost some of that fascination when CGI took over.
             | Even though I was also very interested in computers back
             | then (and I really loved Tron).
             | 
             | There was so much creativity involved and out of the box
             | thinking about physics and time and optics, to craft
             | something that in the end resulted in a nice optical
             | illusion. Like a magic trick (interestingly, in German
             | visual and special effects are (or were) also called
             | "Filmtricks").
             | 
             | Now with CGI, everything is possible and paradoxically,
             | that makes it more boring somehow. And sometimes practical
             | effects still look better IMHO.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | I wasn't that young, but we tried with a cheap plastic 20
             | gallon fish tank which gave us a bit more depth. It was
             | before LEDs, so all we had were hot lights that wound up
             | needing to be very close to the tank to get the amount of
             | light needed. Over the course of the day, that heat
             | actually melted the tank which meant we no longer had a 20
             | gallon tank but whatever the volume was below the melted
             | part where it would start to leak.
             | 
             | I love your attempt at a practical to that level. I have
             | one that I'm still working on with long exposure timelapse
             | and motion control, but I just can't ever get my schedule
             | to let me do it. I have models of flying saucers with
             | little aliens at the helm that I've rigged up with LEDs
             | connected to an Arduino. That also controls the motion
             | control slider I have, and the camera shutter. The idea was
             | to turn on the UFO lights for a very short duration while
             | the shutter is open to keep from over exposing during the
             | long exposure to capture the night sky in the background.
             | There is no point in doing the shot, except just because. I
             | have the problem of when I have free time, the weather is
             | shite or the wrong time of the year for the part of the sky
             | I want.
        
       | steve1977 wrote:
       | I vaguely remember having tried this myself with a very small
       | aquarium and liquid latex (IIRC), filmed with my Super 8 cam in
       | slow motion (which meant 36 frames instead of 18).
       | 
       | The results weren't that impressive, but it was fun, as was all
       | the Super 8 stuff. I kind of miss those times and I see at least
       | one other poster seems to have similar recollections :)
       | 
       | To add another nice example of this effect, which is where I
       | learned about it, is The NeverEnding Story (1984). There it's
       | used for the "nothing"
       | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPfQogtS2Eo) and also in the
       | opening of the US release
       | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCgfRC6gHtI). The original
       | German release only had text on a black background.
       | 
       | It might not look the most realistic, but IMHO it still looks
       | beautiful.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-19 23:01 UTC)