[HN Gopher] Single bone in Spain offers first direct evidence of...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Single bone in Spain offers first direct evidence of Hannibal's war
       elephants
        
       Author : Archelaos
       Score  : 88 points
       Date   : 2026-02-06 19:25 UTC (5 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (phys.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
        
       | keeganpoppen wrote:
       | score yet another win for the stories of antiquity being more
       | right than wrong.
        
         | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
         | I think it would be more accurate to say "based upon true
         | events".
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | I don't think anyone doubted the story. The details might be
         | questionable, but the basics that he tried to fight with
         | elephants is highly likely. We have plenty of sources for War
         | Elephants in his time, so the idea that he didn't have them
         | would be the larger surprise if someone could prove that.
        
         | arduanika wrote:
         | It's more like, the surviving written histories and the
         | archaeological record are each giving us only a part of the
         | real truth. It's as if they're both grasping in the dark at two
         | different parts of the same elephant.
        
       | L2007W wrote:
       | Herodotus wrote of fire breathing ants in Egypt.
        
         | RupertSalt wrote:
         | He was referring to his mother's sisters.
         | 
         | Misinterpreted all the time. Very similar terms in the Greek
         | sources.
        
       | Starman_Jones wrote:
       | Worth noting that these would have been North African elephants,
       | a now-extinct subspecies. It is not as tall as the modern African
       | elephant - 2.5m at the shoulder, as compared to 3 to 3.5m for
       | African elephants. A large warhorse might measure 1.5m tall, for
       | comparison.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_African_elephant
        
         | Mordisquitos wrote:
         | It is my understanding that Asian elephants are easier to tame
         | by humans than African elephants, which is evident just by
         | seeing how elephants are used in parts of Asia and how they are
         | used (not) in Africa. Also circus elephants, when they were
         | still common, would always be Asian elephants and not African
         | ones. The reason I'm pointing this out is that I wonder whether
         | the North African subspecies was more amenable to taming than
         | still extant subspecies of the African elephant.
        
           | wahern wrote:
           | There are multiple species of African elephants, and the
           | North African elephant may yet turn out to be related if not
           | identical to one of the others: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
           | /North_African_elephant#Taxonom... The African forest
           | elephant is of similar size, and it would be interesting if
           | the forest elephant is indeed more easily trained.
        
         | rightbyte wrote:
         | > A large warhorse might measure 1.5m tall, for comparison.
         | 
         | By sadle hight not at ear top hight, right?
        
           | Starman_Jones wrote:
           | Correct :)
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_%28unit%29
        
           | metalman wrote:
           | ears will be at 8' or above on a real tank
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_elephant
           | 
           | mentions hannibals last surviving elephant by name
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | Shoulder height.
        
       | AdmiralAsshat wrote:
       | Terror Lake salutes Hannibal crossing the alps
        
       | Insanity wrote:
       | This month I read "Carthage Must Be Destroyed"
       | (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10133950-carthage-
       | must-b...), which dives deep into Hannibal's war against Rome
       | (and the other punic wars).
       | 
       | I highly recommend reading about what happened from the
       | Carthaginian perspective instead of the typical Roman
       | perspective.
       | 
       | There's also some elaboration on the usage of elephants, the
       | feasibility of of this, and how ultimately ineffective it was for
       | war. (It was great for scaring the enemy, but the issue is they
       | indiscriminately hurt both armies).
        
       | jimnotgym wrote:
       | Hannibal loved it when a plan came together.
       | 
       | The latter years of his life must have been very disappointing
        
         | awesome_dude wrote:
         | I ain't gettin' on no plane Hannibal!
        
       | dzink wrote:
       | After interacting with some Asian elephants with handlers
       | recently this makes a lot more sense. Even if he used North
       | African elephants - they can hike up and down mountains and rough
       | terrain easily with stability. I'm assuming they could pull
       | equipment and even potentially be armed and armored. They are
       | incredible creatures.
        
       | drewnoakes wrote:
       | I highly recommend "The Fall of Civilisations" podcast's episode
       | on this topic. it's such an epic story and the narrator builds
       | such a rich picture of the times and events.
       | 
       | https://fallofcivilizationspodcast.com/2023/04/11/%F0%9F%90%...
        
         | drewnoakes wrote:
         | There's also a video version of the episode on YouTube:
         | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6dbdVhVSat8
        
         | dkislyuk wrote:
         | The Paul Cooper production is great. The Rest Is History also
         | just finished a long series (spread out in three seasons,
         | starting on episode 421) on the Punic wars, similarly well
         | done.
        
       | hinkley wrote:
       | Something often left out of fiction about war is how easily a
       | moving army can overwhelm a local ecosystem, particularly if its
       | supply lines sag. You might not even be their target, and yet you
       | will be pillaged. No more easy hunting for you for years. No more
       | quick trips for firewood, or tinder.
       | 
       | It stands to reason that if an occupying force doesn't stay long
       | in an area, and its animals die along the way, that the now
       | destitute locals will take the "road kill" and scrounge every
       | possible calorie from it. And marrow was a dish rather than
       | something for soup stock up until the modern era. The Illiad
       | basically won't shut up about it.
       | 
       | So I have no doubt that every dead elephant anyone could find was
       | 100% rendered down into food and leather by the beleaguered
       | locals. And probably every cousin from one village over got told
       | about the find too. (I suspect elephant leather would make
       | amazing peasant shoes)
        
         | HPsquared wrote:
         | And perhaps it's not so good even if you are being "defended"
         | by the hungry army! It kind of resembles when a monarch comes
         | to visit a noble; you would need to spend a lot on them and
         | their entourage.
        
         | Archelaos wrote:
         | Why should the army leave a dead elephant on the road? They
         | would butcher it themselves and take the meat with them (and
         | the tusks). The locals may have found some large bones for
         | their living room decorations (and may be some skin, if they
         | were lucky).
        
           | lukan wrote:
           | Because they might be in a hurry to reach that mountain pass
           | before the snow comes. Or to meet other goals set by the
           | general and if already stocked up on supplies, it would be
           | quite a burden to also carry an extra elephant (which was
           | likely also carrying things before it died).
        
         | ahmedfromtunis wrote:
         | > You might not even be their target, and yet you will be
         | pillaged.
         | 
         | Isn't this how Rome was sacked way back when it was just a city
         | among many others in the Italian peninsula? If I recall
         | correctly, this was a wake-up call for the city to start
         | working on protecting itself adequately.
        
         | siofra wrote:
         | > Something often left out of fiction about war is how easily a
         | moving army can overwhelm a local ecosystem, particularly if
         | its supply lines sag. You might not even be their target, and
         | yet you will be pillaged. No more easy hunting for you for
         | years. No more quick trips for firewood, or tinder.
         | 
         | This is also why so many soldiers ended up dead outside of
         | battle, and not from getting stabbed. Why Sun Tzu and
         | Clauzewitz went on and on about logistics.
        
           | ManuelKiessling wrote:
           | Micro-nitpick: it's ,,Clausewitz" with an ,,s".
        
           | contingencies wrote:
           | While indeed an army marches on its stomach, it's easy to
           | miss the fact that the entire field of operations research
           | which now runs such modern marvels as international air
           | transport and major data centers grew out of the field of
           | logistics, which itself grew out of increasing complexity in
           | once primitive military food logistics.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-11 23:00 UTC)