[HN Gopher] LLMs as the new high level language
___________________________________________________________________
LLMs as the new high level language
Author : swah
Score : 11 points
Date : 2026-02-03 10:00 UTC (4 days ago)
(HTM) web link (federicopereiro.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (federicopereiro.com)
| toprerules wrote:
| After working with the latest models I think these "it's just
| another tool" or "another layer of abstraction" or "I'm just
| building at a different level" kind of arguments are wishful
| thinking. You're not going to be a designer writing blueprints
| for a series of workers to execute on, you're barely going to be
| a product manager translating business requirements into a
| technical specification before AI closes that gap as well. I'm
| very convinced non-technical people will be able to use these
| tools, because what I'm seeing is that all of the skills that my
| training and years of experience have helped me hone are now
| implemented by these tools to the level that I know most
| businesses would be satisfied by.
|
| The irony is that I haven't seen AI have nearly as large of an
| impact anywhere else. We truly have automated ourselves out of
| work, people are just catching up with that fact and the people
| that just wanted to make money from software can now finally stop
| pretending that "passion" for "the craft" was every really part
| of their motivating calculus.
| echelon wrote:
| These models are nothing short of astounding.
|
| I can write a spec for an entirely new endpoint, and Claude
| figures out all of the middleware plumbing and the database
| queries. (The catch: this is in Rust and the SQL is raw, without
| an ORM. It just gets it. I'm reviewing the code, too, and it's
| mostly excellent.)
|
| I can ask Claude to add new data to the return payloads - it does
| it, and it can figure out the cache invalidation.
|
| These models are blowing my mind. It's like I have an army of
| juniors I can actually trust.
| TZubiri wrote:
| "Following this hypothesis, what C did to assembler, what Java
| did to C, what Javascript/Python/Perl did to Java, now LLM agents
| are doing to all programming languages."
|
| This is not an appropriate analogy, at least not right now.
|
| Code Agents are generating code from prompts, in that sense the
| metaphor is correct. However Agents then read the code and it
| becomes input and they generate more code. This was never the
| case for compilers, an LLM used in this sense is strictly not a
| compiler because it is not cyclic and not directional.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-02-07 23:00 UTC)