[HN Gopher] Understanding Neural Network, Visually
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Understanding Neural Network, Visually
        
       Author : surprisetalk
       Score  : 192 points
       Date   : 2026-02-03 14:49 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (visualrambling.space)
 (TXT) w3m dump (visualrambling.space)
        
       | brudgers wrote:
       | The original Show HN,
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44633725
        
       | 4fterd4rk wrote:
       | Great explanation, but the last question is quite simple. You
       | determine the weights via brute force. Simply running a large
       | amount of data where you have the input as well as the correct
       | output (handwriting to text in this case).
        
         | ggambetta wrote:
         | "Brute force" would be trying random weights and keeping the
         | best performing model. Backpropagation is compute-intensive but
         | I wouldn't call it "brute force".
        
           | Ygg2 wrote:
           | "Brute force" here is about the amount of data you're
           | ingesting. It's no Alpha Zero, that will learn from scratch.
        
             | jazzpush2 wrote:
             | What? Either option requires sufficient data. Brute force
             | implies iterating over all combinations until you find the
             | best weights. Back-prop is an optimization technique.
        
       | esafak wrote:
       | This is just scratching the surface -- where neural networks were
       | thirty years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MNIST_database
       | 
       | If you want to understand neural networks, keep going.
        
       | helloplanets wrote:
       | For the visual learners, here's a classic intro to how LLMs work:
       | https://bbycroft.net/llm
        
       | tpdly wrote:
       | Lovely visualization. I like the very concrete depiction of
       | middle layers "recognizing features", that make the whole machine
       | feel more plausible. I'm also a fan of visualizing things, but I
       | think its important to appreciate that some things (like 10,000
       | dimension vector as the input, or even a 100 dimension vector as
       | an output) can't be concretely visualized, and you have to
       | develop intuitions in more roundabout ways.
       | 
       | I hope make more of these, I'd love to see a transformer
       | presented more clearly.
        
       | ge96 wrote:
       | I like the style of the site it has a "vintage" look
       | 
       | Don't think it's moire effect but yeah looking at the pattern
        
         | Bengalilol wrote:
         | Lucky you!
         | 
         | <https://visualrambling.space/dithering-part-1/>
         | 
         | <https://visualrambling.space/dithering-part-2/>
        
           | ge96 wrote:
           | Oh god my eyes! As it zooms in (ha)
           | 
           | That's cool, rendering shades in the old days
           | 
           | Man those graphics are so good damn
        
       | javaskrrt wrote:
       | very cool stuff
        
       | cwt137 wrote:
       | This visualizations reminds me of the 3blue1brown videos.
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | I was thinking the same thing. Its at least the same
         | description.
        
       | pks016 wrote:
       | Great visualization!
        
       | anon291 wrote:
       | Nice visuals, but misses the mark. Neural networks transform
       | vector spaces, and collect points into bins. This visualization
       | shows the structure of the computation. This is akin to
       | displaying a Matrix vector multiplication in Wx + b notation,
       | except W,x,and b have more exciting displays.
       | 
       | It completely misses the mark on what it means to 'weight'
       | (linearly transform), bias (affine transform) and then non-
       | linearly transform (i.e, 'collect') points into bins
        
         | titzer wrote:
         | > but misses the mark
         | 
         | It doesn't match the pictures in your head, but it nevertheless
         | does present a mental representation the author (and presumably
         | some readers) find useful.
         | 
         | Instead of nitpicking, perhaps pointing to a _better_
         | visualization (like maybe this video:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChfEO8l-fas) could help others
         | learn. Otherwise it's just frustrating to read comments like
         | this.
        
       | artemonster wrote:
       | I get 3fps on my chrome, most likely due to disabled HW
       | acceleration
        
         | nerdsniper wrote:
         | High FPS on Safari M2 MBP.
        
       | 8cvor6j844qw_d6 wrote:
       | Oh wow, this looks like a 3d render of a perceptron when I
       | started reading about neural networks. I guess essentially neural
       | networks are built based on that idea? Inputs > weight function
       | to to adjust the final output to desired values?
        
         | adammarples wrote:
         | Yes, vanilla neural networks are just lots of perceptrons
        
       | jazzpush2 wrote:
       | I love this visual article as well:
       | 
       | https://mlu-explain.github.io/neural-networks/
        
       | jetfire_1711 wrote:
       | Spent 10 minutes on the site and I think this is where I'll start
       | my day from next week! I just love visual based learning.
        
       | shrekmas wrote:
       | As someone who does not use Twitter, I suggest adding RSS to your
       | site.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-06 23:00 UTC)