[HN Gopher] The fax numbers of the beast, and other mathematical...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The fax numbers of the beast, and other mathematical sports
        
       Author : marysminefnuf
       Score  : 25 points
       Date   : 2026-02-03 07:41 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (cabinetmagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (cabinetmagazine.org)
        
       | fix4fun wrote:
       | 667 - "fax number of the beast" - that was funny ;) The thing
       | about mathematics is that it can tickle your brain - in a
       | creative way.
       | 
       | It's becoming increasingly difficult these days, with so many
       | things competing for your attention and "brain-deadening" you. It
       | was a wonderful thing to be bored and play around with math. My
       | favorite moments were the epiphany - that there is some hidden
       | connection between math areas or something got new meaning.
        
         | NoSalt wrote:
         | I had a similar epiphany in college, somewhere amongst Calc I,
         | II, III, DiffEq, physics, and engineering. I kept meaning to
         | pursue it, but life got in the way and I never did.
         | Unfortunately, I can no longer remember what that epiphany was,
         | and I am sad.
        
       | onionisafruit wrote:
       | I don't know anybody who would both appreciate the fax number of
       | the beast joke and not turn it into a conversation about 617
       | being the real fax number of the beast according to most
       | manuscripts.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Yeah, but using 616 is problematic because it ruins the Barney
         | is the antichrist bit [1], and we wouldn't want to associate
         | NANPA area code 616 with both the beast and Grand Rapids, MI
         | (historically, 616 covered more of western MI)
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.christadelphianbooks.org/agora/bible_books/jff01...
        
       | crtasm wrote:
       | As it doesn't seem to be linked, here is Hofstadter Q-sequence
       | https://oeis.org/A005185
       | 
       | I can't tell which of Chai Wah Wu's submissions the interviewer
       | was referring to.
       | https://oeis.org/search?q=Chai%20Wah%20Wu&fmt=short&sort=cre...
        
         | bazzargh wrote:
         | I think maybe https://oeis.org/A263499
         | 
         | You can shorten the candidates list quite a bit:
         | https://oeis.org/search?q=author%3A%22Chai+Wah+Wu%22+2015+Pr...
         | 
         | The article says "Spring 2015" but in fact the magazine was
         | published December 29, 2015. In the text it mentions
         | https://oeis.org/history?seq=A250001 so the interview could not
         | have been earlier than October 2015; Wu's sequence is "recent".
         | 
         | There's a few sequences that jump out, this one, and the prime
         | palindromes of 0's and 1s whose squares are palindromes; but
         | that was August and seems too early.
        
       | hwd wrote:
       | Strange. In the article A138563 is described as a sequence of
       | prime numbers that contain the substring 667. But these are
       | obviously not prime numbers. Having a look at
       | https://oeis.org/A138563 reveals that these are simply any
       | numbers containing the substring.
        
         | tomtomtom777 wrote:
         | Well, they do mention they are looking up whether it exists
         | during the interview, so it's a forgivable mistake.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | https://oeis.org/A321001 is what they wanted, obviously easy to
         | get them confused.
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | https://oeis.org/ is the page, interestingly enough
       | https://oeis.org/A000001 is _not_ the  "positive integers" -
       | that's https://oeis.org/A000027
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-04 23:01 UTC)