[HN Gopher] Geologists may have solved mystery of Green River's ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Geologists may have solved mystery of Green River's 'uphill' route
        
       Author : defrost
       Score  : 162 points
       Date   : 2026-02-02 13:29 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (phys.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
        
       | namenotrequired wrote:
       | Can we take a moment to appreciate that Dr. Adam Smith works at
       | the University of Glasgow?
        
       | sethgrisham wrote:
       | The invisible hand of the lithospheric drip
        
         | IAmBroom wrote:
         | You sly dog.
        
         | cwmoore wrote:
         | I would like to offer a digression on silver, but as it turns
         | out the area was occupied initially for the fur trade:
         | 
         | https://npshistory.com/publications/dino/green_river.pdf
        
       | anthomtb wrote:
       | Why does this article have a picture of the Maroon Bells? As
       | opposed to something along Green River or, ideally, the 700m deep
       | canyon being described?
        
         | indoordin0saur wrote:
         | Having recently gotten into watching documentaries or youtube
         | videos of accounts of mountaineering expeditions it's amazing
         | how lazy content creators, film makers and journalists can be
         | when choosing what images or videos to show. You'll get
         | something about climbing a mountain in the Andes and keep
         | getting shown completely misleading pictures of Himalayan
         | mountains, etc.
        
           | PyWoody wrote:
           | Simple, lazy stuff like that always drives me up the wall.
           | 
           | The HGTV show House Hunters used to be _wildly_ inaccurate
           | with their map location pins. On more than one occasion they
           | 'd say a couple is from the Bay Area but when they show the
           | map the location pin would be in LA County. Like, come on.
           | That's not even close.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | Maybe the pin was closer and they were lying about it being
             | in the Bay Area???
             | 
             | Also, no need for exact location for these pins. The new
             | home owners probably are fine with it not being exact
        
             | toast0 wrote:
             | There's a lot of duplicated geographic names in Northern
             | and Southern California. If the production house isn't in
             | the area, it's hard, close enough.
             | 
             | I lived in Burbank, but I was in the unincorporated area of
             | Santa Clara County, not the incorporated city in LA County.
             | Incidentally, I was living in the South Bay, but not the
             | South Bay in LA County, or the South Bay in San Diego
             | County.
             | 
             | Anyway, perhaps the couple is _from_ the Bay Area, but
             | their house is in LA County right now. :P
        
               | PyWoody wrote:
               | A specific one that I'll never forget was actually a
               | House Hunters International episode. It was years ago but
               | the pin being off by about 400 miles burned it into my
               | memory lol
               | 
               | I think they were moving from Market Street to Amsterdam.
        
               | IncreasePosts wrote:
               | Clearly they're referring to the Santa Monica Bay Area
        
           | gedy wrote:
           | I think it's largely because they are "content creators"
           | instead of trying to tell a story or share information.
        
             | indoordin0saur wrote:
             | I'll notice this with TV documentaries and segments on news
             | channels quite frequently as well. I have the "GeoGuessr
             | gene" as well as being decently well travelled so I spot
             | this stuff all the time. One particular pet peeve of mine
             | is movies or shows mean to be shot in medieval Europe but
             | the "forest" they use is actually a tree plantation of
             | North American native trees such as Sitka Spruce.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | The content you create is only as good as the stock footage
           | you have available to you. It's not like these people are
           | trekking to the locations to acquire their own content. If
           | you search in stock libraries for mountaineering in the
           | Andes, and it only brings you footage from the Himalayas
           | you're just going to use it.
        
             | QuadmasterXLII wrote:
             | plenty of them are traveling, and the extent to which you
             | see videos of people putting together stock footage
             | indicates failure of the algorithm. although at this point,
             | the algorithm has failed hard enough that I am down to
             | subscriptions and chronological feed.
             | 
             | Although, this larger structure did create one of my
             | favorite internet algorithm outcomes: There is obviously
             | intense hunger for authentic mountain videos narrated in a
             | generic minecraft youtuber voice, and the resulting
             | incentive gradient physically yeeted a minecraft youtuber
             | to the top of mount everest
             | (https://www.youtube.com/@RyanMitchellYT)
        
         | wil421 wrote:
         | Darn AI agents, I guess they are still cheaper than interns.
        
           | MarkusQ wrote:
           | Sadly, they "learned" it from us. People have been doing this
           | sort of shoddy fill work since the dawn of television (and
           | even earlier if you count wildly misplaced / inaccurate
           | textual descriptions).
        
           | terminalshort wrote:
           | Judging by the performance of AI agents at Geoguessr I
           | suspect such errors are almost 100% humans:
           | 
           | https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/testing-ais-geoguessr-
           | geniu...
        
         | gus_massa wrote:
         | I was confused by the image too:
         | 
         | A few images:
         | https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=4e98a81333b88c42&udm=2...
         | 
         | Map with elevation:
         | https://www.google.com/maps/place/Gates+of+Lodore/@40.585090...
        
         | legitster wrote:
         | > Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
         | 
         | Using what they can from free, public domain sources.
        
       | shermantanktop wrote:
       | Fascinating to think of entire mountain ranges moving up and down
       | like the skin on a wobbly pudding.
        
         | SideburnsOfDoom wrote:
         | And the speed at which it happens:
         | 
         | > a cold, round anomaly about 200 km below the surface.
         | 
         | > By estimating how far the drip had fallen and calculating the
         | speed of its descent, the researchers estimate that the drip
         | broke off between 2 and 5 million years ago.
         | 
         | A few megayears later, the bit that broke off is still falling.
         | 
         | 200km in 2m years, I make that in the ballpark of 0.1m per year
         | - a bit less if it's > 2m years, and started below the surface.
        
           | toss1 wrote:
           | Makes the Pitch Drop Experiment [0] seem jump-to-warp-speed
           | fast!
           | 
           | [0] https://smp.uq.edu.au/pitch-drop-experiment
        
       | markbnj wrote:
       | For people interested in the subject generally I highly recommend
       | John McPhee's anthology "Annals of the Former World." Actually I
       | highly recommend everything John McPhee has written but this is a
       | good start :).
        
         | arethuza wrote:
         | I can also recommend: _" The Earth: An Intimate History"_ by
         | Richard Fortey
        
         | mclaurin10 wrote:
         | Second for John McPhee! Also Rising From the Plains.
        
         | pengaru wrote:
         | References to his books should carry a warning - something to
         | the effect of:
         | 
         | "may inspire circuitous road trips involving many stops
         | dangerously examining road-cuts on busy interstate highways"
        
           | jhundal wrote:
           | I would pay good money for a field guide/itinerary to
           | accompany "Assembling California".
           | 
           | More directly related to the Green River, I found Wayne
           | Ranney's "Carving Grand Canyon: Evidence, Theories, and
           | Mystery" an accessible/engaging intro to deep geological
           | mysteries.
        
         | OisinMoran wrote:
         | Can vouch for his "Oranges" too! A phenomenal writer
        
         | jonstewart wrote:
         | I just finished Annals of the Former World. It's essentially a
         | 700 page-long ode to geology, using scientific terms for their
         | prosody as much as their meaning. I once saw someone else
         | remark that "Rising from the Plains" was the greatest western
         | ever written.
         | 
         | I used to think geology was a dumb science, but this book
         | single-handedly made me obsessed with the topic. Geology is
         | really more like "earth history" and it's a startlingly young
         | field, a dynamic which plays out across the volumes.
        
         | jamincan wrote:
         | And if you manage to wade through that tome, Myron Cook's
         | Youtube channel [1] is an excellent place to continue your
         | exploration of geology.
         | 
         | 1. https://www.youtube.com/@myroncook
        
       | gwerbret wrote:
       | The actual paper (open access):
       | https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/202...
        
       | phkahler wrote:
       | What about ice pressing down? The repeated glaciations might have
       | pushed in area down and back up several times over 6 million
       | years. Might have even caused that drip to break off.
        
         | wiml wrote:
         | That wouldn't cause the "bullseye" pattern the article
         | describes, would it?
         | 
         | I don't think the recent glaciation got as far south at Utah,
         | anyway.
        
           | grosswait wrote:
           | You may be referring to the ice sheet, but there have been
           | many periods of alpine glaciation in Utah. https://www.scienc
           | edirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02773... and
           | https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/utahs-
           | glacial-...
        
         | compiler-guy wrote:
         | It's a detailed paper by five highly qualified researchers,
         | with over 100 citations, and thanks six different reviewers.
         | 
         | It seems very likely to me that they would have said something
         | about this theory if it were relevant.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | A time lapse video would have been great.
        
         | stubish wrote:
         | Unfortunately the camera was lost to flooding about 2.5m years
         | ago, so the only visual records are some rock art.
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | The relevant photons are still flying through space. And with
           | a time lapse video of this scale, clouds are not a problem.
        
             | fuzzfactor wrote:
             | The replacement camera is rocketing out there right now,
             | faster than the speed of light to catch up with those
             | photons.
             | 
             | That'll bring those pictures back, lickety-split.
             | 
             | Too bad it had to go back in time to do so, so it might not
             | be overnight :\
             | 
             | I love an advanced civilization anyway, I'll be getting the
             | popcorn ready ;)
        
       | jongjong wrote:
       | Geology is fascinating. When geologists describe effects over
       | long periods of time, it's like they're describing liquids, not
       | solid matter.
       | 
       | It's interesting to think about the fact that on a long enough
       | timeline, all the matter that we consider to be solid actually
       | behaves more like liquid; bobbing up and down like a rough ocean.
       | The continents shifting apart like two opposing currents with the
       | plagues sliding one above another like what happens when two
       | great currents meet... All the solid objects we interact with are
       | like liquids frozen in time and we're actually moving through
       | time extremely rapidly. So rapidly that we are able to
       | temporarily shape the 'liquids' before they eventually
       | disintegrate and melt into a puddle; as also happens to us.
       | 
       | Thinking about the world in this way makes everything we do seem
       | much more complex, but at the same time, more futile, than it
       | initially appears.
        
       | qwerty_clicks wrote:
       | As a geologist with 2 degrees and a lot of passion in the
       | subject, I've never heard of lithospheric drip related to
       | orogenic dips until now, but I love it and kick myself for not
       | questioning the over simplicity of typical thought around lower
       | crust processes enough.
        
         | defrost wrote:
         | As an exploration geophyicist who 1/ posted this, and 2/ can
         | bang rocks together, I wonder if you've heard of _Continental
         | Drip_ , Ormonde de Kay, 1973.
         | 
         | It introduces an entire other level of simplistic thought.
         | 
         | The _Sudpolarfluchtkraft_ is out there.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-03 23:02 UTC)