[HN Gopher] A Crisis comes to Wordle: Reusing old words
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Crisis comes to Wordle: Reusing old words
        
       Author : cyanbane
       Score  : 37 points
       Date   : 2026-02-01 17:54 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (forkingmad.blog)
 (TXT) w3m dump (forkingmad.blog)
        
       | tuwtuwtuwtuw wrote:
       | I am guessing a high percentage of wordle players prefer a wordle
       | version which uses common words, and New York Times would prefer
       | cater to those, rather than a smaller group of enthusiasts.
        
         | f_allwein wrote:
         | Maybe it should be ,,forked"
        
       | hombre_fatal wrote:
       | 1. Wordle's word list is going to be a lot more curated than
       | TFA's word list because people want to guess words they use or
       | have heard of, not "aahed".
       | 
       | 2. Only a tiny group of people care to "card count" Wordle to
       | rule out words that have already been played because they think
       | that sort of min/maxing is fun. Most people don't even think
       | about that, so whether Wordle reuses words every few years is
       | trivial to them.
        
         | deanputney wrote:
         | I will say that having used the same starter word the whole
         | time that has not come up yet, it's a little disappointing that
         | it may now take even longer to appear.
        
         | pseudosavant wrote:
         | The Wordle list is available here (in addition to many other
         | places): https://github.com/pseudosavant/ps-web-
         | tools/blob/main/wordl...
        
         | tzs wrote:
         | > Wordle's word list is going to be a lot more curated than
         | TFA's word list because people want to guess words they use or
         | have heard of, not "aahed"
         | 
         | The Times sure doesn't think that about the people who do
         | Letter Boxed. One LB had "polymethylmethacrylate" in its
         | dictionary.
         | 
         | I've saved the daily dictionaries from 2024-03-30 and that's
         | the longest word out of the 93 393 total distinct words in the
         | 674 dictionaries I've saved. They average 1199.47 words per
         | dictionary.
         | 
         | They have some truly ridiculous words, such as "troughgeng".
         | WTF is a troughgeng? Googling that gives a couple of pages in
         | Chinese (or a similar looking language) and a Scottish
         | dictionary entry for "Throu" which in one of the examples of
         | "throu" as an adverb lists a bunch of phrases is it used in,
         | including:
         | 
         | > (8) througang, throw-, throoging, trough-geng, -geong (Sh.,
         | Ork.), (i) a going over or through; a passage (I.Sc. 1972);
         | specif. (ii) a narration, a recital (of a story); (iii) a full
         | rotation of crops, a shift; (iv) a thoroughfare, lane,
         | passageway, corridor open at either end (Sc. 1808 Jam.; Sh.
         | 1908 Jak. (1928); Rxb. 1923 Watson W.-B.; Ork., w.Lth., wm.Sc.
         | 1972). Also attrib.; (v) = (5); (vi) energy, drive (Bnff. 1866
         | Gregor D. Bnff. 192);
        
       | Aardwolf wrote:
       | Every now and then I play quordle, octordle, and once a thousand-
       | word variation (which breaks down gameplaywise to just getting
       | every letter at every spot).
       | 
       | A bit of reuse of the same word in the one-word version can't
       | hurt I think
        
       | trothamel wrote:
       | If I remember correctly, the original version of wordle used a
       | word list that was run past the creator's wife, who had learned
       | English later in life. The result was a really accessible game -
       | none of the words felt like ones you wouldn't know. It probably
       | makes sense to reuse words than risk losing that accessibility.
       | 
       | (I kept a copy of original wordle, and it seems to have 2,315
       | words that are possible answers.)
        
         | jonwinstanley wrote:
         | Yes there's no point using technically correct words if hardly
         | anyone know them.
        
           | sobkas wrote:
           | Language or the way we use it is often used to exclude
           | "undesired", so there is a point in using them. Not a very
           | nice point, but a point nevertheless.
        
           | hyperbovine wrote:
           | Sure there is, as long as your audience does.
        
         | knuckleheads wrote:
         | Yes, that's correct! Took her about a year off and on, he had
         | made a little app for her to go through and categorize
         | everything.
         | 
         | As an aside, for about $200, you can ask a true/false question
         | of every word in the English language with a frontier LLM, and
         | get mostly good answers. I make word games in my free time and
         | was sort of shocked when I realized how cheap intelligence has
         | been getting.
        
         | BurningFrog wrote:
         | This may well be why the game became such a hit among everyone.
        
         | hyperbovine wrote:
         | It's this. There are many five letter words that are not
         | "wordley". Words such as, idk, bokeh, are technically part of
         | the lexicon but would never appear as a solution. The wordle
         | bot will even tell you this if you guess them -- "good guess,
         | but unlikely to appear as a solution". The crossword has a
         | similar sort of unwritten rule, maybe not as strict, but really
         | hard technical words seldom appear.
        
           | gretch wrote:
           | > The crossword has a similar sort of unwritten rule, maybe
           | not as strict, but really hard technical words seldom appear.
           | 
           | Not my experience at all.
           | 
           | Ask me how I know what an EPEE is
        
       | znkynz wrote:
       | Connections is better anyway.
        
         | AndrewDucker wrote:
         | It's a very different kind of game. I don't think it's at all
         | comparable.
        
         | AnotherGoodName wrote:
         | I recommend anything at https://www.merriam-webster.com/games
         | for these sorts of games. Lots of wordle variations and all add
         | free.
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | I find Quordle a much better game than Wordle, since there is
           | some real strategy involved, but still not overly much.
        
         | dobladov wrote:
         | My favorite right now is https://tiledwords.com/, not
         | affiliated to it in any way, I just enjoy it.
        
           | paulhebert wrote:
           | Hey, thanks! I'm glad you're enjoying it! (I'm the creator)
        
         | Lerc wrote:
         | Connections is infuriating.
         | 
         | Not only are they using regional specific knowledge, but they
         | use regional relative concepts.
         | 
         | Many people do not agree that ant rhymes with aunt.
         | 
         | The recent Homophones of words meaning brutal.
         | 
         | Gorey, Grimm, Grizzly, Scarry.
         | 
         | I am guessin that Grimm is a eponym which makes it nebulous at
         | best, eponyms take a lot of use to be regarded in objective
         | terms rather than as invoking an arbartrary property of the
         | name holder. Kafkaesque rises to that use. I don't think Grimm
         | does.
         | 
         | I have no idea if Scarry is supposed to be a homonym for scary.
         | Which it neither sounds like nor means brutal.
         | 
         | Perhaps there is another word that means brutal that sounds
         | like however the person who makes connections thinks Scarry is
         | pronounced.
         | 
         | In which case it would be a homonym of a synonym of brutal.
         | 
         | I also do not live in the same country as only connect, yet do
         | not have such issues with their walls.
         | 
         | The real problem is that while you might be wrong about an
         | answer, once you lose faith that the puzzle setter is right,
         | you can never be sure if your guess is wrong or they are wrong.
         | It is no longer a puzzle and you are playing 'what have I got
         | in my pocket?'.
        
       | brikym wrote:
       | For my game redactle.net, I blacklist the Wikipedia article for 2
       | years. I figure there is a tradeoff between novelty and allowing
       | the pool of articles to shrink. The Wikipedia vital level 4
       | category has 10k articles and probably half of them actually meet
       | the criteria (length, number of languages etc) for making the
       | cut.
        
       | sowbug wrote:
       | It seems about right. They reshuffled the deck about three-
       | quarters of the way through (1689 / 2315 = 72.9%). Blackjack
       | shoes are typically shuffled around the same point. Different
       | games, but similar considerations in this respect.
        
       | furyofantares wrote:
       | "Crisis" is a massively overblown word for this. And the "wordle
       | community" is a drop in the bucket of regular players, and not
       | remotely representative.
       | 
       | I did have a similar reaction personally to the "exciting news"
       | framing but I'm not actually sure it's wrong. The original list
       | of words was an excellent list, and it's been over 4 years.
        
         | teeray wrote:
         | > "Crisis" is a massively overblown word for this.
         | 
         | Given that it is Wordle, "panic" would be a far more
         | appropriate word.
        
           | alexfoo wrote:
           | Alarm, dread, scare, shock, start, worry.
        
             | hyperbovine wrote:
             | Alarm is a good guess. On average I can solve a wordle in
             | 3.6 turns when I start with this guess.
        
       | geophile wrote:
       | The analysis misses a point. Wordle uses two lists of five letter
       | words: words that are in the dictionary, and can be used in a
       | guess; and those that can be used as the daily secret word. The
       | latter list is smaller, and sticks to more common words. Wordle
       | has been around for 1550 days, so they have used 67% of the
       | possible words. In another couple of years, they have to either
       | start using uncommon words, or recycle. There's no rush, so it's
       | unclear why this is happening now.
        
         | lkbm wrote:
         | > Wordle has been around for 1550 days
         | 
         | I'm confused. Today's Wordle is #1,688.
        
           | geophile wrote:
           | I did an approximate calculation.
        
       | pseudosavant wrote:
       | I've used my own tool (https://pseudosavant.github.io/ps-web-
       | tools/wordle-solver/) for understanding how many words are left
       | after each guess. It'll show hints if you want them too, but they
       | are disabled by default. I like understanding how my guesses
       | reduce the word space well (or not).
       | 
       | It uses the list of all of the words that can be in Wordle, and
       | there are so many words I can't imagine anyone guessing. And I
       | come from a family with large vocabularies.
        
       | fercircularbuf wrote:
       | My friend and I labored over the word lists for our word game
       | subletters.fun. We wanted the word pairs and at least one optimal
       | path for each word pair to be from words on one list, which were
       | simpler words that we would expect everyone to be familiar with.
       | But players could use their own more advanced vocabulary to solve
       | the puzzles on their own without feeling restricted. Then we
       | bundled literally 10 years of unique word pairs into the game and
       | shipped it.
        
       | arcfour wrote:
       | It doesn't beg the question, it raises it. Begging the question
       | is a type of logical fallacy in which you assume the truth of
       | your conclusion. It doesn't mean something "begs for the question
       | to be asked."
       | 
       | I have no idea why this incorrect use of the term drives me so
       | nuts; however, you'd think a blog post about English words and
       | Wordle wouldn't make this mistake.
        
         | slibhb wrote:
         | I agree with you. But it's clear that "begging the question" is
         | going the way of "literally," and there's (sadly) nothing we
         | can do about it.
         | 
         | I suppose some time in the future, someone will invent a new
         | phrase meaning "assuming your conclusion".
        
           | arcfour wrote:
           | Well, I for one won't be party to it. I think informing
           | everyone I can is my drop in the bucket in the fight against
           | the incorrect usage of words. :-)
        
         | Ericson2314 wrote:
         | I think the idea was NYT was trying to imply they were running
         | out.
         | 
         | To me, "begging the question" doesn't mean assuming the
         | conclusion in particular, it just means that some of the
         | premises used are less obvious than they are being passed off
         | as. Assuming the conclusion is merely an especially egregious
         | form of that.
        
           | arcfour wrote:
           | I was objecting to the incorrect use of the phrase at the end
           | of the article.
        
       | croisillon wrote:
       | is "valew" related to the Brazilian "valeu", expressing
       | gratitude/satisfaction?
        
       | huhtenberg wrote:
       | Seems like a good post to plug a recent find and my new favourite
       | -
       | 
       | https://puzzlist.com/stackdown
       | 
       | It's from the person who made https://wafflegame.net if you are
       | familiar with it, one of many that came on the tails of the
       | original Wordle.
       | 
       | In comparison, the Stackdown is less rushed and way more
       | rewarding when solved. Also, more interesting in structure.
        
       | BurningFrog wrote:
       | I'm surprised they weren't reusing words already.
       | 
       | Obviously a finite resource will run out after a while.
        
       | angry_octet wrote:
       | At the risk of being accused of obscurantism, I would like to
       | know more of the words on the 5-letter list that are excluded by
       | Microsoft Word.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-01 23:01 UTC)