[HN Gopher] Scientist who helped eradicate smallpox dies at age 89
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientist who helped eradicate smallpox dies at age 89
        
       Author : CrossVR
       Score  : 295 points
       Date   : 2026-01-28 10:03 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com)
        
       | kwhat4 wrote:
       | Just in time to roll over in his grave.
        
         | sowbug wrote:
         | And to see himself become the villain.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | Yeah how dare he... helps eradicate diseases!
        
             | sowbug wrote:
             | At least he went down fighting (https://archive.is/M4nek,
             | the op-ed referenced in the article). That's an
             | impressively dignified response to a gobsmacking shift in
             | public opinion. In his position, I might have given up and
             | gone full Two-Face.
             | 
             | (https://screenrant.com/the-dark-knight-best-two-face-
             | harvey-... for those unfamiliar with the quote)
        
         | quesera wrote:
         | Smallpox is not measles! But, point taken.
        
       | olivia-banks wrote:
       | Paywall-free link: https://archive.today/Toq4Y
        
       | m-hodges wrote:
       | I don't think many people know about or remember the 2003
       | smallpox vaccination campaign.1
       | 
       | > The campaign aimed to provide the smallpox vaccine to those who
       | would respond to an attack, establishing Smallpox Response Teams
       | and using DryVax (containing the NYCBOH strain) to mandatorily
       | vaccinate half a million American military personnel, followed by
       | half a million health care worker volunteers by January 2004. The
       | first vaccine was administered to then-President George W. Bush.
       | 
       | 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_United_States_smallpox_va...
        
         | cucumber3732842 wrote:
         | Nobody in Hn type circles wants to remember it because looking
         | back with hindsight it was clearly just part of the theater to
         | get people wringing their hands about whatever chemical or
         | biological WMDs they alleged Saddam had and they killed the
         | program as so as they got their invasion.
         | 
         | Wikipedia somehow makes it eve worse than that:
         | 
         | "The campaign ended early in June 2003, with only 38,257
         | civilian health care workers vaccinated, after several
         | hospitals refused to participate due to the risk of the live
         | virus infecting vulnerable patients and skepticism about the
         | risks of an attack, and after over 50 heart complications were
         | reported by the CDC."
        
       | CaliforniaKarl wrote:
       | I'm starting to think that we should be calling it "contained",
       | not "eradicated". Eradication invites the question "Well then,
       | why do we still need the vaccine?"
        
         | yen223 wrote:
         | Most people nowadays are not vaccinated against smallpox
         | anymore
        
         | quesera wrote:
         | We don't vaccinate against smallpox, but keep in mind that at
         | least two countries maintain live smallpox virus in government
         | labs.
         | 
         | The bad actors are predictable. And I suspect at least two
         | others are lying.
        
         | dgacmu wrote:
         | It really is eradicated - it's the only human disease we've
         | truly eradicated. There are literally no more cases of smallpox
         | in the wild, period.
         | 
         | The problem is that there are samples of viable virus in the
         | labs of the US and Russia. So - it's eradicated but we have to
         | keep stockpiles of vaccine around anyway. But nobody gets
         | vaccined for it any more; it has an unfavorable risk-benefit
         | ratio when the virus simply does not circulate. Smallpox kills
         | ~30% of people who get infected with it; the first-generation
         | vaccine had a mortality rate of about 1 in 1,000,000.
         | 
         | (There are newer-generation vaccines developed and being
         | developed that have an even better safety profile but we still
         | wouldn't use them because the cost - the literal cost and the
         | side effects and general "meh, why get another shot?"-ness
         | outweighs the benefit of protection against something you don't
         | need protection against.)
        
           | saalweachter wrote:
           | Actually, do we need to keep samples anymore?
           | 
           | mRNA vaccines go from sequenced DNA to vaccine without any
           | need to store or culture the original virus in the lab.
           | 
           | We could destroy our existing stockpile of smallpox and be
           | ready to produce vaccines based on it faster than we could
           | thirty years ago.
           | 
           | We couldn't _validate_ new vaccines without access to the
           | live virus, but then, if we aren 't willing to expose
           | hopefully-volunteers to a disease with a 30% mortality rate,
           | we weren't really validating it anyway.
           | 
           | But yeah, I think we could probably unilaterally "disarm" and
           | destroy our smallpox samples, and from a national security
           | standpoint, I don't think we'd be significantly worse off; if
           | the weaponized strain is significantly different from the old
           | strain, enough to bypass vaccination, we'd need samples of
           | the new thing in any case.
           | 
           | I'm not even sure we'd be substantially limiting new research
           | on it, given that smallpox doesn't infect animals, I'm not
           | sure if there's even any animal testing we could do with a
           | live virus.
           | 
           | So yeah. Destroy the samples already.
        
         | rolph wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox_virus_retention_debat...
        
         | ksenzee wrote:
         | This is tangential to your point, but smallpox vaccine protects
         | against mpox (the virus formerly known as monkeypox) and the
         | CDC still recommends it for people in certain mpox risk groups.
        
       | andrewflnr wrote:
       | That's got to be one of the greatest legacies in all human
       | history. No politician or other empire-builder comes close.
        
         | deadbabe wrote:
         | Genghis Khan??
        
           | iwontberude wrote:
           | Greatest, not most fucked
        
           | andrewflnr wrote:
           | I thought it was clear from my statement about politicians
           | and empire builders that I was talking about people who did
           | _good, useful_ things.
        
             | adastra22 wrote:
             | No? That's not at all obvious.
        
           | lmz wrote:
           | Genghis Khan also not too bad:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Mongolica
           | 
           | Whose peace are we now living under and what atrocities did
           | they commit to establish it?
        
             | deadbabe wrote:
             | Sometimes you have to do a lot of things that look very bad
             | in order to do some greater good that overshadows all the
             | bad you did.
        
             | andrewflnr wrote:
             | I think this is a rationalization. Humans are always
             | tempted to look up to power, and what's more powerful than
             | an empire? It goes unquestioned that we should respect the
             | Roman empire, for instance, and you pretty often see an
             | argument for the Mongolian empire. But these days, we know
             | that violence is bad so we have to find other reasons to
             | justify our feelings. So we talk about the "peace" they
             | established after all the war. But is the cost really worth
             | it? How many people not attacked by bandits do you need to
             | justify an innocent murdered by raiding soldiers? Never
             | mind that even the "peace" is often sustained through
             | oppression. The Romans didn't invent crucifixion for Jesus,
             | it's something they did. Never mind that the empire never
             | lasts, and plants seeds of the next dozen wars as it falls,
             | watered with yet more blood.
             | 
             | Ask yourself: if you honestly intended to create peace,
             | would a century or more (in the case of Rome) of bloody
             | conquest actually be the optimal plan? I would say no. An
             | actual plan for peace through strength looks more like NATO
             | than Rome.
             | 
             | Any good an empire builder does is accidental. Whatever
             | they tell you or even themselves, they do it for glory and
             | power, and their actions are optimized for that over any
             | actual benefits. They were not nobler than the conquerors
             | and colonizers were rightfully decry today.
        
         | jfengel wrote:
         | And it comes at a time when a disease we were working on
         | eliminating, measles, has come back and the US is about to lose
         | its measles-free status.
         | 
         | It sounds as if his legacy is to be unique, a feat never to be
         | accomplished again.
        
           | quesera wrote:
           | We still have another chance for eradication in humans with
           | Polio.
        
             | 3eb7988a1663 wrote:
             | Not if the CIA has anything to say about it: CIA fake
             | vaccination campaign in Pakistan[0]                 ...The
             | program was ultimately unsuccessful in locating Osama bin
             | Laden. It led to the arrest of a participating physician,
             | Shakil Afridi, and was widely ridiculed as undermining
             | public health.[2][3] The program is credited with
             | increasing vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan[4][5][6][7] and a
             | rise in violence against healthcare workers for being
             | perceived as spies.[8] The rise in vaccine hesitancy
             | following the program led to the re-emergence of polio in
             | Pakistan, with Pakistan having by far the largest number of
             | polio cases in the world by 2014.[8]
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_fake_vaccination_camp
             | aign_...
        
               | ccppurcell wrote:
               | This should be a war crime...
        
               | tdeck wrote:
               | War crimes are "for Africa and thugs like Putin".
        
               | belorn wrote:
               | Given the period of 2010-2012, the president at the time
               | was Barack Obama. It does not seem realistic that people
               | would accept opening a criminal case.
        
               | goku12 wrote:
               | Why does it matter if it was Obama or Bush in power?
               | Sure, their politics influence the nation's foreign
               | policies. But domestic partisan politics is largely
               | irrelevant to the international partners. To the foreign
               | nationals affected by it, you're just USA either way.
               | 
               | I mentioned just the other day, the problem with anti-
               | intellectualism in the US and how it's fed by these sorts
               | of egregious meddling by the administration. There are
               | much less educated and affluent countries that are
               | nowhere near as anti-science as the US. Yet
               | unfortunately, the US exports it abroad too. I explicitly
               | referred the same Pakistani case as an example of that.
               | I'm all for Osama's elimination, but they jeopardized the
               | entire humanity's future by misusing the vaccination
               | program for it.
               | 
               | Despite a century of this nonsense (remember the radium
               | girls?), neither political party cares enough to not
               | pervert science in the interests of humanity. Smallpox
               | and Polio were horrible diseases that caused untold
               | miseries. Even the remote tribes of Pakistan knew their
               | dangers well enough to participate in their elimination,
               | until the US pulled off this dirty stunt. This is a
               | deeply ingrained toxic culture that was reinforced by
               | both parties over the decade. This should be a war crime
               | irrespective of party allegiances.
        
               | throw20251220 wrote:
               | > Why does it matter if it was Obama or Bush in power?
               | 
               | How can you open a war crime case against a guy who
               | already got a Peace Nobel Prize? And what war crime? Was
               | there a war? Maybe some special military operation
               | against Bin Laden.
        
               | aleph_minus_one wrote:
               | > How can you open a war crime case against a guy who
               | already got a Peace Nobel Prize?
               | 
               | Henry Kissinger (1973 Nobel Peace Prize together with Le
               | Duc Tho) can be considered a war criminal:
               | 
               | > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trial_of_Henry_Kissin
               | ger
               | 
               | Yasser Arafat (1994 Nobel Peace Prize together with
               | Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres) was also very likely a
               | war criminal.
        
               | throw20251220 wrote:
               | Should've could've. If the grandma had a moustache she
               | would be the grandpa.
        
               | aleph_minus_one wrote:
               | > Why does it matter if it was Obama or Bush in power?
               | 
               | If Bush was in Power, of course the accusation would have
               | to made against Bush. So, of course, the accusation has
               | to be made against the president that was in charge at
               | the time. Dark skin color does not give him a "Get Out of
               | Jail Free Card".
        
               | sigwinch wrote:
               | Are you kidding? A way to smear Obama and portray him as
               | disrespectful to non-whites? The only reason it's not on
               | Fox is that it reminds Americans that we've only had one
               | victory in the War on Terror and the Republican Party
               | contributed nothing positive.
        
               | atoav wrote:
               | I would accept it if it even if it was done by Ghandi.
        
               | trueismywork wrote:
               | Who is Ghandi?
        
               | et-al wrote:
               | It's probably a mispelling of a French domain registrar
               | known for its nonviolent resistance.
        
               | belorn wrote:
               | It is approaches like that which gives some hope to the
               | future. War crimes are indeed something which should
               | never be allowed or overlooked. Being a political leader
               | doesn't make people immune to criticism, but rather
               | should be someone held to a higher expectation.
        
               | michaelsshaw wrote:
               | International law does not apply to the leaders of the
               | western hegemony. It is merely a tool used to oppress
               | poor nations even further.
               | 
               | This fact only further proves one thing: the CIA is a
               | terrorist organization and the state behind it is
               | responsible for some of the most disgusting things this
               | planet has ever seen.
        
               | kakacik wrote:
               | CIA at its best, f_cking up world one bit at a time (and
               | amount of those bits amount to quite a few kilobytes at
               | least at this point, I can attest that every European
               | country I've ever lived in carries some more or less
               | visible involvements in past few decades although this
               | one is quite a spectacular clusterf_ck)
        
               | throw20251220 wrote:
               | > The program is credited with increasing vaccine
               | hesitancy in ...
               | 
               | Sounds like RFK Jr...
        
               | DangitBobby wrote:
               | Evil shit
        
               | gosub100 wrote:
               | Why would this cause everyone in the area to not
               | vaccinate, and not just limited to parents who are on a
               | most-wanted list?
               | 
               | What made me disappointed about this was that they
               | revealed how they did it, and they didn't rescue the
               | doctor who helped them pull it off.
        
           | epistasis wrote:
           | Perhaps I'm overly an optimist, but I have a feeling we will
           | develop the informational and psychological technology to
           | combat the destructive misinformation campaigns that
           | brainwash people into harming their children with anti-
           | vaccine beliefs.
           | 
           | We are not there yet, because the destructive media forces
           | are too new and we haven't developed defenses against
           | information diseases like RFK Jr. But we will get there. Two
           | steps forward, one step back.
        
             | vkou wrote:
             | Who is we, who will pay for it, and how will such
             | informational inoculation benefit the rich?
             | 
             | The current media status quo, and its consequences does,
             | which is why we get to enjoy it.
        
             | tjpnz wrote:
             | As a non-American I don't care what you do, if you want to
             | behave like irresponsible idiots without any regard for the
             | lives of others you have that right. Just don't subject
             | vulnerable individuals in other countries to your own bad
             | choices (you can get the MMR vaccine as an adult if your
             | parents were neglectful). Maybe visitors from the United
             | States should have to present vaccine certificates at
             | airports or be quarantined at their own expense.
        
               | epistasis wrote:
               | Canada and the UK have a ton more measles than even the
               | US's completely unacceptable level of measles.
               | 
               | Thinning this is a _US_ problem completely misunderstands
               | the nature of the misinformation problem.
               | 
               | And I hope there's vaccination requirements for travel,
               | according to how public health officials determine
               | threats.
        
               | Aurornis wrote:
               | Canada already lost their measles elimination status and
               | had several times higher measles rate than the US.
               | 
               | At this point, anyone pushing anti-vaccine thinking as an
               | American problem is just pushing anti-American bias.
               | Vaccine misinformation and hesitancy is an almost
               | worldwide problem.
        
               | nathan_compton wrote:
               | > you can get the MMR vaccine as an adult if your parents
               | were neglectful
               | 
               | if you are still alive.
        
             | jfengel wrote:
             | I admire your optimism. I genuinely wish I could share it.
             | I hope that you are right.
        
               | epistasis wrote:
               | Russia is close to falling, which is the true source of
               | many of the mental viruses that are destroying
               | democracies. And now, Russia's biggest win, the US, is
               | proving that instead of heading towards fascism, that the
               | people will actually stand up and fight back. Six months
               | ago, the outlook was far more uncertain and if the US had
               | not resisted, or Trump had picked a softer target than
               | Minnesotans (never invade a winter people in winter), I
               | would probably be feeing far different.
               | 
               | Things in the US are going to get far worse from here,
               | and there will be a political war, but at least there
               | _will_ be a political war against the fascism. A lower
               | bound has been established for badness that at least
               | allows saving democracy in the US. I have not been this
               | hopeful since October 2024.
        
             | DangitBobby wrote:
             | How does a public that derives its knowledge from authority
             | (For example, how do 99.999% of people know that the earth
             | is flat and orbits the sun? Would they be able to reach
             | those conclusions if school books taught something else?)
             | stand a chance at resisting misinformation spread by
             | trusted authorities?
        
               | aleph_minus_one wrote:
               | > how do 99.999% of people know that the earth is flat
               | and orbits the sun?
               | 
               | Pun intended?
        
             | somenameforme wrote:
             | People can simply have different perspectives on things.
             | Measels has mortality rate of around 0.1% while small pox
             | has a mortality rate of around 30%. So the individual risk
             | from measels is relatively low leaving plenty of room for
             | individual choice.
             | 
             | There's less room for the same argument with small pox. In
             | fact small pox is where the term vaccine comes from - it
             | was observed that milk maids weren't getting smallpox,
             | which led to the discovery that infection with cow pox
             | (which is relatively harmless) provided immunity to small
             | pox - hence 'vacca cine', vacca = cow in latin.
             | 
             | But there's a long history of people trying to self
             | vaccinate with all sorts of things against small pox
             | including using scrapings off somebody's small pox wounds
             | to hopefully give oneself a light infection. Needless to
             | say that came with well understood side effects up to and
             | including full-on small pox infection. But when the death
             | rate is 30%, people were willing to do some crazy things,
             | because the risk:reward was seen as worth it.
             | 
             | ---
             | 
             | FWIW I did ultimately decide to vaccinate my children
             | against measels, but it was not an easy decision, because
             | it is in general not that risky a disease whose mortality
             | rate had already precipitously declined (from 13 per 100k
             | to 0.19 per 100k) [1] before a vaccine was first introduced
             | in 1963. Obviously I think it's the right decision, but I
             | also wouldn't really fault anybody for going the other
             | direction either.
             | 
             | [1] - https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/measles-cases-and-
             | death-r...
        
               | jfengel wrote:
               | I think that if people observed what a 1 in 1,000 chance
               | of a dead child looked like, they'd have a much easier
               | time making the decision.
        
               | somenameforme wrote:
               | A friend's favorite Wiki page is on the micromort. [1] I
               | found it kind of banal, but perhaps that's my more casual
               | attitude towards death. I suspect the average person
               | doesn't realize, or doesn't accept, how brief life truly
               | is. One micromort is something with a 1 in a million
               | chance of death. So with measels, we're talking about
               | 1000 micromorts, if you're infected - which is also
               | extremely unlikely. So if you give yourself a 1% chance
               | of ever being infected with measels (which would be quite
               | high) then not vaccinating would be down to a 1% * 1000 =
               | 10 micromorts of risk.
               | 
               | All non-natural cause of death in the US, excluding
               | suicide, is about 1.3 micromorts per day. So it's the
               | same all non-natural cause risk you'll be exposed to over
               | the next week. The page offers a lot of other comparables
               | - traveling 100 miles by biking, 2500 by car, or 10k by
               | airplane, and so on.
               | 
               | [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micromort
        
               | jfengel wrote:
               | In a world with a low vaccination rate, infection with
               | measles is practically 100%. It spreads more easily than
               | COVID.
               | 
               | You can take your risk with herd immunity if you want.
               | That works well now, with a near universal vaccination
               | rate. But if the rate drops below 90%, then you _will_
               | get infected.
        
               | riversflow wrote:
               | Getting sick isn't just life or death.
               | 
               | My parents both got measels, and they had no hesitancy
               | getting me vaccinated. I'm _significantly_ taller than my
               | dad, who lost 40 pounds when he got German measles when
               | he was 17. I grew several inches that year.
               | 
               | People who don't get vaccinated are bad people. I have no
               | qualms saying it.
        
               | flufluflufluffy wrote:
               | Your child being vaccinated against measles is 1. yes,
               | protecting them, but 2. also protecting all the other
               | children at school they interact with, and vice-versa. It
               | isn't just an individual choice. You should definitely
               | fault people for going the other direction because they
               | are willingly increasing the chance of your child or your
               | child's friends getting measles.
        
         | s0rce wrote:
         | Norman Borlaug probably comes close. H. Trendley Dean was also
         | impactful on a large scale, while its seemingly less important
         | it helps a lot of people.
        
         | davidgay wrote:
         | I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur wins this
         | one, though.
        
         | wesleywt wrote:
         | Politicians and empire-builders (Elon) is currently standing in
         | the way of human progress and history.
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | So creating cheap, reusable giant rockets is standing in the
           | way of human progress? Being able to use neural links to
           | restore sight to the blind is standing in the way?
        
             | Mordisquitos wrote:
             | I'm pretty sure that GP commenter was referring to the
             | other stuff.
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | He shouldn't leave people guessing what he was referring
               | to.
        
               | Mordisquitos wrote:
               | Maybe not, but one can always converse curiously and ask
               | them what they meant. It's nicer to respond to the
               | strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says,
               | not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | My replies ended in question marks.
        
               | andrewflnr wrote:
               | You're really going to play the "just asking questions"
               | card? You're smarter than this. Or should be.
        
             | lukan wrote:
             | There was another group of people famous for building
             | innovative rockets, but are otherwise not associated with
             | human progress.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb
             | 
             | So it is about the big picture. (And about small pictures
             | like that of Elon making a salut like the other group).
             | 
             | So yes, currently his rockets do not transport explosives.
             | But that can change anytime and I expect it will very soon.
        
               | lmz wrote:
               | I thought American space flight etc was directly indebted
               | to the people behind the V bombs?
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | The Saturn V was simply a scaled up V2. The critical
               | components were all there:
               | 
               | 1. boundary layer cooling
               | 
               | 2. pre-heating fuel and cooling the nozzle by pushing the
               | fuel through tubes in the nozzle
               | 
               | 3. baffles to prevent pogo-ing
               | 
               | 4. turbo fuel pumps
               | 
               | 5. supersonic airframe
               | 
               | 6. guidance system (although primitive)
               | 
               | The V2 was an ineffective military weapon that did little
               | damage - because its guidance system was too primitive to
               | be able to hit a target. Hitler also poured enormous
               | resources into the V2 program, shifted away from
               | producing weapons that were effective.
        
               | Verdex wrote:
               | Elon rockets are only interesting because they can be
               | reused.
               | 
               | What use is a reusable rocket with respect to explosives?
        
               | lukan wrote:
               | They can bring explosives to space, loitering space
               | ammunition.
        
               | Spooky23 wrote:
               | Pretty easy. The only limits are your imagination and
               | depravity. You launch the rocket, drop an orbital vehicle
               | behind, and land. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
               | 
               | That vehicle could deorbit and drop a tungsten
               | penetrator, smallpox, a nuclear device or any number of
               | things.
               | 
               | All funded by a combination of government spending and
               | defrauding the public via the Tesla Ponzi scheme.
        
               | NetMageSCW wrote:
               | Dropping a tungsten penetrator from orbit is an idea only
               | science fiction can justify. In the real world the
               | economics never close.
        
               | lukan wrote:
               | Huh?
               | 
               | In the real world we so far just managed to keep space
               | free of military weapons not because they are expensive,
               | but because of treaties. I just don't expect those to
               | last much longer.
               | 
               | And frankly I never looked into the concept, but why do
               | you think, a space base tungsten penetrator would be way
               | more expensive, than a nuke on a missile?
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | A car can be used to take people to the hospital, or it
               | can be used to transport explosives.
        
           | wtcactus wrote:
           | Yes, I'm sure that starting the EV revolution, creating a
           | satellite based internet network that covers the all planet
           | and making space launches fully reusable and 10x cheaper is
           | "standing in the way of human progress and history".
           | 
           | If you people could only hear yourselves talk...
        
             | accidentallfact wrote:
             | These people have been a problem in the west for over a
             | century. They are unintelligent people who spend their
             | lives fighting what confuses them, and replacing it with
             | something worse, that they can understand.
        
             | flawn wrote:
             | It's not what his businesses are doing, it is what he says
             | and what he spreads to a tech bro disciple that spreads
             | this shit far away, working with technologies like AI at
             | the forefront, ending up setting us back in our progress &
             | history.
             | 
             | Same applies to Thiel, Zuckerberg and whoever not. Read up
             | on Thiel & Trump, then come back.
        
               | michaelsshaw wrote:
               | I don't think reading comprehension is his forte.
        
             | i_cannot_hack wrote:
             | Elon Musk is promoting progress only when he has something
             | to gain from it (in economical terms or in terms of his
             | image), but has no qualms wrecking progress, butchering
             | indiscriminately and hurting prople when it comes to his
             | personal grievances. This is further aggravated by his
             | mercurial and egomaniacal personality, and the false
             | reality build on conspiracies he surrounds himself in.
             | 
             | Hapazardly and chaotically dismantling the US public sector
             | on some ideological crusade was not advancing human
             | progress. Netiher was turning Twitter into some farcical
             | shell of its former self, owned by Saudi Arabia. Neither
             | was sabotaging projects such as high-speed rail systems
             | purely out of spite.
             | 
             | > Musk told me that the idea originated out of his hatred
             | for California's proposed high-speed rail system. ... At
             | the time, it seemed that Musk had dished out the Hyperloop
             | proposal just to make the public and legislators rethink
             | the high-speed train. He didn't actually intend to build
             | the thing. ... With any luck, the high-speed rail would be
             | canceled. Musk said as much to me during a series of
             | e-mails and phone calls leading up to the announcement.
             | 
             | Any good he has produced along the way (that mitigates the
             | damage he is causing) is only a means to an end for him,
             | and he would have no hesitations burning it all to the
             | ground the moment it suites him. If everyone acted like him
             | humanity would be doomed, not quickly progressing toward
             | some technological utopia.
             | 
             | Or, as his acquaintance Sam Altman put it: "Elon
             | desperately wants the world to be saved. But only if he can
             | be the one to save it."
        
             | michaelsshaw wrote:
             | I must have forgotten that Elon actually is the original
             | founder of Tesla and not a phony. At best he's their money
             | guy.
             | 
             | Do you think Elon knows a single thing about rockets? Do
             | you actually think he has literally anything to do with
             | them? He isn't even capable of forming a sentence without
             | stuttering, much less actually doing literally anything at
             | all. Keep defending your pedophiles, bro. I'm sure in 10
             | years you'll be glad we have a written record of your
             | stance.
        
               | NetMageSCW wrote:
               | Yes , he does. And making fun of people who stutter isn't
               | a good look.
               | 
               | I will take the word of the world's foremost rocket
               | engine engineer who was in the room with Musk a lot of
               | times, to someone posting in ignorance on the Internet.
        
             | BoredPositron wrote:
             | Haven't seen anything of your talking points make any
             | reasonable impact in societal problems.
        
         | vkou wrote:
         | Is there any way that people can work to re-introduce it into
         | society? I know some folks are making a lot of progress with
         | MMR.
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | Food produced by Fritz Haber's Haber-Bosch process (making
         | fertilizer) supports about half of the world's population.
        
           | andrewflnr wrote:
           | He has quite a bit of chemical warfare weighing down his
           | record.
        
             | adastra22 wrote:
             | He killed millions. He fed billions.
        
               | Y-bar wrote:
               | Epstein was friendly with, and made more people smile,
               | than he raped.
               | 
               | Phil Spector produced music which meant a lot to a lot of
               | people. Still a murderer.
               | 
               | Harold Shipman Saved the lives of thousands, yet should
               | always be labelled a mass murderer because he knowingly
               | positioned hundreds.
        
               | Metacelsus wrote:
               | >Harold Shipman Saved the lives of thousands
               | 
               | Probably not though, I don't think a typical GP saves
               | thousands of lives
        
               | Y-bar wrote:
               | Not alone, but as a team I bet he did. Just as Fritz
               | Haber did not personally save countless millions with his
               | discovery, thousands of other people had to be involved
               | there as well.
        
               | adastra22 wrote:
               | Billions. The total carrying capacity of the Earth maxes
               | out at 4bn people, even with maximally optimized
               | agriculture and a vegetarian diet. The extra half of the
               | Earth's population today owe their existence to Haber-
               | Bosch.
               | 
               | It really was a two-man team that discovered nitrogen
               | fixation - the other being not Carl Bosch, but Robert Le
               | Rossignol who assisted Haber in developing his bench-
               | scale nitrogen fixing reactor. Carl Bosch led the team
               | that scaled it up, and that was a large effort of
               | hundreds of people.
        
               | Y-bar wrote:
               | Please not that this was in relation to whether or not a
               | general doctor saves lives... A lot of work is indirect.
               | 
               | The Haber-Bosch process was never a two-man mission to
               | "feed the world." Haber devised a laboratory method to
               | fix nitrogen, and Bosch led the first industrial-scale
               | implementation, but neither of them was personally
               | producing, optimizing, transporting, and applying
               | fertilizer across the globe. Turning that reaction into
               | most of the world's nitrogen fertilizer required teams of
               | chemists, engineers, metalworkers, factory operators,
               | agronomists, logistics workers, and farmers, and an
               | entire century of industrial expansion. If it truly were
               | a two-person accomplishment, we would only need a handful
               | of farmers per country, which is obviously not how
               | agriculture or industry work.
        
           | accidentallfact wrote:
           | There is no reason to believe that a lack of nitrogen was a
           | problem in particular. It seems that most effort was spent on
           | getting fertilizers with phosphorus and other minerals,
           | nitrogen was secondary, as many plants can obtain it from the
           | air. If anything, it allows our modern, heavily cereal skewed
           | diet. Poor nutrition rarely meant an absolute lack of food,
           | most of the time it only meant insufficuent quality, and the
           | green revolution was a massive step backward in that regard
        
             | adastra22 wrote:
             | Plants cannot obtain nitrogen from the air. You are deeply
             | misinformed on this subject.
        
               | gucci-on-fleek wrote:
               | > Plants cannot obtain nitrogen from the air
               | 
               | That is literally true, but for anyone who hasn't studied
               | plant biology, I think that "some plants have evolved
               | specific structures to host obligate symbiotic bacteria
               | that obtain nitrogen from the air and convert it into a
               | form usable by the plant" is close enough to "many plants
               | can obtain [nitrogen] from the air".
               | 
               | (A link for anyone not familiar with this:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_nodule)
        
         | gucci-on-fleek wrote:
         | I completely agree, but to be fair, there are some people who
         | are politicians _and_ helped to eradicate a disease [0] [1].
         | 
         | [0]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/guinea-worm-disease-nearly-
         | erad...
         | 
         | [1]:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eradication_of_dracunculiasis
        
       | webdoodle wrote:
       | Except it wasn't eradicated. It's still stored at the US's Fort
       | Detrick, and in Russian and Chinese bioweapons facilities, too be
       | released as a bioweapon, now that no one has natural immunity
       | anymore.
        
         | MagicMoonlight wrote:
         | If you don't keep it then the first time you'll get to study it
         | will be when the first bodies are recovered from your cities.
        
           | runako wrote:
           | Coincidentally, that would be the first time it would be
           | urgent to study.
        
         | IshKebab wrote:
         | It would be a pretty shoddy bioweapon considering you can't
         | really target it and vaccines are available.
         | 
         | Maybe Russia or China are funding anti-vax idiots in the US so
         | that it only affects America :-D
        
           | webdoodle wrote:
           | Most people aren't vaccinated for smallpox, and only a very
           | small amount of vaccine is even produced, mostly for medical
           | and military people. Targetting is easy, here's your blanket
           | while the power is out...
        
       | octate wrote:
       | He did a great service to humanity
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-02-01 23:01 UTC)