[HN Gopher] The engineer who invented the Mars rover suspension ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The engineer who invented the Mars rover suspension in his garage
       [video]
        
       Author : UltraSane
       Score  : 246 points
       Date   : 2026-01-27 00:08 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | postalcoder wrote:
       | Best not read the comments until you've watched at least the
       | first four minutes of the video.
        
         | gorgoiler wrote:
         | Seconded, and maybe worth expanding why: there's a very
         | heartening reveal within the first few minutes that would be
         | spoiled by reading the comments (which, surprisingly for
         | YouTube, are all very positive about it.)
        
         | spiralcoaster wrote:
         | The video's narrator is the son of the engineer who invented
         | the suspension.
         | 
         | It is even listed in the video description. What's this idea
         | that this is a spoiler or integral to the video?
        
       | jacquesm wrote:
       | "There are no shortcuts to expertise".
       | 
       | What a fantastic post this.
        
         | mathieuh wrote:
         | As Marx put it: "there is no royal road to science, and only
         | those who do not dread the fatiguing climb of its steep paths
         | have a chance of gaining its luminous summits.
        
       | rvnx wrote:
       | Not surprised of such article.
       | 
       | It's not the first time something important is built in a garage:
       | 
       | for example, the Apollo 11 lander; a lot of people were thinking
       | it was made from aluminum folio and cardboard in a garage, but
       | actually it was kapton folio and professional-grade cardboard.
        
       | rozab wrote:
       | This guy has incredible videos on hiking gear, examining common
       | claims scientifically and rationally. He never gave any hints as
       | to his professional background, so as not to taint his arguments
       | with appeals to authority. It makes perfect sense that he grew up
       | in this environment, doing engineering work for NASA as a kid!
        
       | cartoonworld wrote:
       | Cool!
       | 
       | I just popped in to add that NASA employee Charles White, a
       | scientist involved with the Mars Rover project, also helped make
       | a Burning Man Mars Rover Car (back before Playa Burning Man was
       | completely and utterly torched twice over by Military Industrial
       | Complex Vacationers and Billionaires) and you can hear an
       | interview with him here on Charles White's yt channel:
       | https://youtu.be/BKGROOedAgI ( Mars Rover Art Car interview with
       | Ray Cirino and Charles White )
       | 
       | Charles White is a pretty good guy in my opinion, we play the
       | same video game (EvE: Online) Where Charles White is a very, very
       | well known community member who is known as "The Space Pope". He
       | officiates weddings at our Iceland Fanfest gathering and also
       | runs a Suicide Prevention Outreach group in EvE: Online, as well
       | as teaching leadership skills.
       | 
       | Here's Charles White giving a presentation as an Official NASA
       | employee about Space and our solar system at EvE Fanfest 2016:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atm6Y_JYPEU
       | 
       | Heres a interview about EvE: Online with the Space Pope:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWuj7LfyN4U
       | 
       | anyhow sorry to hijack this about EvE: Online but we have lots of
       | cool people like Scott Manley playing, too:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huZlA0eg12U
        
       | wendgeabos wrote:
       | I worked with Lee Sword (also RIP) for a while; he was on the
       | mechanical team for Sojourner. Interesting guy.
        
       | petcat wrote:
       | Apparently the first Mars Rover operated on only 5 watts of
       | power. A common bathroom nightlight draws _~7 watts_.
        
         | zokier wrote:
         | > A common bathroom nightlight draws ~7 watts.
         | 
         | Philips "60W" equivalent (806 lm) LED lamps are 3.8 watts.
        
       | swinnipeg wrote:
       | This is really Youtube at its best.
       | 
       | Deep dive into a niche topic, expert led, compelling
       | storytelling, and professional production.
       | 
       | Not sure how/if something this could have been created / shared
       | 20+ years ago.
        
         | intrasight wrote:
         | If you are an engineer and you haven't watched this video
         | please do yourself a favor and do so. I watch very little TV or
         | YouTube, but I ended up taking off the afternoon after this
         | video unexpectedly drew me in. It was impossible to not finish
         | it - so if you do start watching it make sure you have two
         | hours to spare. This is easily the best and most enjoyable
         | thing that I've watched in the last several years!
        
       | itissid wrote:
       | Is it true that a walking system only to operate its legs and
       | limbs would still consume more power than a rocker bogie -- with
       | all the innovations in battery tech?
       | 
       | Ofc Yes.
       | 
       | On Mars would any other mobility system today achieve better
       | performance for it's purportedly stated(neigh most ridiculous
       | stated but to be fair difficult engineering) goals i.e.
       | colonization? Also no.
       | 
       | I am surprised after watching this that there is so much of the
       | Boston dynamic stuff man/dog walking out there, given that
       | mobility is so well accomplished. Do you need -- to invest -- an
       | anthropomorphized man to scale walls and be stable after getting
       | kicked around?? I know one thing here on earth all large scale
       | semi(think agro machines) and almost fully(delivery bots)
       | autonomous look nothing like anthropomorphics or canines.
       | 
       | Maybe I have the dunning Kruger effect, because I am not a
       | robotics engineer, but why is building an anthropomorphic
       | _mobility_ platform so important to solve _pragmatic_ problems?
        
         | itissid wrote:
         | To answer my own last question I would also think probably not
         | that important.
        
         | wredcoll wrote:
         | The usual reasoning is that 2 legged robots will be able to use
         | the same affordances that two legges humans do.
        
         | fnord77 wrote:
         | a bicycle is more efficient than walking, it's not hard to see
         | why - moving a mass up and down is wasted energy
         | 
         | > why is building an anthropomorphic _mobility_ platform so
         | important to solve _pragmatic_ problems
         | 
         | because something rolling along isn't as visually impressive as
         | a complex system to walk, and these companies require hype
        
         | nobodyandproud wrote:
         | I'd say a lack of imagination.
         | 
         | Lose mobility for a few weeks or months, like breaking both
         | legs (or just try wheelchair access) and see how much of even
         | the paved first world is inaccessible.
         | 
         | Nevermind less refined places like well-maintained hiking
         | trails.
         | 
         | And you can forget about actual trail-blazing.
         | 
         | Then appreciate just how flexible and robust animal and human
         | mobility really is!
        
         | verytrivial wrote:
         | Building a robot and building a robot to operate on Mars are
         | eye-wateringly different challenges.
        
         | torginus wrote:
         | I'm also wondering why people are so enamored with these
         | humanoid robot - what they've accomplished is impressive, but
         | from the perspective of replacing humans, I'm sure we are many
         | years away from the versatility required to replace skilled
         | tradespeople.
         | 
         | A humanoid robot shambling along a factory floor to pick up a
         | plastic cover and deposit it onto a shelf does not look like a
         | trillion dollar industry. I'm sure there are much more
         | straightforward ways of accomplishing the same stuff.
         | 
         | Imo the biggest advantage of reproducing humanoid forms, is
         | that then the robot can be teleoperated with full body
         | harnesses that track the human operator. One such system I like
         | really much, is what the Japanese use for fixing overhead power
         | wires - it looks like a humanoid robot torso mated to a mobile
         | crane.
         | 
         | Altough the technology behind that could be done in the 80s,
         | with electromechanical analog controls.
        
       | cubefox wrote:
       | Wow, this turned out to be an amazing documentary!
        
       | lisper wrote:
       | I had the privilege of working with Don back at JPL at the time
       | he invented the rocker bogey. (I wrote the software for the first
       | prototype with a computer on board.) Not only was he brilliant,
       | he was also a really nice guy. I didn't appreciate at the time
       | how rare that combination of traits is among humans.
       | 
       | To my astonishment, it turns out Don doesn't have a Wikipedia
       | page (though the rocker bogie suspension does).
        
         | bediger4000 wrote:
         | Thanks for pointing out the rocker-bogie Wikipedia page.
         | There's a true dearth of info about them. Do you happen to know
         | if there's any kinematic analyses of these suspensions
         | available? I used to do stress analysis in the aerospace
         | industry and I've been interested in that sort of analysis
         | since the 1997 Sojourner rover.
        
           | thinking_cactus wrote:
           | I'm not sure what you mean by kinematic analysis, but the
           | video mentions several analytical analyses of his suspension
           | and how he came up with it. They did some computer
           | simulations to optimize how it would deal with various
           | obstacles. Really cool and clever.
        
             | bediger4000 wrote:
             | I wasn't sure what word to use. That suspension has lots of
             | pin joints and linkages, which are usually the subject of
             | kinematics, 3-bar linkages, mechanisms, etc etc.
             | 
             | I realize that the stiffness of the rockers and links will
             | make a difference in how forces are distributed, because
             | that suspension is clearly not statically determinant, but
             | the main factor in the design has to be the proportions of
             | the links and beams. I can't find anything about that, so I
             | asked.
        
               | thinking_cactus wrote:
               | > I realize that the stiffness of the rockers and links
               | will make a difference in how forces are distributed,
               | because that suspension is clearly not statically
               | determinant
               | 
               | I think it's (mostly) the terrain geometry (plus gravity)
               | that constrains the system, not joint or bar stiffness.
               | This makes them feasible to analyze with the tools of
               | theory of mechanisms I believe.
               | 
               | Also a really noteworthy insight I think he had was that
               | when there is some kind of non-planar geometry
               | arrangement of the wheels, that tends to create
               | additional (perpendicular to surface) force on the
               | wheels, effectively increasing the coefficient of
               | friction. Think how a child may be able to climb a door
               | frame by pressing hard enough on the sides.
        
           | lisper wrote:
           | > Do you happen to know if there's any kinematic analyses of
           | these suspensions available?
           | 
           | Sorry, I have no idea. I never actually worked on the
           | mechanics, just the software.
        
         | jacquesm wrote:
         | He really deserves a page, in the engineering world this is as
         | notable as it gets. The number of skills casually on display
         | here. Just wow.
        
       | hcknwscommenter wrote:
       | Most of my comments on hacker news are to point out something
       | incorrect or mischaracterized. All I can come up with here is
       | that this is a brilliant and heartfelt and entertaining
       | documentary. Thanks to OP for posting.
        
       | WillAdams wrote:
       | Is this the same guy who developed the Spyderench?
       | 
       | https://spy-derco.com/catalog/details/T01/SpydeRench-trade-/...
       | 
       | https://multitool.org/blog/spyderco-usa-spyderench
        
       | foxglacier wrote:
       | This kind of mechanism is fascinating. I built a four-wheeled
       | version and even that is beautifully smooth when one wheel goes
       | over a bump because the chasis maintains an average orientation
       | based on the positions of all the wheels. The video shows an
       | 8-wheeled one but it still only has two rows of wheels. I've
       | wondered how to generalize it to an arbitrarily sized grid of
       | wheels so a vehicle would be like a flexible mat that conforms to
       | the ground. I couldn't work that out but I'm no Don Bickler. FEA
       | software has a feature called "RBE3" which models an even more
       | general case of any number of "wheels" and they can also move in
       | any direction while still keeping the orientation of the
       | "chassis" (dependent node) rigidly determined by their average
       | displacements. The "R" stands for rigid because every part is
       | rigid or completely free - no springs! There seems to be nothing
       | like it in machines or nature but it's a beuatifully elegent and
       | seemingly natural mechanism - if it was possible to build.
        
       | thinkingtoilet wrote:
       | What an incredible mind. I wonder how many more people out there
       | there are that have made huge contributions to humanity and very
       | few know their name.
        
       | B-Con wrote:
       | I know this guy from his videos over the years on hiking topics,
       | like how to safely purify water with the minimum fuel and how to
       | pack calorie efficient food.
       | 
       | His videos are incredibly well researched, very in-depth, and
       | absolutely zero fluff. Very much feels like his cycle is to get
       | intrigued by a topic, spend a year deep diving into everything
       | that's published, extrapolate what he can from there, then
       | summarize it in a 1 hr video.
        
       | code443 wrote:
       | The rocker-bogie suspension is fascinating because it solves a
       | real constraint problem with elegance rather than brute force--
       | reminds me of how the best engineering often comes from working
       | within limitations. As someone who's debugged systems under
       | resource constraints, I'm curious whether the garage iteration
       | process actually made it into the final Mars rover design, or if
       | it had to be significantly redesigned for the extreme
       | thermal/radiation environment.
        
       | random_duck wrote:
       | I love how you can just fell the admiration he had for his dad.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-30 23:00 UTC)