[HN Gopher] How London became the rest of the world's startup ca...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How London became the rest of the world's startup capital
        
       https://archive.ph/ebA1T
        
       Author : ellieh
       Score  : 73 points
       Date   : 2026-01-28 00:16 UTC (22 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.economist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.economist.com)
        
       | claude_sh_1959 wrote:
       | Smells like marketing stuff.. there are plenty of other places
       | that i think are better.
        
         | paradox460 wrote:
         | Sand Hill road
        
           | arjie wrote:
           | That would be pretty funny to say. Where are America's
           | startups founded? Principally the San Francisco Bay Area.
           | What about the Rest of the World? Oh, principally the San
           | Francisco Bay Area.
           | 
           | It reminds me of the funny fact that for years I worked at a
           | building in Bush St. that was nice but not particularly
           | remarkable only to find out that that's where Saudi Aramco
           | was originally headquartered when some Twitter post counted
           | them for the Bay Area for their "Where are the top market
           | capped public companies from?" segment.
        
         | kaashif wrote:
         | It's not based on marketing, it appears to be based on metrics
         | like amount of venture capital raised.
        
           | alephnerd wrote:
           | Having a London domicile often leads to an overstating in
           | venture capital raised _for_ the UK ecosystem.
           | 
           | For example, I've funded Polish and Indian startups that
           | chose the UK as their legal domicile because we couldn't be
           | bothered to hire a legal team to draft a contract to Polish
           | or Indian specifications.
           | 
           | Builder.ai [0] is a great example of that - it was an Indian
           | startup that was domiciled in London to simplify raising
           | capital from Gulf investors.
           | 
           | [0] - https://www.ft.com/content/926f4969-fda7-4e78-b106-4888
           | c8704...
        
             | fakedang wrote:
             | Startups like Builder AI use London because a.) they want
             | to raise money from filthy rich Arab investors and b.)
             | those guys are not known for doing much due diligence. They
             | go more by vibes and hype and who's on the existing cap
             | table. Also c.) they are very comfortable with London
             | because it was so much easier back in the day to launder or
             | siphon away funds from their home countries. London is an
             | extremely popular destination for Gulf Arabs.
             | 
             | You'll get a lot of shady startups of that kind in London
             | for this reason.
        
           | noosphr wrote:
           | Given that London has little else going for it other than a
           | financial industry it's not surprising money is raised and
           | companies are registered there.
           | 
           | That said I don't know anyone doing a startup in London. But
           | I know dozens in Berlin without even thinking about it.
        
             | dukeyukey wrote:
             | Eh, I know quite a few. LegalTech, hardware, obviously
             | fintech, quite a bit of AI. But I work at a London startup
             | so my social circle might be different to yours.
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | It should be based on the number of successes relative to the
           | amount raised or ROI and that picture is quite different. In
           | that sense London is _way_ behind SV.
        
         | dukeyukey wrote:
         | For you specifically that may be true, but the numbers say
         | London dominates by _far_.
        
         | personjerry wrote:
         | I'm waiting for the yearly "Waterloo is the Silicon Valley of
         | Canada" article that always fails to deliver its promise.
         | 
         | I grew up in Waterloo but it's just not it lol.
        
         | captain_coffee wrote:
         | Could you give only a few examples from those PLENTY of other
         | places that are better? Like the first 10 that come to your
         | mind, you made me very curious!
        
       | flawn wrote:
       | Bruder, komm nach Berlin or frere, allez a Paris
        
         | lifestyleguru wrote:
         | Come to Germany, the letters from Rundfunkbeitrag and Waldorf
         | Frommer are already waiting for you!
        
         | renewiltord wrote:
         | I arrive in 2026. Decide to start a startup. By the year 2038,
         | the state mandated reader of legal documents has finished
         | reading out aloud to me and my co-founder. Now we find a VC.
         | His documents need to be read to us both. But the Y2K38 problem
         | strikes. He thinks we are in the year 1970. He needs to read us
         | the "ancient company addendum". While he's reading he chokes
         | and keels over, dead from the emissions from his Volkswagen.
         | Our ARR may be zero, but what about our government grants? Also
         | zero.
         | 
         | My friend. He starts in France in 2026. The government mandates
         | that the retiree earnings to worker earnings ratio must be
         | fixed by law to what it was in 2025: 130%. For every employee I
         | hire, I must also pay a retiree 1.3 times his salary. He visits
         | me via train in 2038. I ask him how his trip was. Turns out he
         | actually got on Deutsche Bahn train back then in 2026. I just
         | didn't know because he spent all his time on Twitter explaining
         | why the US approach to startups won't work. He's lucky. Pretty
         | short delay for DB train.
        
           | michaelscott wrote:
           | This was crafted with a subtlety that captures the
           | continental combination of infrastructural petrification and
           | untethered pride perfectly. Wonderful
        
       | romanhn wrote:
       | A different perspective:
       | https://x.com/aakashgupta/status/2016375397131420005
       | 
       | TL;DR: What London actually built is Europe's most efficient farm
       | system for US acquirers. The city does the expensive, risky work
       | of finding founders, funding early rounds, and proving product-
       | market fit. American companies wait until the risk is de-risked,
       | then buy the winners at discounts enabled by London's shrinking
       | public markets.
        
         | philipwhiuk wrote:
         | There's an argument that some of these takeovers should have
         | been blocked.
        
         | dukeyukey wrote:
         | > enabled by London's shrinking public markets
         | 
         | That doesn't seem to be true?
        
           | alephnerd wrote:
           | It is -
           | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-30/london-
           | dr...
           | 
           | Edit: can't reply
           | 
           | The majority of IPOs in 2025 were in 4 markets - US, China,
           | Hong Kong, India, and South Korea [0]. It's really hard to
           | exit in the LSE currently, and this article is self
           | congratulatory while ignoring major recent (past 2-3 years)
           | mistakes that negatively impacted the entrepreneurship scene
           | in the UK (eg. the revocation of funding for Tech Nation [1]
           | and the ongoing leadership crisis at Monzo [2] which makes no
           | one look good).
           | 
           | [0] - https://www.ey.com/en_pt/insights/ipo/trends
           | 
           | [1] - https://sifted.eu/articles/tech-nation-shutting-down
           | 
           | [2] - https://www.ft.com/content/3405c6f3-931b-4fe3-a169-a966
           | 5a132...
        
             | dukeyukey wrote:
             | No it isn't, London's IPOs in 2025 were mostly towards the
             | end of the year, after that article was written. London
             | ended up about 8th worldwide for issuances in 2025 -
             | https://www.pwc.co.uk/press-room/press-releases/research-
             | com...
             | 
             | Plus, the FTSE 100 returned 25.8% last year. That is not a
             | shrinking market!
        
         | monkeydust wrote:
         | London and UK for that matter is great and seeding
         | Startups...high quality universities, entrepreneurialism and
         | attractive tax benefits for angels but for real growth capital
         | it lags massively behind US and has forever.
         | 
         | The Kraken story is one to follow to see if this
         | changes...https://www.british-business-bank.co.uk/news-and-
         | events/news...
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | This.
         | 
         | Also UK contract law is well established and it's easy to find
         | experienced transatlantic lawyers and firms (there's a reason
         | UK lawyers can practice in NY and why both Hong Kong and the
         | Emirate of Dubai kept poaching judges with contract dispute
         | into their business judiciary).
         | 
         | In most cases when we'd invest in a startup abroad, the founder
         | would often structure their startup as a subsidiary of a US,
         | UK, Singapore (especially Indian/Chinese startups), or Cayman
         | Islands (it's a BOT so you basically get it for free)
         | corporation.
         | 
         | Ironically, this ease of financial access is what makes it
         | difficult to seed a lasting DeepTech startup in the UK because
         | capital would often be deployed to invest in other startup
         | ecosystems. I wrote about this before on HN as well [0][1][2]
         | 
         | [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42768018
         | 
         | [1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42767986
         | 
         | [2] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42763734
        
         | siquick wrote:
         | In football we'd call the US "tap-in merchants".
        
         | dukeyukey wrote:
         | I don't know Aakash Gupta so I can't say if he's lying or just
         | didn't do his research, but I know the IPO figures he cited
         | there are wrong, like very wrong, which puts everything else
         | there in doubt.
         | 
         | Not to mention location of IPO not being all that important.
         | But that's a whole separate thing.
        
       | edogrider wrote:
       | This checks out. I live in Silicon Valley but now work for a
       | startup in London. Same vibe, less attitude.
       | 
       | They are not the same. The energy/resources in SF/SV are 5x at a
       | minimum - but London has it going on.
        
         | HPMOR wrote:
         | Yeah SF is 10x every other place in earth. People that think
         | things are comparable have never lived here.
        
         | bbarn wrote:
         | Working for London startups in the past, I've found they're
         | much more polite, but much less honest and straightforward.
         | There's a layer of britishness you have to get past sometimes
         | to get to what people really want instead of directness.
        
           | Quarrelsome wrote:
           | best reasoning I've heard for this is that English is subtext
           | heavy, like Japanese due to the history of the aristocracy.
           | The populace were in thrall to their feudal lords and the
           | aristocracy as serfs and servant classes for so long, that
           | being indirect has been embedded into the language as a
           | defense mechanism to not upset the pay masters. We get the
           | subtext but people new to our culture might not.
           | 
           | I remember a technological mess being present at work and my
           | team lead bringing out the classic:
           | 
           | > it's not ideal is it?
           | 
           | or the classic Jeeves and Wooster valet/aristocrat
           | relationship with Jeeves giving it the:
           | 
           | > as you say sir
           | 
           | > very good sir
           | 
           | with both statements being flexible but often being delivered
           | with the dripping subtext of "yeah that's complete
           | bollocks".[0]
           | 
           | Obviously this doesn't apply to the real working classes but
           | then those types are not the sort to gain a STEM education.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s03Fq1nsbng
           | 
           | (The full scene is around 11:30 in the first episode and I
           | think its captures a conversation of subtext and indirectness
           | quite well).
        
             | Oras wrote:
             | > yeah that's complete bollocks
             | 
             | We say "interesting" for that
        
         | rconti wrote:
         | How's the comp? From HN I had gotten the feeling that the UK
         | was worse than most of western europe in that regard.
        
           | dukeyukey wrote:
           | According to levels.fyi London is basically the best paying
           | non-US city, I think maybe beaten by some Swiss cities.
        
       | sp1982 wrote:
       | Yup, London has consistently showing up in geographic hotspots in
       | my job postings data. I think it could be also be due to success
       | of companies like DeepMind.
       | 
       | https://jobswithgpt.com/blog/global_software-engineering_job...
        
         | philipwhiuk wrote:
         | Another British company swallowed by the US :(
        
           | brokencode wrote:
           | At least Elon Musk didn't end up getting it, which he tried
           | before Google swooped in.
        
           | walthamstow wrote:
           | A London company, still in London today and expanding.
        
       | throwaway7783 wrote:
       | Funny how San Francisco can't fit the chart they have. League of
       | its own I guess.
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | It truly is. I've seen multiple pre-seed startups and founders
         | burn significant amounts of personal capital in order to land
         | an O-1A visa because of how much capital and mentorship is
         | available here.
        
       | lifestyleguru wrote:
       | I wonder who are these people willing to work in London and
       | transfer 60% of their net income directly to landlord. Maybe
       | money doesn't matter because most of the time they spend in work
       | and commuting?
        
         | ojhughes wrote:
         | Isn't it the same deal in every major tech hub?
        
           | lifestyleguru wrote:
           | In other European "tech hubs" you're not going to find a job
           | or will not be able to rent anything.
        
             | LunaSea wrote:
             | Or you can come to SF and live in your car or at the gym.
        
           | retinaros wrote:
           | London is #1 at that. You earn a bit more than rest of europe
           | but everything is way more expensive
        
         | dangus wrote:
         | The math works out for almost every HCOL area. Your salary is
         | higher. Rent is high too but people either choose to live
         | further away or accept a smaller apartment/condo.
         | 
         | London has a big commuting radius with strong regional transit
         | (as maligned as it is).
        
           | lifestyleguru wrote:
           | There goes another 15% of your net income on train tickets.
           | Eating out every time (because have no time for proper value
           | shopping) and you are basically working in exchange of food,
           | housing, and commute.
        
             | blibble wrote:
             | it wasn't even close to 15% of my net income when I was 25
             | 
             | and it certainly isn't now that I'm quite a bit older, and
             | I earn a multiple of what I did then
        
             | conradludgate wrote:
             | As long as you live within Greater London and can use TFL,
             | it's more like 5%
        
             | dangus wrote:
             | Using hyperbolic percentages harms your point, it doesn't
             | help it.
             | 
             | But yeah you're right dude, _we live in a society_. We work
             | to support ourselves. What a shocking surprise.
        
           | blibble wrote:
           | > London has a big commuting radius with strong regional
           | transit (as maligned as it is).
           | 
           | yes, you can quite easily live 50 miles out and be at your
           | desk in under an hour
        
       | kjellsbells wrote:
       | Is this really surprising? London picks up all the advantages of
       | the UK (legal system is sound, eg in contract law, native
       | speakers of English, the lingua franca of business, strong
       | university tradition) and adds in its special sauce: access to
       | the City, global-tier culture, excellent public transport (I know
       | we moan about it, but it really is excellent), and a timezone
       | location that easily serves the US and Asia markets.
       | 
       | The awkwardness for founders in London is that when they want to
       | IPO, London doesnt have nearly as deep a pool of capital as the
       | US, so they are potentially leaving a lot of money on the table.
        
         | hadlock wrote:
         | Startups might thrive there, but business investment in England
         | (particularly in mature businesses) has not exactly been lively
         | ever since Brexit. I can't recall the last time I heard someone
         | talking favorably about investing in England, or at all,
         | really.
        
           | funkyfiddler369 wrote:
           | right, people will just tell you the best places and things
           | to invest in ...
           | 
           | during a game of chess: "hey why'd you make that move?"
        
         | graemep wrote:
         | Is deep enough pool of capital for the vast majority of
         | businesses.
         | 
         | Its cultural diversity is a plus for most people (other than
         | people like DHH).
         | 
         | The big problem with London is that it is very, very expensive.
        
       | walthamstow wrote:
       | I am completely biased but I think London is one of the best
       | places to live in the world, everything considered.
       | 
       | There's a guy on Instagram who spins a wheel for a random country
       | and goes to eat that cuisine somewhere in London. There are maybe
       | 1 or 2 places in the world you can do that. It's an incredible
       | feat of human diversity to pack hundreds of global cuisines into
       | a 10 mile radius.
        
         | lifestyleguru wrote:
         | There is only so much of food one can eat and after all
         | potatoes and steak do the job as well.
        
         | contingencies wrote:
         | I did most of the alphabet in Bangkok once, beginning with
         | Afghan. I'd wager it's better food than London on average,
         | purely based on freshness and tropical inputs. I think if you
         | were to pick the best city on earth for food it would have to
         | have resident international populations, a tropical climate,
         | and at least enclaves of wealth with a relatively free visa
         | policy. Bangkok fits the bill. For variety I much prefer it to
         | Singapore, KL, HK, Jakarta, Taipei, etc. Best for drinks has to
         | be HCMC. Paris and New York are up there too, but you have to
         | be 0.1% to enjoy them exhaustively.
        
       | tremarley wrote:
       | London seems equally incredible & terrible.
        
       | colesantiago wrote:
       | While startup capital flows in, the growth story is very
       | different, and for those living in the UK, it isn't what it
       | seems.
       | 
       | There aren't any jobs in the UK and most are offshored to other
       | low CoL countries.
       | 
       | Young people, founders are leaving for other places like Dubai,
       | Singapore and even SF for higher paying jobs.
        
         | dukeyukey wrote:
         | This doesn't seem true, I work in a UK tech company and it's an
         | incredibly international team. My team has three Brits
         | (including me), a Norwegian, a Swede, a Pole, and an American.
         | The CEO is Irish, the CTO is German/American.
         | 
         | Obviously that's just one data point, but every tech company is
         | similar.
        
       | retinaros wrote:
       | London is tax hell. When tou start to have a family it quickly
       | escalates to the mosr expensive place on earth by far
        
       | jacquesm wrote:
       | That's got to be why one UK VC after another is closing their
       | doors.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-28 23:00 UTC)