[HN Gopher] Exactitude in Science - Borges (1946) [pdf]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Exactitude in Science - Borges (1946) [pdf]
        
       Author : jxmorris12
       Score  : 77 points
       Date   : 2026-01-26 14:44 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kwarc.info)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kwarc.info)
        
       | RansomStark wrote:
       | I can't get enough of Borges.
       | 
       | His way with words and way to highlight to absurdity of
       | situations is first class.
       | 
       | My favorite is the Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge.
       | It's a critique of the classification used by the Institute of
       | Bibliography which he considered nonsensical. He claims to have
       | found the list in an ancient Chinese encyclopaedia:
       | 
       | - those belonging to the Emperor
       | 
       | - embalmed ones
       | 
       | - trained ones
       | 
       | - suckling pigs
       | 
       | - mermaids
       | 
       | - fabled ones
       | 
       | - stray dogs
       | 
       | - those included in this classification
       | 
       | - those that tremble as if they were mad
       | 
       | - innumerable ones
       | 
       | - those drawn with a very fine camel hair brush
       | 
       | - et cetera
       | 
       | - those that have just broken the vase
       | 
       | - those that from afar look like flies
        
         | bobson381 wrote:
         | It's such a wonderful thing to be reminded of how silly it is
         | to take language seriously. IMO it's prickles and goo[1] all
         | the way down - and the prickles help us share meaning and
         | exchange information, but there is no project of exactitude to
         | be completed.
         | 
         | The hubris it takes to maintain the view that we can just keep
         | figuring things out if we are rational enough is also sometimes
         | overwhelming to me. It's not that we can't understand things
         | better through analysis, just that it sometimes seems foolish
         | to me to try to get _all of it_ through system-2 type behavior.
         | We will always miss something crucial[2].
         | 
         | [1]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4vHnM8WPvU
         | 
         | [2]:https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2010/07/26/a-big-little-idea-
         | call...
        
           | mkoubaa wrote:
           | An algorithm written in a well specified language with
           | precise semantics might have bugs. A "logical" argument made
           | with natural language is orders of magnitude less precise
        
             | bobson381 wrote:
             | What I've always wondered, though, is whether that lack of
             | precision is what allows for meaning to arise in the first
             | place. In the gap between language and - this - .
        
               | mkoubaa wrote:
               | Read Wittgenstein
        
         | colechristensen wrote:
         | If you haven't run across it yet you would enjoy _Borges and
         | Me_
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borges_and_Me:_An_Encounter
        
       | divbzero wrote:
       | The most avid members of the Cartographers Guilds had even
       | proposed a Map of the Empire several times larger than the Empire
       | itself to depict microscopic details that would otherwise be
       | invisible. Such proposals were considered the peak of academic
       | excess after the Study of Cartography fell out of favor.
        
         | bobson381 wrote:
         | I do sometimes wonder if we will get "detailed enough" vector
         | embeddings in LLMs to bring the grain of resolution down below
         | human perception - like having enough bits to fully capture
         | what's on tape in audio world. Maybe this is never possible,
         | and (I hope) some details are unresolvable, but it will be
         | interesting to see.
        
           | pixl97 wrote:
           | LLMs are already used in signal processing so the idea is
           | explored.
           | 
           | Simply put anything that can be encoded is a language, so you
           | just need sensors to capture and classify the incoming data
           | and build that into a model. The real question is post
           | training the model to behave correctly as these places are
           | far less explored than things at the human scale. RLHF may be
           | a poor choice because the models may see actual behaviors
           | that humans don't and humans will discount it as being
           | incorrect.
        
           | storystarling wrote:
           | I suspect the curse of dimensionality makes this an
           | optimization dead end. You hit prohibitive latency limits on
           | retrieval long before the resolution approaches human
           | perception. Even with current dimensions, the trade-off
           | between index size and query speed is already the main
           | constraint for production systems.
        
         | anthk wrote:
         | That wil be doable some time with computers :)
        
       | johngossman wrote:
       | "I have a map of the United States... Actual size. It says,
       | 'Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile.' I spent last summer folding it. People
       | ask me where I live, and I say, 'E6."
       | 
       | Steven Wright
       | 
       | Though it's not as funny without his delivery
        
       | zubiaur wrote:
       | Ficciones is full of mockings of intellectualism. I Particularly
       | like the critique on the critical philosophical work of Menard's
       | Quixote. Where Menard, the subject of the story, carefully writes
       | parts of a novel that is word-for-word a copy of Cervante's
       | Quixote, but shaped by Menard's intellectual efforts, one is to
       | draw the opposite appreciations than from the one written by
       | Cervantes.
       | 
       | His stories are such a strange read. The plot, the characters,
       | the mentions, all feel almost secondary to the feeling they
       | evoke.
        
         | lkm0 wrote:
         | Menard's Quixote is also one of my favorites. I feel it
         | illustrates almost in a mean way the futility and arrogance of
         | analyzing a work through its author's life and intention. I'm
         | not knowledgeable enough to know if this kind of literary
         | analysis was still popular in Borges' time and place, but in
         | France up to the early 20th century, an influential critic
         | called Sainte-Beuve was claiming with great success that any
         | work could be entirely (and scientifically) analyzed and
         | elucidated by interviewing the author's friends, partners, by
         | sniffing out their secret habits and what not -- and I assume
         | Borges must've been aware of it, having been educated in early
         | 20th century French-speaking Switzerland. If I had another life
         | I'd probably do another PhD thesis on Borges vs Sainte-Beuve.
         | Fun fact: Marcel Proust was so mad at Sainte-Beuve that it got
         | him out of his writer's block; In Search of Lost Time is an
         | anti-Sainte-Beuve essay that got out of hand.
        
           | zubiaur wrote:
           | Fascinating. Borges is not shy in mentioning his admirations,
           | and what he was exposed to. I like that he leaves
           | breadcrumbs, or whole loaves, pointing to what he likes. It's
           | an interesting way to thread into literature.
           | 
           | I envy a bit those , who, like you, had such exposures. It's
           | such a fascinating world, which I used to scoff at when I was
           | younger. But it's a healthy envy. I feel happy for those who
           | choose to developed such capacities, and it inspires me to
           | try to develop them for myself.
           | 
           | I think I've still got the time.
           | 
           | Thanks for your reply.
        
         | PaulRobinson wrote:
         | I remember a PostSecret from many years ago that was a picture
         | of the title plate of Ficciones, and the "secret" was somebody
         | saying they wished that they could have just one night in front
         | of a fire with a bottle of malt whiskey and the person who
         | introduced them to that work. I had never read Borges before,
         | but I liked that sort of a feeling a book could create, so I
         | trudged to the bookshop and found a copy, and then settled into
         | a corner of a cosy pub (I live in England), not far from a fire
         | and a golden retriever, with a pint of ale and settled in.
         | 
         | Changed my life, when it comes to literature.
         | 
         | The feelings you get from that work are hard to describe, but
         | unique and engaging and marvellous. But when you step back and
         | look at it from a critical reading, it's all a bit odd and
         | silly and mocking.
         | 
         | There is no writer I want in my pocket more than Borges though,
         | particularly when it's dark and cold outside and the fire is
         | burning, and a friend who also appreciates him is nearby to
         | discuss.
        
       | fbn79 wrote:
       | "The House of Asterion" is the most beautifully written thing I
       | have ever read.
       | https://klasrum.weebly.com/uploads/9/0/9/1/9091667/the_house...
        
         | sylos wrote:
         | Holy cow, that was amazing.
        
         | Eliand wrote:
         | The last words almost make me cry everytime I read them. It's
         | such a beautiful tale.
        
         | internet_points wrote:
         | I read that after seeing it was a forgotten inspiration for
         | Piranesi: https://www.betterreading.com.au/news/author-
         | related/susanna...
         | 
         | (And probably House of Leaves)
        
         | RationPhantoms wrote:
         | It was lost on me at first because I had none of the
         | background, it's now beautiful in hindsight with the context.
        
       | profsummergig wrote:
       | I think it's a message about how science is really about
       | effective sampling.
        
       | moss_dog wrote:
       | While we're Borges-posting, I recommend "Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis
       | Tertius"
       | 
       | https://sites.evergreen.edu/politicalshakespeares/wp-content...
        
       | kej wrote:
       | This seems like a good place to ask: I have a memory of a longer
       | story along very similar lines. Maps are made that are
       | increasingly larger, but in the version I'm remembering the maps
       | are in a room of a palace or something?
       | 
       | Does this ring a bell to anyone?
        
         | moss_dog wrote:
         | Maybe Eco's "On the Impossibility of Drawing a Map of the
         | Empire on a Scale of 1 to 1"?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-26 23:01 UTC)