[HN Gopher] Viking Ship Museum in Denmark announces the discover...
___________________________________________________________________
Viking Ship Museum in Denmark announces the discovery of the
largest cog
Author : PaulHoule
Score : 15 points
Date : 2026-01-22 21:43 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.medievalists.net)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.medievalists.net)
| perihelions wrote:
| More discussion,
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46633574 ( _" Found:
| Medieval Cargo Ship - Largest Vessel of Its Kind Ever
| (smithsonianmag.com)"_, 54 comments)
|
| edit: Also, I think this domain (medievalists.net) is suspect.
| This article has _no author byline_ ; and its text is highly
| similar to other published articles (like [0]), with only minor
| word changes. Here's an A/B of an excerpt:
|
| > [vikingeskibsmuseet.dk] _" Dendrochronological analysis shows
| that Svaelget 2 was built around 1410 using timber from two
| regions: Pomerania, which is modern-day Poland, and the
| Netherlands. By comparing tree-ring patterns with reference data,
| researchers were able to date the wood and determine its origin.
| The planks were made of Pomeranian oak, while the frames - the
| ship's ribs - came from the Netherlands. This construction
| pattern suggests that the heavy planking timber was imported,
| while the frames were cut locally at the building site,
| reflecting a practical approach and a complex trade network where
| large quantities of timber moved across Northern Europe."_
|
| > [medievalists.net] _" One of the most striking results so far
| comes from dendrochronology (tree-ring dating). Researchers
| report that Svaelget 2 was built around 1410 using timber sourced
| from two different regions: Pomerania (in modern-day Poland) and
| the Netherlands. The planks were made from Pomeranian oak, while
| the ship's frames (ribs) came from the Netherlands--an
| arrangement the team interprets as evidence of complex material
| supply and specialised shipbuilding capacity."_
|
| [0] https://www.vikingeskibsmuseet.dk/en/news/archaeologists-
| rev... (author byline Rikke Tornso Johansen)
| ggm wrote:
| I wish people didn't use headline superlatives so much. If you
| compare this ship to the pleasure craft of Caligula which was
| destroyed in ww2, you have to start qualifying things by open
| water vs lake-bound. Caligula had two of them, in Roman times.
| One was 20m wide and 70m long.
|
| It's a big ship. It's an important find. It's not a supership or
| a supercog, or a beast, or a behemoth.
|
| It's 9m wide, 6m high and 28m long.
|
| This class of ship was a significant component of middle age
| trade and presages even larger ships, which in turn increased
| carrying capacity. Transport on water is bound by displacement to
| surface area, where drag is bounded in surface area so as ships
| increase in volume the energy cost per unit carried drops
| significantly and thus the crewing and sail burden. Bigger ships
| mean cheaper goods.
|
| Carrying 300 tonnes of cargo in 1400 was pretty good.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-01-22 23:00 UTC)