[HN Gopher] The WebRacket language is a subset of Racket that co...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The WebRacket language is a subset of Racket that compiles to
       WebAssembly
        
       Author : mfru
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2026-01-17 21:23 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | dfajgljsldkjag wrote:
       | It is interesting to see another language target WebAssembly
       | especially one like Racket. The fact that it compiles to a subset
       | of the language limits its utility right now. I think it is a
       | neat proof of concept but it needs full language support.
        
         | d_philla wrote:
         | check out grain! https://grain-lang.org/
        
         | volemo wrote:
         | As far as I know compiling full Racket to WASM is impossible
         | because of continuations.
        
         | gcr wrote:
         | For folks curious about the supported language subset, here's a
         | summary:
         | 
         | - Modules aren't implemented yet, but are high on the list
         | 
         | - Continuation-based control flow isn't supported yet,
         | including break and promises. Tail calls are supported though.
         | 
         | - No support for complex numbers, bignums, weak hashtables,
         | immutable hashtables, prefab structs, regexp, or file I/O
         | support
         | 
         | Most of the rest of racket/base should work, according to the
         | README. There's also a FFI for javascript, including bindings
         | for Math, DOM, Canvas, MathJax, XTermJS, and JSXGraph. Overall
         | feels like you can use most of the language right now unless
         | you need odd Racket-isms or call/cc.
        
       | noelwelsh wrote:
       | I love this. Racket is the future we were promised.
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | Speaking of prolific Racketeers... Noel! Just an hour ago, on a
         | walk, I was thinking, "I should work through that one LLM book,
         | and implement it in Racket." (But have started job-hunting, so
         | will probably be Python.)
        
       | titzer wrote:
       | I noticed the --expose-gc. Does this mean it's using the (now
       | standardized) Wasm GC feature?
        
       | apitman wrote:
       | Hoot is another interesting one: https://spritely.institute/hoot/
        
       | gcr wrote:
       | Is there any shared lineage between this and Whalesong, a
       | previous Racket->JS compiler?
       | 
       | Of course both projects have the same maintainer if I recall,
       | Jens Axel Sogaard is a rockstar :)
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | Jens Axel Sogaard is cool and involved in many things. We
         | collaborated on SICP support.
         | 
         | Original developer of Whalesong was Danny Yoo.
         | https://www.hashcollision.org/whalesong/
         | 
         | There was also this: https://docs.racket-lang.org/racketscript/
         | 
         | Dave Herman worked on various JS-related libraries for Racket
         | (or PLT Scheme) before he was involved with Rust.
        
           | gcr wrote:
           | ah that's right! apologies
        
       | publicdebates wrote:
       | I read the WASM spec and became somewhat of an expert in it for
       | the purpose of eventually designing a low-level language
       | _specifically for_ wasm, to be the most efficient and lowest-
       | level language you could possibly have for wasm, and then
       | gradually add high level concepts into it to make it more
       | convenient. Kind of like building C on top of asm, and then
       | gradually evolving it into C++. That project never came about
       | though due to lack of community interest and time on my part, but
       | I like seeing languages that take a fresh look at how to
       | integrate with wasm using novel techniques to aim for maximal
       | efficiency.
        
       | KarenDaBass wrote:
       | Is a (Web)Racket engineer a racketeer?
        
         | gcr wrote:
         | They're certainly a schemer. :-)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-21 23:00 UTC)