[HN Gopher] KaraDAV - Lightweight Nextcloud compatible WebDAV se...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       KaraDAV - Lightweight Nextcloud compatible WebDAV server
        
       Author : indigodaddy
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2026-01-11 12:50 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | WillAdams wrote:
       | I really wish WebDAV were more popular --- ages ago, back when
       | moving large files was difficult and I worked at a printing
       | company we would have regular difficulties with customers
       | connecting to our FTP site (on at least one occasion resulting in
       | tears of frustration on the part of a customer).
       | 
       | I (stupidly) pointed out that WebDAV was natively supported by
       | both Windows and Mac OS and was quite simple to connect to, and
       | then burned all of my political capital at the company arguing
       | for its adoption --- when we finally got to a meeting on it,
       | rather than simply enable the WebDAV service on the existing FTP
       | Server, it was presented as if I was arguing for a new server,
       | and that said new server should come out of my department's
       | budget....
        
       | p0w3n3d wrote:
       | I wonder isn't WebDAV horrendously slow for you? I have
       | selfhosted nextCloud and sending 1GB file was a nightmare (over
       | WiFi). It took ages and didn't finish at the end. I did fall back
       | to usb pendrive... I would like to have something that is not in
       | PHP I guess, this might be the bottleneck
        
         | indigodaddy wrote:
         | Maybe that's just a product of next cloud's heaviness in
         | general and not a webdav problem? I think that might be the
         | point of this, just a very light webdav implementation with
         | support for nextcloud clients (for basic file functionality not
         | all the other nextcloud features)
        
         | hommelix wrote:
         | Oh ! The performance table on github is not rendered. If you
         | look at the same page on
         | https://fossil.kd2.org/karadav/doc/main/README.md KaraDAV is
         | very close to apache mod_dav module and way faster than
         | NextCloud.
         | 
         | > KaraDAV performance was very close to mod_dav, and NextCloud
         | performance was incredibly poor.                 Client
         | KaraDAV  NextCloud  mod_dav       Dolphin (KDE)  5 seconds  1
         | minute 15 seconds  3 seconds       Thunar (GTK)  5 seconds  1
         | minute 50 seconds  5 seconds       WebDAV Manager.js  4 seconds
         | (no delete)  --  --
        
           | indigodaddy wrote:
           | Are you the author?
        
             | hommelix wrote:
             | No not at all. I happen to read the website a couple of
             | weeks ago.
        
         | winstonwinston wrote:
         | Sometimes the WebDAV client is to blame, especially clients
         | provided by the OS itself, awful performance.
         | 
         | Nowdays i just use (encrypted) SMB over the internet,
         | performance is great and it works on all major systems without
         | additional software. Basically the best and easiest way to
         | transfer (large) files over the network.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-11 23:01 UTC)