[HN Gopher] A set of Idiomatic prod-grade katas for experienced ...
___________________________________________________________________
A set of Idiomatic prod-grade katas for experienced devs
transitioning to Go
Author : medunes
Score : 86 points
Date : 2026-01-07 19:53 UTC (4 days ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| medunes wrote:
| I've been transitioning to Go after years in other ecosystems,
| and kept running into the same problem: I could write correct Go
| code, but not idiomatic Go.
|
| Most material focuses on syntax or algorithms. In practice, what
| caused friction were production mismatches: context cancellation
| and goroutine leaks, errgroup vs WaitGroup tradeoffs, HTTP client
| hygiene, error wrapping semantics, allocation control,
| embed/io/fs for dev-prod parity, etc.
|
| I started collecting small, constraint-driven katas that isolate
| one such mismatch at a time. Each kata defines explicit pass/fail
| idiomatic constraints, rather than providing solutions. The goal
| is deliberate practice, not "best practices" or tutorials.
|
| This repo is curated by someone transitioning to Go, for others
| doing the same. It's not meant to be authoritative. If you're
| experienced with Go and spot incorrect, unsafe, or misleading
| constraints, issues and PRs with rationale and references are
| explicitly encouraged.
|
| I'm especially interested in feedback from people using Go in
| production on where these constraints are wrong, incomplete, or
| missing important edge cases.
| CyberDildonics wrote:
| What is the difference between a "prod grade kata" and a
| practice project?
| typeofhuman wrote:
| I wish it had solutions.
| poly2it wrote:
| And automatic tests in some cases.
| maxloh wrote:
| Could you please add a LICENSE file to the repository? MIT or any
| Creative Commons licenses would be a great choice.
| jamietanna wrote:
| I'm not sure why this has been flagged - its not possible to
| copy code from the repo, as it defaults to All-Rights-Reserved
| (aka proprietary)
|
| Unless that's explicitly the intent, in which case that's fair
| kace91 wrote:
| The instructions mention "Reflect: Compare your solution with the
| provided "Reference Implementation" (if available)" but not a
| single line of code is present.
|
| Is this an artifact of it all being ai generated, or work in
| progress?
| twodave wrote:
| This honestly just looks like a bunch of ChatGPT output. There's
| almost no code (I checked maybe half a dozen topics). Not sure
| how useful this is for anyone besides the author. Why would I
| look at this instead of asking an LLM?
| MrDarcy wrote:
| I'm sure this is useful for me who is a staff+ engineer
| building a team who are transitioning to go.
|
| Including these Kata in AGENTS.md is extremely useful.
| nicois wrote:
| If the idea is to have devs implement each kata, wouldn't it be
| more effective to provide not only automated tests, but also code
| which should be used as a basis for each challenge?
|
| For example, if supporting a dev tag to serve assets from the
| filesystem, why not include a simple webserver which embeds the
| contents?
|
| This would allow aspiring gophers to go straight to the high
| value modification of a project rather than effectively spend
| most of the time writing scaffolding and tests.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-01-11 23:00 UTC)