[HN Gopher] Raspberry Pi and mini PC home lab prices hit parity ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Raspberry Pi and mini PC home lab prices hit parity as DRAM costs
       skyrocket
        
       Author : speckx
       Score  : 82 points
       Date   : 2026-01-06 16:52 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.tomshardware.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.tomshardware.com)
        
       | spwa4 wrote:
       | ... for the worst possible imaginable reason, a massive price
       | rise for _both_ Raspberry Pi and mini pcs.
        
       | giancarlostoro wrote:
       | AI is an impressive technology, but because its turned into a
       | Space Race we're getting into some wild territory. Sam Altman who
       | has been notorious for being quite the con artist is at the helm
       | of this. I heard a friend suggest that the real AI bubble starts
       | with Sam Altman, and I'm inclined to agree. If you're unaware,
       | Sam Altman has quite a crazy history, including selling a company
       | with questionable MAU's for millions of dollars, which was then
       | shut down because the actual MAU's was much lower than suggested.
       | He also claimed to be chairman of YC with the SEC for years,
       | despite never being chairman of YC. I wouldn't trust Sam Altman
       | alone with my wife or kids, why should I trust him with AI?
       | 
       | Funnily enough, Elon Musk calls him Scam Altman, have to wonder
       | what Elon and others know beyond what we know about Sam Altman.
        
         | irusensei wrote:
         | Do you need anything else than scanning people eyeballs for
         | supposedly UBI cryptocurrency?
        
         | lawn wrote:
         | Sam is also behind Worldcoin.
         | 
         | He's a complete grifter.
        
         | metalliqaz wrote:
         | Sam Altman is the world's second most successful liar, behind
         | Elon Musk. Elon only dislikes him because he was on the other
         | end for once.
        
       | ThrowawayR2 wrote:
       | Indirectly related but it's a little surprising that we haven't
       | heard about price adjustments from Valve for the Steam Deck yet
       | to account for the DRAM price increases.
       | 
       | Higher DRAM prices are bound to also affect their unreleased
       | devices and make them a tougher sell to buyers.
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | I assume they're going to sell them at a bit of a loss, but I
         | do wonder too if the RAM cost will force them out of the
         | project for the time being.
        
           | iszomer wrote:
           | They've already ended production for their basic 256GB LCD
           | model; the 512GB OLED is now their new baseline.
        
             | ehutch79 wrote:
             | That's the steam deck, the handheld, not the minipc like
             | cube they announced
        
               | Narishma wrote:
               | This discussion is about the Steam Deck.
        
           | mossTechnician wrote:
           | I don't think they'll be able to sell at a loss, because they
           | are effectively selling desktop computers, not dedicated game
           | consoles. It would be easy for a company to flash Windows
           | onto them and deploy them in an office space, for example.
        
         | isk517 wrote:
         | Perhaps they have already secured components for the
         | foreseeable future.
        
         | prvc wrote:
         | Have they announced any price from which to adjust? If not,
         | then it would be unnecessary for them to announce the
         | adjustment.
        
           | mat_epice wrote:
           | The Steam Deck is an established product that was first
           | released in February 2022. You may be thinking of the Steam
           | Machine, which indeed does not have public pricing that I'm
           | aware of.
        
       | wpm wrote:
       | Price parity but not feature parity. I still struggle to find
       | good use-cases for the full sized Pi that both require direct
       | GPIO _and_ the increased CPU capabilities /storage speeds. For
       | anything that needs GPIO, I find it much easier to just run it on
       | a Zero 2W.
       | 
       | For anything else, where I just need "small computer running
       | Linux to do a thing over USB or the network", the Intel mini-PCs
       | are still a better deal.
       | 
       | 1. They are usually upgradable, either in storage, and/or RAM,
       | WiFi, etc depending on which one you buy.
       | 
       | 2. They usually have actual M.2 storage without the need for an
       | add-on board.
       | 
       | 3. More sensible board and port layouts. I _despise_ the Pi B
       | form factor. Easily the worst thing about my Radxa X4 is the
       | slavish  "lets make it Pi B" form factor, which they didn't even
       | manage to do, so any time I use it it's a port squid mess instead
       | of having everything be neatly managable _and_ I don 't get to
       | use any of the Pi B form-factor accessories I have anyways.
       | 
       | 4. Can run any x86 operating system, and get installed off of a
       | USB. I dual boot my Radxa X4 between Windows and Linux.
       | 
       | 5. Typically have faster networking and definitely better
       | video/NPU hardware. Intel QSV is excellent.
       | 
       | 6. Power usage stats that are a rounding error up or down from
       | what a Pi 5 could do.
       | 
       | At this point, I'd rather the Pi Foundation really focus on the
       | Pico stuff, I find it far more interesting. The compute modules
       | are also pretty useful when you really want to customize the I/O.
       | As the landscape changed, the full-size Pi B's just seem...left
       | out. Weird boot process, weird form factor, weird Broadcom stuff,
       | weird price/performance ratio, downright hostile power supply
       | choices (5V5A is supported by like two special snowflake
       | supplies, and guess what, the Pi Foundation sells one!), few
       | upsides. Maybe if the mini-PCs prices still increase, and the Pi
       | Foundation can still get away with selling 8GB Pi 5s at $100 or
       | whatever, it'll make more sense.
        
         | connorbrinton wrote:
         | 100% agree on the better video hardware. I found out this
         | weekend the Raspberry Pi 5 removes the dedicated video encoder
         | present on the Pi 4B. I was getting 2-3 fps in OBS, which makes
         | it unusable for my application. Any mini PC would do much
         | better with dedicated encode capabilities.
         | 
         | To be fair, I haven't messed around with video encoding
         | settings yet. I've seen claims the Pi 5 can do 1080p60 with 50%
         | of the CPU. I could trade off quality for faster encoding, but
         | with a mini PC I could get high quality encoding at real-time
         | speeds.
         | 
         | I'm feeling some buyer's remorse with the Pi 5 right now...
        
         | tonymet wrote:
         | excellent points. I'd also add that at slightly higher price
         | you can include embedded TPUs /NPU like RyzenAI . With all of
         | the lacking features you mentioned, and the AI features in mini
         | PCs, Raspberry PI seems to be many years behind.
         | 
         | A major selling point of mini PCs is the integrated cooling
         | system, so they run silent. Pi's thermals are terrible, and the
         | active cooling offerings are just garbage.
        
       | margalabargala wrote:
       | I have a lot of trouble trusting pre-built mini computers from
       | random manufacturers. Way too easy to slap some malware on a chip
       | on the board somewhere. Maybe I just have trust issues but I
       | don't really want to give anything I buy on Aliexpress network
       | access.
       | 
       | I wish these form factors were more popular with more reputable
       | brands.
        
         | reactordev wrote:
         | Beelink has served me very well the last decade. I used to use
         | those old Shuttle XPC's and things but Beelink has proved you
         | can fit a lot of power in a puck. You can also take it apart,
         | add memory, add m2 drive, whatever.
         | 
         | Not an ad for Beelink, just saying they have some awesome
         | little mini pc's that I've used for home lab clusters. Ryzen 9
         | 16C+32T little beasts that are completely silent.
        
           | mrmuagi wrote:
           | Some of the recent Beelink ones have soldered ram though.
        
             | reactordev wrote:
             | [delayed]
        
         | trvz wrote:
         | The Mac mini exists. Suffering is a choice.
        
           | margalabargala wrote:
           | I've been Linux-only for over a decade, I've long since made
           | that choice :)
           | 
           | Also, the cheapest Mac Mini is $600. The Mini PCs we're
           | discussing are generally sub-$200.
        
           | burnt-resistor wrote:
           | And _used_ intel Mac minis are cheap and work. They 're
           | pretty handy and upgradable actually.
           | 
           | I'm tired of maker-washed overpriced slow gear that was
           | supposed to be cheap, but is expensive and impossible to
           | find. There are infinitely better choices than RPis. I
           | recently went through having to make a custom shielded M.2
           | cable (by wrapping it in aluminum foil and Kapton tape) and
           | stability burn-in testing for an SBC that would otherwise
           | spontaneously hang. I'm tired of craptastic SBCs.
           | 
           | PSA: Please reuse old stuff first and stop buying new, new,
           | new when alternatives exist that are suitable for a
           | particular use.
        
             | irusensei wrote:
             | Pis are awesome if you have PoE+ or better. I have two pis
             | one of them using the nvme+poe+ hat connected with just an
             | ethernet cable. It also has serial UART port that counts as
             | an offline remote access of sorts.
             | 
             | I also just sent a Rockpro64 on a NAS case with 2x25TB
             | disks overseas to my parent's home where it runs as a low
             | powered backup server.
        
         | tracker1 wrote:
         | Well, if you're willing to pay a bit more, you have Asus,
         | Lenovo and HP all with mini/micro form factor options. I've had
         | decent experience with Minis Forum, BeeLink and GMKTek...
         | though I will buy through Amazon... the returns will usually
         | work better than going through some misc Ali Express seller.
        
         | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
         | It troubles me to see so many sketchy brands recommended by
         | tech reviewers like LTT or ServeTheHome. It's going to be great
         | when they all go rogue in the event of conflict.
        
           | wan23 wrote:
           | What's your definition of sketchy? For me I'd say by
           | definition a non-sketchy brand is one that has some kind of
           | social proof. The next question though is who do you trust?
        
         | tonymet wrote:
         | There have been many cases of spy chips installed on reputable
         | brands. A famous case was Elemental (transcoding company,
         | purchased by AWS) , where AWS discovered espionage chips
         | installed while they were integrating Elemental's Supermicro-
         | based units into AWS datacenter
         | 
         | (AI summary for example)
         | 
         | https://bytegiest2.substack.com/p/grok-breaks-down-supermicr...
         | 
         | All of these boards are made in China, so it's no safer
         | strategy to bet on name brands.
         | 
         | Only Apple and a few other brands may have tight enough supply
         | chains to guarantee BOM security.
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | Learn to live with 1GB of RAM. Either CLI/TUI tools, or software
       | like Dillo or Sxiv. Mainline dillo from their Git and not the
       | outdated one from the repos. The new "dilloc" it's amazing, you
       | need Dillo compiled with socket control support. _Then_ you will
       | be able to use dilloc as a client to spawn commands con scripts.
       | For instance, to rewrite URL 's from a list. Hint: the ones from
       | https://farside.link . Youtube to Invidious, X.com to Nitter and
       | so on.
       | 
       | Connect to https://farside.link, https://lite.cnn.com,
       | https://text.npr.org or gopher://magical.fish as a services
       | portal or news source.
       | 
       | Use mpv+yt-dlp if you are under Unix to watch online videos.
       | Complex? Just a little bit first. Incredibily rewarding later. No
       | JS will be needed to play videos on most websites. Also with yt-
       | dlp you are able to save them for later usage.
       | 
       | Try programming with small languages from https://t3x.org and
       | doing Math/Intro to Statistics book with Klong and its manual.
       | s9fes can be a good enough Scheme Lisp to complete the exircies
       | Concrete Abstractions and maybe SICP if you know how to
       | reimplement (frame) and the missing functions. An easy task after
       | CACS.
       | 
       | Consider SQLite+Python+TkInter or TCK+Tk as the DDBB UI on top.
       | 
       | Golang can be great too with 1GB of RAM and a simple n270
       | netbook, I run Yggdrasil on that, and NNCP too among other tools.
       | Everything with nvi as the editor (basically vi+UTF-8+some status
       | line for help), simple Makefiles
       | git://bitreich.org/english_knight and entr(1) as a tool to watch
       | a directory and spawn 'make' on file changes.
        
         | areoform wrote:
         | If you have an Apple ][ retro emulator, what book would you
         | recommend to explore programming the full stack way (as in,
         | assembly language up to lisp)?
        
       | bullen wrote:
       | To write this article without mentioning the 3588, is like
       | writing about Venezuela without mentioning oil.
       | 
       | Pi 5 and N150 are completely meaningless since before they came
       | into existence.
       | 
       | Also the price of 3588 increases by batch so you can still get
       | them at almost launch price (4GB was $70 now $110, next batch
       | probably ~$150 by now if nothing improves)
        
         | areoform wrote:
         | Could you please provide a link? I don't know what 3588 is. It
         | seems to be, Rockchip RK3588?
        
           | bullen wrote:
           | Yes, you have to google it yourself, there are too many with
           | pros and cons beyond a hn comment.
        
             | toast0 wrote:
             | Google gives me this for 3588
             | https://www.tractordata.com/farm-
             | tractors/000/3/8/381-intern...
             | 
             | I guess giving up a life of computing and starting a life
             | of vintage tractorring is pretty compelling, but I don't
             | think they're making new batches of 1981 tractors; but who
             | knows what VW is up to these days.
             | 
             | OTOH, DuckDuckGo gave me California tax forms. No thanks!
        
               | Youden wrote:
               | If you search "pi n150 3588" (without the quotes), Kagi,
               | Google and DuckDuckGo all make it clear that "3588" means
               | "RK3588" or "Rockchip RK3588".
               | 
               | Back in the old days we didn't have all these AI things
               | and personalization to predict our intent, we had to put
               | context in our queries :)
        
               | areoform wrote:
               | Yes, but they seem to be talking about a specific
               | product?                   "(4GB was $70 now $110, next
               | batch probably ~$150 by now if nothing improves)"
               | 
               | I think it's reasonable to ask, what's $70, now $110 and
               | $150?
               | 
               | If you're quoting specific numbers for a specific product
               | that you're claiming should be in the thread and then you
               | refuse to link it...
        
       | irusensei wrote:
       | Well hopefully this will help to keep the "x86 guy" from barging
       | into EVERY arm sbc related conversation regardless of the
       | subject. They will ignore every argument about what the
       | conversation is about and point out their recycled trash Lenovo
       | uses 6W on idle while conflating idle power usage with efficiency
       | per watt.
       | 
       | "Yeah dude we know but I need a Pi for this project. So sit
       | down."
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-06 23:11 UTC)