[HN Gopher] Repair a ship's hull still in the river in -50@C (2022)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Repair a ship's hull still in the river in -50@C (2022)
        
       Author : aziaziazi
       Score  : 209 points
       Date   : 2026-01-02 13:21 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (eugene.kaspersky.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (eugene.kaspersky.com)
        
       | throwawayffffas wrote:
       | The -50 makes it actually easier, because it's you know on top of
       | the river instead on in the river at this point.
        
         | boomlinde wrote:
         | That's the crux of it; they aren't.
        
       | ZeroConcerns wrote:
       | _Interesting_ choice of tourism destination, but quite cool (no
       | pun intended...) regardless.
       | 
       | One of the most annoying things about working with anything metal
       | at those temperatures, is that your tools will pretty much
       | instantly become stuck to whatever it is you're trying to
       | manipulate, making a propane burner an indispensable addition to
       | your toolbox.
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | Ewan McGregor and his friend Charley Boorman was also in the
         | area, 20 odd years ago, when they did a montorbike trip from
         | London to New York, "The Long Way Round" (Crossing Europe,
         | Mongolia, Russia, Canada and USA): https://youtu.be/6kajsHTy3hA
         | 
         | Man, looking at the map it feels like one of the last wild
         | place on earth. I was wondering if this shipyard is on the
         | Arctic Coast, but not really. If it were, it'll be relevant in
         | the near near future. At the moment it's connected by a river
         | to the Arctic Ocean, it's probably booming with business.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | > The Long Way Round
           | 
           | It was a neat series, but the start where they whinge about
           | not getting free bikes from their brand of choice was so
           | incredibly entitled and such a turn off.
        
             | ahf8Aithaex7Nai wrote:
             | That's right. I wonder if the decision-makers at KTM
             | regretted that afterwards.
             | 
             | Addendum: Considering that the GS has been a bestseller
             | ever since. It feels like every other motorcycle enthusiast
             | in Germany rides one. It has been the best-selling
             | motorcycle almost every year since then. In Italy, many
             | also seem to prefer riding GS bikes over
             | Guzzi/Ducati/Aprilia.
        
               | kridsdale1 wrote:
               | Similar: During pandemic Ewan and Charlie did an electric
               | bike ride from Argentina to the US and the support crew
               | were in Rivians along with the Rivian CEO or head of
               | engineering or something, as an extended QA run before
               | full production. It was my introduction to the brand and
               | sufficiently impressed me such that I think it's the only
               | option I'd look at for an EV.
        
               | chihuahua wrote:
               | What I remember from that show is that they plug in the
               | Rivian to charge, and 12 hours later the charge level has
               | increased by some miniscule amount. At some point they
               | have to bring in a gas-powered support truck with a gas-
               | powered generator to charge various electric vehicles. If
               | anything, it was a commercial against EVs at the time.
               | 
               | It seems that EVs didn't make much sense in the
               | environment of that trip (going through all of South
               | America, where fast chargers were rare at the time)
        
               | testing22321 wrote:
               | Oh yeah. It's very commonly accepted in ADV circles that
               | the GS is THE bike of choice because of long way round.
               | 
               | It could, and probably should have been KTM. The GS is
               | stupidly big and heavy.
        
             | cpursley wrote:
             | I don't think it was entitlement, but enthusiasm about
             | brands (hobbyists tend to get that way).
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | You're probably right. It seems far more likely to be
               | left in of they were trying to show brand enthusiasm.
        
               | chihuahua wrote:
               | But given that McGregor has millions in the bank, he
               | could have bought 3 KTMs and not even noticed the cost.
               | Instead, they insisted that they will only ride bikes
               | that someone gives them for free. Because the poor
               | millionaire Hollywood actor "I was in a Star Wars movie!"
               | couldn't possibly pay for his pet project out of his own
               | pocket. Oh how unfair, those evil oppressors at KTM!
        
               | hadlock wrote:
               | He was coming off the high of being the "star" of the new
               | Star Wars movies. He was a main character in the story
               | but not The main character. I recall watching these on
               | physical DVD via netflix in ~2008 and wondering why he
               | seemed (what we now casually call) entitled; I'd been
               | watching the series for ~3-4 episodes before it clicked
               | with me that he was one of the actors from star wars,
               | despite being a long time star wars fan. He was
               | definitely entitled, the blow up was centered around KTM
               | not being interested in what a Star Wars actor was doing
               | and not taking him seriously. I distinctly recall seeing
               | him cry, or almost cry on camera.
               | 
               | That said, ignoring that drama, the rest of the series
               | was quite good, when they published "The long way Down"
               | from Scotland to South Africa I jumped on that and
               | watched it as well. Someone else pointed out they did an
               | EV thing from Argentina to... Alaska? with Rivian, I
               | might go look at that too.
        
               | barney54 wrote:
               | And it really want's Ewan that was put out about the KTM
               | rejection--he wanted to ride the BMWs, but Charley
               | Boorman was pissed. Charley had dreamed of the KTMs for
               | years.
        
             | yobbo wrote:
             | They offered KTM a 10 hour advertisement series, which
             | would go on to become a classic for motorcycling
             | enthusiasts worldwide. KTM's response was "eh no you could
             | never pull that off, and will make us look bad". It had
             | nothing to do with the cost of the bikes.
        
         | metalman wrote:
         | no propane burners. propane freezes solid at minus 60deg, and
         | you need heaters to get any flow long before it gets that cold,
         | to the point that you can set propane out in a bucket, which I
         | have some experience with in useing it, to supper cool
         | transmission shafts, so that they shrink, and press fit
         | bearings slip right on. so yes they have propane, but they use
         | it in other, less well known ways.
        
           | mapt wrote:
           | Maybe butane?
        
             | LeifCarrotson wrote:
             | Butane stops vaporizing at -1C (31F), isobutane at about
             | -10C (10F). Propane's boiling point is even better, at
             | about -40C/-40F, but it self-cools and doesn't develop the
             | required pressures to run a torch.
             | 
             | I know this because my otherwise dependable camp stove is a
             | 3-season affair. For winter camping, you basically need a
             | white gas system (liquid fueled, manually pressurized or
             | gravity fed).
             | 
             | I suppose I'd reach for an acetylene torch in a cold
             | workshop.
        
               | mapt wrote:
               | You're right. I misinterpreted my little butane torch's
               | apparent high pressure in relation to my big propane
               | torch.
               | 
               | Canned ethane or ethyne ("acetylene") then.
        
           | testing22321 wrote:
           | Propane freezes long before -60C.
           | 
           | The recent cold snap in the Yukon had smaller tanks useless
           | just past -35c, and bigger ones not doing much past -40c.
           | 
           | We don't take it on winter adventures for that reason.
        
         | febusravenga wrote:
         | Interesting observation and I have to relate - today I've
         | measured ice thickness with classic stainless caliper - -3
         | celsius was enough for it to immediately glue to ice it was
         | even barely wet.
         | 
         | Working such temperatures must be real hazard to skin, anything
         | metal will glue to it immediately.
        
           | amluto wrote:
           | Let the metal cool down to the the temperature of the ice and
           | try again. The problem isn't generally that the ice is sticky
           | per se; the problem is that the surface of the ice will melt
           | if something warm enough touches it and then will freeze
           | again and stick.
        
       | aosaigh wrote:
       | There is a good YT channel I subscribe to from a person in
       | Yakutsk who makes interesting videos on life there:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/@KiunB
        
       | giacomoforte wrote:
       | I saw a youtube video of a single mother who job it was to cut
       | out the ice from underneath the ships to create space to do the
       | repairs. Apparently its a very dangerous job because you can
       | easily end up frozen to the river if you're not careful. Must be
       | the same one mentioned in the article.
       | 
       | youtube.com/watch?v=Lu9P3VaMCho
        
         | mapt wrote:
         | I'm reminded of the worker in this bit -
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U3g-h1rxQw
         | 
         | Absolutely loves her job. Screams a little bit every time she
         | swings the pickaxe below a certain depth though. As one does.
        
       | londons_explore wrote:
       | So all these ships are immobilized till summer when the ice
       | melts? But winter is the time for repairs etc?
        
         | tessierashpool9 wrote:
         | makes sense, doesn't it?
        
       | aziaziazi wrote:
       | Unrelated: is there a delay on HN between submission and
       | publication? I posted that article a few days ago and the header
       | is now "3 hours ago".
        
         | huhkerrf wrote:
         | Some postings get a second chance if they're considered
         | interesting but didn't get much traction the first time around.
         | 
         | More info: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308
        
           | aziaziazi wrote:
           | Thanks! Digging into your link I found the explanation:
           | 
           | > There's one glitch that occasionally confuses people. When
           | the software lobs a story, it displays a rolled-back
           | timestamp--not the original submission time, but a
           | resubmission time relative to other items on the front page.
           | If you see a timestamp inconsistency on HN, this is probably
           | why. Edit: if this is the kind of detail that interests you,
           | see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19774614 for a more
           | recent explanation.
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11662380
        
         | mothballed wrote:
         | HNs system can be hard to figure out. I posted an ~identical
         | article to one that hit #1 on top page a few hours before the
         | other guy. My own posting only got like 8 votes. I have no idea
         | what I did wrong. I think there is some randomness in the
         | beginning; if a couple people notice it in the first 15 or 20
         | minutes then it stays high enough other people notice it and
         | then it snowballs.
         | 
         | If you have a good post though that gets overlooked someone
         | will commonly "steal" it and use a slightly different article
         | and good chance that one will get traction. Surprised no one
         | thought to do that before you got a second chance.
        
           | Brian_K_White wrote:
           | There is something slightly with the system if people are
           | actually even thinking about posts in terms like this. "The
           | other guy stole my spotlight?" Do people somehow make money
           | from their HN post stats? I guess somehwere some how some
           | people probably do.
           | 
           | I do obvioulsy recognize that at a low level it's fundamental
           | human nature to apply those kinds of game/competition
           | thoughts to literally everything in life, but still it seems
           | like this would be a case where the act of thinking about it
           | consciously enough to write it down, is enough to make one
           | realize it sounds silly.
        
             | TheCraiggers wrote:
             | It seems like human nature that if you attach a number or
             | score to something, people are going to try and get the
             | most they can.
             | 
             | Which is kinda the point. Nobody wants to lose score, so
             | they don't post horrible comments (usually) and they try to
             | find the most interesting articles to post. That's good for
             | everyone. But it does have the side-effect of people
             | complaining that their karma was "stolen".
        
               | mothballed wrote:
               | In my case I was glad someone else got it out because it
               | was in regards to a civil rights leader being imprisoned.
               | I used "steal" in quotes for a reason, but of course, I
               | will admit, I am a lowly ape. When I see other ape get
               | huge points for same action I wonder what I did wrong,
               | even though I happy for other ape, the best simple word I
               | can come up for it is "steal" as lowly ape brain
               | understand and convey this easily.
               | 
               | Brian is much higher ape, free from these low-level ape
               | impulses so long as he writes them out. I hope to be
               | higher ape someday. Ape work harder to get higher thought
               | like Brian.
        
           | huflungdung wrote:
           | Diddums
        
       | zhrvoj wrote:
       | Coming back from warm and cozy Oman Al Hajar mountains and Wahiba
       | crossing, this makes my cry. So beautiful and interesting planet
       | we live on !!
        
       | yuppiepuppie wrote:
       | Thanks for the story!
       | 
       | The pictures of this technique triggers my submechanophobia -
       | especially the photo of the two people working underneath the
       | ship.
        
       | foobarian wrote:
       | Huh, that actually seems pretty convenient. It's like a
       | subtractive scaffold
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | I once was extremely proud of myself when I had to change a
         | tire without a jack; realizing that I could move the car so the
         | tire was over dirt/sand, brace the car, and dig out underneath
         | the tire.
        
       | nubskr wrote:
       | Skip the dry dock, just chainsaw the river until it freezes deep
       | enough, peak yakutsk engineering
        
         | stivatron wrote:
         | hahaha.
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | I don't see the wheels on the boat with wheels - is it the
       | "paddle wheel in the next shot?
        
       | throwaway5752 wrote:
       | It's not okay to casually appreciate the vacation pictures of a
       | corrupt Russian oligarch, even if they overlap with an area of
       | technical interest.
       | 
       | Kapersky is part of a corrupt regime that has killed tens of
       | thousands of innocent Ukrainian civilians and murdered leaders of
       | rival political parties. You can get numb to it, but it is a
       | horrible, historic war crime. He is complicit and his boat
       | pictures can go to hell.
        
         | lo_zamoyski wrote:
         | > It's not okay to casually appreciate the vacation pictures of
         | a corrupt Russian oligarch
         | 
         | This is totally incoherent and nonsensical. There is no moral
         | case for this and you are making a purely emotional remark.
        
           | samothrace wrote:
           | I don't think either of you have made your point very well.
           | "It's not okay to ... appreciate ... pictures..." Isn't
           | nonsensical, but it doesn't really convey the meaning that
           | I'm assuming was intended (so I guess it's incoherent to some
           | degree). That assumed meaning being that it's not okay to
           | support people that support evil regimes. Even if that
           | support is minimal and indirect.
           | 
           | Would you buy an art book by a Nazi officer in 1942? After
           | all, the officer would only receive a very small portion of
           | the proceeds of the book, in reality providing an
           | infinitesimal benefit to the Nazi party itself. Would you
           | recommend said book to people you know? After all, you
           | wouldn't be providing even that tiny amount of material
           | support. And after all, it's simply the creative work of
           | another human, unrelated to the war or atrocities, not
           | representing the interests of the Nazi party itself.
           | 
           | I'm sure that there are plenty of people that will show up to
           | argue that actually, yes, they would gladly buy the book if
           | they liked it and they would recommend it. And some will have
           | the logical devices to show that there are no moral
           | obligations involved. I disagree. Generally speaking, each of
           | us only have tiny levers to pull, and we should pull them.
        
           | proprietario wrote:
           | I feel like this an interesting angle and I want to approach
           | the discussion in good faith..
           | 
           | So why should it be morally ok to show support/better the
           | public image/engage with a party that is
           | supporting/purporting some huge morally bad things?
           | 
           | My reasoning is as follows, I wonder where you wouldn't
           | agree:
           | 
           | A: You shouldn't support people doing morally bad stuff
           | 
           | B: Someone supporting morally bad things is morally bad
           | 
           | B.2: Sharing/Engaging with them shows support and betters
           | their public image
           | 
           | C: Kaspersky is an oligarch supporting stuff that is morally
           | wrong
           | 
           | D: So you shouldn't support him by driving engagement to his
           | site
        
         | axus wrote:
         | Ooh, are we holding Larry Ellison and Elon Musk accountable for
         | US actions now?
        
           | samothrace wrote:
           | Whataboutism.
           | 
           | Are you implying that OP hypocritically supports Larry
           | Ellison and Elon Musk? Are you implying that not supporting
           | Larry Ellison and Elon Musk by not promoting their media or
           | avoiding their products is absurd? Are you implying that
           | people should hold Larry Ellison and Elon Musk accountable
           | for US actions, but don't, and therefore doing it to other
           | oligarchs is unfair or unreasonable?
        
             | axus wrote:
             | I'm OK with anyone expressing their feelings on Kapersky,
             | Ellison, Musk, their boats, and their politics. My guess is
             | that throwaway has similar feelings about all three.
             | 
             | Personally I do feel that we share guilt proportional to
             | our contributions to the ones hurting others; and I'd be
             | interested in the calculus of their respective moral
             | burdens. My tax payments mean I bear 0.0000001 % of the
             | responsibility for US government behavior.
        
           | throw-the-towel wrote:
           | Why not?
        
       | rkagerer wrote:
       | How bad is it for a ship's hull to get frozen in ice? Are these
       | ships all reinforced? Are there clever mitigations this "drydock"
       | undertakes?
        
       | tintor wrote:
       | This looks like real life MineCraft.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-06 23:09 UTC)