[HN Gopher] Last Year on My Mac: Look Back in Disbelief
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Last Year on My Mac: Look Back in Disbelief
        
       Author : vitosartori
       Score  : 403 points
       Date   : 2025-12-28 10:12 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (eclecticlight.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (eclecticlight.co)
        
       | thenaturalist wrote:
       | Tahoe is such a criminal worsening of UI quality, it really is
       | worrisome that Apple is proudly releasing it.
       | 
       | If this kind of software trend continues in 2026, it might be the
       | first time I take a serious look at Linux distros on Mac.
        
         | renegade-otter wrote:
         | Installed Mint on my GAMING Windows system, uninstalled Steam
         | on Windows. All is well.
         | 
         | While at it, nuked my old MacBook Pro and Air with Mint too -
         | not like they are getting updates anyway.
         | 
         | It can be done, it should be done. These commercial operating
         | systems have enshitified to a critical point and are beyond
         | repair.
        
           | roxolotl wrote:
           | The thing that's weird about this though is it isn't
           | enshitification. I don't want to defend the worsening of
           | software quality/ux/ui for monetary gain but at least it's
           | somewhat rational. This is not a change that emphasizes
           | profit driven changes over user driven ones. Maybe I'm
           | missing some profit motive but it just seems like an awful
           | design choice.
           | 
           | Edit: Not to disagree though. I too have a Linux gaming pc
           | and are helping friends do the same.
        
             | trinix912 wrote:
             | Maybe not enshittification in the sense that every other
             | UIImageView has an ad in it, but definitely a huge
             | regression from the UI it had before.
             | 
             | Sadly it's only a matter of time until everyone copies it
             | because it's cool and it's what Apple does so they must be
             | right!
        
         | trinix912 wrote:
         | I'm holding off upgrading my laptop (2013 MBP running Catalina)
         | until they get their UI stuff together. I'd just gotten used to
         | Sequoia on my desktop but this is unbearable.
         | 
         | Not a single update since 2019 has improved the UI more than it
         | regressed it in my opinion. Too much whitespace, too little
         | contrast, too big controls, and now too little readability.
         | 
         | It's almost like their entire UI department is under threat of
         | being fired unless they invent a radical UI update every other
         | year.
         | 
         | Even Vista was a readability zen compared to this and they
         | aren't listening to feedback at all.
        
       | sylens wrote:
       | Perhaps the thing I hate most about Tahoe is the embedded rounded
       | rectangle around the menu inside of the larger rounded rectangle
       | window. They're trying to go for this look of a menu floating
       | above the rest of the window it belongs to, but it just looks
       | sloppy to me in dark mode.
        
         | Lord-Jobo wrote:
         | Looks sloppy in any mode. The amount of wasted space has gone
         | from "well a little bit of rounding/padding is alright to
         | achieve a unified unique look" to "holy shit this is just
         | Fischer price laugh and learn garbage".
         | 
         | 1/2 pixel strips everywhere, around tons of elements. Huge
         | rounded corners. Slow showy animations.
         | 
         | This isn't a UI for adults, this is a UI for a fake computer
         | sequence in a cheap Netflix movie.
        
           | xp84 wrote:
           | Even Jony Ive, who I thought was a bad UI designer when that
           | job was unwisely given to him, thinks Alan Dye has no taste.
           | That's saying something.
        
         | rick_dalton wrote:
         | Personally I couldn't get past the horrible gray squircle jails
         | for icons that don't adhere to their boring new standard. They
         | didn't even update the pixelmator icon for quite a while, which
         | they themselves acquired. Shows you how much effort went in to
         | this.
        
       | xqcgrek2 wrote:
       | Tahoe has to be the worst software Apple has released in three
       | decades. It's unbelievable it got through. If Macs and macOS were
       | not a tiny portion of their revenue I would short the stock.
        
         | uxp100 wrote:
         | iOS 26 is also very bad. Many Christmas conversations between
         | boomers baffled by their phones, and as I younger (than boomer)
         | person I am not as baffled but there are a number of things
         | that take more button presses than they did in previous
         | versions for no apparent reason. And it's real ugly imo.
        
           | treetalker wrote:
           | Viewing all tabs in Safari is the thorn in my side.
        
             | uxp100 wrote:
             | Yes, that's the main one I was thinking of, though there
             | are spots in the photos app too iirc.
        
           | xp84 wrote:
           | They've achieved sufficient lock-in that they can enshittify
           | everything as much as they want with no consequences.
           | Switching has too high an ecosystem cost, plus in the US it's
           | a special case that a lot of people think if you don't use
           | all Apple products you are probably poor.
        
         | vegardx wrote:
         | One thing that made Tahoe even worse is that Apple changed what
         | they considered an update or upgrade, so for Tahoe it was
         | suddenly considered as a update and not an upgrade, in all
         | management solutions.
         | 
         | This force-upgraded a lot of Macs at work and we lost days of
         | effective work across many engineers. The machines was
         | practically useless for weeks.
         | 
         | They clearly don't care about power users anymore, and haven't
         | for quite some time. It's so sad.
        
           | hexbin010 wrote:
           | That's egregiously bad, and malicious.
        
         | xp84 wrote:
         | >short the stock
         | 
         | The frustrating part is that even if you take the position that
         | iOS 26 is just as awful, their incentives are so decoupled from
         | what you'd hope they would be, that ruining your product isn't
         | really bad for the business! After all, Apple can just point to
         | Windows 11's embedded ads, three or four layers of different
         | generations of overlapping settings panes, and inferior
         | hardware and dare you to switch. Most of the customer base has
         | only those two realistic options.
        
       | jwlake wrote:
       | its very odd that apparently everyone working in Apple software
       | dev either refuses to dogfood this stuff or just uses iPads for
       | everything.
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | Ironically that would be a new kind of dogfooding.
        
         | lotsofpulp wrote:
         | It would not matter if they dogfooded it, the decision makers
         | higher up in the chain are getting paid more to make a visible
         | change and/or increase revenue, not to make a better user
         | experience.
        
           | g947o wrote:
           | I think this goes both ways.
           | 
           | Famously, Jobs' demands pushed engineers to think and work
           | harder to achieve what they think was impossible, which
           | resulted in many of the most iconic designs of personal
           | electronic devices in history.
           | 
           | On the other hand, we have butterfly keyboard and this.
        
             | lapcat wrote:
             | Jobs did not run on a fixed annual schedule like Tim Cook
             | does.
             | 
             | Mac OS X 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, and 10.7 all took over 12
             | months to develop, sometimes much more, and 10.5 was
             | famously delayed out to 30 months.
             | 
             | Jobs may have pushed engineers, but he was more careful
             | about what he pushed out the door to consumers.
        
               | franktankbank wrote:
               | Doesn't sound very agile..............
        
         | hamdingers wrote:
         | So many of the rough edges disappear when "Reduce Transparency"
         | is enabled I've theorized that setting must be pretty popular
         | around Apple's offices.
        
           | normie3000 wrote:
           | My browser has a half-inch white bar at the bottom
           | constantly, presumably because of this setting.
        
             | hamdingers wrote:
             | Cannot reproduce on 26.2 with either Safari or Chrome with
             | the setting on. That would infuriate me.
        
               | normie3000 wrote:
               | When first scrolling, the bottom page controls disappear.
               | But they leave their container blocking the page content.
        
           | xp84 wrote:
           | Using that option suddenly nerfed all my themes in Edge,
           | forcing the window title bars to all be gray instead of the
           | bold colors I use to differentiate the different profiles I
           | use for work. I wish there was a "Reduce bullshit" toggle on
           | MacOS and iOS, and also that it would skip all the
           | increasingly stupid animations. No, reduce motion sucks
           | because it just uses an equally-slow crossfade. Just STFU and
           | let me move to the next task and stop animating everything.
           | Good for you, you have a good GPU, I don't care.
        
         | keyshapegeo99 wrote:
         | iPadOS 26 is an even bigger F-up than macOS 26, though
         | 
         | It's hugely embarrassing how they've had to perform a
         | screeching U-turn in bringing back Slide Over and dock-
         | launchable Split View with the .1 and .2 updates - lest graphic
         | artists and others who depended upon these features left their
         | platform in droves. This is essentially an admission that
         | iPadOS 26's touch-based UX had precisely zero thought put into
         | it. They do not have a clue what they're doing
         | 
         | There are still many, many more nonsensical UX degradations and
         | bugs that need ironing out
        
           | mitchell209 wrote:
           | For years I was begging to get better multitasking and more
           | powerful apps, especially after they introduced the magic
           | keyboard. They can take it all back now. I'd rather they
           | stick with 0 multitasking, if this is the best they can do.
        
       | ghusto wrote:
       | Adding insult to injury, my fans are constantly going now because
       | I have to pay for this disastrous upgrade with tons more
       | resources.
        
         | xp84 wrote:
         | Well, the M1 is still good enough to last years longer under
         | the sane demands of nearly any type of work. That's bad for the
         | stock price. How else are they going to keep people on the same
         | upgrade cycle as the Intel days if they don't tax those GPUs
         | with all these pointless animations?
        
       | avidphantasm wrote:
       | Since macOS went to a yearly cadence, I usually upgrade during
       | Christmas break, this allows for a couple of point releases to
       | work out the kinks. I won't be upgrading this year. I hope macOS
       | 27 fixes this abomination. Otherwise, this 30+ year Mac user will
       | be moving on...
        
         | Y-bar wrote:
         | You would do well to avoid 26. I upgraded to be a Guinea Pig
         | for a few colleagues and I regret it. Things like apps and
         | scripts work in the technical sense, but it is worse because
         | the myriad of graphical and interactive issues.
        
       | egypturnash wrote:
       | I just hope that my current Mac keeps being usable long enough
       | that Liquid Glass has been fixed or replaced entirely by the time
       | I'm forced to upgrade to whatever's shipping on my next computer.
        
         | stefanfisk wrote:
         | My kid dumped a glass of water all over my MBP M1 a few days
         | ago. Deciding between an inferior M4 with Sequoia or a fancy
         | new M5 with Tahoe has been rough :/
        
           | HelloUsername wrote:
           | > dumped a glass of water all over my MBP
           | 
           | I believe that's how the designers at Apple came up with
           | Liquid Glass
        
           | dghost-dev wrote:
           | Liquid Glass is not that bad lol.
        
             | stefanfisk wrote:
             | Neither is an M4 Pro.
        
           | coldpie wrote:
           | If it helps, I've been using XFCE since 2007 and it's
           | remained functionally identical for all of those almost 20
           | years. It just works, it improves a tiny bit with each major
           | upgrade, and they don't rearrange everything every couple
           | years for the sake of justifying a salary.
           | 
           | Maybe it's a good opportunity to consider whether you
           | actually _have_ to keep running on Apple 's treadmill.
        
             | baq wrote:
             | I'd love an XFCE (or even gnome tbh) environment on a
             | properly built laptop, unfortunately only Apple is able to
             | build something that works in all areas that matter: sleeps
             | when lid closed, wakes when lid opens, touchpad and display
             | don't suck.
        
               | coldpie wrote:
               | FWIW that all worked out of the box for me on my Intel
               | Framework. But yes, it's fair to say there are tradeoffs
               | for each solution. Maybe Apple's cons are getting big
               | enough these days. Worth considering.
        
               | gray_-_wolf wrote:
               | > all areas that matter: sleeps when lid closed, wakes
               | when lid opens, touchpad and display don't suck.
               | 
               | All of these seem to be fine on my thinkpad (true, I
               | probably have somewhat lower standards for passable
               | display). Battery life sucks a bit, what I can usually
               | fine outlet somewhat to plug into.
        
               | somebehemoth wrote:
               | I have an oled thinkpad running fedora that has never had
               | a sleep issue. Excellent touchpad as well. Thinkpad X1
               | Carbon.
        
               | tasuki wrote:
               | Which version? I have a X1 Carbon from, uhh, 2017? It
               | supports S3 sleep. I'd think about an upgrade, if only I
               | wasn't worried about sleep issues. I run Debian if that
               | makes any difference.
               | 
               | Actually now that I think about it, my visceral reaction
               | is one of dread: a feeling the trouble will be more than
               | the benefit of a new computer.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | For me the touchpad experience is not just about the
               | hardware. I got a Magic Trackpad for my Linux desktop
               | hoping that it would at least be somewhat comparable to
               | my MacBook. But scrolling and gestures are nowhere near
               | as consistent and fluid as in macOS since the software
               | support just isn't there.
               | 
               | As a fairly typical example, getting Firefox on Linux to
               | actually scroll smoothly takes googling and fiddling with
               | settings. Gesture support is hit or miss. On macOS,
               | Firefox behaves just like any other native app in this
               | regard.
        
               | bigyabai wrote:
               | My Magic Trackpad feels _more_ consistent on Linux, Force
               | Touch notwithstanding.
        
               | encom wrote:
               | Firefox on Fedora on X1 Carbon and scrolling just works.
               | Maybe it was different in the past.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | This was a few weeks ago. IIRC, the issue with Firefox
               | was not that it didn't scroll but that the scrolling
               | wasn't inertial unless you changed some settings.
        
               | snazz wrote:
               | If you "fling" the page, lift your fingers off, and then
               | tap with two fingers, does the page come to a stop?
        
               | ako wrote:
               | I have a thinkpad p1 with popos, but it doesn't sleep
               | properly. Closing the lid causes it to be super active. I
               | have to lay it down up side down so the ventilation gaps
               | are not blocked, otherwise it overheats. Burned one SSD
               | this way.
        
               | cosmic_cheese wrote:
               | > unfortunately only Apple is able to build something
               | that works in all areas that matter: sleeps when lid
               | closed, wakes when lid opens, touchpad and display don't
               | suck
               | 
               | In my case I'd add:
               | 
               | - Chassis that doesn't flex like crazy
               | 
               | - Battery life good enough that I typically don't need to
               | think about AC outlet accessibility
               | 
               | - Can sit in standby for upwards of a week without
               | battery drain forcing it to shut down
               | 
               | - Is inaudible except when maxing out CPU or GPU for
               | several minutes
               | 
               | - Has a screen panel with a resolution that's either 1x
               | or 2x UI scaling native
               | 
               | The number of laptops in the market that check these
               | boxes is disappointingly tiny.
        
               | zingar wrote:
               | I don't see anyone in these replies really addressing the
               | touchpad. Would love to hear from people who have used
               | macbooks if they have found a Linux machine that matches
               | the Apple trackpad.
               | 
               | "Never tried a MacBook, my Linux machine trackpad always
               | worked perfectly" is the usual response I get when I
               | press for a response... but without trying Apple (on this
               | one thing) you'll never understand until you've
               | experienced the downgrade.
        
             | stefanfisk wrote:
             | I've combined my MacBook with a Linux desktop for about
             | five years now. Linux has its pros as a developer, but IMHO
             | daily driving it is like walking around with pebbles in my
             | shoes.
             | 
             | Something as basic as scrolling feels slightly inconsistent
             | in just about every app and keybindings are all over the
             | place. There's always the allure of getting the config
             | "just right" but after a while I swear I start seeing
             | Sisyphus' reflection in my screen.
        
               | coldpie wrote:
               | What DE are you using? Some of the higher profile ones
               | (Gnome, KDE) try to be all smooth and polished and
               | feature-full and in my opinion just introduce more
               | complications and bugs that get in the way of just being
               | a good desktop. I like XFCE because it's just a really
               | good, simple window manager, desktop, and set of basic
               | utilities. Other than that it just gets out of your way
               | and doesn't make you relearn how to do things every few
               | years. It's like if the Win98 desktop got another 30
               | years of gentle refinement.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | I've tried XFCE, i3, Pop Shell and plain Gnome.
               | 
               | But it doesn't really matter, since the DE doesn't
               | determine how individual apps behave.
               | 
               | My baseline is OSX from decade ago OSX with native apps
               | where everyone was following the Apple HIG so
               | consistently that using a Java app felt like waking up in
               | the twilight zone. macOS these days have fallen quite a
               | bit from its UX glory days but there's still quite a bit
               | to go before it hits the level of Ubuntu or Windows.
               | 
               | On Linux it feels to me like every app exists in its own
               | parallell dimension where you never know if even the
               | basic laws of physics still apply.
        
               | coldpie wrote:
               | Fair. I guess I haven't had that experience, but so much
               | stuff is web-based these days that probably 90% of my
               | computing time is just spent in a browser and the rest in
               | just a handful of applications that I know well.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | I'd guess that I am unusually picky about UX for being a
               | techie. The story would probably have been very different
               | 20 years ago when fiddling with my computer was more of a
               | hobby than a chore.
        
               | coldpie wrote:
               | Yeah, could be. You mentioned elsewhere in this thread
               | having to tinker a bunch to get scrolling in Firefox to
               | be smooth and I don't even know what that means :) I just
               | put 2 fingers on the touchpad and move them up and
               | Firefox scrolls the page down and I'm happy, haha.
               | 
               | Anyway sounds like you've already done what I suggested
               | and it didn't out work you. I hope for your sake Apple
               | comes to their senses soon!
        
               | docmars wrote:
               | I'm completely with you on this. Everything from
               | scrolling to how windows behave makes a huge difference
               | in the feeling of quality and responsiveness.
               | 
               | Once you're spoiled by a macOS machine's smoothness, it's
               | hard to use anything else, where cursors feel like
               | they're literally lagging behind your trackpad movements
               | and land somewhere imprecise, and scrolling feels like
               | opening a rusty car door as it catches on itself and you
               | feel the friction.
               | 
               | macOS on an Apple Touchpad is like using a well-oiled
               | machine by comparison. These things really matter!
        
           | dpedu wrote:
           | There could be hope for it, but it might be too late now. I
           | dumped tea on my M1 Macbook air earlier this year. I managed
           | to save it - sort of. I had to replace the battery. The
           | screen was working but also had liquid damage so I replaced
           | it as well.
           | 
           | Immediately after spilling tea on it I shut it off, took off
           | the bottom plate, rinsed it with water, and rinsed it again
           | with isopropyl alcohol. I think I waved a heat gun over it
           | for a bit and then left it in front of a fan. This was about
           | 8 months ago and it still works!
           | 
           | The only lingering problem is that when caps lock is off, the
           | light on the key is _slightly_ illuminated. Weird, but I can
           | tolerate that!
        
         | colechristensen wrote:
         | eh, the problems aren't prominent on macOS.
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | Eventually it will go away just like brushed metal, lickable,
         | green felt, and woodgrain. Unfortunately for that to happen
         | they will need to invent something so heinous you will wish for
         | liquid glass.
        
           | bookofjoe wrote:
           | https://imgur.com/a/5uHuYyV
        
           | egypturnash wrote:
           | Personally I would be down for a return to woodgrain or
           | brushed metal.
        
         | eoskx wrote:
         | I thought Liquid Glass was cool & interesting when I first saw
         | it in the Developer releases, but I find myself yearning to go
         | back to Sequoia. Hopefully, Apple decides to go back to
         | "simple" soon.
        
         | rayiner wrote:
         | It's infuriating that you can't downgrade.
        
           | docmars wrote:
           | Especially when Sequoia will be supported by security updates
           | for at least another 1-2 years. There aren't any compelling
           | "gotta have it" reasons to upgrade to Tahoe.
        
         | encom wrote:
         | Just keep giving Apple more money. That'll show them!
        
           | jasonvorhe wrote:
           | How is using an already paid for computer giving more money
           | to Apple?
        
             | simne wrote:
             | They treat you belong to community, and use your appearance
             | in hidden ads as "just another consumer choose A..
             | products".
             | 
             | Even if you will intentionally hide all logos of A.. from
             | A.. products u use, their design is very distinctive and
             | widely known, so even looking on Xiaomi most people will
             | think it is A..
             | 
             | Plus, A.. products usually deep integrated into their
             | infrastructure, I mean A.. Wi-fi router, A.. printer, A..
             | speakers, A.. interfaces (Lightning), etc.
        
       | petesergeant wrote:
       | Updated iOS overnight and what the fuck man. Also Settings search
       | is so totally broken I can't even
        
       | efficax wrote:
       | liquid glass is a total disaster. what the hell is going on in
       | the ux teams at apple? this is like their windows vista era. i
       | hate it so much
        
         | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
         | I'm almost positive that it's because they want to make as many
         | apps as possible VisionOS-friendly.
         | 
         | I suspect that they were rather shaken at how poorly AVP was
         | received.
        
           | emchammer wrote:
           | I don't want to wear one of those things on my face. I want a
           | high-quality computer and phone. Apple executives are out to
           | lunch.
        
             | MagicMoonlight wrote:
             | Alright grandad. You said the same thing about
             | touchscreens, and look how well that went for blackberru.
        
               | bigyabai wrote:
               | Bring him inside, we're just about to start another round
               | of _Ultraman Quiz King_ on the family Pippin.
        
               | efficax wrote:
               | the market agrees for the most part. VR goggle interfaces
               | just aren't taking the world by storm. When it came out I
               | thought: I'll wait for the iteration that comes 2 years
               | later (the AVP 3 or whatever) since by then they'll have
               | worked out the kinks and it will be a solid computing
               | platform. It's 2 months shy of 2 years since general
               | availability of the AVP and it's essentially identical to
               | the initial release with just a minor chip upgrade. It's
               | a dead product line
        
               | fauigerzigerk wrote:
               | AVP may be dead but VisionOS is not. I'm pretty sure
               | Apple smart glasses are coming.
        
               | phantasmish wrote:
               | If someone cracks "smart glasses" that's the next
               | smartphone-size market and revolution, guaranteed, no
               | question about it.
               | 
               | VR headsets ain't it but I'm convinced the reason every
               | company is working on them and developing AR stuff for
               | their traditional devices (which are terrible to use for
               | AR) is because they don't want to still be at the
               | starting line if someone figures out smart glasses.
        
               | PrairieFire wrote:
               | This is the "answer" in plain sight and I agree. The
               | iPhone is the beating heart of the modern Apple empire.
               | Tim Cook has been a vocal proponent of AR since the
               | summer of Pokemon Go. That combined with Meta getting
               | traction with their Rayban line is almost certainly at
               | the center of an overarching internal strategy at Apple
               | to ensure they are positioned to maintain or even grow
               | position as end user mobile computing form factors shift
               | beyond the traditional smartphone. Getting the ux and app
               | ecosystem ready visually is what 'caused' Liquid Glass.
        
               | worksonmine wrote:
               | Counterexample: how did the metaverse go? Is there anyone
               | using it? Facebook even rebranded to Meta on that bet.
        
               | array_key_first wrote:
               | People were right about touchscreens, actually, and
               | mobile phones.
               | 
               | They never did replace the productivity usecases. They
               | replaced a lot of casual usecases, and created a _bunch
               | more_ usecases, mostly around media consumption.
               | 
               | But if you go to an office anywhere in the world, and you
               | look around, it's not people on their phones. It's a sea
               | of desktop computers, like it's 1995. Even at Apple. Not
               | because everyone is out of the times, but because we did
               | truly find the perfect form factor, and have chosen to
               | refine it.
               | 
               | Apple vision pro wont replace the productivity suite,
               | like the iPhone didn't. And it won't replace the iPhone,
               | because it's way bigger and more inconvenient. So, I'm
               | not sure where that leaves it.
        
               | nothrabannosir wrote:
               | Grandparents also said it about a lot of technologies
               | that actually were worse and didn't survive. Those are
               | just not around anymore to be the subject of survivorship
               | bias.
               | 
               | I'm not sure when we're started dismissing the elderly's
               | advice as "just complaining because they're old" but it
               | seems we're hell bent on reinventing the wheel of
               | misfortune with every generation.
               | 
               | If old people complain about something, maybe they have a
               | point?
        
               | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
               | If they're still complaining about something that's
               | around, do they have a point? How do we know? What things
               | have survived the fires of testing and should just be
               | accepted, and what things can be groused about as bad?
               | 
               | ps. I am a grandparent, on the edge of elderly.
        
           | pjmlp wrote:
           | It would help if it wasn't 3500 dollars, they did not embrace
           | games, and were expecting developers to buy such devices for
           | so little return in development cost, released at a time most
           | headsets were already on yet again going down on another VR
           | headset cycle.
           | 
           | It was bound to fail since day one.
        
             | DonHopkins wrote:
             | Are there even enough active Vision Pro users to make the
             | $3500 back selling an app for it, not even considering the
             | cost to develop it, or Apple's 30% app store tax?
             | 
             | How about porting "I Am Rich" to the Vision Pro, and it
             | could just show a glowing red orb floating in front of your
             | face.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Rich
        
               | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
               | That would be like the countdown in _Three Body Problem_
               | (the Netflix version).
        
             | btown wrote:
             | IMO one of the big misses for launch, and one of the most
             | untapped markets for VR/AR, was business analytics &
             | visualization. Any manager worth flying to a corporate
             | retreat is worth getting a capex-treatable top-of-the-line
             | device to see an extra dimension of data breakdowns. There
             | would be a trendiness factor here, too, much like how every
             | executive needed a Blackberry back in the day.
             | 
             | But one of my big takeaways from e.g.
             | https://www.tableau.com/blog/exploring-spatial-computing-
             | and... (2024) was that some of the most basic UX research
             | around 3D visualization was left to the market to discover.
             | 
             | > During Tableau Conference 2024 in San Diego, we recruited
             | 22 attendees to help us assess the usability, learnability,
             | and potential utility of Tableau on the visionOS platform,
             | along with broader perspectives on the potential for HMDs
             | to create engaging experiences around data. Participants
             | were tasked with a series of analytical exercises using one
             | of three datasets. These tasks included specifying filter
             | settings, changing data fields, and interpreting trends
             | across various visualizations, such as bar charts, line
             | charts, and a 3D globe. Examples of tasks included
             | identifying the country with the highest CO2 emissions in
             | Asia and determining when poultry production first exceeded
             | beef production in South America.
             | 
             | If you want to launch a $3000 device properly, why are you
             | making Tableau do this themselves?
        
           | xp84 wrote:
           | It sounds plausible, but only in the shallowest "yeah, make
           | 'em look the same" way. Just like when they started shipping
           | the Catalyst-based Mac apps of Messages, Photos, etc so that
           | they'd look the same as the iOS apps (and no doubt so they
           | could reuse some code from there instead of wasting
           | developers on the Mac platform they hate).
           | 
           | It's not as though anything about Liquid Glass makes a
           | meaningful difference in usability.
        
             | fauigerzigerk wrote:
             | I think this goes deeper. Transparency is clearly not a
             | good fit for desktop or mobile apps, but imagine smart
             | glasses where every app completely blocks your view of the
             | things behind it. It just wouldn't work.
             | 
             | To move around safely with smart glasses on your face, apps
             | need to be semi transparent from day one. It's not about
             | superficial stylistic similarities this time. And it's not
             | primarily about design either.
             | 
             | This is absolutely about core usability, just not for macOS
             | or iOS.
        
               | xp84 wrote:
               | You seem to have a more solid idea than I of what a
               | Vison-like device is for. As far as I know, it's for
               | approximately nothing. I have no opinion on what I'd use
               | a $4,000 AR goggles for besides the world's most
               | expensive way to watch Netflix on a plane, or the second-
               | most-expensive monitor you can buy for your Mac (Apple's
               | hilarious $6K 6K monitor being the first, of course).
               | 
               | So I don't think I necessarily buy that apps have to have
               | any transparency at all. If I'm walking around doing
               | things in the real world with a Vision Pro on my head,
               | that itself beggars belief to me. It's wildly impractical
               | for that with its 2-hour battery life, super heavy
               | weight, and hilarious appearance, and all those will
               | continue to be true long after the 5-year window when the
               | "26" OS aesthetic will likely persist.
               | 
               | So, might some future glasses or something benefit from
               | transparency? Maybe. But if I find myself walking down
               | the street with a screen on my face, I'd personally
               | prefer to just close the apps that I don't need, rather
               | than look through them. If the glasses are going to
               | highlight place names, people's names, etc. they can do
               | that with text floating in midair, like a subtitle.
        
           | ninkendo wrote:
           | I would be shocked if Apple was making any product decisions
           | to benefit visionOS at the expense of anything else. It's so
           | abundantly clear that the vision pro was a failure, it would
           | be a horrible mistake to sacrifice anything to try and save
           | it at this point. I think Apple is done with that experiment.
        
           | glhaynes wrote:
           | I keep seeing this take lately and I don't understand it at
           | all because there is ~zero Liquid Glass in visionOS,
           | including in visionOS 26.
        
           | PufPufPuf wrote:
           | Remember when Windows 8 tried to make all desktop
           | applications touch-friendly? The situation seems remarkably
           | similar.
        
           | crooked-v wrote:
           | VisionOS doesn't actually have the degree of transparency of
           | Liquid Glass, though, which makes the whole thing
           | particularly weird. It has a much more opaque frosted glass
           | effect.
        
         | Shadowmist wrote:
         | It actually runs on Metal so the "GL" wasn't supposed to be in
         | the name.
        
           | ics wrote:
           | Liquid (Gl)ass
        
       | baggy_trough wrote:
       | I do enjoy the liquid glass controls in some places. The glass
       | effect is really beautiful. What I hate about it is the way the
       | overall UI constantly gets in the way of my content.
        
         | treetalker wrote:
         | I expect and demand a level of, for want of a better term, UI
         | _crispness_.
         | 
         | It is equally aggravating to err on either side: Windows 3.1
         | clunk to the left, Tahoe's operationally useless (indeed,
         | operationally detrimental) visual fireworks to the right.
         | 
         | Apple needs to hit a sweet spot of _crisp_ , but the priority
         | must be fast, logical interaction that lets me operate at the
         | speed of thought. With Tahoe, Apple tried to gild the lily.
        
       | sho_hn wrote:
       | MacOS aesthetically peaked with Leopard in '09, but speaking
       | frankly the OS has felt abandoned to me since around 10.2, with
       | so many basic interaction issues with window management and the
       | dock just never getting fixed properly and a long list of half-
       | assed bandaids and abandoned experiments over the years.
       | 
       | There is no true passion in MacOS, and the marketing has come
       | face to face with reality in 2025. It's the neglected step-child
       | of a company distracted by other things.
       | 
       | There's been some impressive engineering done by lower-level
       | folks under the hood of it all, though.
        
       | drnick1 wrote:
       | The answer is KDE and GNOME, at least on the machines that
       | support some form of Linux.
        
         | tensor wrote:
         | That is not the answer. Many of us run software that is not
         | available on Linux.
        
       | dijksterhuis wrote:
       | > Maybe this is because I'm getting older, but that gives me the
       | benefit of having experienced Apple's older interfaces, with
       | their exceptional quality and functionality.
       | 
       | i really missed snow leopard for about 10 years all the way up to
       | when i moved on from my macbook circa 5 years ago.
        
         | hallole wrote:
         | Snow Leopard, Mountain Lion were so peak. The first step into
         | minimalism was beautiful, too, I'll admit, but it's culminated
         | in this Liquid Glass garbage, so it was ultimately a misstep.
        
         | stefanfisk wrote:
         | I feel so old saying this, but back in the days both Apple and
         | third party developers would follow the HIG closely enough that
         | something felt off right away when an app wasn't behaving 100%
         | native. Running something like a Java app was jarring to say
         | the least even if they were supposedly using a "cross platform"
         | UI library.
         | 
         | But then Gruber said that the HIG was dead and the decline
         | gained more and more momentum...
        
           | Groxx wrote:
           | Very much yes. When "affordance" was one of the primary
           | goals, rather than "breathing room". Information density took
           | a nose-dive and we lost all visual separation and gained...
           | what? Less battery life?
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | > back in the days both Apple and third party developers
           | would follow the HIG closely enough that something felt off
           | right away when an app wasn't behaving 100% native.
           | 
           | That's only true for desktop productivity apps and widgets.
           | Apple and 3rd party "creativity" apps never followed the HIG
           | religiously, if at all.
        
       | dc_giant wrote:
       | Design got worse since Maverick for professional users.
        
         | thomassmith65 wrote:
         | It has been worsening since Snow Leopard. That is cliched but
         | true.
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | There are claims that Liquid Glass was in development for three
       | years. If that is accurate, the results are even more appalling.
        
         | api wrote:
         | All the non-technical people I know loved it. It's pretty. It's
         | neat. It looks cool. Apple is a consumer products company.
         | 
         | My personal feeling on it is just "meh." My productivity with
         | my laptop hasn't changed. I'm not a huge fan but it's not a
         | deal breaker. I still find it better than Windows 11 for the
         | most part, and Linux has other issues as a daily driver for me.
         | 
         | IMHO Apple needs a "tick" release where they only polish and
         | fix bugs and usability issues with an almost total feature
         | freeze. I've heard they may be doing that.
        
           | omnimus wrote:
           | Looking at popularity of similar design on iOS it would be
           | surprising "non-technical" users like it. People HATE new
           | iOS. Low contrast, not clear layering and focus, things being
           | moved around for unknown reasons.
           | 
           | Also who uses MacOs beaides developers? Majority are creative
           | prosumers in arts/design and they are even more annoyed by
           | messed up designs. What you are left with are lawyers,
           | writers, students? I guess they might like it.
        
             | rr808 wrote:
             | > Also who uses MacOs beaides developers?
             | 
             | Students - all of them.
        
               | omnimus wrote:
               | I said that in the next sentence. Than again this is
               | really true only in US. In rest of the world (including
               | europe) Macs are seen as luxury environment.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | Macs are not seens as a luxury environment in Sweden at
               | least.
               | 
               | Of the people I know only old folks, gamers and some
               | techies own PCs. A lot of people will however just use
               | whatever wintel laptop their employer provides them with.
        
               | hu3 wrote:
               | Sweden is another rich country.
               | 
               | But worldwide Chromebooks are more numerous than macs in
               | education.
        
               | stefanfisk wrote:
               | I'm not arguing that macs are more common than non-macs,
               | only that "In rest of the world (including europe) Macs
               | are seen as luxury environment." is false.
               | 
               | Chromebooks dominate K12 here so it kinda depends on what
               | you mean by "students". Once people start buying their
               | own computers however my impression is that Macs are
               | quite common of not dominating.
        
               | trinix912 wrote:
               | Very few uni and high school students have MacBooks in
               | East and Southeast Europe and it's seen as quite a flex
               | there. They're also impractical for those in engineering
               | schools due to required software that only works on
               | Windows.
        
           | hu3 wrote:
           | My wife is non-technical and hates it. She said it looks
           | "ugly and childish".
           | 
           | And I made sure to not bias her with my or HN's opinion about
           | liquid glass. I patiently waited for her initiative to
           | comment on the update.
        
             | FireBeyond wrote:
             | Yup. I didn't say anything. My partner's first question to
             | me was "is there any way to get rid of this?"
        
           | someNameIG wrote:
           | > All the non-technical people I know loved it. It's pretty.
           | It's neat. It looks cool. Apple is a consumer products
           | company.
           | 
           | My partner doesn't like it, and outside of excel she is not a
           | technical person.
        
       | wintermutestwin wrote:
       | While the UI designers are rearranging deck chairs, the UX is
       | totally failing to love up to the promise of an ecosystem. Cross
       | system cut n paste is a neat trick, but I just want timers and
       | alarms to actually work as expected.
       | 
       | I shouldn't be surprised given that the mac save as dialog box
       | has a name field that is still hard coded to 32 characters
       | visible. Whenever I bitch about it I get pushback that filenames
       | shouldn't be longer than that! Um hello - tell me you have never
       | worked in the real world outside your iphone bubble without
       | telling me.
        
       | cglan wrote:
       | I think for the first time I've been considering moving off iOS
       | because of liquid glass. The bugs on apple products have hit a
       | breaking point for me. Mac is still unequivocally the best laptop
       | around imho, but it's less clear cut for phones. My iPhone 15 pro
       | is borderline unusable. Every day is a new issue. I'm very much
       | over it.
       | 
       | You used to be able to count on the basics working smoothly, but
       | stuff like the camera and messaging are frequently broken for me
        
         | SkyeCA wrote:
         | I've recently been using an Android phone a family member gave
         | me after they upgraded and to my shock it's...fantastic? It's
         | not at all like I remember Android from back in the early
         | Android days.
        
           | loloquwowndueo wrote:
           | Dunno man, I've used Android recently and it's still as
           | bafflingly confusing and crappy as I remember it being.
           | 
           | Definitely an "to each their own" kind of situation.
        
             | rr808 wrote:
             | I think that is what you get used to. I've been using
             | Android for over a decade and my wife's iPhone is super
             | confusing to me.
        
               | loloquwowndueo wrote:
               | That's a good observation, I think you're right.
        
               | bigyabai wrote:
               | Yep, my parents are both Android users and have to ask
               | "where is the home button" when someone passes them an
               | iPhone.
        
               | mceachen wrote:
               | Followed by "where is the back button."
               | 
               | Answer: sometimes apps let you swipe right from the left
               | margin, sometimes there may be a left arrow in the upper
               | left, but it may not be visible unless you enable tinted
               | Liquid Glass, but also look in the bottom left, there may
               | be a less-than sign, and some times you have to force-
               | quit the app and restart (like with Libby books borrowed
               | via Kindle...)
        
               | tempest_ wrote:
               | Does apply still sometimes put the back button in the top
               | left?
               | 
               | That used to drive me nuts especially as they grew the
               | phone to size 5+ inches
        
               | phantasmish wrote:
               | You mean the "roulette-wheel do-something-vaguely-
               | backish" button?
        
               | nozzlegear wrote:
               | I can't remember the last time I've encountered an app
               | that didn't let you swipe to go back. That's practically
               | built into iOS at this point.
        
               | Groxx wrote:
               | iOS UX-affordance has done an incredible reversal from
               | "one of the best" to "unambiguously the worst" over the
               | years :| it's stunningly unapproachable nowadays, and
               | Android seems excited to follow them
        
               | loloquwowndueo wrote:
               | > ask "where is the home button" when someone passes them
               | an iPhone.
               | 
               | This is actually hilarious because Android had all-screen
               | phones with only virtual buttons long before iPhones did
               | :)
        
               | andy99 wrote:
               | I had (the same) Samsung android phone from 2017-2025. I
               | bought an iPhone, mainly because of privacy concerns (for
               | which I consider apple to be the least bad mainstream
               | option, not good).
               | 
               | But I couldn't get over how bad the ux is compared to my
               | 7 year old phone. Things like highlighting, autocorrect,
               | placing the cursor where you want "just don't work", the
               | setup is unintuitive, the hotspot doesn't work half the
               | time, there are bugs (like email not connecting) that
               | based on my searches are prevalent and have no solution
               | "did you try updating and restarting". I really couldn't
               | believe how bad it is.
               | 
               | But evidently people really like them, and I imagine they
               | could find things not to like about my old Samsung, so to
               | each his own I guess.
        
               | swiftcoder wrote:
               | > Things like highlighting, autocorrect, placing the
               | cursor where you want "just don't work"
               | 
               | Hilariously, those things actually did work back in 2017,
               | and Apple has since broken all of them in various OS
               | updates
        
               | rootusrootus wrote:
               | Yeah that's the joke. 10 years ago all of this basic
               | stuff was working well. Now, autocorrect and cursor
               | placement regularly make me want to chuck the phone into
               | a chipper shredder.
        
               | macNchz wrote:
               | I've had an iPhone since 2009 and feel they have gotten
               | much more confusing over time.
               | 
               | It seems to be there has been some sort of internal
               | conflict between the need to add basic functionality to
               | be remotely comparable with Android, and the desire to
               | keep everything "simple". The end result being a kind of
               | a worst case of neither being especially featureful nor
               | all that simple. There's a cottage industry of apps that
               | exploit users' lack of understanding of their own
               | device's capabilities (e.g. flashlight apps with ads +
               | in-app purchases).
        
             | Groxx wrote:
             | If you want to see daily bugs on top of it: disable
             | animations in accessibility. Constant, 10x-daily-or-more
             | issues in system UI (apps are surprisingly much better
             | normally). E.g. it has partly or completely broken the
             | recent app switching for the past 4 major versions so far,
             | especially if you use a non-stock launcher.
             | 
             | I still prefer it over iOS due to being able to install
             | stuff outside of the Play Store. If/when Google kills that,
             | I'll be switching to a Linux mobile something. (I'm aware
             | of the verification nonsense, but that isn't in place yet,
             | and it has been shifting a bit)
        
           | beezlebroxxxxxx wrote:
           | Android has frequently been ahead of Apple in terms of
           | features for years at this point. But Apple's overall
           | "ecosystem" is (or was) much more cohesive, so everything
           | felt very Apple, while Android's has (for better or worse)
           | been something of a wild west situation; and iPhone's have
           | excellent cameras. If you go with a flagship Android phone,
           | though, you're now getting an equally good camera (if not
           | better in some cases) and the benefit of Android's more
           | freedom, in relative terms of course.
           | 
           | NA seems to really fixate on the luxury and social significer
           | aspect of having an iphone though. But I think this update is
           | finally ending that for some people. I have many friends who
           | were diehard iPhone users that are now thinking of moving to
           | Android. There's also a growing sense that new gens of most
           | phones are making only marginal advances. Keeping a phone for
           | 3 or more years is much more common and some mid-tier phones
           | are now getting long security and update commitments.
        
             | rootusrootus wrote:
             | > NA seems to really fixate on the luxury and social
             | significer aspect of having an iPhone though
             | 
             | I have yet to experience that. The biggest reason I have
             | mostly stayed with iPhones over the years was because the
             | tight integration with my MBP was useful, and iMessage is
             | way better than SMS.
             | 
             | RCS helps even out the playing field a bunch, but just
             | about the time that went mainstream I hear that it's a
             | regular source of trouble for _everyone_ (Android an iPhone
             | both) because the carriers suck. And Apple did at least
             | finally add some equivalence for one of the Android
             | features I had wanted (call screening).
        
               | bigstrat2003 wrote:
               | Teenagers supposedly care. But I've never seen adults who
               | care in the least what kind of phone someone has.
        
             | nozzlegear wrote:
             | > I think this update is finally ending that for some
             | people.
             | 
             | For some people in the HN social sphere, maybe. My sisters
             | have had iPhones since they were first released in the
             | naughties. They used to make fun of me for using Android
             | and then Windows Phones (I'm on iOS now). The notion that
             | my sisters would ever switch over to Android is risible;
             | they don't care about phones "making advances" or having
             | "security commitments." They care about iMessage, TikTok,
             | Instagram and Snapchat.
             | 
             | There are no other phones that are not iPhones for them.
             | The blue/green gap is real.
        
           | tempest_ wrote:
           | Fair if you haven't looking at it in a while but they have
           | largely been on par for a decade.
           | 
           | The Apple hardware is more consistently premium of course but
           | if you compare the Samsung Galaxy whatever with the iphone
           | they have been pretty close for a while. The entire industry
           | has been in incremental innovation for a long time.
        
           | nyarlathotep_ wrote:
           | Things like media playback via a web browser (and really
           | browsing in general) are so superior to iOS it's not even a
           | fair comparison.
        
         | coldpie wrote:
         | I recently switched from a 13 Mini to a Motorola Razr and wow
         | Android is so much nicer than iOS. Notifications don't randomly
         | disappear on Android, I have a Back button, and I can use real
         | Firefox!
        
           | ewoodrich wrote:
           | As an Android user since the T-Mobile G1, I tried switching
           | to an iPhone 15 Pro as my primary phone from a carrier deal
           | as the hardware looked nice plus Android/iOS has converged so
           | much over the years with all the same apps available on
           | either. I was pretty used to iOS from iPads and as a backup
           | phone so the switching costs were minimal and the better
           | MacOS integration seemed cool.
           | 
           | But man, the notifications are a _constant_ thorn in my side.
           | I have missed so many work notifications due to the lack of
           | persistent notification indicator (other than on the lock
           | screen), and the overall weirdness of iOS lockscreen
           | notification panel (segmentation between  "old" notifications
           | that can be mass dismissed and "new" notifications that pile
           | up individually-ish). I use an Apple Watch and somehow still
           | miss Teams notifications as they come in, I'm not even sure
           | how that happens...
           | 
           | I'm so close to abandoning the iPhone as my main phone and
           | going back to my S23 Ultra pretty much entirely because of
           | notifications, it's been a disappointment...
        
         | guestbest wrote:
         | I'm actually glad because it seems like we are finally leaving
         | behind the flat design that started in iOS 7, if I remember
         | correctly. I'm not sure it would be good to go full
         | skeuomorphic but at least a button looks more like a button
         | again
        
         | cosmic_cheese wrote:
         | I'm not the biggest fan of Liquid Glass, but I regularly use
         | Android via single-use tablets and dev test devices and I think
         | I dislike Material 3 Expressive even more. M3E feels weirdly
         | awkward and unrefined and it's a struggle to come up with a
         | color scheme that looks right. It would be a constant
         | irritation if Android were my daily driver.
        
       | jjice wrote:
       | I don't mind how Liquid Glass looks at all. It's just insane how
       | buggy the system has become. Even Messages will bug out, like
       | deleting my first word if I type too fast after opening a
       | conversation or auto scrolling and not letting me scroll down
       | until I exit and re-enter.
       | 
       | Unacceptable for the premium you pay for Apple software.
       | Unacceptable for any software one is paying for. I hope they get
       | their shit together and start fixing before they continue adding
       | new stuff. 26.2 doesn't inspire me that they're on that
       | trajectory.
       | 
       | The thing that amazes me most is that everyone on the teams
       | responsible is probably using their Apple devices and running
       | into these same bugs!
        
         | eoskx wrote:
         | I've had similar observations with different behaviors in
         | Safari and Finder. One would think the quality of Apple's
         | software would be increasing with the usage of Swift over
         | Objective-C, but the opposite seems to be true.
        
           | walthamstow wrote:
           | Spotlight is also slow and buggy now, on an M3 Pro no less. I
           | loathe the feeling of being faster than my computer and
           | having to wait for it to catch up, something that I haven't
           | felt since the M1 came out.
        
             | runjake wrote:
             | This was my last straw that caused me to disable Spotlight:
             | 
             | Typing something into Spotlight, having it pull up the
             | right result and highlight it, and me hitting the Enter
             | key, and the search results suddenly updating after and
             | highlighting some new result and then opening that instead.
             | 
             | It's not just Liquid Glass. It's bugs like these where I
             | realized Apple software was truly rotten to the core.
             | Whomever is running the show (Craig) can't do their job.
             | 
             | I'm now noticing the same bug in the latest versions of
             | Windows 11 when I hit the start button and run a search.
             | 
             | This _was_ a solved computer science problem.
        
               | ptr wrote:
               | Apple software used to exhibit reasonable UX for "edge
               | cases" just like the one you described. This was one of
               | my main reasons for going Mac -- they cared about the
               | details. Sad to see that seems to be going away.
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | It seems to be that these things never last, as company
               | culture inevitably changes.
        
               | seemaze wrote:
               | The updating input locations under your cursor in
               | particular is _so_ f*ing frustrating.
               | 
               | To be fair, it's not just macOS, but many webpages which
               | load dynamic content as well.
        
               | jkestner wrote:
               | That laggy behavior plus indexing not appearing to find
               | some obvious files made me switch to Raycast.
        
               | walthamstow wrote:
               | Raycast looks really cool, thanks
        
           | phantasmish wrote:
           | There are like a half-dozen blatant bugs I encounter between
           | daily and weekly in Safari. Text input and textarea editing
           | is buggy in a couple ways, Apple Pay has a positioning bug
           | where sometimes its bottom button is about 1/3 off the
           | screen, certain elements on a couple pages smear when I
           | scroll (but only sometimes). Not even counting ways the
           | keyboard itself is worse now.
           | 
           | I haven't seen browsing this buggy outside weird niche Linux
           | browsers in... 15+ years?
        
             | eoskx wrote:
             | My issues with Safari have mostly been iCloud-related. The
             | latest one being the iCloud tabs SQLlite database getting
             | corrupted constantly and keeping stale tabs around that I
             | have long closed. 26.2 seems to have fixed it, but it was
             | around at least since Sonoma. I've had similar issues with
             | Reading List, where again, the database gets corrupted and
             | changes that I've made to Reading List get reverted. It is
             | just little stuff like this that adds up and creates poor
             | UX.
        
               | eoskx wrote:
               | What's also telling is how long the bugs stayed around,
               | too. They were reported on Reddit and Apple's forums for
               | awhile with various workarounds, like deleting the
               | phantom entries from the SQLlite database manually and
               | doing some other gymnastics like removing the other
               | devices from iCloud in hopes that everything would sync
               | up nicely. No one at Apple had the time or took the time
               | to chase down the bugs. In a world of Claude Code or
               | Codex you would think they would have at least tried a
               | cursory "fix this".
               | 
               | On a related note, maybe one of these days iCloud will
               | have a force sync option that tells the other devices to
               | trash their copies vs having to remove all devices and
               | re-add to get everything coherently synced.
        
               | mitchell209 wrote:
               | I gave up on the normal iCloud tabs for over a decade
               | now. But the Safari Tab Groups implementation is by far
               | the best I've used. If I need to share a window, I just
               | open it in a tab group and those have synced flawlessly
               | for me so far.
        
             | amluto wrote:
             | If you switch Safari's tab bar mode to bottom (i.e.
             | restoring the sort-of-one-touch controls that existed
             | before iOS 26), textareas become utterly and completely
             | broken. It's almost impossible to reply to an HN message,
             | for example.
             | 
             | This bug is so blatant that I assumed my would have been
             | fixed by now, but no.
        
             | mrkstu wrote:
             | I've highly preferred Safari on Mac OS for a very long
             | time- the bugs and memory leaks are forcing me to Firefox
             | at this point, it's completely unusable on the betas I've
             | been driving lately in the hope they fix the previous bugs.
        
           | manoDev wrote:
           | Swift was the worst thing that happened to Mac OS, because
           | we're now suffering second system syndrome.
        
             | voidhorse wrote:
             | I completely agree. I saw the writing on the wall the
             | moment they started boosting swiftUI as a UI library of the
             | future where it was only half done and not even compatible
             | with existing frameworks.
        
           | voidhorse wrote:
           | Maybe the sharper edges of objective-C lead to a programming
           | practice that was more careful, which has been abandoned
           | under the impression of Swift's increase default safety.
        
         | mort96 wrote:
         | I think parts of Liquid Glass on macOS looks pretty bad. But I
         | don't care that much about how things look, so it doesn't
         | offend me.
         | 
         | What does offend me are all the bugs, as you say. It's still
         | utterly broken all these months after the public release.
         | Spotlight is a mess; I've seen it take _DAYS_ before it has
         | made an app in  '/Applications' findable through search (even
         | as the app shows up in Spotlight's long scrollable list of
         | apps), and the animation where it comes in as a result of the
         | four finger gesture has so many bugs I won't go through them
         | all here. The most annoying is that it can end up in a state
         | where Spotlight is not on screen, but you need to do the "make
         | Spotlight go away" gesture before the "make Spotlight appear"
         | gesture works again. It also often loads icons slowly;
         | sometimes loading them in one by one over time, sometimes all
         | at once after thinking for a second. It's arguably better from
         | a UX design perspective than Launchpad was, but Launchpad was
         | _so_ much more polished and better performing.
         | 
         | There's also just constant minor graphical glitches. Things
         | which pop in, things which load in with the wrong background
         | color, that sort of stuff. The Settings app sometimes loads in
         | stuff gradually and parts of the app jump around for a second
         | before it settles, like a bad web app. It feels _janky_.
         | 
         | Mac OS X used to feel like a solid operating system. It has
         | been going downhill for a while, but macOS 26 is the biggest
         | leap in a long time.
        
           | pdpi wrote:
           | > I think parts of Liquid Glass on macOS looks pretty bad.
           | But I don't care that much about how things look, so it
           | doesn't offend me.
           | 
           | I don't care overmuch about the purely cosmetic side of it,
           | but Liquid Glass looks absolutely terrible from an ergonomics
           | point of view. It's just plainly, objectively bad UX.
        
             | nothrabannosir wrote:
             | Tip: in accessibility , enable High Contrast and disable
             | transparency. Optionally disable animations. Decent
             | experience imo. I can now see what areas are clickable.
        
               | pdpi wrote:
               | I did basically that on my iPhone. My laptop was needing
               | a cleanup, so I just wiped it and re-installed Sequoia.
               | the Mac Studio never got the upgrade at all. If at some
               | point I find there's something in Tahoe that I
               | particularly need, I'll revisit upgrading.
        
               | mitchell209 wrote:
               | Doing a fresh install of Sequoia was the best move for
               | me, too. I had an unnecessary amount of third party apps
               | installed for no reason. I don't even use Ice for the
               | menu bar anymore, I realized the icons that I had hidden
               | I didn't need in the first place so I completely disabled
               | them, in whichever apps it's possible.
        
               | phantasmish wrote:
               | Nb I see tons of rendering bugs across a bunch of apps
               | and I suspect it's because I disabled as much animation
               | and transparency as I could. Things like the keyboard
               | opening slightly off the screen to the right then jumping
               | into place, some apps going black when certain overlays
               | are open, stuff like that.
        
           | teaearlgraycold wrote:
           | This year I've had to perform many hard resets on my MacBook,
           | iPhone and even Apple Watch because they've locked up. And
           | they're all relatively new devices. Apple needs to get its
           | shit together. I already expect to move away from their
           | mobile ecosystem when it comes time to upgrade.
        
             | DonHopkins wrote:
             | It's Apple itself that needs a hard reset. Maybe if we all
             | at the same time collectively hold our power buttons down
             | for sixty seconds, Apple Park will reboot.
        
             | rootusrootus wrote:
             | I recently upgraded (downgraded?) from an iPhone 15PM to a
             | smaller iPhone 17P, and I have found myself wondering if I
             | got a glitchy piece of hardware or if it's just iOS 26
             | bugs. I hardly had any problems with the previous phone,
             | but on the 17 it's pretty routine that I have to close apps
             | (including native Apple ones) which have become non-
             | responsive. Frustrating, for sure.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | Nope, that's iOS (I'm on a 16 Pro). I routinely have apps
               | I can switch into but are entirely dead. They're not
               | chewing CPU cycles, the phone is "cold". But very much
               | so.
               | 
               | So very frustrated.
        
               | davnicwil wrote:
               | the one I've noticed being the worst for lock ups is the
               | camera / photos app, which is frankly very surprising
               | given how central the photography usecase appears to be
               | to iPhone sales and therefore Apple's bottom line.
               | 
               | I'm talking, I pull up the camera and try to take
               | literally 4-5 shots quickly and by the 6th there's what
               | feels like seconds of lag between the button press and
               | the photo being taken.
               | 
               | It feels like I'm using an ancient camera phone, or a
               | more modern phone but in extreme heat when the CPU is
               | just throttling everything. But instead, this is a 2 year
               | old iPhone at room temperature.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | Interesting, likewise, the Camera app. And other camera
               | apps, I use Halide too.
               | 
               | And Photos. Will it sync? Yes. When? Who the fuck knows?
               | Doesn't matter whether you're on Ethernet or Wifi,
               | gigabit internet. You can quit Photos on both devices,
               | you can then keep Photos open foreground... so what?
               | Photos will sync when it wants to, not what when you want
               | it to.
        
               | davnicwil wrote:
               | you're right! The photo syncing is comically bad, again
               | given the alleged importance of photos in the Apple
               | marketing material. That said I've rarely used it in the
               | past and so wasn't sure if it was a newly degraded
               | experience or had always been that poor.
        
           | dham wrote:
           | > But I don't care that much about how things look, so it
           | doesn't offend me.
           | 
           | So I'm guessing you use some default Mac editor (Xcode?)? You
           | don't change your color scheme, you don't change your font,
           | etc?
           | 
           | Aside: Software devs are very weird, they spend all this time
           | crafting their dev setup and but when it comes to their OS
           | they just give up and whatever Tim Cook feeds them their in.
           | Makes no sense. Anyway, off to Linux land. See ya'll!
        
             | rogerrogerr wrote:
             | My IDE provides 98% of the pixels on my screen and provides
             | 90% of the overall experience. That's why it gets all the
             | attention. If the OS is able to show my IDE on one screen
             | and a web browser and UNIXy terminal on the other, it's
             | working.
        
               | dham wrote:
               | So you don't use the built-in Terminal? What about
               | Finder, Safari, Mail, Spotlight, System Settings, etc? If
               | someone doesn't care about how they look, they should use
               | all the built-in stuff right?
        
           | nyarlathotep_ wrote:
           | > It also often loads icons slowly; sometimes loading them in
           | one by one over time, sometimes all at once after thinking
           | for a second.
           | 
           | This is frequent, if not constant, on iOS for me. I never
           | witnessed it before the 26 update.
           | 
           | How can it take an entire second or more to display an icon
           | in list in the settings application? It was literally a
           | solved problem for every iOS version I've ever used.
        
         | pjmlp wrote:
         | It is akin to some military operations doomed to fail, and
         | everyone ends up dying because of the chain of command no one
         | is willing to speak against.
         | 
         | That is how the current chaos feels like.
        
           | DonHopkins wrote:
           | Apple employees should have kidnapped Alan Dye from his
           | office and deposited him on Facebook's doorstep wrapped up in
           | a straightjacket with ribbons and a bow years ago before he
           | finally left voluntarily.
        
             | philistine wrote:
             | Like the Hong-Kong guy in _The Dark Knight_!
        
             | kibwen wrote:
             | Using Dye as a scapegoat feels like cope. The rest of the
             | executives were fully content with this effort, and in the
             | end he wasn't even forced out. There's no evidence that
             | Apple will correct its course without him.
        
               | danaris wrote:
               | Yes, there is: Lemay, who replaced him, is a career UI
               | guy.
               | 
               | Regardless of whether the C-suite recognized the problem
               | or made a conscious decision to replace Dye with Lemay,
               | it is _likely_ that this outcome will, indeed, result in
               | improved UI.
        
               | Y-bar wrote:
               | Sort of in agreement here.
               | 
               | In-between not paying attention to general software
               | quality and not voicing concern, Craig Federigi should
               | not get a free pass.
               | 
               | In-between kissing the boots of Kings, and dining with
               | Murderers, and posting AI slop on Twitter, Tim Cook ought
               | to have been more involved.
               | 
               | There is enough blame to pass around at Apple today among
               | the leadership, but the specific shitty UI buck stops
               | with Dye. Dye is putting his signature on it and is the
               | face of the Liquid Glass demo, if he wants the primary
               | fame, he can have the primary blame.
        
               | acdha wrote:
               | I agree that it's a mark of shame that he left
               | voluntarily, but I do think a lot of this traces back to
               | Apple being more of a hardware company at heart. Jony Ive
               | pulled off some industrial design which looked really
               | nice and I think his history there meant that when he
               | promoted the packaging designer to be in charge of UI
               | people gave it too much credence, forgetting that Jony
               | Ive also wasn't experienced in that area and, as the
               | history of UX botches shows, was about as good at it as a
               | software developer would be at winging hardware design.
               | People who've been successful at one thing just aren't
               | guaranteed to be successful somewhere else and loyalty to
               | the company shouldn't overshadow that.
        
               | concinds wrote:
               | > The rest of the executives were fully content with this
               | effort, and in the end he wasn't even forced out
               | 
               | Tim Cook, by all accounts, can be very micromanaging and
               | demanding when it comes to logistics underlings, but has
               | been extremely hands-off with all his other underlings,
               | doesn't insert himself into their loops or require his
               | approval, doesn't decide by decree like Jobs which forces
               | underlings to fight the bureaucracy on their own, leaves
               | them to resolve conflicts among themselves on their own.
               | He treats Apple like a machine or system where his role
               | is to keep things running smoothly.
               | 
               | It's not "the rest of the executives", that's how Cook's
               | Apple is run. Reportedly.
        
               | kace91 wrote:
               | Such laissez-faire attitude should lead to teams that
               | feel something's great but it doesn't connect. Like a
               | product that's an amazing feat of engineering but feels
               | convoluted to the end user.
               | 
               | The thing is, when glass was presented the very first to
               | cry in disbelief were designers. It is very much at odds
               | with many industry standards.
               | 
               | So I really have nothing on how this came to pass. At
               | this point, the tinfoil hat view that this design was a
               | resource hogger as a feature for obsolescence sounds
               | reasonable. At least there would be a method to the
               | madness.
        
               | concinds wrote:
               | Corporations are more boring than that. Reportedly, Jony
               | Ive (who was given oversight of Apple's UIs), in turn put
               | Dye in charge of the iOS 7 redesign. Dye and Ive then
               | presented it internally. Here's how journalist Tripp
               | Mickle reported it back in 2022, long before Liquid Glass
               | came about:
               | 
               | > Ive's focus on visual styling vexed the software design
               | team. Though they obsessed over colors and shapes, they
               | prioritized how people interacted with the phone and
               | often built demonstrations of the software they planned
               | to introduce so they could experience how intuitive it
               | would be for users and adjust as needed. Many of them
               | believed that design was how the software behaved and
               | thought that Ive was myopically focused on how it looked.
               | [...] At Ive's direction, they shifted from demonstrating
               | how an app worked to making paper printouts that showed
               | how an app looked. They became more like graphic
               | designers than software savants.
               | 
               | The book then details a big talent drain from the design
               | team.
               | 
               | Fast forward to the Liquid Glass release, reportedly many
               | Apple designers hated the direction. Fast forward to last
               | week, John Gruber says Ive hates Liquid Glass and Dye,
               | and heavily implies that he heard this either from Ive
               | himself or a close associate.
               | 
               | When you leave a moron in charge and a chunk of the
               | talent leaves, Liquid Glass is what you get. It's
               | ultimately Cook's fault. Dye was under Jeff Williams
               | (operations, now gone) who was under Cook. Operations
               | dictates everything under Cook, I doubt anyone else could
               | say no to him.
        
         | embedding-shape wrote:
         | > The thing that amazes me most is that everyone on the teams
         | responsible is probably using their Apple devices and running
         | into these same bugs!
         | 
         | This is what surprises me the most to be honest. CarPlay
         | seemingly still suffers from a (sometimes deadly) issue of
         | covering the entire map on your dashboard with the
         | avatar/number of the person calling, so if you're actively
         | using it for navigation (since, you know, there is a map there
         | and all) someone calling you is a highly stressful moment and
         | more than not you need to hang up because otherwise the call is
         | in the way.
         | 
         | I've had my iPhone 12 Mini for so many years now, and this is
         | still an issue, the only conclusion I can take from this is
         | that people at Apple actually all have Android phones.
        
           | varispeed wrote:
           | Often it is that people who use the devices learn how to work
           | around bugs and then they forget they exist.
           | 
           | There is also subconscious resistance to create an action
           | that will uncover a bug and then remind of personal failure.
           | 
           | Then once whole teams get used to this, it's not possible to
           | get it fixed as it gets deprioritised always.
        
           | lapcat wrote:
           | The Apple release schedule is unremitting. We know that bugs
           | are reported to Apple by developers, and we know that
           | reported bugs get ignored for years, or forever. I suspect
           | that every Apple engineer has a mountain of bugs in their
           | queue.
           | 
           | If Apple leadership doesn't care about software quality, then
           | Apple engineers can't care about software quality. They use
           | the same buggy crap that we do, because they have no choice.
        
         | sheepscreek wrote:
         | Indeed - the system as a whole is starting to feel bloated.
         | Today's macOS design is akin to the cosmetic mufflers/exhaust
         | pipes in cars, which serve only to justify the "Sport" badge. I
         | long for the days past.
        
           | socalgal2 wrote:
           | It's felt bloated for a while. Everytime I setup a new Mac I
           | have to remove all of the icons from the doc. A new Dell
           | isn't that bloated.
        
             | jakeydus wrote:
             | > a new Dell isn't that bloated.
             | 
             | At least a new Mac doesn't try to serve you ads in the app
             | launcher.
        
               | muro wrote:
               | what about iCloud and News?
        
               | jakeydus wrote:
               | I was specifically referring to ads for third party
               | applications in the start menu, so you're technically
               | correct and I should have been more specific. I'd argue
               | that those are upsells for the OS to enhance existing
               | apps and systems. Not my favorite, but preferable to
               | windows telling me to install candy crush in the start
               | menu.
        
               | hagbard_c wrote:
               | A new ${computer_brand} with Linux doesn't show you any
               | ads, doesn't add more bloat than you let it, doesn't
               | insist on you creating any iCloudy or Microsofty
               | accounts, doesn't try to police what software you run on
               | the thing, doesn't try to upsell you to some
               | ${precious_metal} plan, doesn't insist your 5 year new
               | computer is obsolete, doesn't spy on you, etcetera.
               | 
               | What are you waiting for?
        
               | dundundundun wrote:
               | Proper sleep.
        
               | hagbard_c wrote:
               | Works fine for me, on Fruit Factory hardware even. Close
               | the thing, it goes to sleep. Open it, it wakes up. Leave
               | it closed for a very very long time and it hibernates.
               | Open it again and it comes back to life. Your experience
               | may vary depending on what hardware you run it on but for
               | me it works fine on the mentioned machines, on a HP
               | Spectre 360, another HP Elitebook and on a really ancient
               | Toshiba Satellite. I've had problems with sleep on a
               | Thinkpad P50 with a discrete NVidia Quattro GPU, it goes
               | to sleep but won't wake up so I have that machine set to
               | hibernate as soon as the lid is closed. This takes a bit
               | longer (but not that long, SSD is fast) but it would have
               | been more pleasant to use if normal sleep worked as
               | intended.
        
               | jakeydus wrote:
               | Oh I 100% agree, but what consumer-grade Dell comes with
               | Linux out of the box?
        
             | runjake wrote:
             | This is my shining moment! I just happened to setup a new
             | Dell. It was _far more cumbersome_ than dealing with a new
             | Mac.
             | 
             | Here's some of the stuff I had to do on my new Dell, from
             | memory:
             | 
             | - Uninstall all the bloatware apps that come installed with
             | Windows 11. They nag and beg you not to uninstall them, but
             | after several prompts, they mostly seem uninstalled?
             | 
             | - Remove the trial offers from the Start menu.
             | 
             | - Remove the third-party stub apps from the Start menu (eg.
             | TikTok).
             | 
             | - Remove the O365 stub apps.
             | 
             | - Remove the McAfee antivirus payware.
             | 
             | - Remove Dell SupportAssist from the laptop.
             | 
             | - Then, just reinstall Windows 11 from scratch, because of
             | all the remaining detritus left after performing the above
             | steps. And uninstalling SupportAssist caused some
             | instability and weird errors upon login.
             | 
             | - Uninstall all the bloatware apps the come installed with
             | Windows 11 again.
             | 
             | - Remove the trial offers from the Start menu.
             | 
             | - Remove the third-party stub apps from the Start menu (eg.
             | TikTok).
             | 
             | - Remove the O365 stub apps.
             | 
             | Compared to on my Mac:
             | 
             | - Remove apps from the Dock
             | 
             | - Go into /Applications and uninstall about 6 Apple apps I
             | don't use.
        
               | TacticalCoder wrote:
               | > Here's some of the stuff I had to do on my new Dell,
               | from memory:
               | 
               | Or, you know, just format the disk and install Linux.
        
         | general1465 wrote:
         | I agree with bugs, you can't even scroll through settings with
         | touchpad without permanently enabling scroll bars.
        
         | apexalpha wrote:
         | >I don't mind how Liquid Glass looks at all.
         | 
         | I do, and the fact that it isn't even optional is crazy.
         | 
         | Windows Vista vibes where they first looked at what the could
         | technically pull off on todays' hardware. And mind you: Liquid
         | Glass _is very impressive!_.
         | 
         | It's just not necessary.
        
           | downrightmike wrote:
           | Who decided things that slide in place need to jiggle like
           | jello?!
        
             | seemaze wrote:
             | I've been describing it as if the ui has been covered in
             | corn syrup; like it has been drizzled in a slow and sticky
             | and slightly blurry layer of transparent obfuscation.
        
           | cmurf wrote:
           | Although outright opt-out isn't possible, it seems like
           | heading to Accessibility -> Motion -> Reduce Motion (on) and
           | Prefer Cross-Fade Transitions (On) reduces the effect.
           | 
           | I'm not sure if this reduces the buggy artifacts though.
        
           | therealpygon wrote:
           | Necessary has never been the deciding factor for Apple's
           | decisions, especially when it comes to design. Nor has
           | "optional" ever really been part of that discussion. They
           | know, like most people, supporting multiple interface simply
           | creates more BS to maintain for the few resistant people who
           | don't accept change. Like it or hate, you bought an Apple.
        
         | shimman wrote:
         | I have these insane bugs where my apple tv will connect to my
         | mbp even tho my mbp has blutooth disabled. I'll be listening to
         | a podcast on my mbp with airpods while my wife is watching some
         | show on the apple tv. It will still randomly connect to my
         | airpods when my wife never tries to connect them.
         | 
         | Apple is quickly becoming a trash company and we're seeing the
         | effects of an industry writ large when you only hire leetcode
         | monkeys.
        
         | eviks wrote:
         | > Unacceptable for the premium you pay for Apple software.
         | Unacceptable for any software one is paying for.
         | 
         | You don't pay anything for the software, so the quality matches
        
           | jasonvorhe wrote:
           | This is not an argument that works for the company proudly
           | pairing hardware and software as their core business.
        
           | zdragnar wrote:
           | Funny, last time I used macos there were so many annoyances
           | and every suggestion was to use some paid third party app. I
           | finally caved and used hammerspoon to write everything I
           | needed myself.
           | 
           | You pay for it in lots of ways, including an obscene premium
           | on minor hardware upgrades, not to mention you have to buy
           | their hardware to even use the software itself.
        
         | frizlab wrote:
         | I don't mind Liquid Glass either to be honest. I kind of like
         | it even. I also completely agree regarding software quality,
         | which is abysmal (I am sufficiently aware of the internals of a
         | lot of things on macOS to know most of the time _why_ it's like
         | this, but it's still unacceptable).
        
           | bbkane wrote:
           | I'll bite. Why is it like this (in your opinion of course)?
        
       | estetlinus wrote:
       | I am trying hard to have strong feelings about it, but I just
       | can't bother. The only thing constant is change.
       | 
       | What I do know for a fact, is that for each error I have on my
       | MacBook, I'll have ~10 ungoogable errors on any other OS. I rage-
       | sold my last Windows due to losing my Java installation (or just
       | confusing which terminal I installed it in).
       | 
       | Please, crop all thumbnails in the corners, as long as you come
       | pre-installed with just one working terminal.
        
         | bigyabai wrote:
         | > I'll have ~10 ungoogable errors on any other OS.
         | 
         | If you ever attempt to compile software, the shoe instantly
         | hits the other foot. WSL is a godsend, and Apple's "native"
         | terminal environment becomes a confusing liability.
         | 
         | Catering to different audiences, I suppose.
        
       | baq wrote:
       | Not upgrading to Tahoe for as long as $DAYJOB allows. 'Defer
       | update' dialog can be conveniently moved away to the second
       | display almost out of sight.
        
       | mvkel wrote:
       | One of the most egregious issues with macOS 26 is the
       | accessibility/usability regression. Apple prided itself on making
       | their operating system accessible. Good ux is inherently
       | accessible.
       | 
       | There are so many parts of the os that flagrantly ignore well-
       | established accessibility standards, some of which Apple
       | themselves advocated for
        
         | xp84 wrote:
         | It's what you get when you install a hack print designer who
         | knows nothing about UI as the head of software design and leave
         | him there for a decade. Even Jony Ive, who also had no business
         | designing software, didn't respect Dye.
         | 
         | Thank goodness Meta has done Apple the biggest favor of the
         | century by poaching him.
        
           | hu3 wrote:
           | I hope I'm wrong but I don't see quality control improving
           | with Dye's leave.
           | 
           | The man had a bad taste for design but bug prevalence is
           | endemic and changing head of design won't fix that.
        
             | franktankbank wrote:
             | How is it possible that the head of a divisions particular
             | UX taste pervades the product?
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | Well once Tim started hanging out with Trump and licking his
         | boots and awarding him participation trophies and illegal
         | gilded emoluments, the MAGA attitudes that empathy is a
         | weakness, transparency is performative cosmetics, accessibility
         | is for crippled people who should be mocked, and usability is
         | for DEI hires, all start trickling down into the culture and
         | user interface design.
         | 
         | Liquid Glass looks like Trump hooked Alan Dye up with Don Jr's
         | coke dealer.
        
       | fauigerzigerk wrote:
       | It seems obvious to me that liquid glass is no designer's idea of
       | a good UI. It's a business move to force developers to support
       | the upcoming iGlasses where transparency is actually necessary.
       | 
       | Perhaps Apple is willing to accept that most macOS users will
       | enable "reduce transparency" so long as devs implement support
       | for transparency.
       | 
       | But there is another explanation making the rounds, possibly a
       | conspiracy theory. Some people claim that Apple is doing this to
       | make cross-platform technologies look obsolete and hard to
       | implement.
       | 
       | If there's any truth to this, it's a terrible idea that could
       | easily backfire. People could get used to there not being a
       | consistent platform look and feel. Like on Windows, "native"
       | could lose its meaning.
       | 
       | Whatever Apple promotes as "native" could become just another
       | style among many.
        
         | xp84 wrote:
         | I think people are already used to inconsistency. Whatever
         | Apple thinks, and honestly even in spite of what any users
         | think, only the very largest companies have the appetite to
         | mess around making bespoke SwiftUI things, so that they have to
         | build their app twice. So, actual "native" stuff is mainly the
         | realm of passionate indie developers and everyone else will
         | always use cross-platform tools.
        
       | bratwurst3000 wrote:
       | i switched this year from windows to mac because windows is
       | unbearable.... but apple seems to want to get rid of desktop user
       | also
        
         | xp84 wrote:
         | It's clear how much Apple now hates the MacOS as we have known
         | it... I think the concept of a computer which can run code
         | outside a sandbox and without tollbooths that extract rents for
         | Apple is abhorrent to them.
         | 
         | I think the vague plan is to iOSify it more and more until
         | there is no real difference, including the lockdown and
         | mandatory App Store requirement.
        
       | soulofmischief wrote:
       | M2 MBP here. Definitely skipping Tahoe. Sequoia is already just
       | terrible, not only is the UX clunky and hostile, but Apple seems
       | to have flat out broken its Bluetooth and networking stacks in
       | multiple ways, and in general the system is extremely unstable.
       | 
       | Best hardware around, but at this point I might even take W11
       | over this locked down mess. At least Asahi support is decent
       | these days.
       | 
       | And I'm tired of paying for things that should be stock, such as
       | proper window and mouse management, or reasonable fan control so
       | that the keyboard doesn't burn my fingers under moderate
       | workloads.
        
       | rayiner wrote:
       | > That was little more than a decade ago, in 2014. Not that I
       | want to turn the clock back, but it would be really helpful if I
       | could read clearly what's on my display once again.
       | 
       | I want to turn the clock back. It's not a reflexive opposition to
       | anything new. I thought OS X clearly got better from 10.0 to
       | 10.4. But in the last vie versions it's been a regression.
        
         | E39M5S62 wrote:
         | I booted a G4 Mac the other day, running 10.4.something. I was
         | thrown back in time to a period where OS X was clearly their
         | flagship software stack. Everything was coherent and cohesive -
         | and shockingly - fast. I'd daily 10.4 again if it could operate
         | on the modern internet comfortably!
        
           | vdupras wrote:
           | Nevertheless, I also remember that in the 10.4 days, OS X had
           | the reputation of being sluggish compared to Linux or even
           | Windows (I guess it was Windows 7 at the time?). And it kinda
           | was. Bouncing ball when launching an app.
           | 
           | How high the bar was back then.
        
       | rick_dalton wrote:
       | I've deferred my next Mac upgrade to when my current M1 air on
       | Sequoia stops being supported. If they mess it up further I may
       | just move off the platform. Such a shame because the hardware is
       | great.
        
       | renaudg wrote:
       | Liquid Glass appears to be the culmination of the Alan Dye era at
       | Apple, where UI terms like "radio buttons" were derided as
       | "programmer talk".
       | 
       | https://daringfireball.net/2025/12/bad_dye_job
       | 
       | Thankfully he has now left. Things could hopefully pick up again
       | usability-wise within 2-3 years.
        
         | mort96 wrote:
         | The worrying thing is that his departure seems in no way like a
         | consequence of his terrible job. He wasn't squeezed out by
         | upper management, he left because Meta made him a better offer.
         | I'm sure Apple's software quality will go up now that he's gone
         | and his replacement is allegedly liked by Apple's competent UX
         | people who disliked Dye; but Cook clearly doesn't recognise the
         | problems, lest he'd have planned to get rid of Dye by now.
        
           | swiftcoder wrote:
           | It's honestly hard to tell from outside - execs at that level
           | are very rarely fired. They tend to be asked politely to find
           | something new to do with their time
        
             | mort96 wrote:
             | They also tend to not be featured very prominently on a
             | huge product launch event while in the process of "finding
             | something new to do with their time". If he's actually
             | being squeezed out, that process must've started after the
             | public launch of iOS 26.
             | 
             | EDIT: though I guess you could also read it as, iOS 26 had
             | come too far to stop it, so they let Dye be the visible
             | face of it so that he'd be the fall guy and the next guy
             | would get the credits for fixing it... I don't know, I
             | guess we don't really have enough info to speculate one way
             | or the other
        
               | acdha wrote:
               | I'd also believe that he was able to ride his past
               | reputation and his sponsor's memory enough to get the
               | commitment to ship Liquid Glass, but that gamble blew up
               | once most reviews revolve around how they'll probably
               | make it less bad in an update. Apple values keeping users
               | on current releases and this is the first one where so
               | many experienced users and fans have been advising people
               | to hold back. I think Dye knows he had enough capital to
               | bull the release through but not to recover from making
               | the story about the release about his shortcomings.
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | I'm hopefully optimistic that he can destroy Meta in less time
         | than that!
        
       | rich_sasha wrote:
       | I'll have to upgrade my M1 MBP some time and no way am I putting
       | up with this nonsense - back to Linux laptop for me.
       | 
       | What recommendations do people have for good metal-body linux-
       | friendly "ultra books" (or whatever they're called these days)?
        
         | evantbyrne wrote:
         | It would be newsworthy if Linux laptops could compete with
         | MacBooks on performance and quality. Maybe reconsider Windows
         | if you feel the need to switch?
        
         | syabro wrote:
         | Try installing asahi on mbp? I tried on my mbp m2 pro, works
         | great
        
       | embedding-shape wrote:
       | > After three months of strong feedback during beta-testing, I
       | was disappointed when Tahoe was released on 15 September to see
       | how little had been addressed
       | 
       | Now it was a while ago I left the Apple ecosystem as it became
       | clear they didn't actually care about UX anymore, but did "strong
       | feedback during beta-testing" ever actually result in any
       | results? I remember doing something similar back in 2012-2013
       | sometime, and friends having similar feelings across the years,
       | that it makes me think that Apple never really did any changes
       | based on feedback receiving during the beta testing.
       | 
       | Has anyone here ever written something in via the traditional
       | feedback forms/venues and actually had something changed before
       | the final release? I even asked around my circle of acquaintances
       | and even the ones 110% into the Apple ecosystem seem to never
       | have noticed anything changed based on their feedback.
        
       | foxygen wrote:
       | My MacOS has this insane bug where the cursor sometimes won't
       | change to a pointer/loading/any other state on my second monitor.
       | This is really bad, but even worse for me who writes websites for
       | a living, and need to check that my CSS cursor pointer class
       | actually worked. I can't count how many minutes I've lost
       | refreshing my browser and double-checking my code. Now I just
       | keep my browser on my primary monitor. I've found many other
       | people with this bug on the internet, and it has been happening
       | for YEARS. I honestly can't understand how a premium product
       | aimed at developers can have something like this for YEARS
       | without a fix. I'm moving away from MacOS, and might ditch my
       | iPhone too as I won't have all the nice integration with MacOS
       | anymore.
       | 
       | Fuck you, Apple.
        
         | dgreensp wrote:
         | I ran into this, and there was a bizarre fix--I think having
         | Adobe apps open in the background caused it, or something.
        
           | foxygen wrote:
           | I saw some responses like this. I have zero Adobe apps in my
           | Mac.
        
         | n8cpdx wrote:
         | Do you have a trackpad? If you re-enter focus by right clicking
         | (very easy to do with gestures), focus stops working until you
         | leave and re enter by left clicking. Unfortunately not a new
         | issue.
        
           | foxygen wrote:
           | I don't use a trackpad. I leave my Macbook closed with 2
           | external monitors and an external mouse/keyboard.
        
       | frou_dh wrote:
       | What's obvious to me is that the PRIMARY motivation for Liquid-
       | Glass-ifying MacOS was not to improve MacOS, but simply to make
       | it look consistent with the new version of iOS/iPadOS.
       | 
       | So for Apple to start with a level of disrespect for the existing
       | product where the question of whether each change is actually an
       | improvement is effectively off-topic, it's no wonder they made a
       | dog's dinner of Tahoe.
        
       | talentedcoin wrote:
       | These articles always make me laugh. Everyone complains and then
       | everyone lines up and buys Macs again. macOS has been on the
       | decline for literally years now. If you really want things to
       | change put your money where your mouth is and switch!
        
         | 7e wrote:
         | Switch to what? Windows is horrible and Linux is just as bad
         | (but in different ways).
        
           | nutjob2 wrote:
           | Although its not for everyone, I run a Hackintosh and stick
           | to 10.15 or lower.
        
           | analogpixel wrote:
           | I think a lot of people on HN don't realize that some people
           | require software outside of a terminal and a web browser. Can
           | I run Ableton on linux? can I run all the audio plugins that
           | only ship windows/mac versions? is there a decent graphics
           | editor? (gimp is not it.) If all I did was play in the
           | terminal and a web browser, I'd have switched to Linux by
           | now.
        
             | tambourine_man wrote:
             | Exactly. There's nothing that comes close to the Adobe
             | suite. Maybe someday an investment similar to what was made
             | in Proton will happen to Wine in general.
        
             | bigyabai wrote:
             | > Can I run Ableton on linux
             | 
             | Yes? The .msi installer for Live has worked in Wine for
             | more than a decade.
        
               | trinix912 wrote:
               | Until you need a specific plugin that doesn't, or some
               | hardware equipment with custom drivers (very common in
               | the AV world).
        
             | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
             | > Can I run Ableton on linux?
             | 
             | Well, _they_ do (what do you think powers the Push 3?) They
             | just choose not to let you make that choice.
             | 
             | > can I run all the audio plugins that only ship
             | windows/mac versions?
             | 
             | Obviously not (though yabridge can go quite a long way).
             | Also note that you cannot run AudioUnit-only plugins on
             | Windows, though there are not many released in only this
             | format.
             | 
             | Fortunately, however, you _can_ run Bitwig on Linux, along
             | with one of a thousand or so 3rd party plugins. If you
             | prefer a FLOSS alternative, those exist too, though the
             | core functionality of Live  & Bitwig is still not quite as
             | polished (it is getting there, though).
             | 
             | Your point, however, is well taken. There's a world of
             | software out there beyond the browser, and it is absolutely
             | OS-dependent.
        
           | kibwen wrote:
           | Windows is horrible, yes. But Linux definitely isn't "just as
           | bad" as MacOS, it's already better, and it keeps getting
           | better every year while MacOS keeps getting worse.
        
             | troupo wrote:
             | > But Linux definitely isn't "just as bad" as MacOS, it's
             | already better
             | 
             | Is this better Linux in the room with us [1]?
             | 
             | My main gaming computer used to be Windows until this year
             | when Windows has gone completely to shit. So first I ran
             | Omarchy for a few months, and now running CachyOS because
             | it's better for gaming.
             | 
             | Yeah... Even with things going to shit MacOS is still a
             | better proposition (at least I have a working sleep and
             | restore, and the OS remembers which windows need to be open
             | next time you restart/go out of sleep, and in which
             | locations). Though I haven't upgraded to Liquid Ass yet.
             | 
             | [1] Let's count the number of "oh, you chose the wrong
             | distribution" and count the number of different
             | distirbutions people will come up with that are 100%
             | guaranteed to not have issues.
        
             | nutjob2 wrote:
             | Obviously not representative, but recently I installed the
             | most recent release of the "user friendliest desktop Linux"
             | and tried to get it to stop asking me for my password, or
             | asking me to select the user, on startup.
             | 
             | Not only is the issue spread across more than one similar
             | sounding system setting which interact in strange and
             | mysterious ways, but nothing works as designed or
             | described. It's a horrible mess.
             | 
             | Searching for an fix was great: forums were full of
             | sanctimonious "you shouldn't be doing that, it's not
             | secure" and no solution.
             | 
             | I gave up. The average user has no chance with desktop
             | Linux is my experience is any guide.
        
           | edoceo wrote:
           | Laughs in very stable Xfce for 15 years.
        
           | eigenspace wrote:
           | Linux has loads of problems, but at least to me, I register
           | these problems in a very different way.
           | 
           | The problems with Windows and MacOS are almost all the result
           | of bad incentives, user hostile arrogant design, or just
           | neglect. As such, the presence of these problems feels
           | malcious, and it always feels like I'm pitted against the
           | very company that I'm paying quite a bit of money to. I'm
           | left with very little hope of things actually improving,
           | because these companies seem to have no incentive to actually
           | make their operating systems more useful or aligned with my
           | needs.
           | 
           | On Linux, the problems are almost always just a result of
           | "hey man, I tried my best to make something good and useful,
           | but I either don't have the resources or the skills to get it
           | all the way there." Sometimes things break or are ugly or
           | whatever, but it's not malicious. There's a strong sense that
           | things are rapidly improving, and that I can play a small
           | part in helping those improvements along (via the patches I
           | submit, or with donations or other forms of support). Because
           | of this, I find the problems on Linux so much less
           | frustrating than analogous problems on MacOS or Windows.
           | 
           | I also think a lot of people might not realize just how
           | rapidly things have been improving on Linux. The situation
           | today is pretty different versus even just 3-5 years ago.
        
             | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
             | > On Linux, the problems are almost always just a result of
             | "hey man, I tried my best to make something good and
             | useful, but I either don't have the resources or the skills
             | to get it all the way there."
             | 
             | Or, since there are few to zero gatekeepers of UI and/or UX
             | on Linux, you and the person who was responsible for the
             | UI/UX in question just don't agree.
             | 
             | On Windows and macOS, at least for components provided by
             | MS or Apple, there's a degree of gatekeeping that means you
             | agree or disagree with one to 10 people. On Linux, not so
             | much.
        
           | heresie-dabord wrote:
           | > Windows is horrible and Linux is just as bad
           | 
           | I will civilly contradict you about both MW11 and about
           | Linux.
           | 
           | MW11 is rather good for _usability_. The failures at this
           | point are the egregious telemetry, the spyware misfeatures
           | (e.g. _Recall_ ), and the AI slop being squeezed into
           | everything including _Notepad_ for pity 's sake.
           | 
           | Linux with Wayland is sweet. Gnome and KDE now use Wayland by
           | default and they are celebrated for their usability. I
           | personally have taken a _leaner_ approach by opting for Sway
           | (tiled) and _labwc_ (floating) depending on the current task.
           | 
           | TL;dr _ Get with the times, Linux is great. Windows UX is
           | _actually_ rather good, but the leadership of MSFT continues
           | to be ghoulish.
        
             | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
             | > Linux with Wayland is sweet
             | 
             | Unless you want to run KiCAD. Or Ardour. Or any other
             | number of applications that assume X Window functionality
             | that Wayland does not yet (and might never) support.
        
       | analogpixel wrote:
       | If you notice your OS/Window Manager, then they have failed in
       | what they were designed to do.
       | 
       | I don't own a computer for the OS, I own it to run the
       | Applications that I find useful.
        
       | JaggerJo wrote:
       | +1 I only updated my MacBook Air and really don't like it. Will
       | keep all other macs on Sequoia until macOS 27 hopefully fixes
       | most of the issues.
        
       | pmdr wrote:
       | For me, earlier versions of macOS/OS X and Windows Vista/7 were
       | the right mix of eye candy and usability. Apple's just showing
       | off with this liquid glass thing. Yeah, it's cool that they
       | attempted it, but it should've remained entirely opt-in. Apple
       | being Apple, there's no opt-in -- once _they_ like it, it 's the
       | default.
        
         | brokencode wrote:
         | For a major revamp, you should either do it or not do it.
         | Making it opt-in or even opt-out means every app then has to
         | try to support both different UIs, which is a longterm
         | maintenance cost. Not only for Apple, but the entire ecosystem.
         | 
         | I personally sort of like the liquid glass, but it's also kind
         | of a mess in a lot of edge cases. I feel like it was an
         | interesting idea that didn't really pan out fully and should
         | have been scrapped. It's just too controversial for pure eye-
         | candy.
        
       | e40 wrote:
       | I 100% agree with OPs take, though I don't really mind it as much
       | as he does. I do hope the changes will be rolled back in 27, or
       | at least controls given to us that allow us to roll back changes.
        
       | kruuuder wrote:
       | Funny to see the last screenshot of OS X from 2014 in the
       | article. I would love to use a system with such a high contrast
       | and information density. But I also remember very well how many
       | users were upset with the most recent design changes at that
       | time: The all caps section titles in the sidebar, and the gray
       | icons that were previously colored.
        
         | lapcat wrote:
         | Yes, IMO Tiger was actually peak Mac UI.
         | 
         | As soon as Apple released iPhone, the Mac took a back seat.
        
           | cosmic_cheese wrote:
           | Tiger with 10.5/10.6-style 2D grid virtual desktops and
           | Mavericks traffic light buttons, or alternatively Mavericks
           | with aqua scrollbars and 10.5/10.6-style 2D grid virtual
           | desktops is very close to my ideal desktop environment.
        
             | docmars wrote:
             | Wow I completely forgot that Spaces were also vertically
             | oriented. I miss that.
        
               | cosmic_cheese wrote:
               | It was really nice. With the current linear design I
               | organize desktops by theme (e.g. one for dev, one for
               | research, etc) and with the 10.5/10.6 design I'd use
               | vertical desktops for subcategories -- so following the
               | same example, on a single screen setup I might have
               | desktops arranged something like:                  |
               | Rails Docs/Search   |   Backend Dev  |    Music   |
               | +-----------------------+----------------+------------+
               | |   UIKit Docs/Search   |     iOS Dev    |    Chat    |
               | +-----------------------+----------------+------------+
               | |  MDN/Web Dev Search   |     Web Dev    | Email/News |
               | 
               | With this, I quickly develop muscle/spatial memory for
               | where each category "lives" and can navigate there in a
               | flash. It also substantially reduces the need for
               | individual programs like browsers to bear organizational
               | load, so for example suddenly "just" single-tier vertical
               | tabs become sufficient, making browser workspaces and
               | tree style tabs much less necessary.
        
         | vintagedave wrote:
         | It was worse than what came before, but we had no idea how bad
         | it was going to get.
        
       | karmakaze wrote:
       | The day that I need to update to macOS 26 for continued security
       | patches is the last day I'll choose to run macOS. I'm pretty much
       | all on Linux for non-work stuff anyway with an old Windows
       | 'gaming' PC that only runs a 10 year old game.
        
       | virgil_disgr4ce wrote:
       | Just as a datapoint: Not only do I actually like Liquid Glass, I
       | don't have any errors or bugs on my MBP or my iPhone EXCEPT for
       | the audio scratching sometimes on macos. Which alone is flatly
       | unacceptable.
        
       | QuiEgo wrote:
       | The really really frustrating thing is that even in this lesser
       | state, all of the alternatives are still a worse experience than
       | an Apple Silicon macbook.
       | 
       | It's sad to be in a time where enshitifcation is the word of the
       | day and things are getting worse as time goes on. There's nothing
       | on the horizon of tech that excites me anymore. I used to feel
       | joy and excitement for the future of tech. Now I feel profound
       | sadness at this reality.
        
       | LucidLynx wrote:
       | Not gonna lie, this year has been exceptionnaly disappointing for
       | every product and every OS (more generally: software) from Apple.
       | 
       | The battery life first: I lost 6 to 8h of battery life EVERY DAY
       | because of iOS 26. The battery life of my macbook is worst too,
       | even after all the updates and a fresh install of macOS 26.2. The
       | interface is very ugly, and not easy to use at all. I am oftenly
       | loston both systems (iOS 26 and macOS 26) because of all those
       | glass interfaces on top of each other. The performance did not
       | improved either, and the gaming ecosystem that I was very
       | optimistic is becoming a mess. Again. To finish, an exceptional
       | high number of annoying bugs that are not solved yet, despite my
       | feedbacks since the first Beta versions. It seems nobody care.
       | 
       | It's infuriating that I can't downgrade the OS on both devices.
       | Especially on my mac.
       | 
       | This pushed me to re-try a Linux distro on my old laptop, and re-
       | try Android on an old Google Pixel phone. Both are great for my
       | needs, and the phone has way more battery life than the iPhone
       | (despite the phone has already 5yo).
       | 
       | I did not expected at all that 2025 would be the year of Apple
       | pushing me out of it ecosystem... Very nice job guys.
        
       | zingar wrote:
       | Without arguing with the main point I do want to say that
       | although I didn't ask for increased control size from 18 to 26,
       | my hands are really appreciating it.
        
       | wutwutwat wrote:
       | windows vista called, it wants its Aero back...
       | 
       | just format and install Sequoia, that's what I did
        
       | synapsomorphy wrote:
       | I'm a Linux and Windows user thinking of getting a Macbook,
       | mostly for the hardware.
       | 
       | All these recent proclamations of disappointment in Tahoe seem
       | insanely overblown to me. The problem that this post leads with
       | is that thumbnails' corners are too rounded, which
       | "misrepresents" the original? Seriously?
       | 
       | Maybe it's worse now compared to the golden years, I don't know,
       | never owned a Mac. And it's fair to criticize it from that
       | perspective. But I am completely at a loss for how any of these
       | issues could be bad enough to make you switch platforms. Windows
       | and Linux are not exactly usability all-stars! I had to write my
       | own app for decent speech-to-text on Linux which is built in at a
       | system level on Macs.
       | 
       | This feels to me like just the age-old tale of people wanting to
       | (love | hate) brands, when really, things are nuanced. I switched
       | from Android to iOS recently and the experience did not change
       | much. iOS is absolutely not "borderline unusable" like I've seen
       | many claim. If anything it's maybe a 10% nicer experience
       | overall.
       | 
       | Lack of nuance in people's takes makes for less signal in the
       | noise and makes it annoying to figure out the actual pros and
       | cons of different platforms.
        
         | LucidLynx wrote:
         | It is not only for the corners.
         | 
         | Do some searches and you will find a ton of bugs, bad
         | performances and bad battery life for laptops, random crashes,
         | ...
         | 
         | The issue is not only on the lack of good design ideas, but
         | also on the quality of what Apple provides since a few years
         | now.
        
           | synapsomorphy wrote:
           | Maybe the quality is reduced, sure. But if you "do some
           | searches" you can find all of those things for any major
           | software release.
           | 
           | Seems to me like people in Apple's walls are forgetting that
           | the outside world is not some Garden of Eden. But yeah, I'd
           | have to use it to say for sure.
        
             | LucidLynx wrote:
             | > you can find all of those things for any major software
             | release
             | 
             | Maybe it is because you were using Windows all the time and
             | you can't judge outside (no judging), but the quality and
             | the (legendary) reliability of macOS was true. Everything
             | was well engineered, well designed, and had a purpose.
             | 
             | This is not the case anymore, and this is why people are so
             | upset too. People are also upset because all those annoying
             | things have been reported since betas and Apple did not
             | really listened to them (except most absolute valid
             | points).
        
         | bigyabai wrote:
         | Okay, now go use it and report back. The grass isn't always
         | greener.
        
         | Daishiman wrote:
         | > All these recent proclamations of disappointment in Tahoe
         | seem insanely overblown to me. The problem that this post leads
         | with is that thumbnails' corners are too rounded, which
         | "misrepresents" the original? Seriously?
         | 
         | The example in Photos is absolutely egregious, and as a user of
         | Linux for the past 25 years and recent user of a Mac for work I
         | can't remember something that bad in a mainstream desktop
         | environment on Linux.
         | 
         | In fact from a usability perspective a modern Gnome desktop
         | seems for more usable and consistent than modern Mac OS and
         | that's saying something. Font scaling seems to work better in
         | Linux, UI wisgers in Gtk seem to be more consistent. Dark
         | themes have been around on Linux far longer and it shows.
         | 
         | I don't use the latest Mac OS version; it's _okay_ from a
         | usability perspective. But this new version seems like a clear
         | downgrade for something where the purpose of paying large sums
         | of money is for higher productivity and comfort.
        
       | walterbell wrote:
       | 2023 Vision Pro (iPad-on-Skull) sold less than 500K devices, with
       | v2 cancelled.
       | 
       | In 2025, the design failed upward to 4000 x 500K users,
       | https://archive.is/gxaYw
       | 
       |  _> [Apple] is working to simplify the way users navigate and
       | control their devices.. The design is loosely based on the Vision
       | Pro's software.. will mark the most significant upgrade to the
       | Mac since the Big Sur operating system in 2020.. For the iPhone,
       | it will be the biggest revamp since iOS 7 in 2013... 2 billion
       | devices in use around the world.. when Apple revamped its Photos
       | app last year, legions of users complained. With the entire
       | operating systems changing, the stakes are much higher._
       | 
       | Since 2023 launch, Meta Ray-Ban sold ~4M camera glasses priced
       | below $500.
        
       | diebillionaires wrote:
       | Couldn't agree more. I haven't and won't update to Tahoe, and am
       | now using linux more frequently as I begin to move away from Mac
       | OS, and eventually Apple products.
        
       | eviks wrote:
       | > with their exceptional quality and functionality.
       | 
       | This was never true, for example, taking this simple criterion of
       | readability:
       | 
       | > would be really helpful if I could read clearly what's on my
       | display
       | 
       | Look at the device's names at the left-most screenshot - you
       | can't clearly read them even though there is plenty of space
       | wasted on the margins and the "..."
       | 
       | I mean, sure, liquid glass made everything worse, but it doesn't
       | mean all the other decades-old UI sins disappear in the
       | exceptionally fuzzy rearview window
        
       | anarticle wrote:
       | I think if macOS is a tool it should change less.
       | 
       | Looks too much like vista to me.
        
       | CodeWriter23 wrote:
       | The Bozo Explosion is in full force at Apple now. They should
       | bring Forstall back. Engineers need to be be humiliated for
       | making stupid decisions.
        
         | Etheryte wrote:
         | I get where you're coming from, but the word humiliation is not
         | constructive in a professional setting. Reasonable decisions
         | can easily look stupid without context and hindsight is always
         | 20/20. Being responsible for your actions should be the norm,
         | but ridicule is not the right way to get there.
        
       | nout wrote:
       | This is a good time for trying Linux. If you are coming from Mac,
       | then a distro with GNOME interface (Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu...)
       | will feel like at home after a couple tweaks. I recommend "Dash
       | to Dock" to get the MacOS dock experience and "Search Light" to
       | get the spotlight search.
        
         | LoganDark wrote:
         | I love GNOME Wayland; it has some of the best support for
         | trackpad gestures of any Linux desktop experience I've ever
         | tried. On the other paw though, client-side decorations are not
         | the way to go on Linux, and I'm still incredibly frustrated
         | that they insist on not even supporting server-side decorations
         | at all.
         | 
         | Client-side decorations are for apps that are designed
         | specifically for a certain desktop experience; server-side
         | decorations are for compatibility with the many millions of
         | apps that already exist!! (And for anything cross-platform /
         | cross-DE.)
         | 
         | Apple gets away with it because macOS is largely monolithic,
         | and doesn't really have swappable desktop experiences. GNOME
         | does not get away with it because they're just one competitor
         | in a large landscape of Linux and they should want to be
         | compatible with Linux applications in general, not only GNOME
         | applications.
        
           | hagbard_c wrote:
           | My biggest beef with client-side decorations is that they're
           | not optional. For those of us using tiling window managers
           | those decorations are totally superfluous and only take up
           | space, especially since the Gnome folks seem to have decided
           | that every UI element needs to have _lebensraum_ by adding
           | huge areas of white space around them. I want my windows
           | densely populated and I want lots of them on my screen
           | because I 'm using a COMPUTER - not a PHONE - with a LARGE
           | SCREEN and a pointing device. I do not need to be able to
           | fat-finger those buttons, I have an accurate pointing device
           | with which I control a pointy cursor with which I can
           | accurately hit single pixels if needed. Now I need to
           | LD_PRELOAD some library to get rid of those stupid unneeded
           | decorations, I need to find the current iteration of the
           | compact Adwaita theme (for as long as that is still
           | possible...) and I otherwise need to FIGHT the software as if
           | I were running some proprietary blob of malware from the
           | Fruit Factory or from Redmond. Blegh, so much wasted time and
           | effort.
        
         | lawn wrote:
         | I installed CachyOS recently for my 8 year old kid.
         | 
         | Fantastic experience all around. KDE Plasma is an excellent
         | window manager and everything just worked out of the box
         | (gaming, wifi, etc).
        
       | t1234s wrote:
       | Using Liquid Glass on both a retina and non-retina display it
       | looks like Apple is trying to depreciate non-retina displays just
       | like they have done in the past with floppy disk, cd rom, and
       | having useful ports. Tahoe on a non-retina display looks slightly
       | but noticeably shittier than the previous version.
        
       | docmars wrote:
       | Can Apple get it over with and revert this overhaul? It's such a
       | disaster. Sequoia's UI and icons were nearly perfect and still
       | looked modern. There was no need for this change whatsoever.
        
       | jessegrosjean wrote:
       | I dislike Liquid Glass.
       | 
       | At the same time I make Mac apps and I've got to adopt liquid
       | glass to keep my apps looking alive/updated. How to do this
       | without making my apps UI worse?
       | 
       | I would love to see some "how to fix Liquid Glass" type articles.
       | List out the problems, list out potential solutions.
       | 
       | Anyone run across articles like this? Please share relevant
       | links.
        
       | anentropic wrote:
       | all else aside...
       | 
       | > two windows in the same app, both created using SwiftUI, can't
       | even share a common radius, as shown below
       | 
       | this actually looks correct to me, the smaller 'subordinate'
       | dialog has smaller radius, like nesting dolls
        
       | anal_reactor wrote:
       | The cycle of most products:
       | 
       | Step 1: company caters to a niche
       | 
       | Step 2: niche loves product, recommends to wider audience
       | 
       | Step 3: wider audience adopts product
       | 
       | Step 4: company switches to targeting the wider audience
       | 
       | Step 5: niche doesn't like product anymore, switches to a
       | competitor
       | 
       | Windows is in step 5 - previously undisputed king of desktop, now
       | an ad-infested boomer legacy system. MacOS is in step 4 -
       | previously pricy but good solution for devs and creatives, now
       | PITA for devs and "I would switch if it weren't for Adobe suite"
       | for creatives, but normies think it looks pretty. Linux is in
       | step 1 - Valve has been consistently investing in making it a
       | viable gaming system. If you told me 10 years ago that Linux
       | actually runs games other than TuxCart, I'd have laughed, but
       | nowadays "does it run on Linux" is a serious question for every
       | new release. It just needs some time to mature, and once gamers
       | switch, other desktop users will slowly follow.
        
       | spike021 wrote:
       | honestly the issue i hate the most is how bad the keyboard has
       | gotten over the past 3-5 years/major iOS releases.
       | 
       | on top of the bug people mention a lot where types are miss-
       | pressed, there's a problem i get where if iOS considers a word
       | misspelled it'll refuse to let me use the space key or otherwise
       | move away from the word or close the keyboard. it's almost like a
       | UI thread lockout. it's extremely frustrating.
        
       | DrProtic wrote:
       | I was about to upgrade my MacBook but instead booted up Linux on
       | my dust collecting desktop, all because liquid glass.
       | 
       | They managed to break so many things, they even managed to mess
       | up the volume slider. Instead of showing up across the screen now
       | it's tucked away to the top right. What the hell.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-28 23:01 UTC)