[HN Gopher] Joan Didion and Kurt Vonnegut had something to say. ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Joan Didion and Kurt Vonnegut had something to say. We have it on
       tape
        
       https://archive.md/e6xBV
        
       Author : tintinnabula
       Score  : 87 points
       Date   : 2025-12-22 06:17 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | hoppyhoppy2 wrote:
       | Gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/books/james-
       | baldwin-joan-...
        
       | grahameb wrote:
       | Direct link to the Vonnegut recordings
       | https://www.92ny.org/archives/kurt-vonnegut,-jr
        
         | gen220 wrote:
         | This was an excellent listen, thank you for linking this
         | directly!
         | 
         | Kurt Vonnegut was such a clear thinker and communicator, we
         | were fortunate to have him for so long.
        
       | mentos wrote:
       | Was just thinking to myself how Player Piano has never been more
       | appropriate than the AI age we're in such a hurry to usher in.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Agree. It's just not a very good Vonnegut novel though. You can
         | see him without (yet) a voice in the novel.
         | 
         | If "Breakfast of Champions" is a little too nutty though, I
         | think I might like his "Mother Night" best. (But maybe we like
         | nutty Kurt?)
        
           | dillydogg wrote:
           | I think "Hocus Pocus" is his best, followed by "Cat's
           | Cradle". But how lucky are we to have so many good ones to
           | pick from?
        
             | JKCalhoun wrote:
             | Thanks. _Hocus Pocus_ slipped past me somehow. Now I have
             | something to look forward to reading. (I liked _Cat 's
             | Cradle_ too but it is also on the loopier end of Vonnegut's
             | writing spectrum--but we need some more of that.)
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | Mother Night is the book that has become more relevant every
           | year since it was published, in 1962.
           | 
           | Every time someone is an "Ironic Nazi" online I think of that
           | book, and how 4chan evolved into the modern political
           | juggernaut it is today.
        
           | beardbound wrote:
           | Mother night was my favorite Vonnegut book.
        
         | tsunamifury wrote:
         | Maybe the reason westworld made it such a prominent theme in
         | the show. All of season 3 is essentially that story.
         | 
         | But what vonnegut missed or questioned is what is we aren't
         | much more either. (Core thesis of the show is that skinner
         | proved we are mostly the same as a player piano anyways)
        
         | thinkingtoilet wrote:
         | I happened to reread it recently and was absolutely blown away
         | by how relevant it is today, and how it is almost certainly
         | more relevant today than when it was written.
        
           | detourdog wrote:
           | I think Vonnegut really had his pulse on the human condition.
           | Writers such Aldous Huxley could capture parts of it but
           | Vonnegut seemed to capture it in just about every book.
        
         | sehugg wrote:
         | Bluebeard is a good one too; it ruminates on the nature of art
         | and how/why meaning is assigned to it.
        
           | liamconnell wrote:
           | Loved Bluebeard as well. A mature Vonnegut who knew how to
           | use motifs from his earlier work. And for an old guy, he kept
           | his writing fresh and energetic. The miniature story of the
           | dog without a tail always comes back to me.
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | My programming teacher in 9th grade spent half the class time
         | on Pascal and programming, and half like a literature or social
         | studies class, including reading and discussing "Player Piano".
         | 
         | Today, the people who most should read it and other things are
         | not the people in our field. Just like the people who most
         | should've been reading about the effects and dangers of Wall
         | Street scamming, were not the coked-up bros doing the scamming.
        
       | DrewADesign wrote:
       | "One Headline Copywriting Strategy Increases Clicks. This is How
       | It Works..."
       | 
       | There seemed to be an era where clickbait headlines in major
       | media were seen as passe... but they've seemingly made a comeback
       | over the past couple years.
        
       | anigbrowl wrote:
       | My disgust at this pretentious clickbait outweighs my interest in
       | the historical material.
        
       | Towaway69 wrote:
       | Vonnegut is good but I think (Aldous) Huxley had more to say, at
       | least that resonated more with me.
       | 
       | I recently discovered this 1958 interview of Huxley[1]:
       | 
       | > This is the force which in general terms can be called
       | overpopulation, the mounting pressure of population pressing upon
       | existing resources. ...This, of course, is an extraordinary
       | thing; something is happening which has never happened in the
       | world's history before. I mean, let's just take a simple fact
       | that between the time of birth of Christ and the landing of the
       | Mayflower, the population of the earth doubled. It rose from two
       | hundred and fifty million to probably five hundred million.
       | Today, the population of the earth is rising at such a rate that
       | it will double in half a century.
       | 
       | [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alasBxZsb40
        
         | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
         | Funny then, how he could be so wrong. The population is
         | plummeting in many countries, and the rate of decline will only
         | increase. In China, they're looking at each generation halving
         | the previous (or worse).
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-26 23:01 UTC)