[HN Gopher] UBlockOrigin and UBlacklist AI Blocklist
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       UBlockOrigin and UBlacklist AI Blocklist
        
       Author : _____k
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2025-12-25 20:14 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | HelloUsername wrote:
       | Previous discussion:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39771742
        
         | canyp wrote:
         | Interesting that the previous post was flagged. You may or may
         | not find the list useful, but flag? Did it hurt some
         | sensitivities?
        
           | haupt wrote:
           | It's a so-called hot-button topic and unfortunately HN isn't
           | quite the paragon of pragmatic technical discussion that it
           | was in the past. C'est la vie.
        
       | teruakohatu wrote:
       | It is an unusual list. Along with a list an AI websites it also
       | blocks a handful of instagram, X and Pinterest profiles. It also
       | blocks a number of specific products on Amazon, such as a
       | colouring book that presumably was generated with AI.
       | 
       | This kind of reminds me Steam where indie devs need to exclaim
       | loudly that they are not using AI, otherwise they face backlash.
       | Meanwhile a significant percentage of devs are using GenAI for
       | better tab completion, better search or generating tests. All
       | things that do not impact the end user experience negatively.
        
         | ares623 wrote:
         | I think the backlash comes from all the "AI-driven" layoffs
         | that absolutely impact the end users negatively.
        
         | dexwiz wrote:
         | I think AI as a tool versus AI as a product are different. Even
         | in coding you can see it with tab completion/agents v vibe
         | coding. It's a spectrum and people are trying to find their
         | personal divider on it. Additionally there are those out there
         | that decry anything involving AI as heresy. (no thinking
         | machines!)
        
           | latexr wrote:
           | > Additionally there are those out there that decry anything
           | involving AI as heresy. (no thinking machines!)
           | 
           | I don't think anyone decrying the current crop of "AI" is
           | against "thinking machines". We're not there yet, LLMs don't
           | _think_ , despite the marketing.
        
             | WA wrote:
             | And they don't reason. They do _prompt smoothing_.
        
         | lpcvoid wrote:
         | Devs also shouldn't be using GenAI, it's inherently anti-worker
         | and IMHO also anti-human. But I guess that's an unpopular
         | opinion around here.
        
           | snet0 wrote:
           | If a "C+++" was created that was so efficient that it would
           | allow teams to be smaller and achieve the same work faster,
           | would that be anti-worker?
           | 
           | If an IDE had powerful, effective hotkeys and shortcuts and
           | refactoring tools that allowed devs to be faster and more
           | efficient, would that be anti-worker?
        
             | lpcvoid wrote:
             | What part of c++ is inefficient? I can write that pretty
             | quickly without having some cloud service hallucinate
             | stuff.
             | 
             | And no, a faster way to write or refactor code is not anti-
             | worker. Corporations gobbling up tax payer money to build
             | power hungry datacenters so billionaires can replace
             | workers is.
        
           | bdangubic wrote:
           | what about cars? they are anti-horses... can we use
           | cars/buses/trains... or nah?
        
         | halyconWays wrote:
         | Given the political comments in what's supposed to be a filter,
         | and how everything is prefaced with "shit" like "Pinterest
         | shit," I bet the author had a personal political disagreement
         | with those accounts.
         | 
         | The list is also too specific to be useful in some cases, like,
         | is it really important to you that you add 12 entries for
         | specific Amazon products, like: `
         | duckduckgo.com,bing.com##a[href*="amazon.com/Rabbit-Coloring-
         | Book-Rabbits-Lovers/dp/B0CV43GKGZ"]:upward(li):remove()`?
        
       | SkyeCA wrote:
       | Why did the original get flagged?
       | 
       | Edit: On a second look the list is kind of weird. I'd love to
       | block AI stuff but the blocklist is far, far too broad.
        
         | elcapitan wrote:
         | Yeah I hoped it would blacklist all those spammy autogenerated
         | SEO sites from search results, but it looks like a vendetta
         | with anything AI or machine learning in general.
        
       | mmooss wrote:
       | The reactionary response against the new technology, even on HN,
       | is pretty strong. If I ran an AI developer, I'd take it as a
       | signal that I'm doing something right - people see how powerful
       | our product is, and they care about it. Hate and love aren't too
       | different; we'll have many dedicated users who will have
       | forgotten.                 First they laugh at you       Then
       | they tell you it violates the orthodoxy       Then they think
       | they knew it all along
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-25 23:00 UTC)