[HN Gopher] Beijing is enforcing tough rules to ensure chatbots ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Beijing is enforcing tough rules to ensure chatbots don't misbehave
        
       no paywall: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/china-is-worried-ai-
       threatens-pa...
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2025-12-24 20:04 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com)
        
       | Imustaskforhelp wrote:
       | Interesting but for a country like china with the fact that
       | companies are partially-owned by CCP itself. I feel like most of
       | these discussions would / (should?) have happened in a way where
       | they don't leak outside.
       | 
       | If the govt. formally anounces it, perhaps, I believe that they
       | must have already taken appropriate action against it.
       | 
       | Personally I believe that we are gonna see distills of large
       | language models perhaps even with open weights Euro/American
       | models filtering.
       | 
       | I do feel like everybody knows seperation of concerns where
       | nobody really asks about china to chinese models but I am a bit
       | worried as recently I had just created if AI models can still
       | push a chinese narrative in lets say if someone is creating
       | another nation's related website or anything similar. I don't
       | think that there would be that big of a deal about it and I will
       | still use chinese models but an article like this definitely
       | reduces china's influence overall
       | 
       | America and Europe, please create open source / open weights
       | models without censorship (like the gpt model) as a major
       | concern. You already have intelligence like gemini flash so just
       | open source something similar which can beat kimi/deepseek/glm
       | 
       | Edit: Although thinking about it, I feel like the largest impact
       | wouldn't be us outsiders but rather the people in china because
       | they had access to chinese models but there would be very strict
       | controls on even open weights model from america etc. there so if
       | chinese models have propaganda it would most likely try to
       | convince the average chinese with propagandization perhaps and I
       | don't want to put a conspiracy hat on but if we do, I think that
       | the chinese credit score can take a look at if people who are
       | suspicious of the CCP ask it to chatbots on chinese chatbots.
        
         | KlayLay wrote:
         | Last time I checked, China's state-owned enterprises aren't all
         | that invested in developing AI chatbots, so I imagine that the
         | amount of control the central government has is about as much
         | as their control over any tech company. If anything, China's AI
         | industry has been described as under-regulated by people like
         | Jensen Huang.
         | 
         | A technology created by a certain set of people will naturally
         | come to reflect the views of said people, even in areas where
         | people act like it's neutral (e.g., cameras that are biased
         | towards people with lighter skin). This is the case for all AI
         | models--Chinese, American, European, etc.--so I wouldn't dub
         | one that censors information they don't like as propaganda just
         | because we like it, since we naturally have our own version of
         | that.
         | 
         | The actual chatbots, themselves, seem to be relatively useful.
        
       | stevenjgarner wrote:
       | Will these heavy-handed constraints ultimately stifle the very
       | innovation China needs to compete with the U.S.? By forcing AI
       | models to operate within a narrow ideological "sandbox," the
       | government risks making its homegrown models less capable, less
       | creative, and less useful than their Western counterparts,
       | potentially causing China to fall behind in the most important
       | technological race of the century. Will the western counterparts
       | follow suit?
        
         | Zetaphor wrote:
         | I don't see how filtering the training data to exclude specific
         | topics the CCP doesn't like would affect the capabilities of
         | the model. The reason Chinese models are so competitive is
         | because they're innovating on the architecture, not the
         | training data.
        
           | stevenjgarner wrote:
           | Intelligence isn't a series of isolated silos. Modern AI
           | capabilities (reasoning, logic, and creativity) often emerge
           | from the cross-pollination of data. For the CCP, this move
           | isn't just about stopping a chatbot from saying "Tiananmen
           | Square." It's about the unpredictability of the technology.
           | As models move toward Agentic AI, "control" shifts from "what
           | it says" to "what it does." If the state cannot perfectly
           | align the AI's "values" with the Party's, they risk creating
           | a powerful tool that could be used by dissidents to automate
           | subversion or bypass the Great Firewall. I feel the real
           | question for China is: Can you have an AI that is smart
           | enough to win a war or save an economy, but "dumb" enough to
           | never question its master? If they tighten the leash too much
           | to maintain control, the dog might never learn to hunt.
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | Imagine a model trained only on an Earth-centered universe,
           | that there are four elements (earth, air, fire, and water),
           | or one trained only that the world is flat. Would the
           | capabilities of the resulting model equal those of models
           | trained on a more robust set of scientific data?
           | 
           | Architecture and training data both matter.
        
             | AlotOfReading wrote:
             | Pretty much all the Greek philosophers grew up in a world
             | where the classical element model was widely accepted, yet
             | they had reasoning skills that led them to develop theories
             | of atomism, and measure the circumference of the earth.
             | It'd be difficult to argue they were less capable than
             | modern people who grew up learning the ideas they
             | originated either.
             | 
             | It doesn't seem impossible that models might also be able
             | to learn reasoning beyond the limits of their training set.
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | I mean they came up with it then very slowly, they would
               | quickly have to learn everything modern if they wanted to
               | compete...
               | 
               | Kind of a version of you don't have to run faster than
               | the bear, you just have to run faster than the person
               | beside you.
        
           | throwuxiytayq wrote:
           | I imagine trimming away 99.9% of _unwanted_ responses is not
           | at all difficult at all and can be done without damaging
           | model quality; pushing it further will result in degradation
           | as you go to increasingly desperate lengths to make the model
           | unaware, and _actively, constantly unwilling to be aware_ of
           | certain inconvenient genocides here and there.
           | 
           | Similarly, the leading models seem perfectly secure at first
           | glance, but when you dig in they're susceptible to all kinds
           | of prompt-based attacks, and the tail end seems quite
           | daunting. They'll tell you how to build the bomby thingy if
           | you ask the right question, despite all the work that goes
           | into prohibiting that. Let's not even get into the topic of
           | model uncensorship/abliteration and trying to block _that_.
        
         | bilbo0s wrote:
         | Probably not.
         | 
         | It's the arts, culture, politics and philosophies being
         | kneecapped in the embeddings. Not really the physics,
         | chemistry, and math.
         | 
         | I could see them actually getting _more_ of what they want:
         | which is Chinese people using these models to research hard
         | sciences. All without having to carry the cost of  "deadbeats"
         | researching, say, the use of the cello in classical music.
         | Because all of those prompts carry an energy cost.
         | 
         | I don't know? I'm just thinking the people in charge over there
         | probably don't want to shoulder the cost of a billion people
         | looking into Faure for example. And this course of action kind
         | of delivers to them added benefits of that nature.
        
         | cherioo wrote:
         | The west is already ahead on this. It is called AI safety and
         | alignment.
        
           | throwuxiytayq wrote:
           | People laughing away the necessity for AI alignment are
           | severely misaligned themselves; ironically enough, they very
           | rarely represent the _capability frontier_.
        
         | sho_hn wrote:
         | > Will the western counterparts follow suit?
         | 
         | Haven't some of them already? I seem to recall Grok being
         | censored to follow several US gov-preferred viewpoints.
        
       | SilverElfin wrote:
       | This isn't surprising. They even enforced rules protecting
       | Chinese government interests in the US TikTok company
       | (https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/14/tiktok-forced-staff-
       | oaths...), so I would expect them to be tougher within their
       | borders.
        
       | bgwalter wrote:
       | China has been more cautious the whole year. Xi has warned of an
       | "AI" bubble, and "AI" was locked down during exam periods.
       | 
       | More censorship and alignment will have the positive side effect
       | that Western elites get jealous and also want to lock down
       | chatbots. Which will then get so bad that no one is going to use
       | them (great!).
       | 
       | The current propaganda production is amazing. Half of Musk's
       | retweets seem Grok generated tweets under different account
       | names. Since most of responses to Musk are bots, too, it is hard
       | to know what the public thinks of it.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-24 23:00 UTC)