[HN Gopher] Qntm's Power Tower Toy
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Qntm's Power Tower Toy
        
       Author : ravenical
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2025-12-20 11:19 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (qntm.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (qntm.org)
        
       | konmok wrote:
       | I'm a big qntm fan. I highly recommend their "antimemetics" SCP
       | stories and articles.
        
         | jdpage wrote:
         | There's a new, professionally-published book version of "There
         | Is No Antimemetics Division" out as well[1], if you want to
         | support Sam's work that way. I have print copies of both the
         | self-published V1 and the new V2. I'm very excited about the
         | latter, though I haven't finished it yet.
         | 
         | [1]: https://qntm.org/antimemetics
        
           | patleeman wrote:
           | I loved this book. The audiobook is available on spotify and
           | was a great listen.
        
         | solid_fuel wrote:
         | I really enjoyed one of their other stories - Ra
         | https://qntm.org/ra
        
           | riffraff wrote:
           | I'll add that Lena/MMAcevedo[0] is both a wonderful story and
           | terrifying
           | 
           | [0] https://qntm.org/mmacevedo
        
       | analog8374 wrote:
       | Hey he does good scifi too
        
       | AnotherGoodName wrote:
       | Fun fact with arrow notation, if you put it under a modulus it
       | quickly converges to the same value no matter how high in
       | exponents you go!
       | 
       | Eg. 2^2^2 = 2^4 mod 35 = 16
       | 
       | Let's go one higher
       | 
       | 2^2^2^2 = 2^16 mod 35 = 16 too!
       | 
       | and once more for the record
       | 
       | 2^2^2^2^2 = 2^65536 mod 35 = 16 as well. It'll keep giving this
       | result no matter how high you go.
       | 
       | https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=2%5E2%5E2%5E2+mod+35 for a
       | link of this to play with.
       | 
       | I could do this with any modulus and any exponent too.
       | 
       | 2^3^3 = 2^3^3^3 = 7 mod 11 etc.
       | 
       | The reason is that the orders of powers are effected by the
       | totient recursively and since totients always reduce, eventually
       | the totient converges to 1. This is where the powers no longer
       | matter under modulus. Eg. the totient of 35 is 12 (the effective
       | modulo of the first order power), the totient of 12 is 2 (the
       | effective modulo of the second order power), the totient of 2 is
       | 1 (the effective modulo of the third order power) and so after 3
       | powers under mod 35 it converges.
        
         | ashivkum wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure there was a project Euler problem premised on
         | this property but I can't find it at the moment.
        
           | AnotherGoodName wrote:
           | A classic would be quickly computing such big numbers under a
           | modulus. You just compute the carmichael totient recursively
           | till it hits 1, disregard higher orders and then going
           | backwards calculate the powers, reducing by the modulo of the
           | current order (this way it never gets large enough to be a
           | pain to calculate). The totients reduce in logn time and each
           | step is logn so it's merely logn^2 to calculate.
        
       | 112233 wrote:
       | As someone from time to time peeking into googology.fandom.com ,
       | my favorite big number device probably still is loader.c, simply
       | because of how concrete and unreachable it feels.
       | 
       | Too bad most Friedman's work has linkrotted by now...
        
       | piskov wrote:
       | Ah, for a second I hoped it is another novel.
       | 
       | If you haven't read "There is no antimemetics division", do it
       | now. Easily one of the top science fiction out there.
       | 
       | However buy the Penguin books 2025 edition, not the self-
       | published free one -- that version has a meh ending and suffers
       | from not having an editor.
        
       | Sharlin wrote:
       | Is it buggy for at least 2^(n)^2? It gives 4 for any n, but
       | surely for example 2^^2 = 2^(2^2) != 4?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-24 23:00 UTC)