[HN Gopher] Space Math Academy
___________________________________________________________________
Space Math Academy
Author : dynamicwebpaige
Score : 32 points
Date : 2025-12-20 18:47 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (space-math.academy)
(TXT) w3m dump (space-math.academy)
| dynamicwebpaige wrote:
| Introducing Space Math Academy!
|
| Reimagined NASA's Space Math curriculum
| (https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/) as an immersive game, instead
| of static PDFs. Students solve the same problems real scientists
| face daily -- calculating orbits and trajectories, dealing with
| space weather, etc. -- in an interactive way that goes beyond
| worksheets (or just sending PDFs to an LLM).
|
| https://space-math.academy
| https://www.github.com/dynamicwebpaige/space-math
|
| Powered by Gemini for storytelling and text-to-speech (TTS).
| Links to the GitHub repo and live link that you can play above,
| thanks to Google Cloud Run. Please file feature requests, if
| there's enough interest will add more missions and a leaderboard.
| burkaman wrote:
| Only had a couple minutes to try this but I'm already confused by
| a couple things.
|
| - "UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE" I guess this is a
| joke but I don't really get it, just seems like a weird thing to
| have there.
|
| - In the first popup, the "audio transmission" is significantly
| different than the printed text.
|
| - "The Earth is a sphere." - this is not true, I think it should
| be classified as a hypothesis
|
| - "The universe is expanding." Isn't this a theory? I don't think
| it can be called "a basic statement", it is a well-tested theory
| based on a lot of observational evidence.
|
| - "Humans and gorillas evolved from a common ancestor species."
| This is obviously a theory, it's like THE theory when you need an
| example of what a theory is. You cannot establish this by
| experiment or observation.
|
| - "Light is an electromagnetic phenomenon described by Maxwell's
| Laws" Why is this classified as a theory?
|
| etc.
|
| The categorization of this first lesson seems very arbitrary, and
| often contradictory with the "knowledge database" on the left.
|
| Edit: Did you AI-generate these questions and then not proofread
| them?
| tzs wrote:
| There are photos of the Earth taken from the neighborhood of
| the Moon. They show something that is indistinguishable from a
| sphere to the naked eye.
|
| Sure, with instruments you can measure it and find that it
| deviates from a perfect sphere. But every object that is made
| of atoms multiple atoms is not a perfect sphere.
| burkaman wrote:
| I don't think it's a pedantic point, this is supposed to be a
| site about learning math that NASA scientists use, and the
| exact shape of the Earth is very relevant to them.
|
| I just think it shouldn't be used as a canonical example of a
| fact when you'll probably learn at some point that it
| technically isn't true.
| 0wis wrote:
| Seems fun but unusable on mobile. Windows are not responsive
| enough. General design seems fun though
| OkayPhysicist wrote:
| "If I jump out a window I will die"
|
| Is not a fact: I have never died jumping out of a window, thus it
| is a _hypothesis_ (because it is testable, though that raise
| epistemological problems in of itself)
| ricksunny wrote:
| viz. this evergreen gem:
| https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/12/13/we-jumped-from-planes-w...
| constantcrying wrote:
| >Math
|
| But the first exercise is about judging statements based on
| nebulous definitions, definitely unrelated to mathematics?
| nimonian wrote:
| Mathematics is concerned with a lot more than arithmetic and
| computation. Beyond the most basic levels, a mathematician will
| profit greatly from being aware of this type of epistemological
| vocabulary and a strong sense of their underlying meaning.
| Whether reading or writing mathematics, we're constantly
| dealing with propositions, and correctly taxonomising those
| propositions can really help keep your mental workspace clean.
|
| I do question the effectiveness (and accuracy) of this
| exercise, but its learning objectives I think are quite apt.
| NooneAtAll3 wrote:
| I'm so confused by the first task...
|
| specifically I got hit with "chimpanzees and humans have common
| ancestor" (or something like that)
|
| definition for a "fact" (supposed correct answer) given on the
| page ("A basic statement established by experiment or
| observation. True under specific conditions.") seems to me akin
| to "direct result of some experiment"
|
| meanwhile, determining common ancestry - in my mind - took a lot
| of work, comparing anatomy, digging out bones and stuff... all
| the correlation, all the composition
|
| surely it's more of a theory that's supported by many facts?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-12-23 23:00 UTC)