[HN Gopher] Cartoon Network channel errors (1995 - 2025)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cartoon Network channel errors (1995 - 2025)
        
       Author : Pikamander2
       Score  : 96 points
       Date   : 2025-12-22 09:01 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (cnas.fandom.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (cnas.fandom.com)
        
       | pjerem wrote:
       | But how ?
        
         | BrentOzar wrote:
         | And why?
         | 
         | Sometimes it's just amazing to look at how much dedication
         | someone put into a list like this, and wonder what they do with
         | this information. It's inspiring (to me at least.)
         | 
         | In a park near my hotel, there's an elderly gentleman who uses
         | a giant brush to paint calligraphy on concrete walkways every
         | morning. He paints it with water - so it gradually evaporates
         | over the course of the next hour or so. I admire his work in
         | the same way I admire this web page.
        
           | neuronexmachina wrote:
           | The table of events reminded me of an SCP article, except
           | without any sort of buildup towards something supernatural.
        
           | hulitu wrote:
           | > And why?
           | 
           | Exercise for Jira. /s
        
         | gosub100 wrote:
         | I am guessing someone who works at the station shared some
         | internal documents.
         | 
         | I remember in the mid 90s watching Nickelodeon before school
         | and they played an entire 30m block of commercials instead of a
         | program. They probably lost the tape or something.
        
           | weinzierl wrote:
           | I can imagine that it used to be valuable information for
           | advertisers or respectively for the channel as preparation
           | for advertisers complaints.
        
             | smitelli wrote:
             | There are definitely outside organizations whose sole
             | responsibility is to monitor TV/radio broadcasts and
             | nowadays even podcast sponsor breaks to ensure that ad copy
             | is inserted as agreed. (Source: I was contracted to do some
             | of that work for a time.)
        
       | cadamsdotcom wrote:
       | If people are watching your work closely enough to document
       | errors in it, and they care enough to make a wiki page, you're
       | doing truly great work.
        
         | wiseowise wrote:
         | Preach.
         | 
         | And now compare to modern endless stream of junk that flows
         | into oblivion.
        
         | cr125rider wrote:
         | Yes exactly. And this is an incredibly short list. Great
         | engineering over there.
        
           | ekropotin wrote:
           | To be fair, there is no way to know if the list is complete
           | or not.
        
             | crumpled wrote:
             | It almost certainly isn't. Some TV engineers are
             | discovering the list right now and biting their tongues.
        
         | crumpled wrote:
         | I completely agree.
         | 
         | But as a person in charge of keeping a brand new (volunteer) FM
         | station running smoothly, this is horrifying. I feel every
         | technical problem physically in my body.
         | 
         | It's not them, it's me.
        
       | tt_dev wrote:
       | Hats off to you sir
        
       | haritha-j wrote:
       | TIL that showing a screenbug on the screen was an absolute pain.
       | Also TIL what a screenbug is.
        
         | weinzierl wrote:
         | TIL that a dog is a bug
        
         | DoctorOW wrote:
         | This is the rare opportunity I get to flex my broadcast
         | experience. Generally these are setup in a chain:
         | Playlists -> Playback -> Character Generator (draws the bugs,
         | coming up next, and other graphics overtop), -> (other stuff)
         | -> Network feed
         | 
         | > _July 16, 2023: About 17 minutes into the 1:00pm airing of
         | the Teen Titans Go! episode "And the Award for Sound Design
         | Goes to Rob / Some of Their Parts", the feed blacked out for
         | six seconds, then the screenbug disappeared for the rest of the
         | episode. The screenbug returned during the 1:30pm airing of the
         | episode "Cat's Fancy". _
         | 
         | This sounds to me like the character generator failing and the
         | playback being taken directly to air.
        
       | mobilene wrote:
       | I completely understand the kind of mind that would catalog such
       | a thing.
       | 
       | This wouldn't be my thing to catalog, but I'm glad somebody did
       | it.
        
         | ashleyn wrote:
         | As a kid i remember being fascinated by technical difficulties
         | screens, EAS tests, etc. Generally anything that unwittingly
         | revealed the technical aspects of running a broadcast station.
         | This was before we really knew how to use the internet even, so
         | for many years, I'd wonder what a screen saying "No Access
         | Card" or "Coriogen Eclipse" meant. When we learned about
         | Google, it was suddenly a very educational experience to google
         | these things and learn what was going on behind the scenes. I'm
         | a software engineer today, but surely the nearest parallel
         | universe version of me grew up to be a broadcast engineer.
        
           | hn773746483 wrote:
           | On Toronto's public transportation, TTC, occasionally the
           | upcoming bus stop ticker would flash diagnostic
           | information(?) and "64K RAM" instead of the upcoming stop
           | name. Doesn't seem like there's a wiki page about these
           | faults yet.
        
             | zoky wrote:
             | Actually, the Canadian government suppresses it because
             | they just _really_ don't want anyone to know how to get to
             | 64K RAM, ON.
        
             | nubinetwork wrote:
             | What would they be running them on that has so little
             | memory these days? Esp32?
        
         | butlike wrote:
         | I think I get it too. There's a strange, hard-to-describe
         | feeling there for me. It's like a "comfy, but darkly eerie"
         | feeling whenever something like a broadcast technical
         | difficulty or "Max Headroom"-esque event happens.
         | 
         | Like, I'm sitting comfy watching TV, and there's some technical
         | glitch that pulls back the curtain a little bit. It's
         | interesting and not as irritating as a bug in say a website,
         | because I'm still intrinsically doing the activity I was
         | previously (watching television), I'm just now inexplicably
         | watching a different broadcast.
         | 
         | Who knows, it might be the dreamlike quality Cartoon
         | Network/Toonami/Adult Swim had in the late 90s/early 2000s as
         | well. The technical glitches fit thematically with the low-fi
         | beats.
        
         | nosrepa wrote:
         | My favorite niche catalog is this list of chairs of star trek:
         | https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/database/chairs-trek.htm
        
       | kotaKat wrote:
       | I'm suddenly reminded of a fairly large channel error from one of
       | CN's competitors.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickelodeon_Games_and_Sports_f...
       | 
       | When Nick GAS shut down, somehow, Dish Network had an automated
       | loop of the channel that they themselves kept running for about
       | 15 months after the channel's demise. I'm curious what systems at
       | Dish Network were still running a ghost channel by itself like
       | that. Did they just get delivered loops of programming to shove
       | on the air from Nick directly and just leave it up? I would have
       | figured Dish would have been getting a feed from Viacom that
       | would have dropped at the same time as GAS itself.
        
         | thesuitonym wrote:
         | I suppose it makes sense if your channel doesn't have a lot of
         | new or live programming to just send a tape instead of setting
         | up a feed.
         | 
         | I always wondered about these types of channels back then, that
         | had absolutely no original programming, and very few if any
         | commercials. What was the plan with them? Were they just trying
         | to keep brand familiarity? Was it so difficult to get a channel
         | spot that they didn't want to lose it? But if so, why go
         | through all the hassle to get the spot with no income stream?
        
           | kotaKat wrote:
           | Weirdly GAS was a popular channel back in the day but was
           | offered only on higher tier cable packages (in my market, it
           | required _Digital Cable_ , which meant hoping your parents
           | were willing to splurge for the extra package, the digital
           | box (or boxes)...). I assume the income stream was more being
           | delivered from offering GAS as a 'premium' channel, then
           | eventually it became an automated vehicle that just got
           | lumped into a "bundle" of channels being sold to the cable
           | companies (eg "Buy Nick for your customers and we'll throw in
           | GAS and Jr") once they stopped providing actual live content
           | for it circa 2004-2005.
        
         | drunken_thor wrote:
         | Knowing cable companies that was probably until all contracts
         | with that channel as part of the subscription ended. They had
         | to keep the channel running otherwise they might need to refund
         | people.
        
       | Dwedit wrote:
       | You mean that channel that plays nothing but "Teen Titans Go"?
        
       | dpifke wrote:
       | As someone who has moderated online communities in the past, I
       | recognize the value in having a page like this, to which you can
       | point people if they want to enumerate such trifles instead of
       | discussing the episodes or series themselves. Rather than just
       | say such discussion is off-topic, you give them a separate, on-
       | topic place to discuss it.
       | 
       | (I don't actually know if that is how this page came about, but
       | it seems similar to other wiki pages I've seen used for such a
       | purpose.)
        
       | puddnutz wrote:
       | I worked for 10 years in broadcast, as a director, IT support,
       | and an Engineer.
       | 
       | I love picking errors out of any broadcast, especially with what
       | I know now.
       | 
       | Seeing things like this and other documented cases of broadcast
       | errors always make me happy because I know how hard it is
       | sometimes to be in that line of work and how easy it is to just
       | make little blips here and there.
       | 
       | Making errors is how I learned to never get between older people
       | and their midday TV dramas. They absolutely know how to get a
       | hold of you if they miss a few minutes of Young and Restless!
        
         | SbEpUBz2 wrote:
         | Broadcast errors are not only interesting to watch, they also
         | made TV feel human and alive. Nowadays, watching most cable
         | channels feels like staring at the output of a VLC playlist
         | with ten movies on loop.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-22 23:01 UTC)