[HN Gopher] Three Ways to Solve Problems
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Three Ways to Solve Problems
        
       Author : 42point2
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2025-12-21 14:35 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (andreasfragner.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (andreasfragner.com)
        
       | pyrolistical wrote:
       | This is why you schedule angry emails to be sent the next day.
       | Maybe you'll wake up and realize it's not a problem at all
        
         | bob1029 wrote:
         | I do this with emails I'm not even angry about. Wait for your
         | audience to come to you wherever possible. It's a lot cheaper
         | to leverage the momentum of other people than to get them
         | started from zero every time. I find the desire to author angry
         | emails is often a side effect of trying to go too fast.
        
       | CapitalistCartr wrote:
       | Two methods I have found useful. If it seems an intractable
       | problem, you've made two goals equal. Figure out the conflicting
       | goals and decide which will give way, such as once I think about
       | it I realize the unspoken goal is I don't want to challenge Mom,
       | M-I-L, Boss, etc.
       | 
       | Second method is 6 steps: Intel, intel, intel, always be
       | gathering intel. Clear mind, set aside emotions. Clear vision of
       | what I want, the more clear and detailed, the more likely I'll
       | get the result I want. Detailed plan to get from current reality
       | to vision. Execute plan. Debrief: what worked, what mistakes,
       | etc.
        
       | journal wrote:
       | be first, smart, or cheat.
        
       | nine_k wrote:
       | There's way number 1.5: Solve a different but related problem,
       | which gives you like 80% of the benefits of solving the original
       | problem, but at 20% of the cost. This allows you to experience
       | much less pain without an investment of resources you can't
       | afford.
       | 
       | Aka "quickfix" or "hack".
        
         | asplake wrote:
         | Rinse and repeat
        
       | fragmede wrote:
       | I wrote this up as the four disagreements.
       | 
       | https://blog.onepatchdown.net/philosophy/2023/10/03/four-pil...
        
         | JackSlateur wrote:
         | This misses bad faith, lack of good will and assume an aligned
         | objective (i.e. lack of selfishness)
        
       | 1970-01-01 wrote:
       | There's a 4th way, but it works least often. Maybe Method 2.5
       | fits better: Wait for the problem to fix itself to your level of
       | risk. Ex: This road is blocked. I have a good news it won't be
       | blocked in X days/months/years. Let's just wait until it's a
       | little better for us to travel down and do something else for a
       | just little while. It's a hybrid between waiting for the path to
       | open up for everyone and forcing your way through. Taking a
       | stepping stone between changing the world and changing your
       | solution to the problem.
        
         | yapyap wrote:
         | That 4th way is a nicely realistic but very toxic (in my
         | experience) way to solve problems.
         | 
         | Not when it's applicable in the situation but if you use it in
         | your toolbox it's very easy to overapply, if you're a hammer
         | everything looks like a nail style.
         | 
         | Use it critically
        
         | bicepjai wrote:
         | My experience in trying to build AI tools has always been the
         | 4th way :) Let's build a coding agent in 2022, procrastination
         | takes over, and then came along Aider, Cursor, Roo, and others.
         | Same with AI observability tools. Wait just enough time to see
         | the tools built themselves.
        
       | erichocean wrote:
       | A favorite of mine: assume a sub-problem has a solution (even
       | though it doesn't), and solve everything else assuming that
       | solution holds.
       | 
       | I find that after I do that, once I have a solution for
       | everything else, a less-general solution to the sub-problem is
       | often sufficient to keep the global solution valid.
        
         | n3t wrote:
         | I wonder what a specific example of this approach would be.
        
           | treetalker wrote:
           | I'm intrigued and would appreciate further
           | examples/explanations too.
        
       | RobotToaster wrote:
       | Where does "Make the problem worse so someone else fixes it" fit?
        
         | porise wrote:
         | It's in own category for higher level beings who make pot holes
         | bigger until it gets fixed.
        
       | bhhhhhhcc wrote:
       | y
        
       | StrangerFoos wrote:
       | It's very interesting that he's talking about start-ups.
       | 
       | I worked for one of Fragner's start-ups and it was an unmitigated
       | disaster in all ways.
       | 
       | He secretly recorded a meeting with myself.
        
       | mrandish wrote:
       | The site's text is medium blue on a gray background with a font-
       | weight of 300. I'm all for a bit of visual variety and personal
       | expressiveness but this is pushing the boundaries of accessible
       | legibility on some systems and screens.
       | 
       | (Yes, I realize there are various browser accessibility tools,
       | reader modes and even custom CSS overrides, but I'd prefer not
       | being forced to force those things on for all sites - because it
       | means that "bit of visual variety and personal expressiveness" no
       | longer exists for increasing numbers of visitors.)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-21 23:00 UTC)