[HN Gopher] A Giant Ball Will Help This Man Survive a Year on an...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Giant Ball Will Help This Man Survive a Year on an Iceberg
        
       Author : areoform
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2025-12-13 15:25 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.outsideonline.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.outsideonline.com)
        
       | I_dream_of_Geni wrote:
       | "The capsule is strong enough to survive a storm at sea or
       | getting crushed between two icebergs."
       | 
       | The first part is probably true. The second part is folly.
       | "Remember the Titanic".
        
         | danielbln wrote:
         | The Titanic wasn't crushed, it was sliced, wasn't it?
        
           | vineyardmike wrote:
           | The titanic was advertised as _unsinkable_ and we know its
           | history.
           | 
           | Advertising this capsule as _uncrushable_ is a commensurate
           | gamble.
        
             | margalabargala wrote:
             | Just make it out of carbon fiber. That's what they did with
             | that uncrushable submersible that went to the Titanic.
        
       | monster_truck wrote:
       | Christ this website is terrible. Blogspam to the core, scrolling
       | even a little bit changes the url to random other articles on
       | their site
        
         | smelendez wrote:
         | Yeah it's frustrating how many legitimate media outlets have
         | made their websites basically unreadable.
        
           | antonvs wrote:
           | *how many _once_ -legitimate media outlets...
        
         | rendall wrote:
         | ...By clicking "Accept All Cookies" you consent to the setting
         | of these cookies and technologies. By clicking "Decline All
         | Cookies" you decline all non-necessary cookies and similar
         | technologies...            [Accept All Cookies]
         | 
         | There was no [Decline All Cookies] button at all. Why even
         | bother with the pretense of a consent warning?
        
         | croisillon wrote:
         | techcrunch does the url change too
        
       | recursivecaveat wrote:
       | So when the flip starts you basically have a few seconds to strap
       | in before getting tossed around the capsule as it tumbles down
       | the side of the berg right? Even if you are strapped in I feel
       | like surely you're going to come out very concussed at the least.
        
         | waldothedog wrote:
         | Not saying it's full-proof but I believe it is a cage inside a
         | ball w rollers so that the outside spins while the inside is at
         | least somewhat stable. Nonetheless, they do mention that a full
         | inversion is a worst case scenario due to the suddenness
        
           | waldothedog wrote:
           | Foolproof*
        
             | yesitcan wrote:
             | Fulpruf*
        
         | onraglanroad wrote:
         | That is what I was thinking. Are you also strapped down for the
         | toilet? It's going to be messy when it flips while you're
         | evacuating your bowels.
         | 
         | And, overall, it seems incredibly pointless! If you have a
         | survival ball like this, why not just let it float? Why put it
         | on a dangerously unstable surface?
        
           | pstuart wrote:
           | > Why put it on a dangerously unstable surface?
           | 
           | I think that's the whole point? No "normal" person would
           | think doing this is a good idea -- he wants the thrill of the
           | ride with a minimum of recklessness.
           | 
           | You couldn't pay me enough to do this.
        
         | chis wrote:
         | His idea seems to be to detect the approximate timing of a flip
         | or roll with sensors and then strap in and wait for it to
         | happen. I have some serious concerns though lol. I mean if the
         | ball rolled off a cliff on the iceberg and fell into the water
         | I'm pretty sure it would be like trying to survive a crash at
         | terminal velocity, and I doubt the racing chair would handle
         | it.
        
         | tomasphan wrote:
         | No it's a self righting interior. Read the article.
        
       | bmitch3020 wrote:
       | Missing from the article is any details on ventilation. You need
       | fresh air to survive, which means non-water tight holes will be
       | somewhere on that thing. Normally on a boat, they would be on the
       | part that's above water. On a spinning ball, that wouldn't be an
       | option.
       | 
       | My best guess is that it will be integrated in the center tube.
       | Buoyancy ensures the center of the ball is usually above water,
       | and one end of the tube would always be above water.
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | You only need to get rid of CO2. There would be oxygen enough
         | in the sphere for quite some time.
        
           | imglorp wrote:
           | Yes, so now you're talking CO2 scrubbers, air monitoring, O2
           | replacement, cabin pressure management, and reliable power to
           | keep all this life support running. It's basically a
           | submarine at that point, all for $20k per pod? I'm skeptical
           | this is practical.
        
       | RealityVoid wrote:
       | > The survivors, including Nobile, spent a month wandering the
       | free-floating pack ice, at one point shooting and eating a polar
       | bear, until their rescue
       | 
       | This sounds like something Jules Verne could have written. In
       | fact I seem to remember this exact plot device in a book a read
       | when I was a teenager, but the name escapes me.
        
       | Xylakant wrote:
       | I'm amazed by the idea that providing escape capsules would have
       | saved many lives. The Christmas tsunami caused about 230 000
       | fatalities in a densely populated area. People didn't even get to
       | higher ground. Where are you going to store the hundreds of
       | thousands capsules that you'd need to even make a dent in that
       | number. And how will people get into those capsules within
       | minutes of the warning?
        
         | imglorp wrote:
         | And who is going to find all those capsuled people and rescue
         | them? Rescuers will be swamped with hundreds of thousands of
         | non-capsuled people who should logically take priority.
         | Depending on how these things float, if they get swept out to
         | sea, you might need a ship with a crane to lift the capsule
         | aboard. Does it float nicely with the hatch open or do you have
         | to stay sealed up to stay afloat? Can you float with air ports
         | open or do all of you have to stay breathing that scuba tank in
         | the photo; how long will that last? What will many --
         | thousands? -- of EPIRBs all going off at once do to the SAR
         | system?
        
           | croisillon wrote:
           | there is only one way to find out
        
       | praptak wrote:
       | Stability of icebergs is tricky. They don't "become" top heavy as
       | the article states, they are constantly top heavy.
       | 
       | The center of mass of the iceberg is above the center of buoyancy
       | 100% of the time. What prevents the flip is a flat base which
       | hopefully counters the small tilts by moving the center of
       | buoyancy in the same direction as the center of mass.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-13 23:00 UTC)