[HN Gopher] Japan law opening phone app stores to go into effect
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Japan law opening phone app stores to go into effect
        
       Author : shlip
       Score  : 120 points
       Date   : 2025-12-12 16:59 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www3.nhk.or.jp)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www3.nhk.or.jp)
        
       | shlip wrote:
       | JFTC's full 'Mobile Software Competition Act Guidelines' are
       | available here :
       | https://www.jftc.go.jp/file/MSCA_Guidelines_tentative_transl...
       | 
       | Curious to see how Apple and Google are going to circumvent this.
        
         | madeofpalk wrote:
         | How is it different to what Apple's done in the EU, with
         | allowing for third party app stores there.
        
         | idle_zealot wrote:
         | My admittedly amateur reading of this is that while it does
         | promote competition, it also explicitly allows what Apple is
         | pulling in the EU with its signing/review requirements for non-
         | App Store applications. So no need to circumvent, they still
         | retain control over what code is allowed to run on iPhones,
         | albeit subject to restrictions on what reasoning they're
         | allowed to use to refuse to sign an app.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Some background:
       | 
       |  _Japan to open up Apple and Google app stores to competition
       | (2023)_
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36368735
       | 
       |  _Japan enacts law to promote competition in smartphone app
       | stores (2024)_
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40662176
       | 
       |  _iOS 26.2 to allow third-party app stores in Japan ahead of
       | regulatory deadline (Nov 2025)_
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45822302
        
       | websiteapi wrote:
       | Sony and Nintendo stores are still closed I see lol
        
         | socalgal2 wrote:
         | Sony and Nintendo only sell games. They don't gate access to
         | banks, investments, health insurance, auto insurance, news,
         | movies, social media, car control apps, appliance apps, grocery
         | stores, e-commerce, etc...
         | 
         | That's not to say Sony and Nintendo shouldn't be opened too but
         | their impact is much smaller (game devs) than Apple (nearly all
         | businesses)
        
           | websiteapi wrote:
           | Apple didn't start that way though. Better to open it up now
           | no? Also, a better law would be making the web first class,
           | not adding more stores, with other gatekeepers...
        
             | ghurtado wrote:
             | > Also, a better law would be
             | 
             | No, the better law is the one that exists.
             | 
             | Yours doesn't.
        
               | websiteapi wrote:
               | Laws aren't inherently good though... we will see what
               | this does for Japan, I guess.
        
               | bloppe wrote:
               | Are you implying that laws should never be changed?
        
           | dangus wrote:
           | It should be pointed out that they have way less of a
           | monopoly on the market and way more gaming alternatives exist
           | than Apple and Google.
           | 
           | Apple, Google. Two app stores that are basically necessary
           | for existing in the modern world with a smartphone, which
           | include apps covering Japanese government services.
           | 
           | In the gaming space, you've got PlayStation Store, Xbox
           | Store, Nintendo eShop, Steam, Epic Game Store, GOG, a
           | bazillion publisher storefronts, Apple and Google (again),
           | Itch.io, physical media for the big 3 consoles at dozens of
           | brick and mortar retailers, or even installing games directly
           | with no store at all (Minecraft originated from its own
           | online purchase portal).
        
             | ffsm8 wrote:
             | > include apps covering Japanese government services.
             | 
             | These exist?
             | 
             | Honestly asking, I've never been there myself so my only
             | contact to their government is via social media, and the
             | Japanese people can't stop talking about how you need to go
             | there in person for everything and how absolutely nothing
             | official is digital
        
           | charcircuit wrote:
           | The switch eshop has youtube which I would count as social
           | media.
        
             | redserk wrote:
             | This does not change that:
             | 
             | - The Switch is primarily a gaming device for entertainment
             | purposes.
             | 
             | - The eShop overwhelmingly focuses on providing games for
             | said entertainment purposes.
             | 
             | - It can be assumed that the overwhelming majority of
             | people do not use the Switch, or expect to use the Switch,
             | for general lifestyle purposes.
             | 
             | (That said, I wish we lived in a world where the eShop
             | wasn't the only way to get digital games on the Switch, but
             | phones have evolved to impact a large segment of the
             | economy in many ways)
        
               | websiteapi wrote:
               | It's sad how arbitrary people define things. Just make
               | all types of digital stores support alternatives. Why are
               | you even arguing about it lol... there's no excuse to
               | begin with.
        
           | al_borland wrote:
           | I just got a PS5 and there are bunch of media apps available.
           | I was looking at moving my AppleTV to a different TV and just
           | using the PS5 on that screen.
           | 
           | On Apple platforms, for most of the things mentioned, web
           | apps are an option and don't have any restrictions. This was
           | Apple's original plan, but the people fought for local apps.
           | Now companies fight for space on people's home screens. If
           | they get an app on the device they can get more info and send
           | notifications and things, which they apparently love. A lot
           | of apps these days are glorified web apps. There are also the
           | ones that exist for a one-time setup, which then sit on
           | people's phones for years. It's kind of a mess the way
           | companies use apps.
        
         | heavyset_go wrote:
         | Open those, too
        
       | Mathnerd314 wrote:
       | how does this interact with Google's push to sign all apps?
        
         | idle_zealot wrote:
         | It doesn't. The law explicitly allows platform owners to
         | require a verification/vetting process for applications, though
         | it does limit the grounds on which Google is allowed to refuse
         | to sign apps.
        
       | pzo wrote:
       | It seems we in EU got the worst implementation for apple
       | malicious compliance. It should have been similar like this one
       | Japan from the beginning.
        
       | linuxhansl wrote:
       | Nice. Someone is doing something. Apple's app store monopoly
       | together with a 30% commission is a modern form of way-laying.
       | 
       | Meanwhile Google is trying to go the opposite way with mandatory
       | developer registration/verification. In the US we will likely let
       | them. Who needs freedom if there is money to make (and Google is
       | just making a fake security argument.)
       | 
       | It shouldn't be that hard to do with _my_ phone what _I_ want,
       | including accepting the consequences of my actions.
        
       | tekacs wrote:
       | I really hope that Japanese developers take advantage of this
       | situation to show off at least some of the creativity that's
       | possible when we're not quite as limited by Apple's restrictions.
       | I don't doubt that from a 'security' point of view, Apple is
       | going to continue to enforce all sorts of things that make it
       | wildly more difficult to use the supercomputer in our pockets
       | than I would like. But nonetheless, perhaps this gives a bit of
       | room to be a little more illustrative.
       | 
       | I know that from time to time people have argued that
       | jailbreaking should have resulted in more creativity if it were
       | going to, but with that tiny, tiny market, it's hard to believe
       | that many developers, relatively speaking, would have been able
       | to go hard at building something custom and impressive. With this
       | larger market, hopefully folks will get the chance to do that
       | now.
        
       | bloppe wrote:
       | > _But some public comments released by the commission expressed
       | concern that the legislation could undermine user security._
       | 
       | I'm constantly amazed by how many people have fallen for this
       | trick.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-12 23:01 UTC)