[HN Gopher] Delivery Robots Take over Chicago Sidewalks, Sparkin...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Delivery Robots Take over Chicago Sidewalks, Sparking Debate and a
       Petition
        
       Author : mikhael
       Score  : 21 points
       Date   : 2025-12-08 21:27 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blockclubchicago.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blockclubchicago.org)
        
       | ElijahLynn wrote:
       | Valid points by those concerned with taking over the sidewalks.
       | 
       | I will also say, people riding electric scooters shouldn't be
       | zooming along at 20mph (or pedal bikes) on sidewalks either,
       | which are a true safety hazard.
       | 
       | And on the other side, much better for our environment, to have a
       | lighter weight robot delivering a burrito than a 2,000lb vehicle,
       | in terms of net energy consumption/expenditure.
        
       | mindcandy wrote:
       | "About half of all food deliveries globally are shorter than 2
       | and a half miles, which basically means that all of our cities
       | are filled with burrito taxis"
       | 
       | There is a future where a city's burrito taxis are replaced with
       | drones rolling on the sidewalk or flying to the rooftops. And,
       | the large majority of the remaining city drivers are replaced by
       | robotaxis with multi-sensor 360 tracking. Where there are nearly
       | zero parked cars. So, the parking spaces have been replaced with
       | bike lanes of bikers and scooters with every robotaxi on the
       | street planning around their motion.
       | 
       | Far less fuel consumption. Far less street crowding. Far fewer
       | accidents.
       | 
       | And, of course everyone hates the idea.
        
         | crooked-v wrote:
         | Recently there's been a lot of anger in San Francisco about a
         | Waymo (which have an excellent safety record with humans)
         | killing an outdoor cat who that walked under the car and sat in
         | front of a tire, when not long after someone was killed by a
         | person backing into a crosswalk and it was a barely a blip on
         | the radar.
        
         | glitcher wrote:
         | Pneumatic burrito tubes directly into my home is the future I
         | want.
        
           | kiernanmcgowan wrote:
           | I'm working on a burrito artillery system. It's the ideal
           | form factor for high velocity chorizo but the delivery tends
           | to make a mess.
        
         | slillibri wrote:
         | I hate it because the last thing we need on sidewalks, at least
         | here in Seattle, is more junk making it impossible to walk
         | anywhere.
        
         | CameronBanga wrote:
         | The Alameda-Weehawken Burrito Tunnel is the solution.
        
         | pirates wrote:
         | Yes in fact I do hate the idea of dozens to hundreds of drones
         | per day flying around my house and neighborhood.
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | 1) "Take over" is slanted language. More accurately "Some
       | residents complain about delivery robots on sidewalks"
       | 
       | 2) Remote control delivery carts are much safer and less
       | intrusive than double parked delivery cars (sometimes unlicensed,
       | untagged, and uninsured) or even delivery bikes (riding 20+ mph
       | in the bike line or against traffic on 100+ pound "bikes").
        
         | toss1 wrote:
         | True, they are less intrusive than double-parked cars, and
         | maybe vs some bikes, but that does not mean it is still not
         | corporations trying to take private profit from using a public
         | space.
         | 
         | The videos of those particular bots show them taking up a
         | substantial portion of the width of a sidewalk (and definitely
         | the full width in tight spots next to trees & fences) and
         | moving and positioning themselves very clumsily and
         | discourteously. They just sit in the middle occupying something
         | like half the sidewalk width trying to decide what to do next,
         | forcing people to walk to both sides in ~1/4 of the width.
         | These things are not even close to ready for prime-time.
         | 
         | It is rude as a human to just stop in the middle of the
         | sidewalk and unfold your map to figure out where you are going.
         | 
         | Programming in this kind of rudeness is just stupid, and will
         | rightly generate backlash that will not be good for the
         | companies. Of course safety is first, but it'd be more safe and
         | courteous to have it hug one side of the walk. And if you
         | cannot do that safely, not only are you not ready for prime-
         | time, you aren't ready for public Alpha tests.
        
       | crooked-v wrote:
       | I feel like part of this is people not being comfortable with the
       | idea that they don't have to be deferent to the robots (i.e. do
       | what you want, it will avoid you). That's perfectly
       | understandable (nobody wants to walk in front a moving industrial
       | robots), but is something these companies will have to work on if
       | they want people comfortable around their bots.
        
         | delfinom wrote:
         | >Robertson shares Rodriguez's concerns, pointing to incident
         | reports of the robots pushing neighbors off the sidewalks onto
         | busy streets, colliding with bicyclists and even deterring
         | emergency vehicles.
         | 
         | Sounds like the robots don't do a good job at avoiding
        
       | jeffbee wrote:
       | You only have to glance at the photos to see that the thing that
       | has "taken over" is parked cars. The allocation of space is
       | moving cars, parked cars, trees, poles, signs, lights, and then
       | the sidewalk. It is not a fact of geology that the sidewalk is
       | that narrow.
        
       | itsdesmond wrote:
       | I live in a Chicago neighborhood where these are in use. They
       | have very bright lights, actually blinding you as you approach
       | one at night. They move much faster than is appropriate on a
       | sidewalk. They position themselves in the middle of the sidewalk
       | as opposed to the right hand side, impacting traffic in both
       | directions. They round corners at intersections at below-eye-
       | level, I've walked into more than one when they appeared in front
       | of me at a corner. They park in the walkway while waiting for
       | customers to retrieve their food. The hey are implemented in a
       | way that demands everyone else gets out of their way. They have
       | not attempted to integrate into the community, they have inserted
       | themselves and we are to figure it out.
       | 
       | I am receptive to the argument that deliveries made in cars are
       | wasteful. I ride a bike exclusively, I am not a fan of delivery
       | drivers jumping out of double parked cars all over town, let
       | alone the environmental impact. But much like rental e-scooters
       | being abandoned on sidewalks, these claim to solve some problem
       | by creating new problems and making the common environment worse
       | principally to create profit for the owners, and not honestly
       | provide any increased convenience for the customer. I'm not
       | willing to accept the cost being externalized onto every other
       | member of the community. People who are against these are not in
       | favor of Uber drivers crowding the streets, but the solution is
       | not a good one. I walk to pick up my takeout order. Now my route
       | there is worse.
       | 
       | And before anyone starts yapping bout NIMBYs: the sidewalk is in
       | the front yard, stupid.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-08 23:00 UTC)