[HN Gopher] Kilauea erupts, destroying webcam [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Kilauea erupts, destroying webcam [video]
        
       Author : zdw
       Score  : 551 points
       Date   : 2025-12-06 23:39 UTC (23 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | stevenhubertron wrote:
       | That arcing of the lava really is something to behold. The
       | pressures to push molten rock like that are impressive.
        
         | 867-5309 wrote:
         | icy what you did there
        
         | asdfman123 wrote:
         | It's just the weight of literally everything on the planet
         | pushing down, as well as miles of rock :)
        
           | louthy wrote:
           | "just" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there ;)
        
             | lisper wrote:
             | Literally! :-)
        
           | praptak wrote:
           | Indirectly. The actual spike of pressure that ejects the
           | magma comes from the gasses dissolved therein. When the magma
           | moves up, the pressure drops and the gasses become
           | oversaturated and thus prone to violent release.
        
         | wanderingstan wrote:
         | Indeed. I just wish we could get a better sense of the scale,
         | which is always hard in nature shots devoid of trees or human
         | structures. A productive use of AI would be to place some
         | houses and automobiles in the video for scale.
        
       | whyage wrote:
       | Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park is absolutely stunning (and safe,
       | away from the closed area). It's like being on a different
       | planet. If you haven't been to the Big Island and the park, you
       | should add it to your bucket list.
        
         | magicalhippo wrote:
         | Sadly there was an ongoing eruption when me and my SO visited
         | the Big Island, so the entire park was closed. Was a bit bummed
         | out, on the other hand people lost their homes so keeping it in
         | perspective.
         | 
         | That said, I second visiting the Big Island and visit various
         | sites. Driving less than an hour and going from barren volcanic
         | landscapes to lush rainforests was something else, and watching
         | the sunset from Mauna Kea was magical. And lots of great
         | beaches, and most that weren't next to a resort had very few
         | people.
         | 
         | While the island is big relative to the other Hawaiian islands,
         | its small enough that you can drive around it in a day.
         | 
         | I'd recommend staying on the Kona side, which is the dry and
         | somewhat barren side. The Hilo side has rainforests for a
         | reason.
        
           | shevy-java wrote:
           | A university professor here visits many areas. He complained
           | by far the most of the dust in the air that stuck around for
           | quite a while there.
        
           | skybrian wrote:
           | The Big Island has good B&B's in many parts of the island so
           | I recommend staying in multiple places, to see the local
           | sights without a long drive afterwards.
        
           | DavidPeiffer wrote:
           | What struck me about the big island is that it has 8 of the
           | 13 climate zones, and you can go around the perimeter of the
           | island in about 5 hours.
           | 
           | I loved going up Mauna Kea visitor center and stargazing. At
           | ~11,000 feet, it's one of the best places in the world for
           | naked eye stargazing. You're literally above the clouds, the
           | island has strict rules about exterior lights at night to
           | minimize light pollution, and you're above the thickest air.
           | I wasn't expecting to see the Milky Way so easily.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way#/media/File:Milky_Wa.
           | ..
        
         | ridgeguy wrote:
         | Decades ago, my wife and I visited the Big Island during a
         | fairly sedate eruption. We drove down Chain of Craters Road,
         | got to see a tiny lava flow (talking like a couple feet of
         | glowing honey), but were wanting more. In the distance, we
         | could see a huge steam column where a lava stream was reaching
         | the sea. We asked one of the ever-attendant Park Rangers if we
         | could walk over there. He said no.
         | 
         | But then he said - we close at 5pm, and there are no gates. OK,
         | we can take a hint.
         | 
         | We drove to Hilo and bought cheap tennis and flashlights, then
         | scurried back down Chain of Craters after 6. As the sky
         | darkened, we walked towards the steam column. The rocks beneath
         | our feet showed incandescent glows deep in the cracks, and we
         | started to smell burned rubber from our cheap tennis.
         | Eventually, we came to the lava outfall.
         | 
         | We watched nearly an hour as a river of molten rock cascaded
         | into the ocean. We used our water bottles on our shoe soles,
         | turning back when we ran dry.
         | 
         | I now understand that we were stupid - apparently the park
         | loses a few tourists to shelf collapse each year - but we
         | lived, and the memory is a treasure. Thank you, Mr. Ranger.
         | 
         | And yes, it's like being on a different planet - like being on
         | our own, maybe 4 billion years ago.
        
           | 14 wrote:
           | Not stupid. Just experiencing life and sometimes amazing
           | experiences have a chance of danger. You get to choose what
           | risk levels you are okay with. Props to that ranger who
           | agreed with that belief.
        
             | ridgeguy wrote:
             | At that time, we had no kids & no pets, nobody directly
             | dependent on us. That figured in our conversation on the
             | drive to Hilo. Nowdays, we might come to a different
             | conclusion, but I'm glad for the path we chose then.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Especially since _that_ path didn't collapse ;)
        
               | serf wrote:
               | it's all whimsy and adventure -- but the reality is that
               | you're not just risking your own lives but also the lives
               | of potential rescuers.
               | 
               | just food for thought. I'm not about to say one should
               | lead a safe and sterile life, but there is more to it
               | than direct dependents.
        
               | parineum wrote:
               | Rescuers choose their jobs too.
        
               | mrwrong wrote:
               | doctors choose their jobs too and they generally
               | encourage people to stay out of the ER
        
               | parineum wrote:
               | That's completely irrelevant. Rescuers can encourage
               | people to be safe, that's expected. they chose that job ,
               | despite it's dangers, because they care about those
               | people being safe.
               | 
               | They know the danger and chose the job. That's the
               | relevant bit.
        
               | jama211 wrote:
               | I think you missed their point - just because you choose
               | a job doesn't mean people shouldn't try to avoid needing
               | to be rescued in the first place
        
               | ljlolel wrote:
               | Though rescuers did consciously choose that role and that
               | they'd be saving ignorant people very often
        
               | Forgeties79 wrote:
               | Doesn't mean you need to add more opportunities for
               | people to get hurt or killed when you know better.
        
               | Vinnl wrote:
               | I wonder if, if you'd talk to a rescuer, they'd agree...
        
             | kbenson wrote:
             | Choosing your risk level and working within it isn't
             | stupid. Not knowing the risk when it's easy to gather some
             | more info and then acting in ignorance _is_ , which is what
             | GP was describing, and likely why they called their own
             | actions stupid.
        
           | abathur wrote:
           | Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laze_(geology) :)
        
           | antonvs wrote:
           | > The rocks beneath our feet showed incandescent glows deep
           | in the cracks, and we started to smell burned rubber from our
           | cheap tennis.
           | 
           | When I was there, this happened in the area that the rangers
           | guided us to. There was an active flow of pahoehoe at the
           | time, which we could get as close to as we wanted - the heat
           | was a strong disincentive to doing anything dumb. We were
           | warned at the start that shoes with rubber soles would be
           | ruined, but that warning was too late for me and I had no
           | alternative. It was certainly worth the price of a pair of
           | sneakers though.
        
         | postalcoder wrote:
         | Haleakala is like this as well. Don't just drive up the crater
         | - hike through the thing. It's a ~12 mile hike. It's a
         | remarkable experience because the landscape changes so
         | frequently and dramatically from desert to tropical forest.
         | 
         | The only comp to this is like the transition in Max Max from
         | the desert to the oasis.
         | 
         | Tourists that drive to the crater, take pictures, and drive
         | down have no idea what they're missing.
        
           | ZeWaka wrote:
           | Highly recommend camping in the crater on a clear night
           | around new moon. Some of the best stars you'll see. Seeing
           | the sun rise in the crater gap (where you can sometimes see
           | the big island) is stunning.
           | 
           | Park in the lower lot, hitchhike to the top (or get someone
           | else to drive you), and then you can hike back up to your car
           | the next day on the switchbacks.
           | 
           | Do not attempt to hike up the sliding sands trail you took
           | down, it's *very rough*.
        
           | throwforfeds wrote:
           | > Tourists that drive to the crater, take pictures, and drive
           | down have no idea what they're missing.
           | 
           | And for some reason blather on and on loudly up there when
           | the most mind blowing sunsets are happening. Can we not be
           | silent for 15 minutes and look at the universe doing it's
           | thing?
        
         | anonymousiam wrote:
         | Went there a little over a year ago. The steam vents were
         | active, but no eruptions. The exhibits are wonderful and the
         | birdsong in the evening is amazing.
        
           | quercus wrote:
           | birdsong? are you talking about coqui frogs?
        
             | anonymousiam wrote:
             | There are a half dozen or so different species of birds in
             | the lava tube jungle areas. If you ever get a chance to go
             | there just after dusk, you will be amazed. (Yes, the frogs
             | make noises too.)
        
         | spike021 wrote:
         | As postal mentioned below, Haleakala is fantastic for that.
         | 
         | Also, I recently visited Mt. Aso in southern Kyushu of Japan
         | and it really felt like I was on Mars.
        
         | ChuckMcM wrote:
         | Definitely a place to visit if you can. I traveled there in
         | 1983 just as it was starting to erupt and visited a lot of
         | places that are now under lava rock! In a later visit we were
         | walking out to see one of the "peep holes" where you can see
         | the lava down below and the rocks started getting slippery,
         | except they weren't slippery it was our shoe soles melting,
         | oops.
        
         | kakacik wrote:
         | How would you compare it to Iceland regarding volcanoes and
         | all? Thats what we Europeans have in our backyard and its a
         | properly stunning and otherwordly experience.
        
       | Mistletoe wrote:
       | The final moments of the webcam were even better than I had
       | hoped.
        
         | qingcharles wrote:
         | That thing took a licking and kept on ticking.
        
       | hnburnsy wrote:
       | USGC live stream
       | 
       | https://m.youtube.com/usgs/live
        
         | hnburnsy wrote:
         | Looks like the camera and stream are still active...
         | 
         | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BqmpkUdMtyA
        
           | reincarnate0x14 wrote:
           | They have three cameras, well, had three. The south rim
           | camera (v3) was overrun by the eruption at about 0957 local
           | time, you can rewind the stream and watch its final moments.
        
           | yuliyp wrote:
           | Starting at 9:46 is when it goes from wow to WOW. The last 2
           | minutes in particular are incredible, including the bizarre
           | artifacts in the last 15 seconds before the stream dies.
        
       | omnicognate wrote:
       | This was incredible to watch, and I have to chuckle at this
       | title. It's obvious why the webcam matters, with people round the
       | world watching, but the destruction of a webcam is such a tiny
       | thing in comparison to the eruption itself it's strangely funny.
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | Would be nice to have a mobile phone live streaming webcam
         | viewer that vibrates when the webcam is destroyed!
        
       | jcranmer wrote:
       | Kilauea is more or less constantly erupting. This is the 38th
       | eruptive episode since in the past year:
       | https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/science/eruption-info...
       | (note that the 38th episode started a few hours ago as of this
       | message). Although this is still considered "one" eruption by
       | USGS.
        
         | dboreham wrote:
         | Although it will stop erupting any time I get on a plane headed
         | there. Same for Iceland.
        
       | nickpsecurity wrote:
       | The threat level for airplanes is set to orange... for anyone
       | dumb enough to fly over an erupting volcano. The orange flying
       | from the ground would be all the motivation I need to stay clear
       | of it.
       | 
       | It was an awesome video, though.
        
         | mschuster91 wrote:
         | > The threat level for airplanes is set to orange... for anyone
         | dumb enough to fly over an erupting volcano.
         | 
         | Even 180km away from the eruption, airplanes can be seriously
         | damaged [1].
         | 
         | Jet engines really, really do not like to ingest anything else
         | than air and, maybe, a tad bit of water.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_009
        
           | avalys wrote:
           | Volcanic ash is particularly bad because it is so abrasive,
           | having been freshly formed without any opportunity for
           | erosion to smooth it down like regular dust.
        
             | duskwuff wrote:
             | That's not the only problem - volcanic ash also has a low
             | enough melting point that it'll melt in the combustion
             | chamber of a jet engine and leave glassy deposits on cooler
             | components.
        
           | euroderf wrote:
           | Prevailing winds are key. Reykjavikings told me that during
           | that big eruption many moons ago, all traffic to Europe was
           | ended but traffic to North American continued merrily along.
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | An erupting volcano can spew ash over a large distance. When
         | Eya.... that Icelandic volcano (that's hard to spell because I
         | don't know Icelandic) erupted several years ago, the ash cloud
         | traveled far enough to disrupt travel over most of Europe for a
         | few days.
        
           | Polizeiposaune wrote:
           | Eyjafjallajokull
        
           | kzrdude wrote:
           | A favourite tidbit from that time: Icelandic post released
           | stamps of that eruption and it was used for European postage
           | (mail to Europe).
           | 
           | https://findyourstampsvalue.com/news/stamps-created-from-
           | eyj...
           | 
           | (Stamp is marked "Bref til Evropu" - European postage)
        
         | jasonkester wrote:
         | I dunno... Different times, different risk tolerance.
         | 
         | Back in 1980, my dad was sitting at his desk in Bellevue one
         | morning when news came in that Mt. St. Helens was erupting. Him
         | and a pilot friend had the presence of mind to head straight to
         | the local airport and rent a plane.
         | 
         | "Be careful not to head South. Mt. St. Helens is erupting, and
         | you sure don't want to get close that by accident."
         | 
         | "Oh, yeah, sure. No way we'd do something like that."
         | 
         | He has this amazing framed aerial photo of the mountain with
         | the ash plume rising. Evidently, the flight home was pure
         | chaos, bobbing and weaving to avoid dozens of midair collisions
         | since every other pilot in the Seattle area had had the same
         | idea, but 45 minutes later.
        
       | shevy-java wrote:
       | Pretty cool - that looks like two or three eruption holes.
       | 
       | Now someone timejump to krakatau, year 1883 ...
        
         | embedding-shape wrote:
         | If we're lucky, we (humanity) get to experience another
         | supervolcano eruption sometime in the future, and then we'll
         | finally get some good content out of it.
        
           | avalys wrote:
           | Personally I'm looking forward to a nearby supernova or giant
           | meteor impact!
        
             | smartbit wrote:
             | How about waiting for a _Geomagnetic reversal_? They happen
             | on average every .45M years, the last one .78M years ago,
             | big chance one happing anytime now :-)
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
        
       | accrual wrote:
       | It's wild to see this footage safely behind a monitor. Kind of
       | macabre to ponder but I wonder if the victims of Pompeii had a
       | similar experience. The last we see is a hailstorm of ash and
       | molten lava raining down then signal lost.
        
         | toss1 wrote:
         | iirc, Pompeii was a pyroclastic flow [0], a fast-moving current
         | of hot gas and volcanic matter with speeds between 100-700
         | km/hr and temperatures up to 1000degC. So, probably something
         | like that, but a lot bigger, faster, and arriving faster from
         | further away.
         | 
         | I was surprised how long the camera lasted getting buried. It'd
         | be a not good end.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroclastic_flow
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | i just posted a sister comment to yours about the Mt St
           | Helens explosion, with a picture from 1980, and then i
           | noticed that they are calling (it's a non technical article)
           | what rained down in the photograph onto the camera and
           | photographer "pyroclastic flow" and it looks very similar to
           | what happened here.
        
             | db48x wrote:
             | This is not a pyroclastic flow and doesn't look even
             | remotely similar. The problem is that you're comparing a
             | very close up image of some lava falling on a camera to
             | videos taken from tens of miles away from Mt St Helens. The
             | scale and nature of the event are completely different.
             | 
             | Weirdly if you are going to be hit by a pyroclastic flow
             | then it won't be moving across your field of view at all.
             | It'll just be getting bigger and angrier-looking for the
             | minute or two that you have left in your life.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | https://youtu.be/T02pJdKARLo?si
             | 
             | This is what a pyroclastic flow looks like.
        
           | asdfman123 wrote:
           | Yeah, they likely saw it racing down the mountain and then
           | met their doom fairly immediately.
        
           | kzrdude wrote:
           | Just to add, there are two main categories of volcanism,
           | shield volcanoes (hot spots, mid ocean ridges) and
           | stratovolcanoes (continental and subduction zone volcanoes).
           | Hawaii is the first kind ("tourist friendly"), Vesuvius at
           | Pompeii is the latter kind (not friendly). The main
           | difference is the silica content, the stratovolcano lava is
           | sticky and viscous; it gets stuck and things get explosive
           | and nasty.
           | 
           | We have a lot of stratovolcanoes around the pacific rim so
           | it's eruptions like those that we should compare with
           | Pompeii, and not really Hawaii.
           | 
           | The two categories also produce, in general, different kinds
           | of rock.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | https://youtu.be/T02pJdKARLo
             | 
             | Here is a pyroclastic flow from two weeks ago. In the first
             | minute you can watch it boil a rainforest to tree trunks.
             | That is an insane amount of heat to do that, green stuff is
             | full of water and doesnt like to burn.
        
         | fsckboy wrote:
         | there is a poignant set of images taken by a photographer
         | Robert Landsburg who chose to post himself too close to the
         | blow up of the top of Mount Saint Helens in 1980.
         | 
         | the last picture from his salvaged camera is similar to what we
         | see for this topic:
         | https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads...
         | his camera was found under this body, with speculation that he
         | was protecting it, which doesn't seem unlikely, but it also
         | would not be surprising for him not to have had that presence
         | of mind, things were happening very quickly.
         | 
         | https://allthatsinteresting.com/robert-landsburg
        
           | tobyjsullivan wrote:
           | From that article:
           | 
           |  _After taking his final photograph, Landsburg removed the
           | roll of film from his camera and placed it in a canister. He
           | buried the camera and the film canister deep in his backpack.
           | Then, he placed the backpack on the seat next to him and
           | covered it with his body._
           | 
           | It was more than just jumping on top of his camera. Sounds
           | like there's some confidence about his intention.
        
       | clbrmbr wrote:
       | When I walked across the crater as a kid, I remember there was an
       | inner crater that I was told had filled up with lava back in the
       | 80s and then drained down leaving a deep well. Does someone have
       | a map of the historical eruption locations within the main summit
       | crater?
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | USGS has a page on the history of Kilauea here:
         | https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/science/geology-
         | and-h..., which also has some links on some of the eruptions in
         | recorded history.
         | 
         | Probably the closest thing to what you're looking for is here:
         | https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/kilauea-caldera-
         | simplified..., which lists the age of the most recent lave
         | flows as of 2008 (when Halema'uma'u started filling up again).
         | The 2018 eruption caused another caldera collapse within the
         | crater, enlarging Halema'uma'u and creating a new mini-caldera
         | that's labeled as the "down-dropped block" in subsequent maps,
         | e.g. https://www.usgs.gov/maps/october-5-2021-kilauea-summit-
         | erup... ... although, since then, Halema'uma'u has erupted
         | enough lava to more or less fill the entire down-dropped block,
         | see, e.g., the most recent map:
         | https://www.usgs.gov/maps/november-25-2025-kilauea-summit-er...
        
       | alex_young wrote:
       | Here's a video I took of an eruption in June:
       | https://youtu.be/BGOSSNy1hN0?si=MIFkW7MkRDxJ5tUr
        
       | quotemstr wrote:
       | I'd love to learn more about the specific failure mode towards
       | the end. As the eruption debris approach the camera, we see
       | glowing rock up close. The camera then flashes purple for some
       | reason, goes black, then returns to streaming for a few more
       | seconds, recording a vague orange glow. After that, it's gone for
       | good.
        
         | zootboy wrote:
         | A little bit of educated guessing on my part:
         | 
         | The purple frames have a bunch of gradients to white, which
         | looks a lot like what happens when the infrared filter on most
         | color cameras is removed and a bunch of IR light is shone into
         | then. For some reason the green cells are less sensitive to IR,
         | which results in a purple-ish hue. So in this case, perhaps the
         | lava striking the camera melted through the lens holder and
         | shifted the IR filter out of place, or is just able to shine
         | intense IR light into the gap between the filter and the
         | sensor.
         | 
         | In those same frames, the dark areas with noisy borders are I
         | believe an artifact of the CMOS sensor digitization process
         | when cells get strongly overwhelmed. I've seen the same
         | patterns on cameras where an extremely intense light (e.g. a
         | laser pointer) is shone into them. It's like the cells get so
         | overwhelmed they roll around back to zero.
         | 
         | The amorphous shapes at the very end are clearly from the lens
         | being totally detached / moved out of position, allowing
         | defocused light to hit the sensor. I didn't spot any
         | interesting sensor or encoder death frames before the video
         | ends, so likely the lava severed the ethernet cable or
         | destroyed the electronics at that point.
        
       | emmelaich wrote:
       | I had a look at the crater using Google maps. Does this user
       | contributed photo look AI to anyone? Or at least 'shopped.
       | https://maps.app.goo.gl/or6gj5XnTCTwv4Ys7
        
         | pimlottc wrote:
         | It's not real, lava has not flowed into the ocean for many
         | years.
        
         | AstroNutt wrote:
         | Nothing looks right. The waterfall of lava to the caldera. How
         | do you get magma ring above a non erupting caldera? It's 100%
         | fake.
        
         | csomar wrote:
         | Are these giant buildings over there? Would be easy to check
         | their existence (though the photo could be real but the lava is
         | not)
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | That photo is pretty clearly fake.
         | 
         | * The steam from lava should be arising from where the lava
         | hits the lava, boiling it--there's not going to be any steam
         | from the interior of a lava tube, because all of the water will
         | have boiled out long ago.
         | 
         | * It looks like somebody dumped a photo of a black rock field
         | on top of a different image. There's a sploch of a normal tan-
         | sand beach at the base of part of this cliffs; in recent lava
         | activity, the lava will extend fully into the ocean and
         | collapse. Given that the edge of the lava is a) pretty towering
         | and yet b) some distance from the sea.
         | 
         | * The lava activity in the extreme foreground is pretty
         | sketchy. It's not entirely implausible to have lava flowing
         | into a pit like that in some fashion, but there's also no clear
         | source from the lava, and real Hawaiian lava flows tend to look
         | somewhat different than that.
         | 
         | * Lava flows downhill from a rift zone. Where's the rift zone
         | here? It's basically a wall of black rock. Photogammetry is not
         | my strong suit, but the presumably dried lava is towering above
         | the treetops in the distance, and yet there's no clear sense of
         | where the lava is flowing from.
         | 
         | * In the background, you see something more akin to a
         | stratovolcano (actually, might well be an eroded granite dike
         | or some other weird formation like that as opposed to a volcano
         | in the first place). Hawaiian volcanoes are shield volcanoes,
         | they don't look like that. Also, Kilauea and Mauna Loa are too
         | active to really have the deeply-eroded look like that. You
         | have to go to Kohala on the Big Island to get that kind of
         | look.
         | 
         | * Kilauea is nowhere near the ocean. (Also, shield volcano, you
         | can't see the top from the base.)
         | 
         | * There's another island clearly visible in the background.
         | None of the Hawaiian islands are close enough to each other to
         | generally be visible from one another! And certainly not from
         | any view of Kilauea, which is the last volcano in the chain
         | that's above sea level. (Loihi still has another 3,000 feet to
         | go before it pokes above the surface.)
        
           | pfdietz wrote:
           | Not saying this isn't fake, but erupting lava produces plenty
           | of volatiles, including steam. These gases coming out of
           | solution is what drives it to the surface.
        
           | polishdude20 wrote:
           | You can actually sometimes see the big Island from the
           | Haleakala summit!
        
           | antonvs wrote:
           | I agree that image is as fake as can be. I reported it.
           | Nitpick though:
           | 
           | > None of the Hawaiian islands are close enough to each other
           | to generally be visible from one another!
           | 
           | Of the Hawaiian islands usually identified as "major",
           | Molokai, Lanai, and Kaho'olawe are all visible from Maui, and
           | vice versa.
           | 
           | Many people would probably limit the list of major islands to
           | four. Interestingly there doesn't seem to be any official
           | term for that grouping, other than perhaps the "main
           | islands".
        
         | IAmGraydon wrote:
         | That user has submitted 58,000 photos. It's AI. Everyone should
         | be reporting the photo and the account.
        
         | dawnerd wrote:
         | There's a lot of really spammy data on Google maps that should
         | be pretty easy for them to detect too. Go look at some remote
         | locations and you'll find lots of images that advertise
         | businesses, products and all sorts. Wondering if they're using
         | it for image hosting.
        
         | nsoqm wrote:
         | You just have to look at the picture of the person who uploaded
         | it: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-
         | UjW5veVXQHmH8s4Db3W...
        
           | mertd wrote:
           | What's the play here? Afaik there are no monetary perks to
           | being a top maps contributor.
        
             | Retr0id wrote:
             | Perhaps they're seeding the account with "harmless"
             | contributions before using it to make fraudulent business
             | reviews etc.
        
         | pawelduda wrote:
         | This screams AI, 100%
        
       | ak681443 wrote:
       | A new entei has been born?
        
       | 333c wrote:
       | The AI narration was off-putting, but the video footage was cool.
        
         | iamtedd wrote:
         | That is not AI. The same voice narrates at least two years ago.
         | Just scroll down in the channel's video list.
        
           | Deukhoofd wrote:
           | The description of the video states it is in fact AI:
           | 
           | > A synthesized text-to-video voiceover was used in the
           | narration for this story.
        
             | asymmetric wrote:
             | Where does it say that? I can't see it in the video
             | description.
        
               | Loocid wrote:
               | The second line. The video description for me says the
               | following:
               | 
               | "HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK - An incredible sight at
               | the summit of Kilauea volcano on Saturday morning, as
               | Episode 38 erupted enormous lava fountains across the
               | caldera, destroying one of the webcams that was live
               | streaming the event.
               | 
               | All images and video are courtesy the U.S. Geological
               | Survey. A synthesized text-to-video voiceover was used in
               | the narration for this story."
        
         | moffkalast wrote:
         | Well it would've been better if they kept the video on the
         | actual camera that ate it instead of switching back and forth
         | constantly. It's not Liam Neeson climbing a fence, guys.
        
       | mlindner wrote:
       | Just FYI, but the voice for this channel is AI generated.
        
         | unethical_ban wrote:
         | The toughest thing to realize is that it is not obvious. Other
         | posters here say it's a human, which was my assumption. But I
         | wouldn't bet my savings either way anymore.
        
         | happyopossum wrote:
         | Synthetic text-to-speech and "Ai" generated are not the same
         | thing. We've been doing TTS for 30 years now - get over it
        
       | louthy wrote:
       | More detailed coverage from Geology Professor Shawn Willsey [1].
       | He's a good channel to follow if you're even slightly interested
       | in geology...
       | 
       | [1] https://youtu.be/oc2Pr3YiRO0?si=UJInJ_wLzitdKec8
        
       | sedatk wrote:
       | I was there today. We happened to notice the smoke over Kilauea
       | while driving to Hilo, then checked out USGS cams, and
       | immediately drove there and spent the next 7 hours getting
       | mesmerized.
       | 
       | As my first eruption encounter, I didn't expect to experience
       | several things like the heat even from a long distance, enough to
       | keep me warm in my shorts at 60F, and the loud rumble, like a
       | giant waterfall. The flow of lava was way faster than I expected
       | too, almost like oil.
       | 
       | Mind blown.
        
         | kzrdude wrote:
         | Hawaii volcanism is what geologists seem to call "nice and
         | friendly" - low viscosity lava, not prone to explosive
         | eruptions (unlike the stratovolcanoes of the Andes or the
         | Pacific rim in general) - this is because it's caused by
         | hotspot volcanism in Hawaii.
        
           | lazide wrote:
           | It's not nice and friendly because of the hotspot volcanism.
           | 
           | It's because the hotspot has a chemical composition that is
           | generally low in dissolved gasses and very liquid/flows well.
           | (Lots of silicates I think?)
           | 
           | It tends to come out nicely and stay liquid as it leaves, so
           | vents don't plug up. Also, because of the relatively low
           | dissolved gasses, pressure doesn't spike as high when it's
           | flowing out of the chamber like many other magmas do, causing
           | explosions.
           | 
           | Hawaii exists basically because it's great for building up
           | islands/mountains without blowing them up as part of the
           | process.
        
             | kzrdude wrote:
             | I don't think hotspots can be said to have different
             | composition. But if the hotspot is under a continent or an
             | ocean plate makes a difference for the type of eruptions.
             | Hawaii is in the middle of an ocean plate, no continental
             | crust there. So we get a basaltic eruption (comparatively
             | lower silica content, low viscosity lava).
        
               | s1artibartfast wrote:
               | Yellowstone is also caused by hotspot volcanism. The
               | friendly eruption is a property of location, not hotspot
               | origin.
               | 
               | Your initial post read the other way, which the parent
               | post is addressing.
        
             | CGMthrowaway wrote:
             | Low viscosity is due to the LOW silica content. Tectonic
             | setting is the primary factor determining the magma's final
             | composition (basaltic) and therefore its physical
             | properties (low silica, low viscosity). The gentle nature
             | of Hawaiian volcanism is a direct result of its basaltic
             | magma, which it has because the hotspot is located under
             | thin, basaltic oceanic crust
        
         | retSava wrote:
         | I was at the Fagradalsfjall eruption at 2023. Had been to
         | Iceland for two weeks w wife and daughter, and on the last day
         | (since the signs were there) I decided to postpone travel home
         | for two days (w + child wanted to go home). On my last day, the
         | hike opened up and I went at approx 2100 hours to the volcano.
         | That was an approx 10 km hike one way.
         | 
         | Amazing experience. A bunch of us were stupid as can be, but
         | got as close as approx 50 m. Sounds really dangerous, but the
         | sputter were not that violent yet, and the ground sloped away
         | from us. Still, really stupidly dangerous (the sputter wall
         | could've broken down, wind direction change, etc). But it
         | didn't. Lots of moss fires, and walked into a small slope and
         | immediately felt a sting in my nose and lungs from trapped
         | gases so took that as a nope and went back.
         | 
         | Started walking back at 0130 something, boarded flight at 0600,
         | fainted (I had done Mt Esja in the morning too). Sorry other
         | passengers, it was inconsiderate of me and I was an asshole for
         | that. But... that experience...!
        
         | mdani wrote:
         | Same here. I'd add that viewing the lava fountain at night was
         | a mesmerizing experience. You get to see the full extent of
         | red, glowing lava lake and the fountain. There were thousands
         | of people and yet they appeared so small in front of the
         | volcano. We did experience some ash and Pele's hair on the way
         | to the park, near the black sand beach. I do recommend carrying
         | a torch though at night, since it is pitch black at night. The
         | lava illuminated the park with the red glow, but there were
         | some parts where you do need a torch esp. if you park far away
         | and walk.
        
           | JumpCrisscross wrote:
           | > _viewing the lava fountain at night was a mesmerizing
           | experience_
           | 
           | Is there anything comparable to the overview effect [1] that
           | attends seeing a lava fountain in person?
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_effect
        
         | mertd wrote:
         | I was reading about shield volcanoes and it sounds like the low
         | viscosity lava is the defining feature. So the flow is par for
         | the course.
        
         | supernova87a wrote:
         | I am severely tempted to hop on a flight to go and see it, but
         | wondering if it's such a "once in a lifetime" thing to go see?
         | That, and if it'll peter out by the time I get there, and $500+
         | to just fly on a whim and stay overnight.
        
       | egeozcan wrote:
       | Probably this amazing capture is worth more than a hundred times
       | the price of the camera, yet the geek in me feels really sad when
       | perfectly functional hardware gets destroyed :)
        
         | georgefrowny wrote:
         | Definitely don't think about how much "nice" equipment is
         | bought, used once or twice and then sits in a cupboard forever
         | until disposed of in a skip when someone dies or a company goes
         | under and the building is cleared.
         | 
         | My last place had a whole box full of FPGA dev boards that I
         | would have killed to play with as an undergrad.
         | 
         | The real pities are in machining where what looks like a junk
         | heap to the family may actually be a priceless trove of rare
         | tools and irreplaceable machine parts. Not to mention lovingly-
         | made tools and jigs. A physical cousin to unpublished software
         | sitting on a thrown-away hard drive.
        
         | MiddleEndian wrote:
         | Think of it like a delicious meal or a grenade. You pay for it
         | to be consumed once, then it's gone.
        
       | andsoitis wrote:
       | Worth watching: Into the Inferno, a film by Werner Herzog in
       | which he depicts the relationship between active volcanoes and
       | the humans who live in their shadows.
        
       | GaggiX wrote:
       | >A synthesized text-to-video voiceover was used in the narration
       | for this story.
       | 
       | I wasn't even realizing it without reading this in the
       | description.
        
       | ekjhgkejhgk wrote:
       | Just a planet popping a zit.
        
       | seydor wrote:
       | The two events in the title sound so uneven
        
       | cmiles8 wrote:
       | The Big Island of Hawaii and the national park there is an
       | amazing place. One of the only places where you can (relatively)
       | safely visit a highly active volcano.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-07 23:01 UTC)