[HN Gopher] Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 - I added all features HN re...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 - I added all features HN requested - 4
       years later
        
       Author : AwkwardPanda
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2025-12-04 15:06 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (onlyrecipeapp.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (onlyrecipeapp.com)
        
       | AwkwardPanda wrote:
       | Hi HN,
       | 
       | I posted the first version of OnlyRecipe here about four years
       | ago [1], and the response was incredible. The feedback in that
       | thread shaped a lot of what I wanted to build next. That initial
       | momentum proved that the core problem (ads, life stories, and
       | clutter on recipe blogs) needed a solution.
       | 
       | Progress since then has been slower than I hoped -- I had some
       | health issues and was building on and off -- but I kept coming
       | back to this project because I genuinely love working on it. I've
       | been working on the project on and off, fitting development in
       | whenever I could. This post represents a huge personal milestone.
       | 
       | Here's what's new after all this time:
       | 
       | Import from Videos: Import directly from TikTok, Instagram,
       | Youtube and Facebook videos
       | 
       | Import from Handwritten recipes: Import from handwritten notes
       | and screenshots
       | 
       | Unit Conversion: A highly-requested feature. Instantly convert US
       | Customary (cups/oz) to Metric (grams/ml) for any extracted
       | recipe.
       | 
       | Grocery Lists: Consolidate ingredients from multiple saved
       | recipes into a single, clean shopping list.
       | 
       | Meal Plan: Plan your weekly meals in advance
       | 
       | Controls: Full recipe editing, PDF export, printing, and cross-
       | device sync
       | 
       | Mobile-First Design: While the web view (linked above) is great
       | for quickly seeing the result, the mobile apps have dedicated
       | native controls for cooking mode (e.g., screen stay-awake,
       | timers, and offline access).
       | 
       | In-App Browser: Directly import from any site within the app and
       | many more...
       | 
       | To see these features in action quickly (small gif/videos), check
       | it out on the landing page [2]
       | 
       | The link above is a deep link to a live demo on the web app.
       | 
       | I'd love to hear your thoughts on the new utility features and
       | the performance of the parser! Try it out here [5]
       | 
       | [1] Original post from Jan 2022:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29795482
       | 
       | [2] Landing Page: https://get.onlyrecipeapp.com
       | 
       | [3] iOS App: https://apps.apple.com/in/app/only-
       | recipe/id1602130759
       | 
       | [4] Android App:
       | https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nsqr.onlyr...
       | 
       | [5] Web app: https://onlyrecipeapp.com
        
         | neogodless wrote:
         | Constructive feedback on current state:
         | 
         | - many recipe sites let you check/uncheck things you want to
         | print. I'd love to print just [ name, ingredients, instructions
         | ] without [ photo, metadata/servings/nutrition/etc. ]. I much
         | prefer one page recipes to two pages.
         | 
         | - on desktop, some text-break like "6 servings" breaks to 2
         | lines
        
           | AwkwardPanda wrote:
           | Thank you for the feedback. Appreciate it. I have made a note
           | of this. I will fix it in next release.
        
         | jodieweldon wrote:
         | Very cool! it does get a bit confused about number words that
         | aren't amounts, like "3 large russet potatoes, peeled and
         | halved lengthwise" becomes "3 large russet potatoes, peeled and
         | cut in 0.50 lengthwise" which when scaled up becomes "cut in 1
         | lengthwise"
        
           | AwkwardPanda wrote:
           | Yeah it tries to convert generically. I have noted this edge-
           | case and I'll add special handling for cases like this.
           | 
           | Thank you for pointing it out
        
       | RyanHamilton wrote:
       | Congrats on releasing and steadily improving. What was the most
       | unexpected thing you learnt lately?
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thank you.
         | 
         | There are many learnings:
         | 
         | 1. The most unexpected thing that I learned was the absolute
         | nightmare it is to set up subscriptions.
         | 
         | I initially thought it would be a simple task. I started off
         | with writing APIs and webhooks for Play store and App store.
         | 
         | But then as I got into the specifics things got complicated
         | very quickly.
         | 
         | The combinations of subscriptions (monthly/yearly, AI and non-
         | AI), cancellations, cross device subscription sync, how to
         | handle trials, how to manage subscription states of users, and
         | then when users upgrade, that's another few cases to handle.
         | 
         | There were just too many cases to handle.
         | 
         | I then just used a third-party provider (RevenueCat). They have
         | handled all the complexities beautifully.
         | 
         | 2. Supabase self-host is another nightmare in itself. Just the
         | sheer amount of configs needs (through the .env file) is
         | insane. They have intentionally made it so difficult to
         | configure.
         | 
         | 3. Setting up SMTP and sending emails is actually a very tiring
         | and cumbersome process. AWS SES is just too much work. Mainly
         | the domain reputation (emails always landing in spam) and also
         | there are not many providers that give a generous trial.
        
       | regularfry wrote:
       | Very minor point, in the grand scheme of things: when converting
       | measurements from imperial to metric, I would be astonished if
       | many recipes need more than two significant figures. When the
       | recipe says "391.32 gram strained greek yogurt" I would not
       | expect disaster to befall me if I only supplied 391.31g.
       | 
       | A more major point is that I don't seem to be able to select text
       | to copy and paste. I had to type out "391.32 gram strained greek
       | yogurt" like some sort of caveman. And that makes me wonder what
       | a screen reader would make of it...
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thank you for the feedback. Will definitely release an update
         | by tomorrow for this.
         | 
         | Regarding selection of text, that has been a problem with
         | flutter. I will find a way to make it selectable.
         | 
         | There is an alternative. You can share the recipe or click
         | print. There you would be able to select it.
         | 
         | Or, you could share the recipe and it would be copied to your
         | clipboard.
         | 
         | I know that is not exactly what you want, but it will solve the
         | purpose for now.
         | 
         | I'll fix it soon. Apologies.
        
           | pjsg wrote:
           | I'm not convinced that the units conversion is right. The
           | example of 2 Cups of greek yoghurt being 391.32 g. 1 US cup
           | is 240 ml (or 236.5 ml depending on which type of cup you are
           | using). The density of greek yoghurt is somewhere between
           | 0.96 g/ml and 1.04 g/ml (depending on which website you trust
           | the most). This leads me to calculate that 2 cups greek
           | yoghurt weighs between 454 g and 499 g). The 391 g value is
           | way off.
        
             | AwkwardPanda wrote:
             | Thanks for pointing it out. I'll look into it and fix it by
             | tomorrow.
        
           | _bent wrote:
           | This should do the trick
           | https://api.flutter.dev/flutter/material/SelectionArea-
           | class...
        
         | nkrisc wrote:
         | My kitchen scale only shows grams to the nearest integer
         | anyway.
        
         | ibejoeb wrote:
         | For recipes, I prefer to use approximate round figures when
         | talking in terms of metric and American customary. So, 1 fl oz
         | is 30 ml, a pound of flour is 450 g, etc.
         | 
         | These are much easier to measure, scale, and remember. There
         | are very few contexts where minute differences matter, and I
         | don't think you're going to find a material crossover figure
         | between those that want recipe help and those that are working
         | on the kind of stuff where it matters.
        
           | chrysoprace wrote:
           | That works for some recipes, but for bread precise is better.
           | I'm astonished when I read bread recipes that casually ask
           | for 2 cups of flour (which could be wildly different
           | amounts).
        
             | bigstrat2003 wrote:
             | You don't need to get that precise to make bread. I've made
             | bread successfully all the time with volume measurements,
             | it's not like the recipes are _that_ finicky.
        
               | mlyle wrote:
               | You can be wildly off in baking and produce an edible,
               | enjoyable product. Especially if you have a sense of how
               | to adjust the consistency of what you're mixing and can
               | adjust baking times.
               | 
               | But-- if you use weight measurements and attend to
               | precision, you'll have to adjust a lot less and you'll
               | come much closer to the best possible output.
        
               | chrysoprace wrote:
               | It's not that you can't, it's just that it's harder to
               | get consistent results. Switching to weight measurements
               | is the first advice I give to any friends who are
               | struggling with making bread.
        
             | valleyer wrote:
             | Looking through your comments, your spelling indicates you
             | might be from a Commonwealth country, which means you might
             | not be familiar with the fact that a "cup" is a
             | standardized measurement in the US.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_(unit)#Customary_cup
        
               | zahlman wrote:
               | Sure, but in practice people don't use measuring cups all
               | that precisely a lot of the time. Specifying a weight
               | forces people to bust out the scale and pay attention.
        
         | atonse wrote:
         | This reminds me of making a trip to a jeweler when I was < 10
         | years old, and noticing that they had a weighing scale that
         | seemed to be down to decimal points of a gram (which I guess
         | counts when you're weighing gold, etc).
         | 
         | And the numbers kept changing even when the scale was empty. I
         | think I had a whole conversation with my grandpa about why that
         | was happening, and we came up with "probably just variations in
         | air/breeze around the scale causing them to change"
         | 
         | No idea if that's actually what it was, but it's plausible if
         | you're doing sub-gram weighing?
        
           | umanwizard wrote:
           | I have a scale in my kitchen that measures with 0.1g
           | precision, and it doesn't do what you describe (change while
           | you're not touching it). Perhaps technology has advanced
           | since the anecdote you describe? Or maybe my scale is just
           | lying to me.
        
             | atonse wrote:
             | Hmmm then I bet it was a flaw. Or maybe modern scales have
             | microcontrollers that adjust for this?
             | 
             | This was a scale in a jeweler in India. It might have been
             | in the late 80s or mid-90s. I might be misremembering too.
             | So take my anecdote with a grain of salt.
        
               | umanwizard wrote:
               | > Or maybe modern scales have microcontrollers that
               | adjust for this?
               | 
               | This seems likely to me.
        
               | zahlman wrote:
               | > So take my anecdote with a grain of salt.
               | 
               | Oh, come on. Surely the scale wasn't _that_ precise.
        
             | ceejayoz wrote:
             | Your scale may smooth out the fluctuations automatically.
             | 
             | Mine takes a little while to notice when I'm adding
             | something like a tenth of a gram of yeast to a recipe.
        
               | umanwizard wrote:
               | Yeah, I'd guess this is what's happening.
        
           | Scene_Cast2 wrote:
           | Most likely the op amp (or whatever gain stage) noise. After
           | a certain point, you get thermal noise.
           | 
           | But with such scales, low sample rates and averaging are key.
        
           | embedding-shape wrote:
           | > No idea if that's actually what it was, but it's plausible
           | if you're doing sub-gram weighing?
           | 
           | Yes, even dust particles landing on the scale can impact the
           | reading, which is why when you're measuring really small
           | things and want to be precise, you usually have a little
           | glass/plastic cube around the entire thing too.
           | 
           | Also frequently used for people who measure drugs for various
           | purposes.
        
             | jamessb wrote:
             | > why when you're measuring really small things and want to
             | be precise, you usually have a little glass/plastic cube
             | around the entire thing too.
             | 
             | These weighing instruments with draft shields are usually
             | called analytical balances:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytical_balance
        
         | folli wrote:
         | Also, depending on the ingredient, it makes more sense to use
         | cups as a measurement of volume, not mass, when converting to
         | metric. E.g. liquids, yoghurt etc.
         | 
         | Another thing: although not strictly metric, but European
         | recipes also use tablespoon and teaspoon as measurements for
         | smaller volumes, so no need to convert this.
         | 
         | Just my two cents, other than that very nice work!!
        
           | AwkwardPanda wrote:
           | Thanks for the feedback. I've made a note.
        
             | nextaccountic wrote:
             | so use cups and tablespoons but put in parenthesis the
             | value in mL
        
               | AwkwardPanda wrote:
               | Certainly. That would provide a good user experience.
               | Thank you.
        
           | djoldman wrote:
           | Please, please try using weight whenever possible, aka for
           | all amounts >= 2 grams.
           | 
           | 1. People are bad at measuring volume. This has been tested.
           | There is much more variance in amounts measured by volume
           | than be weight. See "science and cooking" (ferran adria).
           | 
           | 2. Using a scale means doing a lot fewer dishes! (measuring
           | cups, spoons, etc.)
           | 
           | 3. It's faster, try it!
        
           | ThomasMidgley wrote:
           | "Also, depending on the ingredient, it makes more sense to
           | use cups as a measurement of volume, not mass, when
           | converting to metric."
           | 
           | Hmmm... What kind of cup? :-)
           | 
           | US "legal" cup (240ml)
           | 
           | US customary cup (246,6ml)
           | 
           | metric cup (250ml)
           | 
           | UK cup (170,5ml)
           | 
           | edit: fixed typo 150ml -> 250ml
        
             | Chilko wrote:
             | Not sure where that 150ml came from - our metric country
             | (New Zealand) 1 cup is 250 ml.
        
               | ThomasMidgley wrote:
               | Thanks, I mistyped. I meant 250 ml.
        
       | bja wrote:
       | This is amazing, and at first glance it is going to solve many of
       | my problems. I see offers to start a free trial but nothing about
       | pricing. The sign up page doesn't work well with my password
       | manager, I imagine you need to add auto fill hints to the
       | textboxes, looks like your using flutter, so add these to each
       | textbox you want to autofill:
       | https://api.flutter.dev/flutter/material/TextField/autofillH...,
       | it should also work with mobile
       | 
       | When I sign up, I get an error when confirming my email: This
       | site can't be reached The webpage at
       | https://api.onlyrecipeapp.com/?code=XXX
       | 
       | Good work, looks very promising.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Oh shoot!
         | 
         | That's a reverse proxy configuration error. I just fixed it.
         | 
         | Please try registering again.
        
       | xiconfjs wrote:
       | Doesn't seem to work for this blog:
       | https://foodwishes.blogspot.com/2016/03/tartiflette-french-p...
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Noted.
         | 
         | This page probably does not have the standard recipe attributes
         | that are needed for parsing the recipe.
         | 
         | I am adding a fallback mechanism for such cases. The text will
         | be parsed using LLM like ChatGPT.
         | 
         | Should be released by tomorrow. Cheers!
        
         | bmelton wrote:
         | I assume that (like most recipe apps out there) he's just
         | trying to parse the json Recipe schema when it is attached.
         | Most blogs attach them because it helps Google get them
         | indexed.
         | 
         | Chef John doesn't
        
           | sdqali wrote:
           | Ironic, considering that FoodWishes has been on Blogspot
           | forever. Blogspot (Google) could auto-generate it on the fly.
        
           | AwkwardPanda wrote:
           | You are right. I'll add a fallback to parse it using LLM.
        
             | rahimnathwani wrote:
             | This one didn't work either: https://www.thekitchn.com/how-
             | to-cook-moist-tender-chicken-b...
        
           | tclancy wrote:
           | Easily fixed. After all, you are the mason of your own JSON.
        
       | imperialdrive wrote:
       | Hijacks the back button :/
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Sorry for that. I am still handling cases in web app. This is
         | built in Flutter and released as a mobile-first or tablet-first
         | app.
         | 
         | I am fixing many such issues right now. Should be at par with
         | the mobile apps soon.
        
       | bflesch wrote:
       | The animations are laggy and the transitions make the website
       | slow.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Can you also tell me which browser and/or version you are
         | using? I'll check it.
         | 
         | I have actually added same transition as mobile apps. But there
         | shouldn't be lags ideally. I'll have a look.
        
           | bflesch wrote:
           | It's most likely because all 3d acceleration is disabled in
           | my browser. Using chrome up-to-date on linux.
        
       | CraftThatBlock wrote:
       | The app looks very nice. Small suggestions: Show the price of the
       | premium plan when not logged in. Many users may not entertain an
       | app depending on the price, and logging in shouldn't be needed to
       | see it.
       | 
       | Also the ability to halve recipes would be great, sometimes you
       | just want to make less.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thanks. Yes, makes total sense.
         | 
         | Will make these changes and release soon.
        
           | ianlevesque wrote:
           | Four years soon?
        
             | AwkwardPanda wrote:
             | Haha. No, not this time. ;) It'll be released by this
             | weekend and I am focusing on this project completely right
             | now.
        
       | amir734jj wrote:
       | Clicking on back button of my mouse starts an infinite loop.
        
       | jpalmer wrote:
       | This looks great. Something I'd like to see in a recipe app is
       | scale is not only reflected in the ingredients list but also in
       | the directions.
       | 
       | The linked recipe is a great example. The 1/2 teaspoon in step 1
       | is never modified regardless of the scale of the recipe.
       | 
       | Also scale should go below 1 (like .5).
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Noted this. Thank you.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Should the measurements be included in the instructions or just
         | left out to avoid that? Instead of "add 1/2 teaspoon of
         | ingredient", just say "add ingredient".
         | 
         | growing up, we had the old red/white gingham Betty Crocker
         | cookbook where the scaled measurements were written in the
         | book. the instructions never had any of the measurements in
         | them. based on that, it just feels natural to the point of
         | adding the scaling into the instructions seems overly
         | complicated. just took a look at couple of other recipe
         | examples, and they all leave out the measurements in the
         | instructions.
        
       | mattcantstop wrote:
       | It's great to see other people working on this. It's a problem
       | that needs solving, and you've solved it in a meaningful way. I
       | have been building https://spoonme.kitchen/ for a couple of years
       | now (but with a different focus) to help solve this problem and a
       | few others that are meaningful to me.
       | 
       | One aspect that I've been really wrestling with is how can we
       | make the end user experience of seeing a recipe better, while
       | still providing meaningful income to the recipe creators who
       | labor so much to share their stuff with us. I'd be interested in
       | your thoughts on this. That to me would be the very meaningful,
       | positive change: that end users get a better experience, and
       | creators get paid. That's been my overarching goal and
       | motivation.
        
       | wjrb wrote:
       | Congratulations on the work.
       | 
       | Some nits/notes:
       | 
       | - Browser history seems to go in a circle (at least in Chrome);
       | try use the browser's native "back" arrow a few times after
       | clicking through the link you shared from HN.
       | 
       | - Transition animations and element "load-in" animations make the
       | whole thing feel slow and hard to use. As it is, I'm frustrated
       | trying to look through recipes or moving through pages.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thank you.
         | 
         | You have confirmed the two issues that others are also facing.
         | 
         | I'll definitely look into this
        
       | sequoia wrote:
       | No one requested "highlight the ingredient names in the recipe
       | steps"? That's a top request from me.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thanks. I'll add this as an optional user preference
        
           | meowcow wrote:
           | Highlighted ingredient names and inline amount/sizing so
           | there isn't as much back-and-forth referencing!
        
       | sirjaz wrote:
       | I would be amazing if you released this as a Windows app. I would
       | love to use it on my surface which sits in the kitchen.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | That should be doable. I have made a note. Thanks.
        
       | pzo wrote:
       | - if you change to metric system suddenly you get numbers like
       | 453,59 grams fusili pasta - its quite demotivating
       | 
       | - instead of grams I would like also tell me how many americano
       | coffee cups more or less than looking for scale.
       | 
       | - I wanna scale down - if serving is for 6 people i want to scale
       | down to to servings
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | I've added it to my notes. Thanks
        
       | cengen wrote:
       | I think it's first time I've seen stuff like tablespoon,
       | teaspoon, cup converted when changing to metric. These are very
       | normal units to use in Europe when cooking. We don't measure
       | teaspoons by the grams when we make food. If measuring flour or
       | something then of course grams would make sense.
        
       | dzonga wrote:
       | would love to see the original requested feature list ?
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Here is a list (summarized by LLM)
         | 
         | Conversion, Scaling, and Measurement
         | Conversion to weights from volume (e.g., converting '1 cup of
         | flour' to grams). One developer noted they'd look into generic
         | conversion feasibility.              Scaling a recipe (e.g.,
         | adjusting ingredients for 1.5x or 2x the batch size).
         | Unit Choice: Offering a clear choice between metric and
         | imperial units.              Unit Specificity: The ability to
         | differentiate between US and non-US cups for accurate
         | conversions.              Data Structure: Displaying ingredient
         | data with consistent units in a database to enable easy batch
         | size adjustments and visualization of value changes.
         | Structured Data and Presentation              C4E Format:
         | Converting recipes to the format used on Cooking For Engineers.
         | Process Visualization: Displaying the entire recipe process
         | using Gantt charts or a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) / graphviz
         | to illustrate dependencies between steps.
         | SEO/Integration: Incorporating JSON-LD support for better
         | recipe recognition and advanced features.
         | Printability: Generating dedicated print-friendly pages.
         | Standard Layout: A simplified, standardized layout for better
         | readability across all recipes.              Sharing: A feature
         | for sharing recipe "image cards" (screenshots) with friends.
         | Management, Search, and Tools              Shopping List:
         | Creating a grocery list from the scraped ingredients.
         | List Filtering: The ability to exclude common ingredients
         | (salt, pepper, olive oil) from the automatically generated
         | shopping list.              Nutrition: Generating automatic
         | nutrition labels.              Personal Database: The
         | capability to ingest every recipe from every cookbook into a
         | personal, searchable database.              Search Function:
         | Allowing search for recipes instead of just requiring a URL
         | input.              Sync/Backup: Enabling server-sync and
         | export/import of recipes.              Timers: The option to
         | set a timer linked to the time specified in a recipe step.
         | Custom Lists: Allowing users to create their own categorization
         | rules for ingredients on shopping lists.           Platform and
         | UI              Dark Mode: Adding a dark mode for late-night
         | cooking.              iOS Integration: Implementing a Safari
         | extension feature for the iOS app to open recipe pages
         | automatically within the app.              Video Parsing: The
         | capability to parse recipes from YouTube URLs or videos.
        
       | cush wrote:
       | Great job!
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Thank you :)
        
       | robhlam wrote:
       | Thank you for this!
       | 
       | [comment about issue that is present in original recipe removed]
        
       | phendrenad2 wrote:
       | Are you still taking suggestions? You should have a "random
       | recipe" button that loads something random from your database.
       | Right now, your product is very one-dimensional: Someone has a
       | specific problem, they find your solution, they use it. But,
       | adding another dimension for people who don't have that problem
       | is a good idea. And I think a random recipe button will naturally
       | open you to finding what that second dimension is.
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Hey! I never really thought in that direction.
         | 
         | That's a great insight. I'd definitely look into it.
         | 
         | Thank you
        
           | namrog84 wrote:
           | In addition to random recipe.
           | 
           | Have a recipe of the day. Rotated per 24 hours.
           | 
           | So we can all enjoy and refine a recipe together
        
       | dbjacobs wrote:
       | Since a recipe can be for multiple services, the ability to scale
       | a recipe down would be helpful.
        
       | egonschiele wrote:
       | Funny timing, I've been building something like this for my own
       | use -- but your feature list has everything I wanted :) How much
       | do you charge? Would love to know without downloading an app
        
         | AwkwardPanda wrote:
         | Glad you liked it. There is a free tier. So you don't
         | necessarily have to purchase. The pricing summary is here
         | https://get.onlyrecipeapp.com/pricing
         | 
         | Thank you
        
       | kelseyfrog wrote:
       | This is great, but it seems to be missing the requisite 5000 word
       | backstory detailing the author's summer trips to their grandma's
       | farmhouse where the recipe originated or the vacation to a
       | foreign land where the author had a personal encounter with the
       | dish's chef who, after much cajoling, revealed the secret recipe.
       | Without the backstory, each recipe feels ungrounded and detached
       | from time, place, and even reality itself.
        
         | spondyl wrote:
         | My particular favourite of this genre is "Maple Shortbread
         | Bars" from The New York Times which starts with the opening
         | "Shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001"
         | 
         | https://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1017089-maple-shortbread...
        
           | dataviz1000 wrote:
           | My neighbor had 1940s Joy of Cooking, which in itself was
           | probably one of the first every recipe, for the most part,
           | just works cookbooks. Between rationing and more important
           | not spoiling when sending cookies from the US to soldiers
           | fighting on the front lines, many cookie recipes were without
           | butter.
           | 
           | Outside of a story like that, there is no reason to include
           | war in your recipe. Cooking is about nurturing and sustaining
           | homeostasis. There is something fundamentally wrong about
           | taking other people's suffering and making it about one self
           | -- it is narcissistic which spoils like cookies made with
           | butter after several weeks of travel.
        
             | Telemakhos wrote:
             | Oh, it's worse than you think. It's not just "taking other
             | people's suffering and making it about oneself." It's often
             | purely SEO. Recipes get ranked higher when they are
             | preceded by long, "engaging" introductions that nobody
             | reads but that use keywords and address common questions
             | (Like "can I substitute ingredients?). Often the longwinded
             | introductions you see aren't the result of narcissism but
             | of thoughtless SEO.
        
       | napolux wrote:
       | hahahahahah i remember you! <3
        
       | Brainspackle wrote:
       | Any planned import options? I would love to import my plantoeat
       | csv into it
        
       | VerifiedReports wrote:
       | Great job! Seems to work well.
       | 
       | I created an account, but when I clicked on the confirmation link
       | in the resulting E-mail, it took me to a log-in page that said,
       | "Sign in to api.onlyrecipe.com:443.
       | 
       | I wasn't surprised when I used my sign-up info and got nothing
       | but a Kong error for my troubles. So... looks like sign-up is not
       | yet working.
        
       | chrysoprace wrote:
       | Fantastic. I was actually working on something like this myself.
       | I was planning to use an LLM as a fallback for recipes that don't
       | contain properly formatted recipe data.
       | 
       | Curious as to how you get around some of the anti-scraping
       | measures like Cloudflare. I put in a recipe blog
       | (https://www.maangchi.com) that usually blocks me with Cloudflare
       | but your site was able to scrape it just fine.
       | 
       | Edit: also as a very minor point your counter on how many recipes
       | have been imported seems to keep going up each time I try to
       | visit the same recipe. It says I've converted 5 but I've just
       | tried to visit the same recipe 5 times.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-04 23:00 UTC)