[HN Gopher] A lost Amazon world just reappeared in Bolivia
___________________________________________________________________
A lost Amazon world just reappeared in Bolivia
Author : ashishgupta2209
Score : 89 points
Date : 2025-12-01 07:30 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.frontiersin.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.frontiersin.org)
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Non-syndicated Source:
| https://www.frontiersin.org/news/2025/11/06/landscapes-that-...
| fwipsy wrote:
| Amazing and humbling to read about technological marvels from
| 1400 years ago. It really puts our modern achievements in a new
| light. It's tempting sometimes to think of innovation as a recent
| phenomen, but people have been innovating and solving the same
| problems for thousands of years. To be honest, I didn't even know
| they HAD e-commerce back then!
| anon84873628 wrote:
| People seem to take for granted that since agriculture is one
| of the oldest technologies, it must be a "solved problem" and
| our modern approach is optimal.
|
| When in reality, modern industrial agriculture is one of the
| most ham fisted and naive approached to the problem: just
| bulldoze, fertilize, irrigate, and spray everything into
| submission. With many negative consequences of course, which we
| generally refer to as "unsustainable".
|
| Because understanding all the complex relationships within an
| ecosystem, and then how to engineer it to yield surplus
| material for human use without intolerable negative
| consequences, is in fact a cutting edge and poorly grasped
| science.
|
| The "biocultural legacy" is an empirical approach to this
| problem refined over milenia, which we would do well to
| understand and appreciate.
| Tarq0n wrote:
| I'd hardly call the solution to Malthusian traps "ham
| fisted". Modern industrial agriculture, or at least
| fertilizer use, has let us escape from constant famine.
| mikey_p wrote:
| Yeah, it's a weird catch-22 for modern ag: don't use
| aggressive chemical herbicide and pesticides, but
| mechanical weed control has it's downsides too: with
| compacting that ground or erosion or use too much fuel.
| anon84873628 wrote:
| If you believe in Malthusian traps then at best we've just
| kicked the can down the road and set ourselves up for an
| even greater collapse. When it's not just that humans are
| starving, but the topsoil is gone, the pollinators are
| dead, the oceans have warmed and the ice caps melted, etc
| etc.
|
| The "green revolution" (a misnomer with our current use of
| the word) sure was effective; the point is that it was also
| unsustainable.
|
| Of course the land has a finite carrying capacity. And I'm
| not anti-ag-tech either. In fact I believe higher precision
| and intelligence is the answer. We need to create highly
| diverse and cohesive ecosystems tailored to the local
| environment, which requires lots of observation and
| iteration.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-12-04 23:01 UTC)