[HN Gopher] Code Wiki: Accelerating your code understanding
___________________________________________________________________
Code Wiki: Accelerating your code understanding
Author : geoffbp
Score : 42 points
Date : 2025-11-26 05:00 UTC (6 days ago)
(HTM) web link (developers.googleblog.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (developers.googleblog.com)
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45926350
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Related:
|
| _Code wikis are documentation theater as a service_
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45937527
| conartist6 wrote:
| I want to opt out for my code. How do I opt out.
| Rendello wrote:
| I had a repo ingested by some AI-slop "product showcase"
| tool. The dev behind it emailed me and welcomed me to the
| platform excitedly. Seeing the page made me feel sick and I
| told him to take it down. But it's the era we live in I
| suppose.
| cafed00d wrote:
| Nice! I've been using deepwiki and loving it! Obviously goggle's
| gemini powered alternative would be much better and trustworthy.
|
| I just hope Google doesn't kill this one as quickly as they did
| Stadia etc.
| gregjw wrote:
| Why after everything you've seen Google do, do you use the
| terms 'better' and 'trustworthy'?
|
| What about DeepWiki has been untrustworthy?
| shadowgovt wrote:
| I looked at the facebook/react one.
|
| Right off the bat, I'm really excited about how it talks about
| the "optimizing compiller," and how these pieces go from
| modules that do something to 'infrastructure.'
|
| If this is a flagship demo, it doesn't fill me with hope about
| the project.
| cess11 wrote:
| How does it know about the tradeoffs and discussions imbued in
| the code, unless someone has already put it in writing?
| shadowgovt wrote:
| Most online documentation doesn't cover the tradeoffs and
| discussions imbued in the code already, so this is at worst a
| side-grade.
| schainks wrote:
| This. What I really want to know is if this tool has also gone
| through the git history for the repo.
| mkagenius wrote:
| Surprising that they haven't made a podcast (NotebookLM-esque)
| based on the repo - that one can listen to on a bus ride.
| Something I had created a while back https://gitpodcast.com
| gunsch wrote:
| I hoped this might be like an externalization of g3doc. Nope.
|
| Instead, I started reading through one of their highlighted
| examples --- the Go repo
| (https://codewiki.google/github.com/golang/go). This might be the
| worst high level overview of Go and its repo I've read. Mostly
| accurate but unhelpfully verbose, spending lots of words on
| trivia, and not at all making a compelling pitch for Go as a
| language or toolchain, how to use it, or how to work on it.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-12-02 23:00 UTC)