[HN Gopher] Amazon faces FAA probe after delivery drone snaps in...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Amazon faces FAA probe after delivery drone snaps internet cable in
       Texas
        
       Author : jonathanzufi
       Score  : 64 points
       Date   : 2025-11-26 11:05 UTC (5 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cnbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cnbc.com)
        
       | bri3d wrote:
       | Video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/089CBuGTkcY (it's also in
       | the article; my ad blocker must have gotten me on this one).
       | Amazon are not having a good run with these lately.
       | 
       | The double crane cable incident (
       | https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/02/us/arizona-amazon-drones-cras... )
       | and the LIDAR failsafe issue (
       | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-16/amazon-re... )
       | were both rather surprising from a process and management
       | standpoint. This issue seems more like a run of the mill "problem
       | with drone delivery conceptually" that Amazon will have to deal
       | with.
        
         | purplecats wrote:
         | > not sure why it's not linked that I can find in the article
         | from the same source?
         | 
         | the point is not news, its to keep you on their sites as long
         | as possible with no escape
        
         | jonny_eh wrote:
         | I half expected the shared clip to be this scene from Pluribus:
         | https://youtu.be/r3D3dg23tyA?t=129
        
           | nullify88 wrote:
           | That scene really cracked me up. The show is shot very well.
           | It's good to have Vince Gilligan back on the TV again.
        
         | itishappy wrote:
         | The article contains the exact same clip without edited audio.
        
           | bri3d wrote:
           | I think my ad blocker must have filtered the element. Post
           | updated, thanks.
        
       | bpodgursky wrote:
       | Maybe we should consider this a chaos monkey test rather than
       | castigating Amazon.
       | 
       | If Amazon can accidentally take down internet in a large area
       | with a cheap commercial drone... what can a genuine bad actor do
       | with a few thousand of these. If this is any indicator, half the
       | country is going to be blind and deaf in the first day of a
       | Taiwan war, it's going to be be over before we even get back
       | online.
        
         | engineer_22 wrote:
         | the ukrainians destroyed hundred million dollar russian bombers
         | with a drone attack in July. drone warfare is very much on-the-
         | radar
        
       | observationist wrote:
       | It's an ethernet cable, looks like? That's pretty cool that a
       | drone has enough power to break an ethernet cable. It just got
       | tangled in a single cable, looks like it was run across someone's
       | back yard. That's not a bad failure mode, imo - gives them a
       | little exercise in problem solving, figuring out how to prevent
       | ethernet/cable collisions and snags, and maybe results in sensor
       | upgrades, or they figure out good detangling maneuvers or
       | something.
       | 
       | One cable getting damaged is inconvenient, but I'd have to laugh
       | it off if it were my service. 5G would be a good enough backup in
       | the meantime, and how often are you going to get to see these
       | types of accidents (hopefully almost never) so it'd be cool to
       | have a story.
       | 
       | "I ordered some flaming hot cheetos from a drone, and it broke my
       | internet cable!"
        
         | malfist wrote:
         | One internet cable isn't a big deal until it is. Or until it
         | isn't an internet cable. That's what we investigate both near
         | misses and minor issues
        
         | d-lisp wrote:
         | It would be great that the drone had some kind of tactile
         | sensibility.
         | 
         | Go slowly in the opposite direction of said contact first, then
         | if that is not working try to rotate on one of the horizontal
         | axis while going in the opposite direction to see if it make a
         | difference, and if it doesn't then something is stuck on your
         | skin, and you should be able to notice that your weight is not
         | the same as before; if that's not the case, then maybe your
         | sensor is just broken, but then maybe you could be able to
         | notice some difference in the power consumption of the tactile
         | components array, and if that's not the case ... well, maybe
         | that sensor is off too ? Wait ... what are you doing in Madrid
         | ?
        
         | bri3d wrote:
         | I think it's a typical retrofit outdoor coaxial cable run. The
         | ridiculously haphazard installation method matches my usual
         | experience with cable provider installations, too.
        
       | binarymax wrote:
       | Am I the only one who doesn't want drones flying all around the
       | neighborhood delivering stuff? I _really_ don't want this.
        
         | engineer_22 wrote:
         | no, you're probably not the only one. bring it up at the next
         | concerned citizens action committee meeting
        
         | rogerrogerr wrote:
         | Solid meh from me. Only thing I really don't like about it is
         | it's likely to impact the personal rights to fly drones we
         | enjoy today (which are already being chipped away).
         | 
         | Otherwise, they're probably not very loud or frequent, don't
         | really present much of a privacy issue vs. what street view
         | already has, and they maybe make the roads a bit safer. Might
         | take some jobs away from delivery van drivers. Nothing seems
         | worth getting overly concerned for.
        
           | asdff wrote:
           | Probably half my immediate neighbors get an amazon delivery a
           | day. The truck makes sometimes two or three stops throughout
           | the day and is there for like 15-20 minutes running packages.
           | The thought of that replaced with drone traffic is crazy. It
           | would be like dozens of landings and overflights per hour. It
           | is already bad enough when the realtors fly their drones
           | overhead. I can't imagine the birds and bees aren't getting
           | stressed out if it's managing to piss me off.
        
             | rogerrogerr wrote:
             | Sounds like there's an opportunity for bigger drones where
             | you are. Lower frequency noise, fewer flights if you can
             | drop more than one package per flight.
             | 
             | I just have a hard time seeing this becoming a major
             | quality of life issue in the real world. It's gonna be
             | fine.
             | 
             | And birds and bees seem to be fine around waterfalls and
             | airports, I think they'll survive drone noise.
        
             | TRiG_Ireland wrote:
             | What on earth are people buying that's delivered so
             | frequently? I find the whole concept of frequent deliveries
             | confusing.
        
             | alistairSH wrote:
             | Same. Even outside the holiday season, there are 5+ package
             | truck deliveries/day on my little street (12 houses).
             | That's UPS, FedEx, USPS, usually multiple Amazon (which
             | always surprises me), plus a couple unmarked vans. Plus
             | couriers in cars. Plus food delivery, at least 2 a night.
             | Almost all the Amazon vans are now electric Rivians or
             | GMCs.
             | 
             | That's a LOT of drone traffic, given there's near zero
             | ability to double up on a single stop as there is today.
        
         | xhkkffbf wrote:
         | I see the downsides. But I also see the delivery vans in my
         | neighborhood that are always double parking and blocking
         | traffic. At least in the air, traffic can be routed in 3d.
        
           | lagniappe wrote:
           | Just as the delivery vans participate with local police
           | through FLOC, so will the drones, soon. Remember, if it can
           | be seen from a public vantage point, it's not private,
           | including what can be seen through windows and behind fences.
        
         | ggreer wrote:
         | Consider that drones substitute for cars and trucks driving
         | through neighborhoods.
         | 
         | For the same payload delivered, ground vehicles cause
         | significantly more property damage, environmental damage, and
         | injuries/deaths.
        
           | malfist wrote:
           | The semi truck isn't driving through my backyard recording
           | video of me. And I doubt the economics of scale make the
           | truck more environmentally damaging than a drone delivering a
           | single item
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | That truck carries 500 packages. That drone one or two at
           | best so to replace one truck you're looking at 100's of
           | flights + return flights. And I'm not convinced the risks are
           | lower.
        
             | jsheard wrote:
             | Trucks also don't sound like a swarm of angry bees, in fact
             | the all-electric truck fleet that Amazon uses around here
             | barely sounds like anything at all. Drones would be a huge
             | step backwards for noise pollution.
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | >Trucks also don't sound like a swarm of angry bees,
               | 
               | Heh, you've not heard my neighbors riced out car then.
        
           | Gigachad wrote:
           | In my area packages are often delivered on what looks
           | something like an electric golf cart. It's efficient, safe,
           | and minimally disruptive.
        
         | stonemetal12 wrote:
         | Annoying drone buzzing when it works, 80lb bricks from heaven
         | when it doesn't. Not really looking forward to that future.
        
       | callamdelaney wrote:
       | User error. Who calls a drone in where there are overhead cables?
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | FAA is now investigating toys that hit trivial cables?
       | 
       | What a joke!
       | 
       | If Mikey's RC car hits someone's foot in the park, will the DOT
       | investigate?
        
         | malfist wrote:
         | Does Mikey's rc car weigh over a hundred pounds and travel at
         | 100mph?
        
         | teachrdan wrote:
         | Does Mikey aspire to have millions of RC cars driving 24 hours
         | a day all over the country?
        
       | mig39 wrote:
       | Looking at the video, the cable looks ... fragile. Would a large
       | bird landing on it do the same amount of damage?
       | 
       | Shouldn't it be thick, armoured cable, attached to a strong wire
       | or something?
        
         | pavon wrote:
         | It is a standard outdoor coaxial cable. Perhaps it looks thin
         | because you are mentally scaling to the size of smaller hobby
         | drones.
         | 
         | Edit: The MK30 is 78 pounds, and about 6 feet diameter. Here is
         | an image with a human for scale:
         | 
         | https://dronexl.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Amazon-Prime-A...
        
       | next_xibalba wrote:
       | I'm generally pretty gung ho about tech adoption. Nuclear? Yes!
       | LLMs everywhere? Let's try it! Crypto? OK... give it a go! Self
       | driving cars? Heck yeah!
       | 
       | But I really, really don't want drones flying over my house,
       | polluting the already noisy soundscape, etc. This just strikes me
       | as a terrible idea.
        
         | teachrdan wrote:
         | My dream is that an increase in drones would lead to a decrease
         | in vehicular deliveries, to the point that there would be a net
         | _decrease_ in noise.
         | 
         | But in my heart of hearts I am certain the convenience of drone
         | delivery -- and an absence of sufficient regulation -- would
         | lead to a drastic net _increase_ in noise instead.
        
           | hamdingers wrote:
           | This dream is naive. One truck rumbling (or humming, in the
           | near future) through your neighborhood delivering packages to
           | each of your neighbors over the course of 30 minutes will be
           | replaced with one drone per neighbor.
           | 
           | If they must exist, I hope they're priced/taxed such that
           | they're used sparingly.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | Bit of a travelling salesman problem, but I think a hybrid
             | approach would be optimal. Have the delivery van drive to a
             | neighborhood, then release drones from the van to deliver
             | packages to individual houses.
        
       | hk1337 wrote:
       | Why would Amazon be in trouble for not knowing the customer has
       | an Ethernet cable stretched across their yard? Even AT&T
       | (Southwestern Bell) buried drops from the pedestal to the house.
        
         | dec0dedab0de wrote:
         | because it should be able to detect and avoid any number of
         | obstacles.
         | 
         | what if the next time it hits a clothes line and lands on
         | someone?
         | 
         | the FAA investigates anything that might cause shit to fall out
         | of the sky
        
       | riotnrrd wrote:
       | I used to work in perception for autonomous aerial vehicles and
       | horizontal wires were the hardest common object to avoid.
       | Traditional stereo won't help you localize them -- wires are thin
       | so even mere detection can be hard, and one portion of a wire
       | looks much like another so feature matching fails resulting in
       | bad or no depth estimates -- and LIDAR sacrifices resolution for
       | weight and power consumption (which both have to be optimizied
       | for drones). It's been years since I've worked in this field, and
       | Amazon has many smart people thinking about it but I'm not
       | surprised it's still a difficult problem.
        
         | vpShane wrote:
         | Ah yeah I came up with the solution to that one. It's 'don't
         | fly drones over our heads' approach. Also the 'upgrade the
         | fragile infrastructure so a light breeze doesn't take out
         | millions of people's power.'
        
           | venturecruelty wrote:
           | Sorry, not profitable enough, not a "team player". Please
           | enjoy these weekly 1:1s with your manager and HR.
        
       | LogicFailsMe wrote:
       | I'm sure this will sound a bit whack to some of the sorts on here
       | but honestly, who cares?
       | 
       | I was at the principal engineers offsite summit in scenic Cle
       | Ellum when they supposedly announced prime Air.
       | 
       | I know, I know, what the f** ever, but there was something very
       | ominous and significant at this unveiling. If this were my demo
       | and my unveiling, I would have had a drone pick up a package at
       | one side of the auditorium and drop it off at the other side of
       | the auditorium.
       | 
       | What we got was a mock package and a mock drone and lots of talky
       | talk from a guy who didn't last long at Amazon. This set the tone
       | for everything going forward. and the engineers of tech, the real
       | engineers of tech, not the toxic empathy talkers who can't do
       | anything (tm), need to put these people in their place or the
       | enshittification will continue unopposed.
       | 
       | I'm mostly out of f**s here having made what I needed to make but
       | it's fun to post here in a position of not caring what people
       | think of me anymore. Make of that what you will
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-12-01 23:00 UTC)