[HN Gopher] Last Issue of "ECMAScript News"
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Last Issue of "ECMAScript News"
        
       Author : Klaster_1
       Score  : 57 points
       Date   : 2025-11-27 06:14 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (ecmascript.news)
 (TXT) w3m dump (ecmascript.news)
        
       | RaizedByWolves wrote:
       | Too bad, I liked it. Does anyone have a good alternative to the
       | newsletter?
        
         | uallo wrote:
         | https://javascriptweekly.com, https://frontendfoc.us
        
           | Klaster_1 wrote:
           | Also https://nodeweekly.com.
           | 
           | Checked my emails, turns out I've been subscribed to ES News
           | from the first issue in 2016.
        
             | embedding-shape wrote:
             | Anyone have any recommendations that aren't run by Cooper?
             | All of the suggestions so far are run by the same person
             | and while I don't have anything against them personally, a
             | bit of diversity wouldn't hurt :)
        
               | yesthisiswes wrote:
               | I like bytes.dev
               | 
               | https://bytes.dev/
        
               | petercooper wrote:
               | Hi. I am he. But I agree!
               | 
               | https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/
               | https://thisweekinreact.com/ https://piccalil.li/the-
               | index/ https://bytes.dev/
               | https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs
               | https://www.reddit.com/r/node (and typescript and vuejs
               | and angular..)
               | 
               | The more the merrier.
               | 
               | Also HN is pretty good itself much of the time. For
               | example: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastWeek&page=
               | 0&prefix=fal...
        
             | jazzypants wrote:
             | This also gave me an "invalid request" response.
        
           | jazzypants wrote:
           | These both gave me an "invalid request" when I tried to sign
           | up. I'm on my cell phone so I can't debug further.
        
             | petercooper wrote:
             | Unfortunately we've had endless waves of botnets attempting
             | to subscribe thousands of fake email addresses to us over
             | the years, and while our IP reputation system helps keep
             | this at bay, it's also catching quite a lot of legitimate
             | users now thanks to the prevalance of VPNs. So we'll need
             | to come up with a new approach. (And no, even Cloudflare
             | Turnstile isn't enough to keep them away, sadly, as there
             | are plenty of human-backed adversarial networks too trying
             | to make scam Gmail addresses look legit by subscribing them
             | to newsletters.)
             | 
             | However, we do subscribe many people manually, and we also
             | have RSS - http://javascriptweekly.com/rss - so you don't
             | have to deal with email at all if you don't want to. There
             | are also numerous other options out there, which I've
             | linked in a sibling comment.
        
               | jazzypants wrote:
               | Awesome, I just added your feeds to my RSS reader. I
               | appreciate you offering that option.
               | 
               | Thanks for the prompt response. Keep up the good work! :)
        
       | Raed667 wrote:
       | I'm not minimizing the amount of effort it takes to curate links,
       | but does a mailing list need to constantly grow for it to be
       | viable ? What does it mean to "operate at a loss" in this case ?
        
         | spiffytech wrote:
         | My first guess is ESP pricing. Just to pull numbers out of thin
         | air to anchor the conversation, mailing to 20,000 subscribers
         | costs $200-$400/mo at Mailchimp/ConvertKit/Klaviyo, three of
         | the top choices in the space. If it's 50,000 subscribers,
         | that's $380-$800/mo.
        
           | alt227 wrote:
           | Just playing devils advocate, but why not just switch to
           | posting on a free hosted blog platform? The information can
           | be there for all to see, it doesnt need to be distributed
           | directly into mailboxes by premium mailer services.
        
             | monooso wrote:
             | I have no idea whether the hosting is free, but they
             | already have an online archive [1].
             | 
             | Either way, "free hosting" doesn't cover the time required
             | to produce each issue.
             | 
             | If you're happy to do such ongoing work without recompense,
             | please consider starting a successor.
             | 
             | [1] https://ecmascript.news/archive.html
        
               | alt227 wrote:
               | The parent comment I was replying to was talking about
               | the cost of distributing a mailing list via email. I was
               | replying to that, no need for snark.
        
           | koakuma-chan wrote:
           | You can send emails for free if you don't use some bullshit
           | platform, no?
        
             | notnullorvoid wrote:
             | You can send emails without these platforms, but your
             | emails very likely will not be recieved if you do.
             | 
             | Email is an incredibly broken technology.
        
               | skydhash wrote:
               | You could just notify the user to add you to their
               | contact list. Like :                 Emails will be sent
               | from feed@example.com. If you're not seeing any email,
               | please check your spam inbox and add this address to your
               | contact list,...[rest of notice].
        
               | anon7000 wrote:
               | If you're not seeing the email in the first place, you're
               | not seeing the "fix."
        
               | skydhash wrote:
               | The message should be in the subscribe page, not in an
               | email.
        
               | koakuma-chan wrote:
               | Wait, but then they wouldn't be able to subscribe you to
               | their shit without your consent.
        
           | yyyk wrote:
           | These are email marketing platforms, not bulk transaction
           | email platforms, and I don't see why they can't do with the
           | latter. At a bulk transaction platform, such a tiny amount
           | would cost at most $20-$50/mo. If you're willing to do a bit
           | of work to use AWS SES, that would be $2-$5 a month. Azure
           | ACS would be even cheaper.
        
         | dbushell wrote:
         | it costs money to send a lot of emails that aren't immediately
         | blocked or sent to the junk folder
        
         | hombre_fatal wrote:
         | Seems obvious that it wasn't generating enough money to make it
         | a viable venture for the person putting in the work.
         | 
         | > The number of advertisers and subscribers has been slowly but
         | steadily decreasing
         | 
         | This does not entail that they need "constant growth" to be
         | viable.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-27 23:01 UTC)