[HN Gopher] Brazil charges 31 people in major carbon credit frau...
___________________________________________________________________
Brazil charges 31 people in major carbon credit fraud investigation
Author : PaulHoule
Score : 50 points
Date : 2025-11-21 18:30 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (news.mongabay.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (news.mongabay.com)
| vkou wrote:
| > The police investigation confirmed that two REDD+ project areas
| were generating carbon credits at the same time they were being
| used to launder timber taken from other illegally deforested
| areas.
|
| > Both projects, which cover more than 140,000 hectares (around
| 350,000 acres), are located in the municipality of Labrea in the
| south of Amazonas state. The area has been identified as one of
| the newest and most aggressive deforestation frontiers in the
| Brazilian Amazon.
|
| > ...led by Elcio Aparecido Moco and Jose Luiz Capelasso.
|
| > In 2017, Moco had been sentenced for timber laundering, but in
| 2019, another court overruled his sentencing. In 2019, he was
| also indicted for allegedly bribing two public officials.
|
| ---
|
| It's strange that a conman doesn't seem to be able to change his
| spots.
| onionisafruit wrote:
| Ironically confidence men often get caught when they have too
| much confidence in themselves.
| staplers wrote:
| Will they line these people up in the street and kill them like
| they did to 100+ people for a low-level drug dealer "sweep"?
|
| Something tells me not. The global push toward hyper-violent
| policing feels one sided class wise.
| vkou wrote:
| Looking at the track record of everyone involved, they'll be
| tried, convicted, and released to pull the con off again - but
| perhaps someone from Brazil can chime in and tell us that
| something's changed in the past year with respect to white
| collar crime prosecutions.
| mono442 wrote:
| Did they even really do anything wrong? This whole emission
| trading thing is a bordeline scam anyway, they just didn't have
| the right connections so they weren't allowed to profit from
| this and got caught.
| nebezb wrote:
| People have been buying fake carbon credits for a long time.
| There's very little incentive to validate the authenticity of the
| credit/offset. The press release is usually all the value they're
| looking for.
|
| I've only just now heard of someone getting in trouble for
| selling them. It's about time.
| bryanlarsen wrote:
| OTOH there are lots of people who are interested in selling
| genuine carbon credits. They are pressuring governments to
| clean up this market. It's a hard coordination problem, since
| we don't have a unified world government. (Thankfully).
| calmbell wrote:
| There should be a world standard or standards for genuine
| carbon credits. Maybe the UN could create an agency that
| determines such a standard and verifies that carbon credits
| meet that standard.
| shrubble wrote:
| It's laden with fraud everywhere, sadly. US regulators like SEC
| have no interest in auditing, from what I've seen. "Spice must
| flow" attitude.
| worik wrote:
| I get very frustrated by "carbon credits". This is an example of
| criminal fraud. But the whole idea is begging for fraud. It is a
| fraudulent concept from start to finish
|
| Reminds me of the Catholic's concept of "indulgences". Sin the
| sins, pay a fee, and go to heaven.
|
| In this case the "sins", and the sinners, are burning the world
| for profit
| cheschire wrote:
| Remember how people used to talk about the environment and stuff,
| back before AI made everyone turn a hard 180?
|
| What place do carbon credits even have anymore in this economy?
| mono442 wrote:
| European Union forces some sectors to buy permits for co2
| emissions.
| Natsu wrote:
| A lot of pro-environment people are reconsidering nuclear these
| days and were even before things like AI started demanding more
| electricity because it doesn't involve burning more
| hydrocarbons.
| _trampeltier wrote:
| Don't are they all? It would be almost more newsworthy if
| somebody could present a bit bigger serious carbon credit thing.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-11-21 23:01 UTC)