[HN Gopher] Show HN: 32V TENS device from built from scratch und...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: 32V TENS device from built from scratch under $100
        
       Author : autonomydriver
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2025-11-17 15:06 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (littlemountainman.github.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (littlemountainman.github.io)
        
       | dmitrygr wrote:
       | > down to ~3.0V (discharged).
       | 
       | That is NOT how one uses lithium batteries one foe snot want to
       | go boom. Consider 3.6V as empty. Discharging them down to 3.0 can
       | cause them to go boom when recharged...
        
         | cenamus wrote:
         | Of course you can go down there? That's literally the lower
         | limit of design voltage?
         | 
         | Below 2,5V is usually when you don't wanna use them anymore
        
           | dmitrygr wrote:
           | only if you want them to lose capacity fast and become spicy
           | pillows in your lifetime
        
             | clumsysmurf wrote:
             | 2.5V is the absolute minimum typically mentioned in spec
             | sheets, 2.8V and above is perfectly fine.
        
         | kees99 wrote:
         | Most cell OEMs will specify safe discharge (low threshold)
         | voltage in a datasheet. 2.75V is quite common [1].
         | 
         | That being said, system designer might choose higher cut-off
         | point, since:
         | 
         | 1) charge/discharge curve is S-shaped. There is very little
         | energy in that last few millivolts;
         | 
         | 2) battery (protection) circuit, and/or battery itself probably
         | have some small leakage current. However minuscule, over
         | months/years on a shelf, even some nano-amps of leakage will
         | add up. If you want device to survive that, you have to factor
         | this in, so that rest cell voltage still stays above safety
         | threshold even _after_ storage.
         | 
         | Also, "Li-ion" is quite a wide category. Don't use arbitrary
         | voltage as a fast rule. Look up datasheet, or characterize
         | actual cell you use. For some[2], disconnecting at 3.6V would
         | mean leaving 50% of capacity unused. For other[3], that would
         | be a reasonable, if somewhat conservative threshold.
         | 
         | [1] https://docs.rs-online.com/080b/A700000007848112.pdf
         | 
         | [2]
         | https://www.murata.com/-/media/webrenewal/products/batteries...
         | 
         | [3]
         | https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140005830/downloads/20...
         | (page 4)
        
         | Kirby64 wrote:
         | 3.6V is considered the nominal voltage, certainly not the low
         | end cut off.
         | 
         | 3.0V is considered basically the highest voltage. Most
         | chemistries suggest even lower, 2.8, or even 2.5 in some
         | situations assuming you can control the cutoff carefully.
         | Perfectly safe to do so. You only start to have issues when
         | you're south of 2.5 without a load.
         | 
         | Most advanced battery usages let the cells drop even below that
         | during heavy load.
        
           | shadowpho wrote:
           | >3.6V is considered the nominal voltage, certainly not the
           | low end cut off.
           | 
           | This is not right (3.6v certainly is and can be cut off
           | depending on device and battery).
           | 
           | One thing you are not considering is discharge after the cut
           | off. Fuel gauge, protection circuitry, the cut off circuitry
           | and battery itself has some discharge.
           | 
           | So you don't want to have the cut off being too low because
           | then the battery is permanently dead after not using it for X
           | period of time.
           | 
           | You want to leave some margin there.
           | 
           | Depending on product, battery chemistry and design I have
           | seen cut-off at 3.0-3.6v.
        
             | Kirby64 wrote:
             | Anyone setting cut-off at 3.6V either is using it in some
             | insanely industrial, ludicrous application where you need
             | to handle cases like multiple years in storage... or
             | doesn't know how to properly design their protection
             | circuitry.
             | 
             | The margin is already there at 3.0V. You can still recharge
             | batteries discharged below 3.0V. It just becomes dicey
             | below ~2.5V.
        
               | shadowpho wrote:
               | >Anyone setting cut-off at 3.6V either is using it in
               | some insanely industrial, ludicrous application where you
               | need to handle cases like multiple years in storage... or
               | doesn't know how to properly design their protection
               | circuitry.
               | 
               | It really depends on application, battery size and
               | leakage. In consumer world of electronics for example
               | there's an often requirement to make sure device turns on
               | after being on a shelf for 1/2 - 2 years.
               | 
               | Then when you do the math it ends up needing to set the
               | limit to 3-3.6v.
               | 
               | >The margin is already there at 3.0V. You can still
               | recharge batteries discharged below 3.0V. It just becomes
               | dicey below ~2.5V.
               | 
               | The margin isn't big enough for some products.
               | Furthermore some of the more leading edge batteries (in
               | terms of energy density) have higher leakage which
               | requires having more margin.
        
               | dmitrygr wrote:
               | ^^ this
        
       | lambdaone wrote:
       | Monophasic waveforms are generally considered less safe than
       | biphasic waveforms. That's why many TENS units have an output
       | stage based around a pulse transformer, so they can deliver two
       | pulses, one in each direction, shortly after each other. Leaving
       | this out seems to me to be a false economy when you've gone to
       | all the effort of building the rest of the system.
        
       | clnhlzmn wrote:
       | I see
       | 
       | > Each electrode channel is tied to a finger pad
       | 
       | but the layout shows the finger pads are all tied together. What
       | am I missing?
        
       | sowbug wrote:
       | My trusty TENS device has gotten me through a few bouts of
       | whatever it is I have had for the last year (pudendal neuralgia,
       | sciatica, pelvic floor issue, not sure). But it really is a pain
       | in the ass (ha) to apply the sticky electrode pads.
       | 
       | Has anyone ever seen something like a TENS shirt or shorts that
       | has the pads built-in?
        
       | ricardobeat wrote:
       | That final paragraph smells of LLM. I might be becoming a bit too
       | paranoid, but without any pictures or description of how well it
       | works, can't tell if this is real or not.
        
       | zhouyisu wrote:
       | I tried to build some TENS device, but lost in "safety maze".
       | 
       | I reverse engineered some existing device, there are TONS of
       | safety measures.
       | 
       | At least: current limiting resistor, transformer, voltage/current
       | feedback, GND isolation, MCU protection.
       | 
       | After replicate all of these, I still not brave enough to try it
       | myself, I just find it too dangerous.
       | 
       | PS: TENS device is fun. article seems like a bait.
        
       | NoSalt wrote:
       | This is cool, and all, but you can buy a TENS unit for $20.00 to
       | $40.00 on Amazon.
        
       | cheschire wrote:
       | Tangentially related homebrew effort by Basically Homeless to
       | built an aimbot using similar tech.
       | 
       | https://youtube.com/watch?v=9alJwQG-Wbk
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | I wonder if this is being used irl. Seems like the next thing
         | would be to attach it to a digital scope like the below.
         | Connecting the low latency of digital compute to the durable
         | self-powered biologic actuators of a human seems like a natural
         | evolution.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCp8-tc0dfY
        
       | bn-l wrote:
       | What do people use this for?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-21 23:02 UTC)