[HN Gopher] I converted a rotary phone into a meeting handset
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I converted a rotary phone into a meeting handset
        
       Author : todsacerdoti
       Score  : 149 points
       Date   : 2025-11-12 09:37 UTC (9 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.stavros.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.stavros.io)
        
       | WesolyKubeczek wrote:
       | If you use such a thing on a regular kind of meeting that happens
       | over zoom or similar, your arm will atrophy and fall off from
       | having to hold that thing for the duration.
       | 
       | The only remedy I see is to give everyone such a contraption and
       | make it mandatory.
        
         | BoxOfRain wrote:
         | This would be an excellent way to make sure the standup stays
         | terse, we could even put lead weights in the handsets to
         | further increase this virtue.
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | NB: Many of these older phones already came with metal
           | weights insides to give a feeling of more substance to them.
           | Not always in the handset, though it wouldn't surprise me if
           | some did have them.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | Usually, the base of the phone itself was a sturdy metal
             | plate. So while not the handset itself, the phone unit was
             | usually a pretty decent self defense weapon candidate as
             | was widely displayed in many a fight scene in movies from
             | the time.
        
         | wffurr wrote:
         | https://www.etsy.com/listing/631698424/vintage-rest-a-phone-...
        
         | phantasmish wrote:
         | They make those shoulder-rest addons for phone handsets. Not
         | too bad to use for extended periods with one of those, with
         | both hands free.
        
         | jon-wood wrote:
         | Back in the day when phones of this style were the only ones
         | available we learned to hold the handset between our shoulder
         | and our ear, leaving both hands free for other things.
        
           | WesolyKubeczek wrote:
           | Cue neck pain
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | That was one of the things they considered when they designed
           | phones. A lot of money was spent on ergonomics getting this
           | "right". Of course we now know a lot more about ergonomics
           | today, but they did the best they could and did a great job
           | considering.
        
           | pimlottc wrote:
           | That's why you'd get the big foamy cushion you could stick on
           | the back so you could rest it on your shoulder
        
         | nkrisc wrote:
         | There were countless products available when I was a kid that
         | were meant to make holding a handset between your ear and
         | shoulder comfortable.
        
           | stavros wrote:
           | These young people don't know what the nineties were like.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | They must think the little things people stick on the back
             | of their phones meant to make holding the device easier for
             | longer periods such a novelty.
        
       | villgax wrote:
       | Someone please make a Moto Razr form factor and snap bluetooth
       | device so I can keep my big and costly device in my bag and use
       | it only when I actually need to.
        
       | pvtmert wrote:
       | love the hangup part. so, i can finally "rage quit" the meeting
       | that discusses 99th revision of a doc where a comma should be
       | added here or there.
        
         | 6c696e7578 wrote:
         | pkill -9 -f '(chrome|firefox)' is my rage quit, it's like
         | hanging up but hitting the keys on the keyboard as hard as
         | you'd throw the phone down
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | You can quit anyway, just say "I've given you write permission,
         | I trust you"
        
       | ipython wrote:
       | I enjoyed the llm generated rotary phone image which had no "3"
       | position but two "8"'s
        
         | thih9 wrote:
         | The author did too:
         | 
         | > Rest assured, though, the image is almost exactly what the
         | phone looks like, except with a bit more 8 and a bit less 3.
        
       | voidUpdate wrote:
       | I enjoy how this article shows the issues with both image
       | generation models and language models
        
         | mrexroad wrote:
         | > "Rest assured, though, the image is almost exactly what the
         | phone looks like, except with a bit more 8 and a bit less 3."
         | 
         | :)
        
       | egorfine wrote:
       | I like this guy's optimism of letting AI create a USB sound card
       | out of a microcontroller from scratch.
        
         | abound wrote:
         | Probably not a bad litmus test for current and future
         | generations of LLMs though, I'd be curious to try it out on the
         | latest crop.
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | Only so long as nobody knows you are using it. Soon as
           | anything becomes a metric people with game it.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | It got really close! Audio played, it was just crackly/poppy.
         | The microphone didn't work, though.
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | > Half an hour and fifty dollars later, I realized I had spent
       | fifty dollars on this, and that this was not sustainable because,
       | if anything, the code was getting more and more buggy the more
       | Claude fixed it.
       | 
       | Off topic, this has been my experience with AI so often that it
       | prevents me from exploring AI uses more.
       | 
       | I liked Cursor's "auto" plan but that now seems gone. I'd happily
       | switch to a provider that offers a similarly "unlimited" usage.
        
         | wongarsu wrote:
         | It's difficult to offer unlimited usage of something that's so
         | expensive to run. OP could have used a $20/month Claude or
         | Cursor plan for "unlimited" usage within their quota had they
         | been willing to use a different model than the $75/Million
         | Token Opus 4
        
           | stavros wrote:
           | I would have, had I realized how much it would cost.
        
             | fuzzfactor wrote:
             | Well if cost is an object, there's always the quick & easy
             | way :)
             | 
             | >Vintage Retro 3.5Mm Telephone Handset
             | 
             | https://www.amazon.com/Telephone-Receiver-Radiation-
             | Micropho...
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | For an update, Codex has been massively better for me. I should
         | probably give it another go, especially now with Codex Max, as
         | it has been much better at not getting stuck like this. Give it
         | a go if you get the chance, although with the general caveat
         | that people have massively different experiences with LLMs, for
         | some reason.
         | 
         | I think maybe it has to do something with the prompting style,
         | my hypothesis is that some people's prompting styles fit
         | certain LLMs better. I don't know how else to explain the fact
         | that my very experienced friends prefer Sonnet to Codex, for
         | example, whereas I had the opposite experience.
        
         | shermantanktop wrote:
         | It is possible to radically increase your chances of success.
         | You have to speak the LLM's language, just like you write Java
         | or Rust. But it doesn't come with a language spec, so you get
         | to figure it out by trial and error. And a model change means
         | revisiting what works.
         | 
         | Lots of tips on how to do this out there but one thing I do is
         | have it try, throw away everything it it did, and try again
         | with a completely restated question based on the good bits in
         | what it was able to produce.
         | 
         | E.g., if you ask for a web app that does X and it produces a
         | working web app that doesn't do X, throw that away and just ask
         | for the web app scaffolding. You've still come out ahead even
         | if you take over fully.
        
           | tenacious_tuna wrote:
           | > Lots of tips on how to do this out there but one thing I do
           | is have it try, throw away everything it it did, and try
           | again with a completely restated question
           | 
           | This is the thing that worries me about AI/LLMs and how
           | people "profess they're actually really useful when you use
           | them right": the cliff to figuring out if they're useful is
           | vertical.
           | 
           | "You've still come out ahead even if you take over fully."
           | 
           | I just finished a weeklong saga of redoing a bunch of
           | Claude's work because instead of figuring out how to properly
           | codegen some files it just manually updated them and ignored
           | a bunch of failing tests.
           | 
           | With another human I can ask, "Hey, wtf were you thinking
           | when you did [x]?" and peer into their mind-state. With
           | Claude, it's time to stir the linear algebra again. How can I
           | tell when I'm near a local or global maxima when all the
           | prevailing advice is "I dunno man, just `git reset --hard
           | origin/master` and start again but like, with different words
           | I guess."
           | 
           | We have studies that show people feel like they're more
           | productive using AI while they're actually getting less done
           | [1], and "throw away everything it did and try again" based
           | on :sparkle: vibes :sparkle: is the state of the art on how
           | to "actually" use this stuff, I just feel more and more
           | skeptical.
           | 
           | [1]: https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-
           | experienced-o...
        
       | Medox wrote:
       | > Since I didn't want to make any permanent changes to the phone,
       | I didn't want to remove these tabs, or to solder anything onto
       | them. I just wanted to connect a cable to them in the easiest way
       | possible.
       | 
       | Same here but I want to go for a xilink bluetooth adapter and
       | maybe even sacrifice and old smartphone with a separate sim. Not
       | sure if the AI stuff will work but it seems possible....
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | I've got you: https://www.stavros.io/posts/irotary-saga/
        
           | a022311 wrote:
           | Interesting how 10 years later we saw an actual cellphone
           | with this color...
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | Did we? Which one?
        
               | toast0 wrote:
               | I had a Blu Win HD in basically that color: https://www.m
               | eetgadget.com/gadget/71500/BLU+Win+HD/photos/im...
               | 
               | Although, that's contemporaneous with your post.
        
               | stavros wrote:
               | Interesting, I didn't know of this!
        
         | hobinjk wrote:
         | It's a good approach! I used an xlink for my super hacky (but
         | very easy) bluetooth rotary phone project:
         | https://hobinjk.github.io//hardware/bluetooth/hackery/2024/0...
        
       | eniac111 wrote:
       | https://petrovs.info/post/2023-01-12-shaiba/ This is my USB
       | rotary dial. It's always fun with the young people when I bring
       | it to IT conferences.
        
         | nirav72 wrote:
         | I bet the reaction was similar to what my teenage kids had when
         | I showed them some VHS tapes I found in storage.
        
           | dxdm wrote:
           | What was their reaction like, for those of us who don't have
           | teenagers at home to repeat the experiment on?
        
             | dfxm12 wrote:
             | It might have been similar to your reaction when you saw
             | (depending on your age):
             | 
             | a floppy disk (3.5")
             | 
             | a floppy disk (5.25")
             | 
             | a floppy disk (8")
        
               | dxdm wrote:
               | I'm flattered, but you're only speculating, and at least
               | for me this is not helpful.
               | 
               | It does not tell me what their reaction was, which is a
               | little sad, because I am curious what happens when
               | somebody for whom Facebook is ancient tech encounters
               | video cassettes.
               | 
               | FWIW, I thought 8 inch floppies were weirdly big, but
               | that's just a different form factor. It was normal to use
               | floppies, tape or vinyl records for data and media
               | storage. These days things are magically beamed through
               | the sky in the most normal fashion. I think video tapes
               | may seem a little weirder than just a larger box.
        
               | dxdm wrote:
               | (The person I asked originally replied while I was typing
               | the above. Their reply is in a sibling comment to my
               | original question.)
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | It's generally "how do I dial?", followed by them trying to
             | press the holes in the dial, and, when told to rotate it,
             | they rotate it to dial before picking up the handset.
        
           | nirav72 wrote:
           | The initial reaction was - What is that? How do you play the
           | video? I happen to have a old VCR in storage and a USB 2.0
           | capture dongle. Hooked it up and showed them some old family
           | videos. So their final comment was - why is the video quality
           | so bad?
        
       | H1BCurryChef wrote:
       | Toll.... so worth the effort.
        
       | jjkaczor wrote:
       | Interesting - summer 2024 I picked-up an old rotary, my plan is
       | to make it ring when a "insert-corporate-instant-
       | messaging/voip/meeting" application call comes in... But time, no
       | time...
        
         | shermantanktop wrote:
         | There's almost always time, as in wall clock time. It's usually
         | energy and attention that is in limited supply.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | I like to say that everyone has the same 24 hours a day, it's a
         | matter of priorities.
        
       | sebastianconcpt wrote:
       | The feeling of the hang up is so satisfying. An important piece
       | of UX.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | Plus the sound through the handset sounds like nostalgia!
        
       | foobarian wrote:
       | Since you didn't modify the original phone, I wonder if the
       | oldschool dialing way of digit-banging would work. For each digit
       | N, you hit the hangup button N times, pause, then go to next
       | digit. Used to do that on our family's Pupin that looks like this
       | one [1]
       | 
       | [1] https://in.pinterest.com/pin/rare-vintage-pupin-bakelite-
       | rot...
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | No, the hangup rocker goes to another GPIO than the dialing
         | rocker in the rework.
        
         | ThePowerOfFuet wrote:
         | >For each digit N, you hit the hangup button N times, pause,
         | then go to next digit
         | 
         | N+1 times for each digit N. The digit 1 was two clicks of the
         | hookswitch, and the digit 0 was eleven.
        
           | stavros wrote:
           | Was it? I've dialed like that a few times and I always
           | clicked N times.
           | 
           | Here's the code for the phone, BTW, as I forgot to include it
           | in the article:
           | 
           | https://github.com/skorokithakis/dialogue/blob/master/src/ma.
           | ..
        
             | foobarian wrote:
             | I remember it being N at least in ex-Yu. But now that I
             | think about it I forget if it was a reverse-click i.e. the
             | pulse was created by releasing the pressure plate briefly.
             | In that case we'd have a fencepost thing and there would be
             | N+1 physical presses maybe
        
       | jtwaleson wrote:
       | Very cool but I think my wireless bluetooth one is even cooler ;)
       | 
       | https://blog.waleson.com/2024/10/bakelite-to-future-1950s-ro...
       | 
       | It actually supports using the rotary dial to call phone numbers
       | on your smartphone.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | I think my full-blown mobile rotary phone is EVEN cooler:
         | 
         | https://www.stavros.io/posts/irotary-saga/
         | 
         | It actually makes calls itself and has a SIM.
        
           | jtwaleson wrote:
           | ok you win
        
         | xhkkffbf wrote:
         | Someone should make a Bluetooth box that outputs to a standard
         | phone connector so any standard phone would work. Has anyone
         | done that?
        
           | stavros wrote:
           | I think I've seen it, I was thinking of making a USB one. I
           | might!
        
           | ebsebs wrote:
           | Someone does - the Cell2Jack is only $36 USD:
           | 
           | https://www.cell2jack.com/
           | 
           | I use one with a 1970's vintage rotary desk phone and it
           | works well.
        
       | kleiba wrote:
       | Relevant Seinfeld bit:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTYSnIxb-k&t=54s
        
       | freedomben wrote:
       | Neat! On a mostly serious note, I went looking to buy a handset
       | that just plugs in via USB and is a normal speaker/microphone,
       | and I was quite surprised there wasn't anything like that out
       | there, at least not that I could find.
       | 
       | Am I the only one that wants something like this? Does anybody
       | know where to get one?
        
       | syUchs wrote:
       | there is accually a marketing guy (founded competeitor to redbull
       | in germany) who mad this comercially.
       | 
       | https://herbworld.com/en/products/retro-telephone-red
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | Some of those old phones are nicely slammable.
       | 
       | What's even more bulletproof are vintage street payphones.
       | 
       | Nothing keeps a daily standup call on track like a payphone
       | atmosphere of being on the run. ("Quick, what's sprint status and
       | blockers?! We've got 60 seconds before they complete the trace!")
       | 
       | Add an accelerometer, and you can detect when the handset is
       | hanging from the armored payphone cable, because they dropped it
       | as they ran away. Trigger dial tone sound, to mark end of
       | meeting.
       | 
       | A variation on this theme is using a "burner" flip phone for
       | meetings, so that you can end each one by snapping the phone in
       | half, and stomping the pieces on the ground. Which is cathartic,
       | but less environmentally sustainable.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-21 23:01 UTC)