[HN Gopher] 'Calvin and Hobbes' at 40
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       'Calvin and Hobbes' at 40
        
       Author : mooreds
       Score  : 327 points
       Date   : 2025-11-20 12:08 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | WillAdams wrote:
       | I can still remember choosing between the morning or evening
       | paper based on which included _Calvin and Hobbes_, so it
       | certainly worked to sell papers.
       | 
       | The boxed collection is wonderful, and one of my favourites.
       | 
       | For folks who want a bit more, there have been a couple of
       | homages:
       | 
       | "Hobbes and Bacon": https://imgur.com/gallery/all-hobbes-bacon-
       | by-pants-are-over... --- a bit too on-the-nose for my taste,
       | which doesn't really add anything
       | 
       | "Calvin and Company" by DomNX, wherein Calvin and Susie have
       | twins named after Albert Camus and Simone de Beauvoir --- art not
       | fully realized/up to the task, and again, all a bit too obvious
       | 
       | There was also one simply heart-breaking one, where Calvin has
       | cancer, gets a decrepit Hobbes out of storage, and gifts him to a
       | troubled grandchild, but not finding it on searching....
       | 
       | The thing is, laughing at problems, while cathartic, isn't
       | actually inspiring folks to actually understand/solve
       | problems/make the world a better place.... I'm reminded of a
       | comic from childhood where a child sees duck hunters as part of
       | the reason why a forest is clearcut for a development, instead of
       | the reason why such land is preserved (the Pa. State Game
       | Commission manages over 1.5 million acres) or, maybe I'm just
       | overly pessimistic this morning because of intractable problems
       | where people choose wrongly, mostly through not understanding the
       | problem/ignorance/lack of sympathy for others --- classic
       | example, drivers in cars who get upset because following a
       | cyclist causes them slow down on their way to a red light ---
       | rather a shame that the strips featuring Calvin's father as a
       | cyclist weren't didactic so as to show/discuss that sort of
       | thing, rather than going for the laugh.
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | > The boxed collection is wonderful, and one of my favourites.
         | 
         | And it still holds up for kids of today. My son is a second gen
         | Calvin and Hobbes kid.
        
         | SanjayMehta wrote:
         | > There was also one simply heart-breaking one, where Calvin
         | has cancer, gets a decrepit Hobbes out of storage, and gifts
         | him to a troubled grandchild, but not finding it on
         | searching....
         | 
         | Are you sure this was a comic? It's a story someone wrote,
         | available on Scribd.
        
           | WillAdams wrote:
           | Maybe that's what I'm recalling.
           | 
           | This one?
           | 
           | https://www.scribd.com/document/848787362/Calvin
        
         | minihat wrote:
         | I think the comic achieves something deeper than a lecture. The
         | humor might reconnect us with a sense of awe we often lose as
         | adults.
        
         | shagie wrote:
         | > For folks who want a bit more, there have been a couple of
         | homages:
         | 
         | I believe the Zen Pencils one is one of the better ones... it's
         | not Calvin and Hobbes, but rather about Watterson himself.
         | 
         | http://www.zenpencils.com/comic/128-bill-watterson-a-cartoon...
        
         | RhysU wrote:
         | Much, but not all, of 'Phoebe and Her Unicorn' has just-enough
         | echoes of C&H while doing its own thing.
         | 
         | https://www.gocomics.com/phoebe-and-her-unicorn
        
           | debo_ wrote:
           | This is so cute!
        
           | WillAdams wrote:
           | Thank you for that!
           | 
           | Ordering the first boxed set for my daughter's birthday next
           | year.
        
         | TACD wrote:
         | A couple of other comics with their own distinct personalities
         | but an unmistakable C&H vibe:
         | 
         | Cul de Sac (https://www.gocomics.com/culdesac)
         | 
         | Wallace the Brave (https://www.gocomics.com/wallace-the-brave)
        
           | svat wrote:
           | The comic "Frazz" is also often compared to Calvin and Hobbes
           | (as if Frazz the janitor is an adult Calvin), there's a long
           | section on the Wikipedia page:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazz
        
         | RunSet wrote:
         | Gene Wolfe wrote a story titled _Petting Zoo_ , and here is the
         | introduction he wrote for it:
         | 
         | > _Petting Zoo_ is a favorite story of David Hartwell 's, the
         | master editor who edited this book and most of my others. Do
         | you like dinosaurs? I loved them when I was a kid, and I've
         | noticed that Hobbes' buddy Calvin loves them at least as much.
         | Perhaps David feels the same way.
         | 
         |  _Petting Zoo_ can be read here:
         | 
         | https://archive.org/details/yearsbestsf30000unse/page/n9/mod...
         | 
         | Bill Watterson also guest-drew a few precious strips for Pearls
         | Before Swine.
         | 
         | https://slate.com/culture/2014/06/bill-watterson-does-pearls...
        
           | WillAdams wrote:
           | It wounds me that I missed that latter, and that the
           | commentary on it at:
           | 
           | https://toostupidtotravel.org/2014/06/07/ever-wished-that-
           | ca...
           | 
           | is 404.
        
       | elicash wrote:
       | My own personal favorites:
       | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XryL7duzj_WZEy0dtdDO48_s...
        
         | olau wrote:
         | The ones about Calvin having an awful day due to what's
         | demanded of him are honestly heartbreaking.
        
         | losvedir wrote:
         | I was actually just thinking of that "cow milk" one the other
         | day. I remember when I read C&H as a kid thinking that one was
         | absolutely hilarious and oh so true. Then I realized, now that
         | I'm older and more experienced in the world, and have had kids,
         | that the idea of drinking cow milk is not actually that far-
         | fetched. Udders look weird, sure, but you know what they are.
         | 
         | In other words, it's kind of amazing that Watterson was able to
         | put himself in the mind of a child so well for that strip.
        
       | andix wrote:
       | My favorite Calvin and Hobbes reference: https://xkcd.com/409/
       | 
       | There are even more on xkcd:
       | https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Calvin_a...
        
         | conartist6 wrote:
         | smbc-comics has done a whole slew of C+H inspired strips with
         | two kids out having a deep but strage philosophical
         | conversation. It's very difficult to actually find anything
         | you're looking for in the SMBC archives though... E.g.
         | https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/qualia
        
           | gazook89 wrote:
           | Zach Weinersmith's Beawolf graphic novel is basically an ode
           | to Calvin. He has a new book coming out soon, too.
        
             | JKCalhoun wrote:
             | Looks like it's "Bea Wolf" (I had not heard of it and
             | Googled.)
        
         | thunderbong wrote:
         | Mobile view -
         | 
         | https://m.xkcd.com/409/
        
       | HeinzStuckeIt wrote:
       | IMO, Watterson stopped at just the right time to preserve his
       | legacy and keep the strip associated with childlike wonder and
       | innocence. In the last years of _C &H_ there was a certain
       | curmudgeonliness creeping in, as Waterson started to mock modern
       | commerce and art. I think the cartoonist was naturally growing
       | older and more disillusioned, and his strip faintly started to
       | sound like Calvin's dad instead of Calvin.
        
         | dbatten wrote:
         | At least based on some of the things he's written in some of
         | the anthologies, it seems like a lot of that disillusionment
         | was not just because of age, but rather because of his battles
         | with the publishers and what not that were pushing him to make
         | changes that he felt would compromise the integrity of the
         | strip. A lot of the comics include subtle jabs about corporate
         | greed, artistic integrity, etc. because he was actively
         | fighting with the corporations that distributed his strip over
         | such matters...
         | 
         | Still, 100% agreed that he stopped at the right time, both
         | because of the creeping cynicism, but also simply because he
         | was running out of fresh ideas...
        
         | andix wrote:
         | I had to look up what curmudgeonliness means, Wiktionary was
         | extremely helpful:
         | 
         | curmudgeonliness: The state or condition of being curmudgeonly.
         | 
         | okay, let's look up curmudgeonly:
         | 
         | curmudgeonly: Characteristic of a curmudgeon; churlish
         | 
         | nearly there:
         | 
         | curmudgeon: An ill-tempered person full of stubborn ideas or
         | opinions, often an older man.
        
           | dmoy wrote:
           | Yea English be like that sometimes
           | 
           | Look up some crazy sounding 20+ character word, takes three
           | steps, and then you get a definition of the sub-sub-sub word
           | and it says ".... blah blah, derived from the Greek base
           | <abc>- and then also the Latin base -<xyz>", and you realize
           | you had no chance at getting it from any kind of first
           | principles or anything.
        
             | andix wrote:
             | I meant the remarks about wiktionary in a sarcastic way.
             | Explaining the word's meaning twice by itself was a bit
             | funny.
             | 
             | Especially as it's not a very common word a lot of non-
             | native speakers need to look up. Probably also a few native
             | speakers.
        
               | mhink wrote:
               | For what it's worth, the first two steps in your lookup
               | would come naturally to a native speaker- it's a suffix
               | formation similar to e.g. "cleanliness" and
               | "friendliness".
               | 
               | "Curmudgeon" itself is interesting, because while it's
               | not particularly common, I actually think a lot of native
               | English speakers would recognize it because it's got a
               | lot of character- for some reason, the way it feels to
               | say and the way it sounds almost has some of the
               | character of the meaning.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | George Carlin, in my opinion, followed a similar arc. In the
         | end he was just ranting for an hour. I appreciated his
         | perspective (and delivery) but it was a lot more nihilistic,
         | less funny.
        
         | takinola wrote:
         | If memory serves, Waterson said the later years were colored by
         | his feelings from dealing with publishers. One of the most
         | memorable comics for me is one where Calvin ends up in bed
         | after resisting his parents' bedtime commands. In the final
         | panel he bitterly declares that clearly his desires have no
         | impact on his outcomes.
        
         | mandevil wrote:
         | I'm currently working through the Complete Calvin and Hobbes
         | with my 9 year old, and he had these jabs at commercialism
         | throughout, though it might have been sharper towards the end,
         | but he was already jaded by art in 1985 as a 27 year old.
         | 
         | He had dreamed of being a cartoonist from childhood (when he
         | was 8 he wrote Charles Shulz of Peanuts who wrote him back and
         | it changed his life). He had actually majored in Political
         | Science at Kenyon College (class of '80) because he thought
         | that political cartooning was going to be his route in. It was
         | not. He was a political cartoonist at the Cincinnati Post
         | briefly before they fired him, then he worked for an ad agency
         | and freelanced a bit before Universal Press Syndicate signed
         | him on for Calvin and Hobbes. But, even at 27 when he started
         | working for UPS, he understood the pressure of the professional
         | art world and was cynical about it.
         | 
         | Apparently he lived a miserable life for the last few years of
         | his work. He had been injured in a bike accident and it
         | terrified him that he would be injured in such a way that he
         | could no longer draw (1) so he basically stopped going out,
         | stopped doing anything that could possibly harm his ability to
         | earn money, stopped doing anything that might bring joy to his
         | life. He lived a recluse for several years, before deciding to
         | just quit, then he and his wife Melissa adopted a child and
         | gave her a good life.
         | 
         | 1: Bill Mauldin, the Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonist who
         | created Willie and Joe, was the editorial cartoonist for the
         | Chicago Sun Times when, in 1991, he crushed his right hand
         | attaching a snow-plow to his truck, and he had to retire. I
         | think that incident is what inspired this fear, the timelines
         | match up. But of course, Watterson is famously private and so
         | this is conjecture.
        
         | jmdeon wrote:
         | I'm sure it was also for his own sake/sanity. He took two
         | ~9-month sabbaticals toward the last half, which was not the
         | norm for cartoonists at the time.
        
       | h2zizzle wrote:
       | Growing up, we had collected volumes of Calvin and Hobbes,
       | Garfield, and The Boondocks. Surprisingly good bedfellows.
       | Covered the bases, so to speak.
        
         | cons0le wrote:
         | The Boondocks is probably the most witty cartoon ever made. It
         | still holds up because we've largely not advanced as a society
        
         | lylejohnson wrote:
         | I also tend to associate "Bloom County" with "Calvin and
         | Hobbes". I think I was reading both of them around the same
         | time.
        
           | buildbot wrote:
           | Same here, though I started bloom county a lot later. Almost
           | all of my 80s cultural knowledge stems from that comic
           | haha...
        
       | jmclnx wrote:
       | 1985, I thought they were around a lot longer.
       | 
       | I remember people at work talking about that comic and loving it.
       | But the my City Newspaper did not carry it :(
       | 
       | I can see it now in gocomics and it is great.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Mandela.
        
       | fruitplants wrote:
       | Calvin's dad was quite a character, wasn't he?
        
         | dhosek wrote:
         | My role model as a parent. I had the why are old pictures in
         | black and white conversation with my kids almost word for word.
         | It wasn't until they were in fourth grade that they learned
         | that the world didn't used to be black and white.
         | 
         | I think they still believe what I told them about how they
         | determine weight limits for bridges though.
        
           | andrepd wrote:
           | You should show then the linear velocity vs angular velocity
           | thing, to keep them awake until 3am
        
           | megaloblasto wrote:
           | I hope this is a joke. Calvin's dad lying to him wasn't
           | supposed to be idealized.
        
             | dheerajvs wrote:
             | "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
        
           | briandrum wrote:
           | We just finished rebuilding the bridge in the center of Mr.
           | Watterson's hometown, and I couldn't pass up the opportunity
           | to reference that one!
           | 
           | https://councilmandrum.net/notes/bridge-closure/
        
         | irrational wrote:
         | As a child I identified with Calvin. Now as a 50+ year old I
         | find I identify much more with the dad.
        
       | Pinus wrote:
       | If you want something to hang on your wall, an original strip is
       | coming up for auction in Stockholm more or less as I write. The
       | bid is currently at over 1 MSEK (100kUSD)...
       | https://auctionet.com/sv/events/891-the-modern-art-design-sa...
        
       | danishSuri1994 wrote:
       | One thing that always struck me about Calvin & Hobbes is how well
       | it ages. The humor lands when you're a kid, but the subtext only
       | becomes clear as an adult.
       | 
       | Watterson managed to keep that dual perspective without letting
       | the strip drift into cynicism, which is rare for long-running
       | comics.
        
       | NiloCK wrote:
       | That is just two years after I burst onto the page.
       | 
       | Calvin and Hobbes was a major part of my childhood - I loved it.
       | For something casually consumed on the daily at the breakfast
       | table, it was so earnestly, so obviously, smarter than the median
       | cultural offering. Smarter also then the local nightly news
       | broadcasts. Smarter also than the median educational intervention
       | I experienced through elementary and middle school. It had
       | finished by the time I was in high school.
       | 
       | I _still_ love it, but my feelings now are mixed as well.
       | 
       | Calvin wasn't exactly a pro-social role model for me. He was the
       | hero of the smartest media I was acquainted with - the sharpest
       | mouthpiece for what was going on around me and how to _be alive_.
       | It was vitally important for me to live up to his disdain for
       | schooling, his aloofness, his contrarianism. Nothing horrified
       | eight or ten or fifteen or twenty-two year old me so much as
       | _conforming_ (gross) to a Susie Perkins mode of existence -
       | smart, but seemingly oblivious or indifferent to life 's
       | contradictions and hypocrisies.
       | 
       | Some thirty years later I understand that a person can move
       | pragmatically, without self-harm or self-righteousness, through
       | life's contradictions and hypocrisies without being oblivious or
       | indifferent. Who knew?
        
         | complianceowl wrote:
         | You know, your comment reminds me of something my wife and I
         | were talking about. We have been starting to let our child have
         | a little more screen time and choose what he wants to watch
         | (within the parameters we set).
         | 
         | Some shows and movies seem harmless, initially, but then we
         | noticed in so many kids movies (e.g., Zootopia, Sing), they're
         | always yelling at each other, expressing anger, frustration,
         | and hostility towards one another.
         | 
         | Then we wonder why kids adopt those attitudes. It's simply
         | because mimic what they see. And worse yet, when they see it in
         | movie/show form, they think those attitudes are cool and
         | relatable.
        
           | robertlagrant wrote:
           | > Some shows and movies seem harmless, initially, but then we
           | noticed in so many kids movies (e.g., Zootopia, Sing),
           | they're always yelling at each other, expressing anger,
           | frustration, and hostility towards one another.
           | 
           | My kids are similar. Years ago I actually just unplugged the
           | TV and put it behind some furniture for 3 months because I
           | was so fed up. It calmed them down a lot (this was after
           | Covid lockdowns, when we'd just given them too much TV) but
           | still - it flares up.
           | 
           | I do think a lot of kids tv is either straight addictive
           | (e.g. Cocomelon) or depicts how kids would like to behave,
           | e.g. in how they talk to adults rudely (e.g. how they talk to
           | the dad in Peppa Pig), or they're always right and the adults
           | are wrong (too may examples to name). Bluey is the saving
           | grace there, as it depicts healthy and respectful
           | relationships, but it's very unusual.
        
             | grepfru_it wrote:
             | As always, the home model is what has greater influence
             | than any tv show. If parents are also behaving as in the TV
             | shows then the shows simply serve as confirmation bias to
             | what the children observe.
             | 
             | I noticed that when I adopted a loving, quieter tone, and
             | truly focused on do as i do vs do as i say attitudes, my
             | children began to reject the "norms" shown on the tv shows.
             | Today my children remark about how their friends act at
             | their homes and towards their parents, and we have
             | discussions about it.
             | 
             | That said, I definitely had the problem you describe, but
             | it was resolved by focusing on consequences of actions and
             | being ready to follow through on punishments (much like you
             | did). Combined with the do as i do attitude, those
             | punishments were ultimately punishments for me as well. You
             | are being a terorrizing little bad ass? ok no TV. But then
             | this means I can't watch TV because then they might watch
             | TV while in the same room as me. Mutual pain.
        
             | gtd wrote:
             | Peppa Pig is at least funny. The one that pushed me over
             | the edge wrt to behavior modeling was Caillou. My god
             | people have some self respect as parents. You have to have
             | to create some boundaries for children, not just knee-jerk
             | syrupy-sweet coddling from dawn til dusk.
        
             | amanaplanacanal wrote:
             | Dr Angela Collier just did a video on children's tv. She
             | has some good recommendations. Evidently before she became
             | an astrophysicist she got a degree in education. Who knew?
        
               | madcaptenor wrote:
               | link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyatqN63RZ4
        
             | aidenn0 wrote:
             | Don't forget that in most shows where kids are the main-
             | characters, adults in general (and particularly parents)
             | are either absent or less mature than the kids. This is the
             | easiest way to make the kids shine, but certainly
             | communicates a particular message. I really respected
             | Netflix's _The Baby Sitters Club_ for not falling into that
             | trap.
        
             | Sohcahtoa82 wrote:
             | > Bluey is the saving grace there
             | 
             | I somehow had never heard about Bluey until TheOdd1sOut
             | (YouTuber who does hilarious 10-15 minute video on slice-
             | of-life topics) did a video about it.
             | 
             | https://youtu.be/nEQHiJVH79o
             | 
             | The TL;DW is that Bluey is a kids show that not only
             | recognizes that the parents will likely be in the room
             | while the show is on and therefore will occasionally have
             | lines that are _meant_ for them, but will actually tackle
             | tough topics that children and their families may be
             | dealing with. For example, in one episode, Bluey 's mom is
             | despairing because Bluey isn't reaching development
             | milestones when he should be, she's blaming herself, and
             | another character comes to console her, and the character
             | looks directly towards the viewer and says "You're doing
             | great!"
             | 
             | I'm almost tempted to actually watch the show even though I
             | don't have kids.
        
               | lll-o-lll wrote:
               | > Bluey isn't reaching development milestones when he
               | should be
               | 
               |  _She_ should be. Bluey and Bingo are sisters.
               | 
               | The show is extremely good, and when my kids were around
               | that age, we all watched together. Hard to explain to
               | your 6 year old why you are bawling your eyes out, but it
               | does lead to some important conversations. It's also an
               | inspiration to be a better parent, particularly for Dads.
               | Thank you Bandit.
               | 
               | I don't know if any of this stuff will hit if you aren't
               | a parent. It hits right into the heart of all those
               | things people tell you "you can't understand if you don't
               | have kids".
               | 
               | It's an objectively good show though, I found myself
               | watching it even when the kids weren't around. There are
               | still some episodes I _can't_ watch; but you'd need to
               | have had those experiences to understand.
        
             | jeffreygoesto wrote:
             | I find Peppa Pig has multiple layers and the stereotypes of
             | the pig parents are actually targeted to entertain the
             | human parents when they join watching.
        
           | rkomorn wrote:
           | I don't have kids so I never thought about it from that
           | angle, but I really dislike how yell-y so many modern
           | animated shows are. Couldn't make it through a single episode
           | of Rick and Morty.
           | 
           | I'd never thought how it might impact kids, but now that you
           | mention it, I can only dislike the trend more.
        
             | amanaplanacanal wrote:
             | Rick and Morty is absolutely _not_ a kids show.
        
               | rkomorn wrote:
               | Yes, sorry, I had a non-sequitur between my two
               | sentences. The first was about modern animated shows. The
               | second was about how dialog in shows (not necessarily
               | Rick and Morty) could affect kids.
               | 
               | Regardless, I also highly doubt that Rick and Morty is
               | only consumed by people who are no longer susceptible to
               | getting cues on how to interact with others from media.
        
             | autoexec wrote:
             | Invader Zim (2006) was a great cartoon but every character
             | was basically screaming every line of dialogue
        
           | jpadkins wrote:
           | there is a reason why they call TV programming.
        
           | virgil_disgr4ce wrote:
           | > Some shows and movies seem harmless, initially, but then we
           | noticed in so many kids movies (e.g., Zootopia, Sing),
           | they're always yelling at each other, expressing anger,
           | frustration, and hostility towards one another.
           | 
           | Although there are definitely a ton of kids shows that I find
           | 100% garbage and would never let my kids watch under any
           | circumstances, none of the 'name-brand' kids movies I've seen
           | in the past 10 years struck me as unacceptably negative in
           | the way you describe.
           | 
           | On the contrary, I get the impression that at least some of
           | these movies are attempting to depict feelings and situations
           | that some kids are feeling in a way that helps them
           | understand 1) they're not alone and 2) their feelings or
           | situations aren't wrong or abnormal.
           | 
           | Like, I took my kids to see Elio when it came out. BAM, right
           | off the bat, dead parents. Anger. Frustration. Fear. Power
           | struggles with parental figures.
           | 
           | This is all intentional--to the point that it's formulaic. A
           | 2021 study found that slightly over 61% of the 155 animated
           | kids features of the last ~80 years had no mention of the
           | child protagonist's biological parents. There are a lot of
           | reasons for this. The simplest are that it's way easier to
           | come up with challenges and conflict for the protag(s) when
           | their parents aren't around.
           | 
           | A more charitable reason is that there are all too many kids
           | who, well, do have absent or fucked up parents. But it
           | doesn't have to be that specific case either--any kid
           | eventually has feelings of anger, fear and frustration, and
           | seeing depictions of this in stories is important (for
           | everyone, of any age, at any time).
           | 
           | I overall doubt that watching those stories causes kids to
           | act angry and frustrated even when they're not angry and
           | frustrated. I'm well aware of how profoundly mimetic human
           | children are (and why that's important), but it doesn't
           | happen with everything 100% of the time.
           | 
           | But this is also age-dependent in various ways. An 8-year-old
           | can absorb a movie depiction of a fight between child and
           | parent in a way that a 3-year-old can't. Are some toddlers
           | going to act out because they watched that? Maybe? Probably?
           | 
           | Anyway, it's tricky to have these discussions because every
           | child is different, even though there _are_ broad
           | anthropological patterns to humanity. But I 've been more
           | impressed than annoyed with lots of animated kids movies that
           | I expected to loathe.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | Once you realize the "dead parent trick" you see it
             | _everywhere_ (with variations of single parent, etc).
             | 
             | It makes things like Bluey stand out - wow, a show that is
             | entertaining and fun where you don't have to kill one or
             | more parents to make it work!
        
               | paradox460 wrote:
               | My mother used to call it the "Disney story," due to it's
               | utter prevalence in their media. Be it death or divorce,
               | seems like you cant throw a rock at the Disney catalog
               | without hitting it
        
           | CurtHagenlocher wrote:
           | One thing I always notice after trips abroad is the extent to
           | which American newscasters are practically yelling at their
           | audience. This is a stark contrast to many European
           | countries, where the tone is calmer and more measured.
        
           | rikthevik wrote:
           | I watched Home Alone last year and the characters call each
           | other names constantly. It's funny for sure, but no wonder me
           | and my friends had such filthy mouths as kids. You grow up on
           | that and sitcoms where the characters just rip on each other.
           | It's so strange to watch as an adult.
        
             | kcplate wrote:
             | I grew up in the seventies, we didn't have the "filthy
             | mouthed kids" media examples until Bad News
             | Bears...however, prior to that, even without examples we
             | still managed to be pretty filthy mouthed kids organically.
             | 
             | Which came first--the chicken or the egg?
        
           | throwworhtthrow wrote:
           | Try the PBS Kids app. The shows are consistently cast with
           | good role-model children and adults, without being preachy.
           | Many episodes show how to resolve mistakes, frustration, and
           | conflict in beneficial ways.
           | 
           | In comparison, the behavior in the kids shows from other
           | producers (Disney, Nickelodeon, etc.) sometimes presents
           | nasty behavior and name-calling as either inevitable, or
           | something that's "someone else's problem": the instigator, if
           | they're punished at all, might suffer the wrath of an
           | authority figure, or simply bad karma.
           | 
           | My intent when choosing shows is not to hide the existence of
           | bad behavior from children, but to teach them how to deal
           | with it.
           | 
           | (My children also read Calvin and Hobbes. And watch those
           | less-wholesome shows. And binge-watch MrBeast when I'm not
           | around...)
        
             | jrussino wrote:
             | > Try the PBS Kids app
             | 
             | Great recommendation. Angela Collier has a recent piece on
             | kids' television and PBS in particular that is worth a
             | watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DGyatqN63RZ4
        
           | JuniperMesos wrote:
           | Human beings yelling at each other, expressing anger,
           | frustration, and hostility towards each other, seems like a
           | human universal, rather than something children would only
           | learn to do from watching recent tv and movies.
        
         | keepamovin wrote:
         | The first C&H comic strip compared to the last one:
         | 
         | https://imgur.com/a/semJX
         | 
         | :.)
        
           | nedrylandJP wrote:
           | Fun fact - Hobbes eventually lost those little paw pads
        
             | rrjjww wrote:
             | Reading some of the compendiums with Watersons commentary
             | are a really interesting look into how things changed over
             | the years and an insight into comic publishing
        
           | geephroh wrote:
           | That last one still makes me tear up. What a beautiful way to
           | exit the stage.
        
             | 9dev wrote:
             | I agree. It was graceful, humble, optimistic, and
             | memorable. I'm hard-pressed to think of anyone else to have
             | pulled that off in ending something.
        
         | chaostheory wrote:
         | They're not supposed to be pro-social. The characters are
         | supposed to represent the philosophers, John Calvin
         | (predestination) and Thomas Hobbes (man is an animal).
         | Watterson is probably making fun of them.
        
           | d-us-vb wrote:
           | Watterson explicitly stated that the names have no relation
           | to the characters' personalities or philosophical views. As
           | someone familiar with John Calvin's views and writings, I can
           | say safely that Calvin is not much in any way similar in
           | personality or spirit to anything John Calvin ever taught or
           | expressed. At best, Watterson is projecting the typical
           | libertine caricature of John Calvin as a cantankerous and
           | disagreeable curmudgeon onto the character. John Calvin was
           | in reality quite progressive for his time, and by all
           | impressions did all that he did out of love for those around
           | them in line with a plain reading of scripture. But to see
           | him that way requires nuance that seems to be lost on the
           | anti-religious.
        
             | adw wrote:
             | The joke is that Calvin is aligned with Hobbes's philosophy
             | and vice versa.
        
         | chanakya wrote:
         | What _are_ these contradictions and hypocrisies? Maybe I 'm
         | just old, but I've never understood the angst younger people
         | seem to have these days.
        
           | bryanrasmussen wrote:
           | from my familiarity with the writing of past generations and
           | even past civilizations it seems reasonable to conclude that
           | contradictions and hypocrisies are generally understood to
           | exit. I don't think it's just down to the young people.
        
             | recursive wrote:
             | I'm curious about this too. No debate about whether they're
             | generally understood, but I'm curious if anyone can name
             | one.
        
               | bryanrasmussen wrote:
               | well one obvious contradiction is if you want peace
               | prepare for war, unfortunately Bart Simpson's paradox
               | doesn't seem to be in the commonly bemoaned list and I
               | don't remember the rest of the paradoxes in that episode.
        
         | next_xibalba wrote:
         | I think Calvin was of a common archetype of that era. The
         | sarcastic, mildly anti-heroic protagonist. And I think that
         | archetype did all of us who grew up in that era and imbibed the
         | culture were done a disservice. I, too, have found my way to
         | respecting and admiring the pragmatic, the persistent, and even
         | the earnest among us over the smart alecs and the sarcastic
         | wits.
        
           | mikkupikku wrote:
           | It could have been so much worse, and did become so. Late 90s
           | / early 00s had Cartman being a role model to kids.
        
             | JuniperMesos wrote:
             | Cartman was not a role model for kids, he was portrayed as
             | a lazy, fat, and stupid asshole in an edgy comedy show not
             | intended for children.
        
               | mikkupikku wrote:
               | He was, factually, a role model for kids. I was there.
               | Everybody watched South Park, everybody thought Cartman
               | was awesome.
               | 
               | It's absurd to even deny it, Cartman was admired and
               | emulated by a whole generation.
        
               | next_xibalba wrote:
               | The bottom line is, Cartman got the biggest laughs. He
               | modeled that a certain type of behavior resulted in
               | certain outcomes. Kids aren't stupid. They see right
               | through the overt morality ("he's a jerk and he got his
               | comeuppance ") to the revealed truths: being an asshole,
               | in some contexts, can be very funny.
        
               | soiltype wrote:
               | Cartman typically had the most and funniest jokes and
               | almost always got his way. He exercised power over others
               | and only extremely rarely did the way he acted have
               | negative consequences for him. That's a pretty attractive
               | role model for the type of kid who's going to watch South
               | Park. Role models don't have to be consciously selected,
               | that's kind of the point, you see success and you imitate
               | it. South Park is an especially stupid show but you'll
               | see this in _plenty_ of TV - it 's basically the sitcom
               | model: some character will be an asshole to everyone
               | around them, but the show will frame it as a joke and
               | consequence-free. The writers want you to think that
               | character is funny and you probably do if you continue
               | watching, so if you want to be a funny person you
               | probably start acting like an asshole. Most _adults_ can
               | 't see that for what it is - kids are screwed.
               | 
               | And South Park was (is?) on TV during daytime hours, of
               | course kids watched it.
        
               | MangoToupe wrote:
               | Whether or not he was intended as one is irrelevant.
        
             | bell-cot wrote:
             | Vs. the fine, upstanding young Beavis and Butt-Head were
             | from the early 90's...
        
           | 0xdeadbeefbabe wrote:
           | I am earnestly inclined to double down on smart alecs and
           | sarcastic wits as a matter of pragmatism.
        
             | next_xibalba wrote:
             | Ok, but will you do so persistently?
        
           | jmdeon wrote:
           | I was going to comment something similar. I think I'm about
           | the same age as the commenter grew up reading C&H, and also
           | had a disaffected attitude. I don't think it was Calvin that
           | made me that way, but the broader media at the time. Heck,
           | most kids at my school did not read it but the general way to
           | be cool was to be aloof.
           | 
           | I think it was a hangover from Gen-X and the 80's. Ferris
           | Bueller was pretty aloof and angst'd to the gills wasn't he?
        
         | kevinwang wrote:
         | Well said. I feel similarly despite being born about 15 years
         | later.
        
         | zemvpferreira wrote:
         | I'm the same age and also read C&H voraciously. Looking back I
         | was (to a point) blueprinted on the kid, but mostly by virtue
         | of being a single child, smart and alienated from most of my
         | peers at school. I wish Susie gave me the time of day. Calvin
         | wasn't a role model, he was an accurate portrayal. (To a point)
        
         | sebastos wrote:
         | I see what you're getting at, and your sentiment is
         | thoughtfully expressed, but come on... it's Calvin and Hobbes!
         | It's part of that rarefied echelon of media that taps into
         | something true about the human condition. Calvin doesn't need
         | to be a manual for how to live your life - it's enough to be an
         | island you can sometimes visit when you're in a Calvin mood.
        
         | vanderZwan wrote:
         | Huh, I'm basically the same age as you but only started reading
         | it as a teenager. It was pretty obvious to me that Calvin
         | thought too highly of himself and that Hobbes was the sensible
         | one. Like, the punchline of many of these comics is him being
         | wrong about something but too stubborn to admit it in a funny
         | way.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | I love that comic.
       | 
       | Watterson, famously, never sold out. He is sort of an idealized,
       | godlike figure, to many cartoonists.
       | 
       | Reminds me of this Onion story: https://theonion.com/peeing-
       | calvin-decals-now-recognized-as-...
        
       | danaris wrote:
       | My wife and I will actually be going to an exhibition of
       | Watterson's work this weekend--we're lucky enough to live not too
       | far from Cooperstown, NY, where the Fenimore House Art Museum has
       | the exhibition running all this fall.
       | 
       | As an '80s kid, Calvin and Hobbes ran for almost my entire
       | childhood, and we have a number of the collections. I never fail
       | to be impressed either by Watterson's talent, both in the art and
       | in choosing the right words to say, nor by his integrity and
       | restraint, both in refusing to allow his work to be merchandised
       | and in choosing to stop when he did--when he felt he had said all
       | he came to say.
       | 
       | Many more artists of all types could take so many lessons from
       | him. Even some that are already great. He is a very humble man,
       | but he stands among the legends of our time.
       | 
       | Edit: realized it would be good to add a link to the exhibition:
       | https://fenimoreartmuseum.org/future-exhibitions/calvin-and-...
        
         | elicash wrote:
         | A painting of a comic strip panel. Sophisticated irony.
         | Philosophically challenging... "high" art.
         | 
         | https://featureassets.gocomics.com/assets/318702d0df96013172...
         | 
         | (I am genuinely considering a trip to Cooperstown now.)
        
         | matthiaswh wrote:
         | We were there a few weekends ago. The C&H exhibit had quite the
         | crowd!
         | 
         | It is largely a collection of original strips. You won't see
         | anything new or original, that is not in one or more of the
         | books. But it is interesting to see his process, to note where
         | he made mistakes, to listen to everyone chuckle at one strip or
         | another, and to see the progression of the characters and
         | artist as you walk through the lifetime of the comic.
         | 
         | Well worth the trip!
        
       | alsetmusic wrote:
       | What a profound and beautiful comic. The art. The storytelling.
       | The expanse of Calvin's vivid imagination.
       | 
       | Every day, I have a reminder to think of three things for which
       | I'm grateful. I was just trying to find the third for today when
       | I saw this headline.
       | 
       | I am grateful that I love my tattoos (and have no regret, which
       | is the risk of tattoos), one of which is Stupendous Man. He was
       | the first and it's because CnH holds such a special place in my
       | heart. The comic largely shaped my childhood.
       | 
       | Bill Waterson had the integrity not to license his work,
       | preferring that the reader not have the characters spoiled. He
       | opted not to make boatloads of money in making this decision
       | (cough, garfield, snoopy). He also declared that Sunday papers
       | could print his comic unbroken or they could drop him and this
       | allowed for truly magnificent art pieces where stories could be
       | told in new ways. His integrity is legendary in the field.
       | 
       | Check out his recent work, The Mysteries.
       | 
       | https://www.comicsbeat.com/graphic-novel-review-bill-watters...
        
       | TheAmazingRace wrote:
       | Bill also ended the strip exactly ten years after he started.
       | Frankly, I appreciated his honesty and integrity around the
       | strip. The comic stuck around just long enough to leave a lasting
       | impression but never too long to overstay its welcome.
        
       | irrational wrote:
       | As a kid, I had no idea they would someday print books, so each
       | day I cut out the strip from the newspaper and paste it into a
       | book. I'm sure my mom threw it away decades ago, but I wish I
       | still had it.
        
       | khy wrote:
       | Watterson serves as one of the symbols of an era when selling out
       | was considered a great sin. It makes me laugh how thoroughly that
       | idea - that selling out is bad - has been defeated.
       | 
       | That being said, I'm sure he would've done it the same way today.
        
       | jwineinger wrote:
       | Calvin and Hobbes was the only comic I ever truly loved and
       | collected. All of the books are well-worn from my childhood. They
       | sat on a shelf for a couple of decades, and now I get to enjoy
       | watching my kids fall in love with them too.
       | 
       | I don't think I fully appreciated the range of humor and topics
       | Bill Watterson explored when I was young. Plenty of strips are
       | perfect for my 9 year old; she was in fits of laughter just
       | yesterday at Hobbes's physical comedy and the elementary school
       | drama with Susie and Mrs Wormwood. But other strips are much more
       | intellectual, touching on politics, life, and morality. I
       | appreciate these more now as well, because they often spark
       | deeper conversations with my kids when they ask me to explain
       | them.
       | 
       | I doubt he'll ever see it, but thank you, Bill, for giving
       | multiple generations so much laughter.
        
       | dcchambers wrote:
       | I was born in 92 and thus didn't start reading them until after
       | the original run of Calvin and Hobbes, but I discovered these
       | comics via book collections at the library and became OBSESSED.
       | 
       | I am so incredibly happy that Watterson never "sold out" and gave
       | away film/animation rights to his characters. They are _perfect_
       | the way they are.
        
       | takinola wrote:
       | C&H was the first time that I realized how authenticity resonates
       | with people. I think people love C&H because they recognize
       | Calvin, Hobbes, Suzie, Biff, the parents (or even Rosalyn) in
       | themselves. Calvin often said the things that we thought only
       | ourselves were thinking (remember the strip where Calvin is
       | selling swift kicks in the pants for 10c because the world
       | clearly needs it?).
       | 
       | Now, I see this technique work so well for business and political
       | leaders, comics, social commentators, etc. It is a very effective
       | technique to capture the hearts of your audience.
        
       | JadeNB wrote:
       | The title got mangled from the grammatically correct "40 years
       | ago, Calvin and Hobbes' raucous adventures burst onto the comics
       | page" (though some of us learned "Hobbes's" in elementary school)
       | to "40 years ago, Calvin and Hobbes' burst onto the page" (the '
       | definitely doesn't belong).
        
       | dingaling wrote:
       | It's curious that of all the famous American syndicated strips,
       | only The Far Side, and maybe Garfield, seem to have bridged the
       | Atlantic divide to the UK.
       | 
       | Maybe C&H and Peanuts were just too rooted in US suburban family
       | culture. Dilbert had a niche following here and beyond that I
       | struggle to even name another strip.
        
         | rullelito wrote:
         | I think it was quite big in Sweden.
        
         | hocuspocus wrote:
         | When I was a kid, C&H strips were translated and published by
         | the main newspaper in Geneva.
         | 
         | The "complete" box set is the first thing I ordered from Amazon
         | US as a teenager, in 2000 or 2001 iirc.
        
       | thunderbong wrote:
       | A bit off-topic, but it's been increasingly tough to view Calvin
       | and Hobbes on the internet.
       | 
       | Gocomics seems to go after everyone who posts these comic strips
       | on a regular basis.
       | 
       | The C&H sub-reddit stopped posting some time ago. [0]
       | 
       | The only C&H Search out there is not allowed to show the strips
       | and instead redirects to Gocomics. [1]
       | 
       | Here's a blog post by S. Anand detailing some background on the
       | takedown notice he received, although he doesn't mention who sent
       | it. [2]
       | 
       | I feel saddened that the one comic strip that resisted
       | commercialization has to have its fans face this.
       | 
       | But I suppose that's the nature of the web now.
       | 
       | [0]:
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/calvinandhobbes/comments/1m8j09a/th...
       | 
       | [1]: https://michaelyingling.com/random/calvin_and_hobbes/
       | 
       | [2]: https://www.s-anand.net/blog/the-calvin-and-hobbes-search-
       | ta...
        
         | mikkupikku wrote:
         | You might as well torrent/etc the books, no sense with using
         | web middlemen who get takedowns because they don't have the
         | rights either. Direct piracy gives you a better experience than
         | indirect piracy.
         | 
         | (You should also buy real copies if you still can, because
         | they're great.)
        
           | Sohcahtoa82 wrote:
           | > (You should also buy real copies if you still can, because
           | they're great.)
           | 
           | https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Calvin-Hobbes-Box-
           | Set/dp/074...
           | 
           | I got this when it came out. It's absolutely amazing, filled
           | with commentary from Bill Watterson.
           | 
           | I've read the whole set twice, but it's been at least 15
           | years. I should read it again.
        
       | dan-bailey wrote:
       | Thirty-two years ago, I got them tattooed onto my leg, the day
       | after I arrived at Ft. Bragg, NC. It's faded and blurred out from
       | the waxing and waning of muscle tone in my calf, and sunlight,
       | and the occasional scrape from crashing the bike. But it's been
       | part of me for so long, the only real option left is to get it
       | lasered-down and redone.
        
       | kstrauser wrote:
       | Someone wrote drew a one-off followup cartoon that nearly broke
       | me:
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/calvinandhobbes/comments/6vwll2/is_...
        
         | lghh wrote:
         | It nearly breaks me, too. It breaks me because it stigmatizes
         | medication that has helped make me function in a world not
         | designed for me. It breaks me because it stigmatizes medication
         | that on average is going to let me enjoy being on this earth ~7
         | more years than I otherwise would be.
        
           | kstrauser wrote:
           | I'm there with you on that, but... there's a time and place
           | for it. I hate that our schools are designed around "sit
           | down, shut up, and toil in silence for a few hours straight",
           | and treat those of us with ADHD as mutants which have to be
           | medicated to fit in.
        
             | Balgair wrote:
             | Montessori Method schools, my friend. Or Waldorf. There's
             | likely a school near you that is public and uses these
             | methods. If not, there are scholarships too. It's not for
             | everyone, but for all the Calvins it's a godsend.
        
               | kstrauser wrote:
               | We sent our kids through Montessori. Unfortunately, in
               | the city where we lived when they were elementary school
               | age, Montessori went through 4th grade before the kids
               | had to go back to regular or religious schools. That was
               | a rough transition.
               | 
               | But I still think that's a sucky situation for the 95% of
               | kids who go to the nearest public school. Their days
               | shouldn't be awful just because their parents didn't have
               | the time, money, or awareness to consider non-default
               | options.
        
       | stack_framer wrote:
       | I always loved that Bill Watterson gave Calvin an extensive
       | vocabulary. He didn't dumb it down. Instead, he allowed young
       | readers like me to learn new words as I read along.
        
       | BrandoElFollito wrote:
       | We didn't have C&H in France when I was a kid in the 80s. I
       | discovered it at the university through a German girlfriend who
       | said that she's kniwn it for some time already.
       | 
       | It is interesting how some random things from far away just used
       | to catch in a country, but not in the neighbour one.
       | 
       | Our nr 1 hero at that time was Goldorak - everyone who is in
       | their 50s today can sing the intro song (at least the first line)
       | and knows a few of the attacks. Girls had Candy but we were
       | absolutely watching it as well (I actually don't know if girls
       | were watching Goldorak, I need to ask)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-20 23:01 UTC)