[HN Gopher] Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature
___________________________________________________________________
Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature
Author : ravenical
Score : 31 points
Date : 2025-11-12 19:14 UTC (6 days ago)
(HTM) web link (elicit.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (elicit.com)
| NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
| >There are on the order of 100 million papers [reference 2]
| published to date.
|
| Does anyone else feel as if this (admittedly rough) estimate is
| off by an order of magnitude?
| cnees wrote:
| OpenAlex has 240M. https://docs.openalex.org/api-entities/works
|
| CORE has 431M. https://core.ac.uk/data
|
| Crossref has 165M. https://www.crossref.org/blog/2025-public-
| data-file-now-avai...
|
| These datasets are all biased towards work published in the
| digital age, but it's important to note that work is coming out
| much faster now than it used to.
| ktallett wrote:
| Is that because there is a pressure to publish? As I wouldn't
| say we make advancements at a rate any different during the
| last two decades than we have over the 20 years prior to
| that.
| rdlw wrote:
| If 1% of the last 10 billion people to live were academics and
| published on average 5 papers (many only had one, i.e. their
| dissertation/thesis, but a small fraction will have had dozens
| or hundreds), that comes to 500 million.
|
| I'm curious, do you think it's an order of magnitude too low or
| too high?
| NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
| I think it's too low.
| pjdesno wrote:
| Note that Claude Shannon's MS thesis was about re-discovering the
| work of an obscure British analytic philosopher, whose work from
| about 100 years earlier had been almost completely forgotten.
| (perhaps a few philosophers and mathematicians remembered Boole,
| but they certainly didn't teach his work to the engineers who had
| to design relay-based logic circuits back in the pre-transistor
| days)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-11-18 23:01 UTC)