[HN Gopher] EDE: Small and Fast Desktop Environment (2014)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       EDE: Small and Fast Desktop Environment (2014)
        
       Author : bradley_taunt
       Score  : 88 points
       Date   : 2025-11-14 12:51 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (edeproject.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (edeproject.org)
        
       | GaryBluto wrote:
       | Funny this should be posted. I was just considering this for a
       | Boot CD project a few months ago.
        
       | WD-42 wrote:
       | Very cool! Love the crystal icon set. I remember when that was
       | first released, it was mind blowing.
        
       | edoceo wrote:
       | Wow! This looks like XP/Win2k. Gotta put this on the parents
       | computer, they'll be happy they got their old Windows back. (They
       | don't really like Xfce)
        
         | 29athrowaway wrote:
         | Maybe they like LXQt more.
         | 
         | XFCE can be themed to be almost identical to XP.
        
           | mghackerlady wrote:
           | theres a windows 9x total conversion out there iirc
        
             | packetlost wrote:
             | I don't think it's _complete_ but I have that mostly set up
             | with LXQT on NixOS on my Framework desktop. I love it
        
             | wild_egg wrote:
             | Chicago95 theme for XFCE is great
        
               | 29athrowaway wrote:
               | Looks more legit than Redmond97.
               | 
               | If we go retro then I would go for a MacOS 9 look. Like
               | what this user achieved: https://www.reddit.com/r/unixpor
               | n/comments/tsric2/xfce_color...
        
         | ikamm wrote:
         | The Q4OS distro has an addon called XPQ4 which has some old
         | Windows themes https://xpq4.sourceforge.io/
        
           | skerit wrote:
           | I like these kind of themes in theory, but they're always a
           | bit janky. Not that they have to be pixel perfect, but
           | they're always broken enough that they're not a pleasure to
           | use.
        
       | WillAdams wrote:
       | Any chance of an rPi image?
        
         | woleium wrote:
         | i imagine it's trivial to install on raspian?
        
           | a96 wrote:
           | https://edeproject.org/wiki/binarypackages Don't see anything
           | for ARM, but might be as simple as getting the source package
           | and (de)building debs for it.
        
       | tyfon wrote:
       | I tried to search their wiki for wayland, but got zero hits so I
       | guess this is for X11 only?
       | 
       | Edit: nevermind, I see this is relatively "ancient" software.
       | Last release over 10 years ago :)
       | 
       | Will take it for a spin on an old computer though
        
         | skeezyjefferson wrote:
         | they posted literally just the wiki article for MUDs earlier,
         | slow news day
        
       | a96 wrote:
       | > EDE (Equinox Desktop Environment) is a simple and fast desktop
       | environment for *nix-like systems. It uses the FLTK GUI toolkit
       | and offers a familiar look and feel. EDE is designed according to
       | the UNIX philosophy, which means it offers seperate executables
       | for each component to "do one job and do it good". This makes EDE
       | very modular and also easy to alter for any user's special needs
       | and requirements.
       | 
       | TIHI, but I can definitely see places where this would be useful.
       | Based on the name, I thought it was just Enlightenment/E rebrand
       | or something.
        
       | analog8374 wrote:
       | I like the look of this. It looks like mate, which I presently
       | use. I wonder what the difference is
        
         | BirAdam wrote:
         | Well, FLTK instead of GTK is a big one. Also, EDE more closely
         | mimics the Win98 Explorer rather than GNOME. EDE is also
         | lighter weight.
        
           | analog8374 wrote:
           | But it's the same desktop, menus, windows, icons thing with
           | nothing fancy tacked on pretty much. Right?
        
       | analog8374 wrote:
       | Have we arrived at where everybody knows what a desktop
       | environment should look like?
       | 
       | I mean, an end to experiments and variants and improvements. We
       | all know how it should be and anything else is wrong.
       | 
       | I would like that.
        
         | seanhunter wrote:
         | Different people want different things because they use
         | computers in different ways. That's ok.
         | 
         | I personally am very happy with my sway setup - it works
         | fantastically for me but most people would honestly hate it.
         | That's ifne - I wouldn't force anyone else to use it.
        
           | analog8374 wrote:
           | And yet for 99% of the cases we have a certain way we like
           | them to be. And I'm in that 99%. And we know exactly what I'm
           | talking about. So for all intents and purposes, fuck the edge
           | cases. Let's focus on the archetype.
        
             | seanhunter wrote:
             | Not 100% sure what point you're making. Mainstream desktop
             | O/Ss strive to service this 99%, so you have an abundance
             | of choice. Windows, MacOS, KDE, Ubuntu are all there to
             | cater to you.
        
         | tracker1 wrote:
         | It depends... I've found things I like and dislike with every
         | DE I've ever touched... from early windows, to OS/2, Mac old
         | and new, Amiga, BeOS, and even some bits from more modern
         | Windows. On my personal desktop, I've been running Cosmic, as
         | it's close to what I want. I had run Budgie desktop previously
         | and had it tweaked very specific to my liking, but it was a
         | hodge-podge and I just wanted an out of the box experience
         | easier to deal with.
         | 
         | I think there is/was a lot to like with the Win9x interface
         | that I feel advanced a lot through to Windows 7 even. I think
         | the current taskbar in windows is relatively nice too, but the
         | start menu itself has taken a few steps back. I'd like to see
         | Cosmic get a bit closer to the taskbar, but keeping it's
         | application menus and settings, which get better with each
         | iteration imo. There's still something alien about the spacing
         | on the dock's corners though.
        
         | kjs3 wrote:
         | No?
         | 
         | Be forced to use Gnome because some royal 'We' decided that's
         | what a DM should be? No farking way. Force someone else to use
         | KDE because I think Gnome is kinda awful? No. Give up on low-
         | resource desktop environments because Gnome or what ever is The
         | One True DE? Sorry...no.
         | 
         | I would not like that.
        
       | lproven wrote:
       | Oh nice. I occasionally mention EDE in desktop roundups on El
       | Reg. Glad it is not forgotten.
       | 
       | It's based on FLTK, and although the effort to create FLTK 2.0
       | faltered and died a few years ago, last year there was a new
       | point release, FLTK 1.4, the first in 13 years.
       | 
       | I wrote about it almost exactly a year ago:
       | 
       | https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/26/fltk_14_released/
       | 
       | (In researching that I discovered that apparently it's not
       | pronounced "eff ell tee kay" but "full tick".)
       | 
       | Since then it's got up to 1.4.4, and they're working on FLTK 1.5.
       | And yes it supports Wayland now.
       | 
       | So maybe it's time for a new release of EDE to go with it. :-)
       | 
       | https://www.fltk.org/
        
       | jayroh wrote:
       | If anyone wants some screenshots:
       | https://edeproject.org/page/screenshots
        
       | chriswarbo wrote:
       | EDE is a standalone WM/DE with a Windows 9x look
       | 
       | XPde was a similar project, but with a Windows XP look. Their
       | site seems dead, though I'm sure the software could be found out
       | there somewhere
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20070825005617/http://www.xpde.c...
        
         | cout wrote:
         | How does it compare to using icewm or fvwm95?
        
       | pndy wrote:
       | Oh I remember EDE being briefly reviewed some 20 years ago in
       | local Linux magazine and if I'm not mistaken being a part of
       | Mandrake packages selection
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | There's Dillo and Florb (Open Street Maps client). Now we just
       | need a simple MPV UI and some kind of FLMail client. On office
       | suites, someone should modernize Siag Office with XFT and Unicode
       | support.
       | 
       | If anyone says "that's outdated crap", Siag supports RTF, and the
       | spreadsheet module could just use plugins written in Scheme with
       | incredible features related to number crunching. Printing?
       | PostScript and PDF, problem solved.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-14 23:01 UTC)