[HN Gopher] Judge Orders OpenAI to Give Lawyers 20M Private Chat...
___________________________________________________________________
Judge Orders OpenAI to Give Lawyers 20M Private Chats -
'Anonymization'
Author : heisenbit
Score : 25 points
Date : 2025-11-13 19:25 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.techdirt.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.techdirt.com)
| busymom0 wrote:
| Wouldn't every single American in that 20M people have standing
| (legal term) to prevent this?
| m463 wrote:
| anonymization wouldn't remove personally identifying data typed
| in. I can think of lots of examples.
| 4ndrewl wrote:
| In what way are these "private chats"?
|
| These are instructions to a computer-based service that you
| presumably signed your rights away to when you accepted the
| T&C's?
| rpdillon wrote:
| The linked article is making the point that the judge is
| claiming that they are preserving privacy with this order
| because they believe in de-anonymization of the data set. The
| judge appears to have no understanding of how re-identification
| works and the history here.
|
| So while it's an interesting question about whether privacy
| exists, the point here is that it doesn't exist, but the judge
| is saying it does.
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Related:
|
| _Fighting the New York Times ' invasion of user privacy_
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45900370
|
| _We analyzed 47,000 ChatGPT conversations. Here 's what people
| use it for_
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45902767
| jazzyjackson wrote:
| never say anything to a cloud hosted chatbot you wouldn't want to
| see printed in the new york times
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-11-13 23:02 UTC)