[HN Gopher] An Algebraic Language for the Manipulation of Symbol...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       An Algebraic Language for the Manipulation of Symbolic Expressions
       (1958) [pdf]
        
       Author : swatson741
       Score  : 72 points
       Date   : 2025-11-08 14:58 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (softwarepreservation.computerhistory.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (softwarepreservation.computerhistory.org)
        
       | leoc wrote:
       | Reposting my now very old comment
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10502434 :
       | 
       | > Herbert Stoyan's historical work on early Lisp
       | http://www.mcjones.org/dustydecks/archives/2010/07/29/185/
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20050617031004/http://www8.infor...
       | is probably worth reading if one is seriously interested. (I
       | haven't read much of it myself yet.) McCarthy praised Stoyan's
       | work as better than his own 1979 HOPL paper ( http://www-
       | formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp/lisp.html ): "Stoyan's
       | reading of the early LISP documents gives a more accurate picture
       | than my own memories turned out to have given." http://www-
       | formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/
       | 
       | > (As a side-note, I'm pretty sure that the broken, Wayback-
       | beating link to "Lisp references according to Miller" on
       | McCarthy's page is to this http://www.ai.sri.com/~delacaze/alu-
       | site/alu/table/Lisp-Hist... document by Kent Pitman and Brad
       | Miller (see http://www.ai.sri.com/~delacaze/alu-
       | site/alu/table/history.h... ).)
       | 
       | From 2015-2018, "The Mysteries of Lisp -- I: The Way to
       | S-expression Lisp" by Hong-Yi Dai
       | https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07375 (
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31153702 )
       | 
       | > Despite its old age, Lisp remains mysterious to many of its
       | admirers. The mysteries on one hand fascinate the language, on
       | the other hand also obscure it. Following Stoyan but paying
       | attention to what he has neglected or omitted, in this first
       | essay of a series intended to unravel these mysteries, we trace
       | the development of Lisp back to its origin, revealing how the
       | language has evolved into its nowadays look and feel. The
       | insights thus gained will not only enhance existent understanding
       | of the language but also inspires further improvement of it.
        
         | MycroftJones wrote:
         | I like how the McCarthy's paper maps the fundamental operations
         | to machine instructions and memory model. It's like something
         | you can actually implement.
        
       | adrian_b wrote:
       | Besides this first report (AIM-001), some of the reports
       | following it in the next months are at least as important, by
       | introducing other essential features of LISP and of many later
       | languages:
       | 
       | 1958-10: AIM-003 (the special form "maplist", i.e. a kind of
       | "forall" iteration)
       | 
       | 1958-10: AIM-004 (anonymous function definitions using "lambda";
       | the special form "select", which already at that early date had
       | better syntax and semantics than the "switch" or "case"
       | statements of later languages; the special form "search")
       | 
       | 1959-03-13: AIM-008 (the special form "quote"; the special form
       | "label", for defining anonymous recursive functions; also the
       | special forms "and" and "or", a.k.a. McCarthy AND and McCarthy
       | OR, inherited by many languages, including C)
        
         | kant2002 wrote:
         | Does anybody attempt to re-implment each variant of pre-LISP
         | described in these reports? Even if it just for
         | educational/historical purposes?
        
           | anthk wrote:
           | https://t3x.org/lispxv/index.html
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | Subset of Lisp 1.5 https://t3x.org/lispxv/index.html
        
       | drob518 wrote:
       | If you ever wondered why Lisp has CAR and CDR, this explains it.
        
         | kazinator wrote:
         | It doesn't fully explain it, but drops some hints:
         | 
         | "The other main advantage of the algebraic notation for list
         | structure processing was first noticed by Gelernter."
         | 
         | That's one of the authors of the Fortran-compiled List-
         | processing Language (FLPL) in which thef unctions XCARF and
         | XCDRF were introduced.
         | 
         | MacCarthy drops a hint that _he_ actually had something to do
         | with Gelernter 's work and his choices:
         | 
         | "Algebraic notation for list processing is not used by
         | Net'Jell, Simon and Shaw, pelhaps beaause to do so is most
         | convenient when a compiler is available, but is used by
         | Gelernter in the geometry program. This was accomplished (on
         | the advice of the present author) by using the Fortran compiler
         | together with a set of machine language coded functions for
         | handling the primitive list processes that go from one element
         | of a list to the next"
        
         | coolThingsFirst wrote:
         | I think the main reason is car/cdr permits elegant recursive
         | solutions to problems.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-08 23:00 UTC)