[HN Gopher] A turn lane in Rhododendron
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A turn lane in Rhododendron
        
       Author : apsec112
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2025-10-26 18:58 UTC (8 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.greentape.pub)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.greentape.pub)
        
       | geophph wrote:
       | "No way this is about the Rhododendron on the way up to Mt. Hood"
       | 
       | ...
       | 
       | Sure was.
        
       | oftenwrong wrote:
       | Would a wider road not embolden drivers to increase their speed?
        
         | wredcoll wrote:
         | I don't know, would it?
        
         | ineptech wrote:
         | The issue isn't people going too fast, it's people turning
         | left. 26 basically connects Portland on one end and Mt Hood
         | recreation stuff on the other, and it used to be that there
         | wasn't that much in between. Over the last few decades, a lot
         | of development has gone up, meaning a lot more businesses and
         | neighborhoods along both sides of 26, plus the highway has
         | gotten a lot busier.
        
       | BigTTYGothGF wrote:
       | I don't believe I've been on that stretch of road, but it seems
       | to me that if the concern is safety there are other alternatives
       | to adding a turn lane, the most obvious of which being a
       | reduction in the speed limit.
        
         | hamdingers wrote:
         | A reduction in design speed of the road has to accompany a
         | reduction of speed limit for it to be effective. Narrower
         | lanes, etc.
         | 
         | It sounds like the residents are opposed to, well, anything.
        
           | throwaway173738 wrote:
           | Actually many of the residents were in favor of changing the
           | road. One person decided to fight the entire project on the
           | basis of a cairn of rocks that 5 or 6 archaeologists agreed
           | had no cultural significance.
        
       | onionisafruit wrote:
       | In the picture the stone pillars look like a decorative feature
       | marking a neighborhood entrance. Does anybody know their origin?
       | I assume if they were installed in the past 100 years there would
       | be some evidence to counter Mr Jones' claims.
        
       | onionisafruit wrote:
       | I clicked through looking for some novel civil engineering
       | because I assumed a rhododendron is a geometric shape I hadn't
       | heard of. The actual story was a good read too.
        
         | seemaze wrote:
         | rhododendron is a flower
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhododendron
        
       | fritzo wrote:
       | The only grave being disturbed is Robert Moses' by his turning
        
       | libraryofbabel wrote:
       | The larger issue, of course, is that eccentric individuals and
       | niche special-interest groups are able to use the planning
       | process and the legal system to jam up all sorts of
       | infrastructure projects in America, from simple turn lanes all
       | the way to high-speed rail. This is not the only reason America
       | has trouble building infrastructure, but it is an important
       | reason. See Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson's new book _Abundance_
       | for a long-form analysis of this... or for a contrast with the
       | US's "lawyerly society" (and, of course, the disadvantages of
       | leaning too much in the other direction) Dan Wang's _Breakneck:
       | China 's Quest to Engineer the Future_ that just came out.
       | 
       | Both are excellent books and will probably appeal to a lot of
       | Hacker News folks with an engineering/builder mindset.
        
         | cholmon wrote:
         | Freakonomics interviewed Dan Wang about his book Breakneck back
         | in September, see episode #647. It's a very interesting lens
         | through which to view both societies, worth a listen!
        
       | jauntywundrkind wrote:
       | Found the rock pillars, FWIW. Gorgeous trees around this area!
       | https://maps.app.goo.gl/7gBd3MuvnmscNLUr6
       | 
       | And you can go back to 2007 to see the old highway,
       | https://maps.app.goo.gl/Qd9evKz7vUnxt1FQ6
        
       | bell-cot wrote:
       | <sigh/> At what point do you assume that the still-objecting
       | NIMBY's either have personality disorders, or are motivated by
       | malicious self-aggrandizement?
        
       | threetonesun wrote:
       | Four lane roads like this, in any context, or any part of
       | America, are an absolute disaster of civil engineering. I get
       | that in the 60s or whenever they were built you had a situation
       | where some cars could barely accelerate up an incline but by the
       | 70s they should have all been reworked.
        
       | jonah-archive wrote:
       | Among the many reasons that stretch of 26 is dangerous is that
       | the approach from Portland is essentially a freeway from Gresham
       | through Sandy, and then turns into a rural highway until it
       | begins the climb up to Hood. This is because of a remnant of the
       | Mount Hood Freeway construction, which resulted in a lot of
       | little oddities that linger in Portland to this day:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Hood_Freeway
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-11-03 23:01 UTC)