[HN Gopher] Reconfigurable Analog Computers
___________________________________________________________________
Reconfigurable Analog Computers
Author : gidellav
Score : 16 points
Date : 2025-11-01 18:03 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (arxiv.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (arxiv.org)
| Marshferm wrote:
| Ullmann to the rescue. We're indifferent to analog computers like
| Detroit was once with electric cars.
| Locutus_ wrote:
| Ahhh, Vaxman still up to his usual shenannigans :-)
| Marshferm wrote:
| Imagine that, a self-organizing, self-learning software that
| builds its own hardware. Even dumb primates like us can build
| 'em!
| Animats wrote:
| The article mention EAI's SIMSTAR, a real software reconfigurable
| analog computer from the 1980s. Here's a description of how that
| worked.[1] This was pretty good. They had a crosspoint of FET
| analog switches to pass signals around, so they managed to do
| this in solid state, without relays. They had a M68000 as a
| control machine to set up connections. It all worked well enough
| to allow a real time man-in-the-loop simulation of the F-16
| control system.[2] Just barely. The USAF paper says that the
| biggest problem was keeping the SIMSTAR analog computers alive.
|
| Analog FPGAs have been made, downsizing this sort of thing to
| chip size. But not recently. The problems seem to be 1) lack of a
| use case, and 2) noise.
|
| Analog computing is all about noise minimization. This is Not
| Fun.
|
| There's interest in this stuff for neural nets, which do a lot of
| clipping and may be less noise-sensitive.
|
| [1] https://www.analogmuseum.org/library/simstar_technology.pdf
|
| [2] https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA189675.pdf
| buildbot wrote:
| Does https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypress_PSoC Count? I've
| kinda wanted to try one out but have 0 use case...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-11-01 23:00 UTC)