[HN Gopher] AI, Wikipedia, and uncorrected machine translations ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       AI, Wikipedia, and uncorrected machine translations of vulnerable
       languages
        
       Author : kawera
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2025-10-25 19:57 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.technologyreview.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.technologyreview.com)
        
       | foxglacier wrote:
       | If nobody's reading them and nobody's writing them, then perhaps
       | it doesn't matter. We could let Wikipedia-Greenlandic persist as
       | its own evolved language that forks from the original.
       | 
       | > potentially pushing the most vulnerable languages on Earth
       | toward the precipice as future generations begin to turn away
       | from them.
       | 
       | OK? We have lots of dead languages. It's fine. People use
       | whatever languages are appropriate to them and we don't need to
       | maintain them forever.
        
         | aucisson_masque wrote:
         | I see that this comment get downvoted but I think we can agree
         | on the facts that languages, just like species, die while other
         | flourish. And that's fine.
         | 
         | Survival of the fittest, right ? Not enough people speaking
         | Greenlandic, too complicated even for it's own population who
         | would rather speak danish ? The very reason I'm speaking
         | English is because it was forced military during the 19th
         | century by the UK and since the 20th by Hollywood.
         | 
         | Just like a virus, if a language doesn't spread, it die.
        
       | ratg13 wrote:
       | It's ironic that the "solution" to the problem is being driven by
       | yet another person that isn't native to Greenland.
       | 
       | While they may be a Greenlandic teacher, it's almost assured that
       | they are teaching western Greenlandic, which is similar to
       | Canadian Inuktitut.
       | 
       | People in the East of Greenland speak a language that has
       | similarities, but is different enough in vocabulary and sounds
       | that it's often considered a separate language and not a dialect.
       | 
       | When people from East and West Greenland come together, they
       | typically speak Danish because they can't understand each other
       | in their own native language.
       | 
       | So we're talking about a country that has 55k people and a
       | portion of them don't even speak the official language.. This guy
       | would have no way of knowing whether something was written poorly
       | by a computer or a poorly educated greenlandic native that maybe
       | isn't so good with the official language.
       | 
       | Given that the majority of the country's citizens do not use the
       | internet at all, it is not even clear what his solution is other
       | than just deciding to be some sort of magic arbiter .. which is
       | not realistic or sustainable.
        
         | optionalsquid wrote:
         | > Given that the majority of the country's citizens do not use
         | the internet at all
         | 
         | On what do you base this assertion? I was not able to find up-
         | to-date statistics, but 72% of participants in this survey from
         | 2013 had internet access at home, either via PC or via mobile
         | devices, and another 11% had internet access elsewhere:
         | 
         | https://digitalimik.gl/-/media/datagl/old_filer/strategi_201...
        
         | Uehreka wrote:
         | I wish people on HN would stop acting like "magic arbiter"
         | solutions are "not realistic", when in reality it's the only
         | way things have every worked. Are federal judges "magic
         | arbiters"? Yes. Do judges make bad calls? Yes. Do we not like
         | when large numbers of judges who are unfriendly to our side get
         | life appointments? Yes. Has anyone proposed an actual better
         | way of solving these kinds of problems? No.
         | 
         | So to get back to the point: Yes the solution is to appoint
         | someone a magic arbiter, and hope they don't screw up. The fact
         | that it's a deeply imperfect way of solving problems doesn't
         | mean it's not workable. It just means it will backfire at some
         | point, and someone else will get appointed instead.
        
       | simonw wrote:
       | I'm surprised this story didn't mention the scandal with Scots
       | Wikipedia: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/aug/26/shock-
       | an-aw-...
       | 
       | > an American teenager - who does not speak Scots, the language
       | of Robert Burns - has been revealed as responsible for almost
       | half of the entries on the Scots language version of Wikipedia
       | 
       | It wasn't malicious either, it was someone who started editing
       | Wikipedia at 12 and naively failed to recognise the damage they
       | were doing.
        
         | fooker wrote:
         | Great, now apply this idea to political ideology.
         | 
         | Papers and books will be written about naive heavy handed
         | online censorship creating echo chambers and driving the US
         | into fascism.
        
           | AlienRobot wrote:
           | Yes, half of my entire political ideology is based on posts
           | written by 12 year olds on the Internet. The other half is
           | based on posts written by dogs[1].
           | 
           | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_know
           | s_...
        
           | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
           | Jfc, not everything is about that.
        
       | aucisson_masque wrote:
       | > Wehr, who now teaches Greenlandic in Denmark, speculates that
       | perhaps only one or two Greenlanders had ever contributed.
       | 
       | That's the core issue, it's not those who use AI translator or
       | worst like Google translate. If there isn't any Greenlander to
       | contribute to their Wikipedia, they don't deserve to have one and
       | instead must rely on other languages.
       | 
       | The difference between an empty Wikipedia and one filled with
       | translated articles that contains error isn't much. They should
       | instead close that version of Wikipedia until there are enough
       | volunteers.
        
         | consp wrote:
         | That last part creates a chicken and egg problem. You can argue
         | about it but I will bet it will never get traction if there is
         | no basis to start from.
        
         | Symbiote wrote:
         | The end of the article says they have closed it.
        
       | johnea wrote:
       | Unlike what the title of the post implies, I would say Wikipedia
       | bears 0% of the blame for this issue.
       | 
       | I would put 50% of the blame on goggle, for offering up
       | translations that are wholly or partially in error, without any
       | indication such as a warning message to that effect.
       | 
       | Then I would assign 40% of the blame on LLM text generation based
       | on models where the model creators performed no review of their
       | training data.
       | 
       | The final 10% of blame goes to anyone who would post rubbish
       | without first hand knowledge that at least the translation was
       | correct.
       | 
       | Except for that final 10%, all of the blame goes to the profit
       | motive. Foisting shit on the world for the sole purpose of
       | profit.
       | 
       | And lets face it, this isn't exactly the first time marginalized
       | people, or their languages, have suffered because of western
       | capitalism...
       | 
       | p.s. fan-bois kool-aid drinkers, feel free to start your down-
       | voting now...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-10-25 23:00 UTC)